Abstract
A substantial body of research has demonstrated the particular difficulties faced by women in securing access to protection under international refugee law. It is typically men who have been considered the principal agents of political resistance and therefore the (more) legitimate beneficiaries of protection resulting from associated persecution. Forms of violence and discrimination more commonly experienced by women have routinely been dismissed as ‘private’ and therefore falling outside the scope of international refugee law. This chapter argues that whilst all refugees have increasingly struggled to secure access to international protection, efforts to engender international refugee law have also been undermined by use of the category ‘Refugee Women’. This category has been harnessed by policy makers, lawyers and civil society organisations to draw attention to the particular experiences of women fearing gender-based violence but has served to ‘flatten out’ the complex gendered experiences of those seeking protection, extrapolating their experiences from the socio-political contexts in which they occur. The result has been a form of ‘exclusionary inclusion’ in which women’s experiences are effectively ‘depoliticised’: they are represented almost exclusively as ‘victims’ of male violence rather than activists and/or resisters of patriarchal norms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2019). Migration diplomacy in world politics. International Studies Perspectives, 20(2), 113–128.
Anker, D. (2020). The history and future of gender asylum law and recognition of domestic violence as a basis for protection in the United States. Human Rights Magazine, 45(2) https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/immigration/the-history-and-future-of-gender-asylum-law/.
Arbel, E. (2013). The culture of rights protection in Canadian refugee law: Examining domestic violence cases. McGill Law Journal, 58(3), 729–771.
Arbel, E., Dauvergne, C., & Millbank, J. (Eds.). (2014). Gender in refugee law: From the margins to the centre. Abington, Oxon: Routledge.
Bains, E. (2004). Vulnerable bodies: Gender, the UN and the global refugee crisis, Oxon: Routledge.
Berger, S. (2009). Production and reproduction of gender and sexuality in legal discourses of asylum in the United States. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(3), 659–685.
Campbell, P. (2001). Gendered human rights: The international community’s failed response to the persecution of women. Politics and Policy, 29(1), 121.
Charlesworth, H. (2005). Not waving but drowning: Gender mainstreaming and human rights in the United Nations. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 18(1), 18.
Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C., & Wright, S. (2001). Feminist approaches to international law. American Journal of International Law, 85(4), 613–645.
Christensen, A., & Siim, B. (2010). Citizenship and politics of belonging: Inclusionary and exclusionary framings of gender and ethnicity. Kvinder, Kon & Forskning, 2–3, 8–17.
Clark, S. (2007). Female subjects of international human rights law: The hejab debate and the exotic other female. Global Change, Peace and Security, 19(1), 35–48.
Crawley, H. (1999). Women and refugee status; beyond the public/private dichotomy in UK asylum policy. In D. Indra (Ed.), Engendering forced migration: Theory and practice. Berghahn Books.
Crawley, H. (2000). Gender, persecution and the concept of politics in the asylum determination process. Forced Migration Review, (9), 17–20.
Crawley, H. (2001). Refugees and gender: Law and process. Jordan Publishing.
Crawley, H., & Lester, T. (2004). Comparative analysis of gender-related persecution in national asylum legislation and practice in Europe. Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit Evaluation Report EPAU/2004/05. Geneva: UNHCR.
Crawley, H., & Setrana, M (forthcoming). ‘The evolution of the ‘global refugee regime’: From rights to ‘burden sharing’’. In E. Carmel, K. Lenner and R. Paul (Eds.), Handbook on the governance and politics of migration. Edward Elgar.
Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2017). Refugee, migrant, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 48–64.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.
Davis, A. N. (2015). Intersectionality and international law: Recognizing complex identities on the global stage. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 28(1), 205–242.
Edwards, A. (2010). Transitioning gender: Feminist engagement with international refugee law and policy 1950–2010. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(2), 21–45.
