Abstract
Ultrasound (US) is a critical skill for the assessment of soft tissue infections in the austere environment. US is more accurate than palpation for the identification of abscesses, can identify foreign bodies of various compositions, and is useful in the diagnosis of cellulitis. It can also be used to plan for the drainage of abscesses as well as the identification of deep abscess tracts and complications. US can be used to guide the removal of foreign bodies and decreases the size of surgical incision during removal. Regardless of the setting and availability of resources, US is portable, mobile, and provides real-time information that can make a difference in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue infections.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Soft tissue injuries and infections account for 80% of injuries sustained in a wilderness or austere setting [1]. Ultrasonography provides an excellent means to evaluate for and identify many of these soft tissue injuries including cellulitis, abscesses, and foreign bodies. The skilled practitioner can also use ultrasound to provide procedural guidance for abscess drainage and the removal of foreign bodies.
Equipment Considerations
A high frequency linear array probe of 7.5 MHz or higher is ideal for the evaluation of the soft tissue (see Fig. 1). Deep penetration of the tissue is usually not required, and the higher frequency probe offers the resolution required to identify minimal areas of fluid and small foreign bodies. In general, most high frequency linear arrays will penetrate to a depth of up to 6 cm or so. There are rare cases in which a low frequency curvilinear (1–5 MHz) or phased array (2–5 MHz) probe may be required to achieve the adequate penetration to clearly identify the back wall of an abscess (see Figs. 2 and 3). This is particularly important when scanning thoracic or abdominal abscesses that may communicate with the thoracic or peritoneal cavities respectively. The lower frequency probes may also be necessary to adequately evaluate obese patients.
Probe size and thus footprint varies, but a larger probe is generally utilized in order to facilitate the evaluation of a greater amount of soft tissue. Smaller probes may be useful in procedural guidance or when evaluating smaller anatomical structures such as digits.
Ultrasound resolution (and corresponding image quality) is normally greatest at a point where the ultrasound beam narrows to its minimum size. This is known as the focal zone. For any given probe, there is a minimum distance from the surface of the probe to the focal zone. For this reason, the resolution of superficial structures closest to the ultrasound probe (before the focal zone is reached) can be limited. Utilizing a water bath to increase the standoff distance between the probe and the anatomical structure in question can improve visualization by placing the area of interest within the focal zone of the probe [2] (see Fig. 4). This technique can also aid in the evaluation of small structures such as fingers or toes that may be difficult to maintain probe contact with due to their small and spherical nature (see Fig. 5).
Technique
Soft tissue structures of interest should be evaluated in the transverse and longitudinal axis. Traditionally the probe marker is placed towards the patient’s head or to the patient’s right. However, if the ultrasound images will be used for procedural guidance, the probe should be oriented so that the directionality of the images seen matches the surface alignment of the patient. Scanning with the ultrasound probe in a dedicated fashion such as from distal to proximal or lateral to medial and labeling images as such will prevent confusion during future review.
Cellulitis
Cellulitis accounts for 25% of all soft tissue injuries in the austere environment [3]. It may accompany abscesses and in rare cases lead to necrotizing soft tissue infections. Ultrasound identification of cellulitis is nonspecific and requires the correct clinical picture of erythematous, warm, and painful skin, usually in a limited and unilateral distribution.
Soft tissue is expected to have well-delineated tissue planes. Cellulitis can be identified as anechoic layering of fluids between and among soft tissue planes. This is often described as a “cobblestone” like appearance (see Figs. 6 and 7). A “cobblestone” appearance is not specific for cellulitis, as many other conditions may lead to fluid accumulation in soft tissue (any cause of peripheral edema or localized inflammation). Cellulitis may also be identified by a loss of the usually well-delineated tissue planes which is thought to occur due to tissue thickening and inflammation. Air that is identified within soft tissue planes or obstructs images should raise the clinical suspicion for a necrotizing soft tissue infection in the correct clinical context (see Fig. 8). Sonographic findings of necrotizing soft tissue infection include distorted and thickened fascial planes with turbid fluid accumulation in both the fascial layers and subcutaneous edema [4].
The soft tissue in question should be systematically scanned in both transverse and longitudinal axis while looking for the nonspecific signs of cellulitis and examining for such complicating features as abscesses or foreign bodies. Examine the affected tissue completely to the margins to visualize the return of normal well-delineated tissue planes. If there is doubt about the diagnosis, compare the affected tissue to the tissue on the contralateral side or tissue elsewhere on the body that is thought to be normal.
Abscess
Ultrasound greatly improves the identification of abscess when compared to palpation. Physical exam has an accuracy of 86% while utilization of ultrasound improves that accuracy to 98% [5]. Further, ultrasound can be used to measure the size of the abscess to evaluate if drainage is required, as abscesses under 1 cm are unlikely to require drainage [6]. Color Doppler (if available) may also be used to better identify vascular structures and ensure no vascular flow exists within a suspected abscess cavity. Prior to drainage, the tissue around the abscess can be examined for communication to deeper structures that may require more advanced intervention, neurovascular structures and tendons that should be avoided during incision, and foreign bodies that may injure the provider and cause recurrent infection in the patient [7].
An abscess can be identified by an irregularly shaped to round anechoic or hypoechoic structure that may contain echogenic material. The soft tissue in question should be systemically scanned in both transverse and longitudinal axis while looking for the suspected abscess. Light pressure applied from the probe to the abscess may result in movement of the echogenic purulent material within the abscess and aid in identification. Once the abscess has been identified, measure its dimensions in short and long axis to determine the need for drainage. Visualize the complete margins of the abscess and look specifically for any deeper tracts or connections to deep structures. Consider more advanced surgical management if either is found. If point of care drainage is appropriate, the depth of the abscess should be measured from the skin surface and the surrounding tissue examined for neurovascular structures and tendons that should be avoided during drainage. Find the most superficial portion of the abscess and mark the corresponding skin (Fig. 9).
Abscess drainage is rarely performed with live ultrasound guidance. As previously mentioned, utilize the ultrasound to mark the most superficial portion of the abscess, clean and anesthetize the skin around this mark, and perform an incision and drainage of the abscess. Examine the area of the abscess after incision and drainage with the ultrasound to ensure there are no missed pockets of purulent material or loculations.
Foreign Body
Foreign bodies such as wood, glass, metal, plastic, and organic material in soft tissue account for about 2% of soft tissue injuries in the austere environment [8]. Given the potential for delayed treatment in these environments, early identification of foreign bodies is important to reduce infection, pain, and inflammation. Patients with foreign bodies in their feet or hands may not be able to ambulate or perform work duties. Ultrasonography has been proven in the identification of foreign bodies as well as in procedural guidance for their removal [9, 10]. Ultrasonography is more sensitive than plain film radiography and can identify between 94% to 98% of foreign bodies [11, 12]. In addition, ultrasound can be used to identify injuries to neurovascular structures while evaluating for foreign bodies or after their identification.
Identification of a foreign body is made through direct visualization of an echogenic structure in the area of suspicion or by identification of secondary signs such as reverberation artifact, shadowing, or fluid collection (Figs. 10 and 11).
Reverberation artifact occurs when an ultrasound beam encounters two strong parallel reflectors. It is often seen with metallic or glass objects such as a needle or shrapnel when viewed in a long axis or short axis. If these objects are small or in the superficial skin, the artifact may aid in their identification [13]. A foreign body that has been retained for greater than 24 hours may have a surrounding hypoechoic rim of fluid. Such a finding increases the sensitivity and specificity of foreign body identification [14]. Foreign bodies with smooth and flat surfaces tend to produce clean shadowing deep to the foreign body while objects with irregular surfaces usually demonstrate dirty shadowing [15].
Before using ultrasound to scan for foreign bodies, evaluate the patient for entrance wounds and estimate the trajectory and path of any foreign bodies. Palpation may be useful. Then place the probe over the entrance wound and evaluate a wide margin of tissue in the suspected trajectory of the foreign body. Evaluate the tissue in both transverse and longitudinal axis while looking for the hyperechoic foreign body or secondary signs such as fluid collection, artifact, or shadowing. Once the foreign body has been identified, examine the surrounding tissue for damage to other structures such as nerves, vasculature, or tendons. Measure the size of the foreign body in both the short and long axis as well as its depth. Mark the location of the foreign body on the skin.
Once a foreign body has been recognized, ultrasound is a useful modality to guide its removal. Using ultrasound in this fashion decreases complications [12]. The size and position of a foreign body can be accurately identified with ultrasonography, and the surgical incision required to remove the foreign body can be smaller and more accurate [16].
