Abstract
The goal of cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is nidus obliteration to eliminate the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. AVM SRS is typically performed in a single fraction using a stereotactic head frame for patient immobilization. Dose planning is based on a combination of stereotactic angiography and magnetic resonance imaging. The prescription dose should cover the entire nidus, but does not need to include the feeding arteries or draining veins. Dose prescription ranges from 20–25 Gy for small-volume AVM (<4 cm3) to 15–16 Gy for large volume AVM (10–14 cm3). Volume-staged SRS can be safely performed for AVM (>14 cm3) that previously were considered too large for SRS.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1.1 General Principles of Simulation and Target Definition
-
The goal of cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is nidus obliteration to eliminate the risk of intracranial hemorrhage.
-
AVM SRS is typically performed in a single fraction using a stereotactic head frame for patient immobilization.
-
The target volume for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the nidus, excluding the feeding arteries and draining veins (Fig. 1.1).
-
Two factors must be remembered when considering the dosimetric parameters of AVM SRS. First, AVM are congenital lesions and do not invade the surrounding brain parenchyma. Thus, increasing the target volume by several millimeters to encompass disease spread that cannot be imaged is not needed or desirable (GTV=CTV). Second, there is often wide variability in defining the nidus volume between different observers. Therefore, conformality indices do not apply well to the radiosurgical treatment of cerebral AVM.
-
Catheter-based cerebral angiography remains the gold standard for accurate definition of the AVM by showing not only the nidus shape but also the temporal filling of nidus relative to angiomatous feeding arteries and draining veins. In addition, angiography also shows coexisting abnormalities such as feeding artery and intra-nidal aneurysms.
-
The addition of axial imaging, typically gadolinium-enhanced SPGR or T2-weighted MRI allows a better understanding of the three-dimensional shape of the AVM increasing the conformality of dose planning.
1.2 Dose Prescriptions
-
Increasing radiation dose directly correlates with the chance of AVM obliteration [1, 2]. The rate of obliteration ranges from 60 to 70% for AVM margin doses of 15–16 Gy, from 70 to 80% for AVM margin doses of 18–20 Gy, and 90% or more for AVM margin doses over 20 Gy.
-
While higher radiation doses increase the chance of obliteration, the likelihood of adverse radiation effects (ARE) also rises at higher radiation doses and larger AVM volume [3,4,5]. Patients with deeply located AVM are at greater risk for neurologic deficits secondary to imaging changes noted on MRI after SRS.
-
To account for the conflicting goals of increased obliteration while minimizing the chance of ARE, small-volume AVM (≤4.0 cm3) are generally prescribed margin doses of 20–25 Gy, medium-volume AVM (4–10 cm3) are prescribed 18–20 Gy, and larger volume AVM (>10 cm3) are prescribed 15–18 Gy. AVM >14 cm3 are considered for volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) [6,7,8,9] (Fig. 1.2).
-
Patients with AVM located in deep locations are generally treated with 15–18 Gy.
-
If initial SRS does not result in obliteration after 3–5 years, then repeat SRS is often performed. Dose prescription for repeat AVM SRS usually ranges between 15 and 18 Gy.
1.3 Treatment Planning Techniques
-
Dose planning should cover the entire nidus with prescribed radiation dose. The majority of Gamma Knife cases are prescribed at the 50% isodose line, whereas linear accelerator-based procedures typically are prescribed to higher isodose lines.
-
VS-SRS of large AVM allows a higher radiation dose to be delivered to the nidus while reducing the radiation exposure to the adjacent brain. The time between the different stages usually is 2–6 months.
1.4 Side Effects
-
Neurologic decline after AVM SRS can occur secondary to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or ARE.
-
Patients remain at risk for ICH until the nidus is obliterated, which generally requires 1–5 years. Numerous reports have shown that the risk of AVM bleeding during this latency interval is either unchanged or reduced [10,11,12].
-
Radiation-induced changes (RIC) noted in the first 1–2 years after AVM SRS (areas of increased signal on T2-weighted MRI) are noted after 30–50% of patients and are distinct from radiation necrosis [13] (Fig. 1.3). Most are asymptomatic and resolve without treatment.
-
Patients with symptomatic RIC (headaches, seizures, focal deficits) can usually be managed with corticosteroid therapy.
-
Late ARE develop 5 or more years after SRS and are characterized by peri-lesional edema or cyst formation [14–15] (Fig. 1.4). Symptomatic late ARE may require surgical removal to improve the patient’s neurologic condition.
References
Flickinger JC, Pollock BE, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD (1996) A dose-response analysis of arteriovenous malformation obliteration by radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Onc Biol Phys 36:873–879
Karlsson B, Lindquist C, Steiner L (1997) Prediction of obliteration after gamma knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 40:425–431
Cohen-Inbar O, Lee CC, Xu Z, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP (2015) A quantitative analysis of adverse radiation effects following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 123:945–953
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Liscak R, Phuong LK, Pollock BE (2000) Development of a model to predict permanent symptomatic post-radiosurgery injury for arteriovenous malformation patients. Int J Radiat Onc Biol Phys. 46:1143–1148
Kano H, Flickinger JC, Tonetti D et al (2017) Estimating the risks of adverse radiation effects after gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 48:84–90
Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC et al (2012) Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, Part 6: multistaged volumetric management of large arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 116:54–65
Nagy G, Grainger A, Hodgson T et al (2017) Staged volume radiosurgery of large arteriovenous malformations improves outcome by reducing the rate of adverse radiation effects. Neurosurgery 80:180–192
Pollock BE, Link MJ, Stafford SL, Lanzino G, Garces YI, Foote RL (2017) Volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: outcomes based on an 18-year experience. Neurosurgery 80:543–550
Seymour ZA, Sneed PK, Gupta N et al (2016) Volume-staged radiosurgery for large arteriovenous malformations: an evolving paradigm. J Neurosurg 124:163–174
Maruyama K, Kawahara N, Shin M et al (2005) The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. N Engl J Med 352:146–153
Pollock BE, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Kondziolka D (1996) Hemorrhage risk after stereotactic radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 38:652–661
Yen CP, Sheehan JP, Schwyzer L, Schlesinger D (2011) Hemorrhage risk of cerebral arteriovenous malformations before and during the latency period after gamma knife radiosurgery. Stroke 42:1691–1696
Yen CP, Matsumoto JA, Wintermark M et al (2013) Radiation-induced imaging changes following gamma knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 118:63–73
Pan H, Sheehan J, Stroila M, Steiner M, Steiner L (2005) Late cyst formation following gamma knife surgery of arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 102(suppl):124–127
Pollock BE, Link MJ, Branda ME, Storlie CB (2017) Incidence and management of late adverse radiation effects after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery:928–934
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pollock, B.E. (2021). Arteriovenous Malformation. In: Halasz, L.M., Lo, S.S., Chang, E.L., Sahgal, A. (eds) Intracranial and Spinal Radiotherapy . Practical Guides in Radiation Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64508-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64508-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64507-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64508-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)