European Parliament (2012). Gender related asylum claims in Europe: A comparative analysis of law, policies and practice focusing on women in nine eu member states, brussels https://www.endfgm.eu/resources/asylum/european-parliament-gender-related-asylum-claims-in-europe-a-comparative-analysis-of-law-policies-and-practice-focusing-on-women-in-nine-eu-member-states-2012/.
Firth, G., & Mauthe, B. (2013). Refugee law, gender and the concept of personhood. International Journal of Refugee Law, 25(3), 470–501.
Foster, M. (2007). International refugee law and socio-economic rights: Refuge from deprivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freedman, J. (2015). Gendering the international asylum and refugee debate (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
_____. (2008). ‘Women seeking asylum’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10(2), 154–172.
______. (2009). ‘Protecting women asylum seekers and refugees: from international norms to national protection’. International Migration, 48(1), 175–198.
Geddes, A. (2003). The politics of migration and immigration in Europe. London: Sage.
Gibney, M. J. (2004). The ethics and politics of asylum. Cambridge: CUP.
Greatbach, J. (1989). The gender difference: Feminist critiques of refugee discourse. International Journal of Refugee Law, 1(4), 519–527.
Hancock, A-M. (2015). When is fear for one’s life race-gendered? An intersectional analysis of the Bureau of Immigration Appeal’s in re AR-C-G- Decision. Fordham Law Review, 83(6), 2977–2998. http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol83/iss6/5.
Hennebry, J. L., & Petrozziello, A. J. (2019). Closing the gap? Gender and the global compacts for migration and refugees. International Migration, 57(6), 115–138.
Hyndman, J. (2010). Introduction: The feminist politics of refugee migration. Gender, Place and Culture, 17(4), 453–459.
Indra, D. (Ed.) (1999). Engendering forced migration: Theory and practice. New York: Berghahn Books.
Johnson, H. L. (2011). Click to donate: Visual images, constructing victims and imagining the female refugee. Third World Quarterly, 32(6), 1015–1037.
Kneebone, S. (2005). Women within the refugee construct: ‘Exclusionary inclusion’ in policy and practice the Australian experience. International Journal of Refugee Law, 17(1), 7.
Macklin, A. (1995). Refugee women and the imperative of categories. Human Rights Quarterly, 17(2), 213–277.
McKinnon. (2010). Excavating gender in women’s early claims to political asylum in the United States. Women’s Studies in Communication, 33(2), 79–95.
Mullally, S. (2011). Domestic violence asylum claims and recent development in international human rights law: A progress narrative? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60(2), 459–484.
Musalo, K. (2010). A short history of gender asylum in the United States: Resistance and ambivalence may very slowly be inching towards recognition of women’s asylum claim. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(2), 46–63.
Oswin, N. (2010). Rights spaces: An exploration of feminist approaches to refugee law. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 3(3), 347–364.
Otto, D. (2013). ‘International human rights law: towards rethinking sex / gender dualism and asymmetry’ (Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 620).
Oxford, C. (2014). Where are the women? In E. Arbel, C. Dauvergne, & J. Millbank (Eds.), Gender in refugee law: From the margins to the centre (pp. 157–175). Abington, Oxon: Routledge.
—–. (2005). Protectors and victims in the gender regime of asylum. NWSA Journal, 17(3), 18.
Spijkerboer, T. (2000). Gender and refugee status. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Squire, V. (2009). The exclusionary politics of asylum. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
UNHCR. (2002). Guidelines on international protection: Gender-related persecution within the context of Article 1A (2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol relating to the status of refugees Geneva: UNHCR https://www.unhcr.org/publications/legal/3d58ddef4/guidelines-international-protection-1-gender-related-persecution-context.html.
UNHCR. (2020). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2019. Geneva: UNHCR https://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2019/.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crawley, H. (2021). Gender, ‘Refugee Women’ and the Politics of Protection. In: Mora, C., Piper, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Migration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63347-9_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63347-9_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63346-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63347-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)