Ultrasound can be used to guide foreign body removal in a similar fashion to ultrasound guidance for vascular access or a peripheral nerve blocks (see chapters “Initial Training, Credentialing, and Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement Processes”, “Care of Equipment”, 30 and 31). Estimate the surgical path by evaluating the skin around the foreign body. Identify any nerves, tendons, or vascular structures that should be avoided. Clean the skin at the planned incision site and anesthetize the superficial skin and deeper structures along the surgical path while using the ultrasound for direct visualization. Make a small incision in the skin and perform a blunt dissection with forceps while maintaining visualization of the foreign body and any structures along the dissection path that should be avoided. Capture and remove the foreign body, irrigate the site, and then close or allow the wound to heal by secondary intention.
Limitations of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research
Ultrasound examination of soft tissue has been used successfully for decades to identify cellulitis, abscesses, and foreign bodies. Nevertheless, there are plenty of opportunities for research in this application of ultrasound. As small, portable ultrasound devices become more readily available, there will likely be questions raised regarding validation of image quality in relation to more standardly used cart-based systems. This is certainly relevant in the austere environment. Additionally, as the “democratization” of ultrasound continues, ultrasound capabilities will be increasingly available to medical providers at diverse levels of experience and expertise, and will likely include advanced practice practitioners, nurses, paramedics, and other paraprofessionals. Research into the optimal model for initial training and skills sustainment for these varied groups will be needed. Some of this is already being done, particularly in the military.
Pearls
Use a linear high frequency array for most soft tissue scanning.
Be thorough and systematic when scanning soft tissue to avoid missing subtle findings.
Orient the screen image to the surface features of your patient.
Whenever possible, scan in two planes.
Use water baths or other methods to achieve stand-off from the surface of the probe in order to better image superficial structures.
Use color Doppler when available to delineate vascular structures.
Use ultrasound in conjunction with physical exam to improve the sensitivity of your clinical assessments.
If you are uncertain about what you are seeing, compare it to an unaffected side or region.
Pitfalls
You may need to use a lower frequency probe in order to adequately image deeper structures.
Not all that “cobblestones” is cellulitis – use clinical judgement and be alert for other causes of soft tissue edema.
If you can’t clearly see the back wall of an abscess, beware extension or tracking into deeper tissue or cavities.
Failure to recognize subtle artifacts may lead to missed recognition of more serious soft tissue infections or foreign bodies.
Failure to completely scan through the entire area of interest into normal appearing surrounding tissue may lead to misdiagnosis.
Key Literature Reviewed
Gentile DA. Wilderness injuries and illnesses. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:853–61.
Blaivas M. Water bath evaluation technique for emergency ultrasound of painful superficial structures. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22:589–93.
Stanford KA. Trends in skin and soft tissue-related injuries in NOLS wilderness expeditions from 1984 to 2012. Wilderness Environ Med. 2017;28:307–12.
Fugitt JB. Necrotizing fasciitis. Radiographics. 2004;24:1472–6.
Squire BT. ABSCESS: applied bedside sonography for convenient evaluation of superficial soft tissue infections. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:601–6.
Adhikari S. Sonography first for subcutaneous abscess and cellulitis evaluation. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1509–12.
Tayal VS. The effect of soft-tissue ultrasound on the management of cellulitis in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:384–8.
Montalvo R. Morbidity and mortality in the wilderness. West J Med. 1998;168:248–54.
Shrestha D. The role of ultrasonography in detection and localization of radiolucent foreign body in soft tissues of extremities. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2009;48:5–9.
Graham DD. Ultrasound in the emergency department: detection of wooden foreign bodies in the soft tissues. J Emerg Med. 2002;22:75–9.
Horton LK. Sonography and radiography of soft- tissue foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1155–9.
Soudack M. Clinically unsuspected foreign bodies: the importance of sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:1381–5.
Feldman MK. US artifacts. Radiographics. 2009;29:1179–89.
Jacobson JA. Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US. Radiology. 1998;206:45–8.
Rubin JA. Clean and dirty shadowing at US: a reappraisal. Radiology. 1991;181:231–6.
Paziana K. Soft tissue foreign body removal technique using portable ultrasonography. Wilderness Environ Med. 2012;23:343–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grisham, J., Perreault, M.D. (2021). Advanced Diagnostic Topic for Austere Providers: Skin and Soft Tissue. In: Nicholson, B.D., Vitto, M.J., Dhindsa, H.S. (eds) Manual of Austere and Prehospital Ultrasound. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64287-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64287-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64286-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64287-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)