Skip to main content

Predicting Adoption of Visual Programming Languages: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 335))

Abstract

Technology acceptance is one of the most dynamic research areas in the field of Information Systems (IS). This chapter provides a systematic overview of technology acceptance theories by clarifying the relations among the theories and models. The chapter developed a theoretical model by extending the “Technology Acceptance Model” (TAM) to better explain adoption of visual programming languages by engineering students. The proposed model was tested by using a “structural equation modelling” approach. Results indicated that “perceived enjoyment” was significantly related with perceived usefulness and attitude. Further, the results indicated that “self-efficacy” was significantly related with perceived ease of use. The proposed model better explained the adoption of Scratch by predicting 75% of the variance in continuous use intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sloan, R.H., Troy, P.: CS 0.5: a better approach to introductory computer science for majors. In: SIGCSE’08—Proceedings of 39th ACM technical symposium on computer science education, pp. 271–275 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352230

  2. Rizvi, M., Humphries, T.: A scratch-based CS0 course for at-risk computer science majors. In: Proceedings—frontiers in education conference FIE (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2012.6462491

  3. De, K.: Scratch: applications in computer science 1. In: Proceedings—frontiers in education conference FIE, pp. 7–11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kölling, M.: The Greenfoot programming environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10(4), 1–21 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, S.: The design of alice. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10(4), 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., Eastmond, E.: The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10(4), 1–15 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández Leiva, A.J., Civila Salas, A.C.: Practices of advanced programming: Tradition versus innovation. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 21(2), 237–244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Resnick, B.Y., Brennan, K., Kafai, Y.: Scratch: programming for all. Comm. ACM 52(11), 60–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolz, U., Maloney, J., Pulimood, S.M.: ‘Scratch’ your way to introductory CS. In: SIGCSE’08—Proceedings of 39th ACM technical symposium computer science education, pp. 298–299 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352239

  10. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 1, 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., Kamaludin, A.: Technology acceptance model in m-learning context: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 125, 389–412 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., Salloum, S.A.: An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: an integrated model. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10094-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Emran, M., Al-Maroof, R., Al-Sharafi, M.A., Arpaci, I.: What impacts learning with wearables? An integrated theoretical model. Interact. Learn. Environ. 0(0), 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1753216

  14. Arpaci, I.: E-government and technological innovation in Turkey: Case studies on governmental organizations. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 4(1), 37–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161011028795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arpaci, I., Yardimci Cetin, Y., Turetken, O.: A cross-cultural analysis of smartphone adoption by Canadian and Turkish organizations. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manage. 18(3), 214–238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198x.2015.1080052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arpaci, I., Yardimci Cetin, Y., Turetken, O.: Impact of perceived security on organizational adoption of smartphones. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Networking 18(10), 602–608 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arpaci, I.: A comparative study of the effects of cultural differences on the adoption of mobile learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(4), 699–712 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arpaci, I., Baloğlu, M.: The impact of cultural collectivism on knowledge sharing among information technology majoring undergraduates. Comput. Hum. Behav. 1(56), 65–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arpaci, I.: Understanding and predicting students’ intention to use mobile cloud storage services. Comput. Hum. Behav. 1(58), 150–157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arpaci, İ.: An investigation of the relationship between cultural orientations and collaborative learning and its implications on higher education. Sakarya Univ. J. Educ. 6(2), 209–221 (2016). https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.22570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arpaci, I.: Design and development of educational multimedia: the software development process for mobile learning. In: Blended Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global, Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA (2016). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0783-3.ch018

  22. Arpaci, I.: The role of self-efficacy in predicting use of distance education tools and learning management systems. Turk. Online J. Dist. Educ. 18(1), 52–62 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arpaci, I.: A qualitative study on the adoption of bring your own device (BYOD) practice. Int. J. E-Adoption 7(2), 1–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijea.2015070101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arpaci, I.: Antecedents and consequences of cloud computing adoption in education to achieve knowledge management. Comput. Human Behav. 70, 382–390 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Arpaci, I.: Innovation policy and technological innovation in the public organizations. METU Stud. Develop. 38(2), 111–123

    Google Scholar 

  26. Arpaci, I.: A hybrid modeling approach for predicting the educational use of mobile cloud computing services in higher education. Comput. Human Behav. 90, 181–187 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arpaci, I., Basol, G.: The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10104-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arpaci, I.: Organizational adoption of mobile communication technologies. Ph.D. dissertation, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara (2013). Accessed on 31 May 2020. [Online]. Available: http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616630/index.pdf

  29. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Addison-Wesley (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ajzen, I.: Attitude structure and behavior. Attitude Struct. Funct. 1, 241–274 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13(3), 319–339 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 27(3), 451–481 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. J. Decis. Sci. Inst. 39(2), 273–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 9(1), 31–47 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2004.11044317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 213–233 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou, T., Lu, Y., Wang, B.: Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Human Behav. 26(4), 760–767 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York, NY (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York, NY (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychol. Rev. 81(1), 59–74 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an IT innovation.pdf. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Compeau, Deborah R., Higgins, Christopher A.: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19(2), 189–211 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 342–365 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Webster, J., Martocchio, J.J.: Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 16(2), 201–224 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/249576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Arpaci, I., Durdu, P.O., Mutlu, A.: The role of self-efficacy and perceived enjoyment in predicting computer engineering students’ continuous use intention of scratch. Int. J. E-Adoption 11(2), 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijea.2019070101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Arpaci, I.: E-Turkey: Turkey’s way to the information society. In: Piaggesi, D., Sund, K., Castelnovo, W. (eds.) Global Strategy and Practice of E-governance: Examples from Around the World, pp. 272–285. IGI Global, Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA (2011). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-489-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(14), 1111–1132 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bandura, A.: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Macmillan, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yang, H.J., Lay, Y.L.: Implementation and evaluation of computer-aided Mandarin phonemes training system for hearing-impaired students. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 36(3), 537–551 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00498.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Creswell, J.W.: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, 4th edn. Pearson, Boston, MA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Arpaci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arpaci, I. (2021). Predicting Adoption of Visual Programming Languages: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. In: Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64987-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics