Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Aesthetic Moment in Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Economic Sociology for the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The relevance of markets for primarily aesthetic products and services is increasing. This is not only the result of a shift in structures of consumption towards goods and services defined by aesthetic features, but also of intensifying competition, based on aesthetic design, in markets for goods and services, which do not primarily service aesthetic functions. The background for these market developments is a fundamental aestheticization of everyday life in prosperous, post-materialist societies. The analysis of aesthetic features of products and services is therefore steadily gaining importance for economic sociology. Such goods and services are associated with a specific form of radical uncertainty. The reason is that aesthetic judgments are socially constituted assessments, so individual and collective aesthetic decisions must be seen, to an especially high degree, as only ever having temporary validity. We present theoretical models, which explain the emergence of aesthetic judgements albeit such radical uncertainty and empirical studies based on the art and wine market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here we are focusing on Bourdieu’s presentation of the artistic field. It would be possible, however, to produce comparable representations for any field of cultural production by exchanging the actors and institutions involved.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspers, P. (2018). Forms of uncertainty reduction: Decision, valuation, and contest. Theory and Society, 47(2), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspers, P., & Beckert, J. (2011). Value in markets. In J. Beckert & P. Aspers (Eds.), The worth of goods: Valuation and pricing in the economy (pp. 3–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, S. (2001). Intellectualization and art world development: Film in the United States. American Sociological Review, 66, 404–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, S. (2002). Marketing, cultural hierarchy, and the relevance of critics: Film in the United States, 1935–80. Poetics, 30, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2011). Where do prices come from? Sociological approaches to price formation. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 757–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J., & Rössel, J. (2013). The price of art. European Societies, 15, 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J., Rössel, J., & Schenk, P. (2018). Wine as a cultural product. Symbolic capital and price formation in the wine field. Sociological Perspectives, 60(1), 206–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessy, C., & Chauvin, P.-M. (2013). The power of market intermediaries: From information to valuation processes. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 83–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1970). Zur Soziologie der symbolischen Formen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1982). Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheiten (pp. 183–198). Soziale Welt, Sonderband 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1999). Die Regeln der Kunst. Genese und Struktur des literarischen Feldes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1996). Reflexive Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Boltanski, L., Castel, R., Chamboredon, J.-C., Lagneau, G., & Schnapper, D. (1981). Eine illegitime Kunst. Die sozialen Gebrauchsweisen der Photographie. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brochet, F. (2001). Chemical object representation in the field of consciousness. Application presented for the grand prix of the Académie Amorim following work carried out towards a doctorate from the Faculty of Oenology. Talence Cadex: General Oenology Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R. (2015). Authenticity: Attribution, value, and meaning. In R. H. Scott & M. C. Buchmann (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–13). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. (2017). For what it’s worth: The political construction of quality in French and Italian wine markets. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charters, S. (2006). Aesthetic products and aesthetic consumption: A review. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 9, 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charters, S., & Pettigrew, S. (2005). Is wine consumption an aesthetic experience? Journal of Wine Research, 16, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. (2007). Assessing the reliability of blind wine tasting: Differentiating levels of clinical and statistical meaningfulness. Journal of Wine Economics, 2, 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessandro, S., & Pecotich, A. (2013). Evaluation of wine by expert and novice consumers in the presence of variations in quality, brand and country of origin cues. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eloire, F. (2010). Une approche sociologique de la concurrence sur un marché. Le cas des restaurateurs lillois. Revue Française de Sociologie, 51(3), 481–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. (1987). Lifestyle and consumer culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 4, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felouzis, G., & Perroton, J. (2007). Les “marchés scolaires”: Une analyse en termes d’économie de la qualité. Revue Française de Sociologie, 48(4), 693–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, B., & Simmons, R. (2013). The impact of individual and collective reputation on wine prices: Empirical evidence from the Mosel Valley. Journal of Business Economics, 83(2), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, G. (1994). Kapital, Habitus, Feld, Symbol. Grundbegriffe der Kulturtheorie Pierre Bourdieus. In I. Mörth & G. Fröhlich (Eds.), Das symbolische Kapital der Lebensstile (pp. 31–54). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel, R. (1997). The use of language by trained and untrained experienced wine tasters. Journal of Sensory Studies, 12, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R., et al. (2008). Do more expensive wines taste better? Evidence from a large sample of blind tastings. American Association of Wine Economists. Working Paper. Volume 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley-Dolan, A., & Winner, E. (2011). Seeing the mind behind the art: People can distinguish abstract expressionist paintings from highly similar paintings by children, chimps, monkeys and elephants. Psychological Science, 22, 435–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. (2011). Judgement and distinction: Review symposium. Lucien Karpik: Valuing the unique. The economics of singularities. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 787–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, B. (2016). Wir leben im Zeitalter der Vergleichung. Perspektiven einer Soziologie des Vergleichs. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 45(5), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, R. T. (2008). An examination of judge reliability at a major U. S. wine competition. Journal of Wine Economics, 3, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B. (1997). Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu’s theory of tastes from its critics. Poetics, 25, 93–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörstermann, K. (2016). Der Wandel der Konsumstruktur in Deutschland. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 68, 713–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howland, P. J. (2013). Distinction by proxy: The democratization of fine wine. Journal of Sociology, 49(2–3), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, S., Verboord, M., & Kuipers, G. (2011). Comparing cultural classification. In J. Rössel & G. Otte (Eds.), Lebensstilforschung (Sonderheft 51, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie) (pp. 139–168). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., & Baumann, S. (2007). Democracy versus distinction: A study of omnivorousness in gourmet food writing. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 165–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jourdain, A. (2010). La construction sociale de la singularité. Une stratégie entrepreneuriale des artisans d’art. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, 6(2), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpik, L. (2010). Valuing the unique: The economics of singularities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karpik, L. (2011). What is the price of a scientific paper? In J. Beckert & P. Aspers (Eds.), The worth of goods: Valuation and pricing in the economy (pp. 63–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpik, L. (2013). Éléments de l’économie des singularités. In P. Steiner & F. Vatin (Eds.), Traité de sociologie économique (pp. 163–206). Paris: PUF.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kneer, G. (2004). Differenzierung bei Luhmann und Bourdieu. Ein Theorievergleich. In A. Nassehi & G. Nollmann (Eds.), Bourdieu und Luhmann. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K. (2017). Lucien Karpik: Mehr Wert. Die Ökonomie des Einzigartigen. In K. Kraemer & F. Brugger (Eds.), Schlüsselwerke der Wirtschaftssoziologie (pp. 507–514). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre, N. (2015). Le marché du travail cycliste comme économie des singularités. Sociologie du travail, 57(4), 446–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrot, G., Brochet, F., & Dubourdieu, D. (2001). The color of odors. Brain and Language, 79, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schneider, T. (1994). Von Schichten zu Erlebnismilieus. Der Wandel der Milieustruktur in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, S. (2012). Weinkonsum: Eine Studie zu sozialstrukturellen Determinanten und Lebensstilen im Feld des Weines. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plattner, S. (1996). High art down home. An economic ethnography of a local art market. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2012). Die Erfindung der Kreativität. Zum Prozess gesellschaftlicher Ästhetisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. G. (2001). Silver signals: Twenty-five years of screening and signaling. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 432–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodet, D. (2012). Des dispositifs de jugement pour et par les consommateurs? Les systèmes participatifs de garantie du commerce equitable, de l’agriculture biologique et des Amap. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, 10(2), 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rössel, J. (2007). Ästhetisierung, Unsicherheit und die Entwicklung von Märkten. In J. Beckert, R. Diaz-Bone, & H. Ganßmann (Eds.), Märkte als soziale Strukturen (pp. 167–181). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössel, J, & Beckert, J. (2012). Quality classifications in competition: Price formation in the German wine market (MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/3). Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössel, J., & Beckert, J. (2013). Quality classifications in competition: Price formation in the German wine market. In J. Beckert & C. Musselin (Eds.), Constructing quality. The classification of goods in markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössel, J., Schenk, P., & Eppler, D. (2018). The emergence of authentic products: The transformation of wine journalism in Germany, 1947–2008. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(3), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, P. (2012). Review of Lucien Karpik (2010): Valuing the unique. The economics of singularities. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 64(2), 415–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, P. (2020). Can judgement devices explain the demand for fine wine? Manuscript. University of Lucerne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. (1997). Präferenzbildung bei Qualitätsunsicherheit: Das Beispiel Wein. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G. (1988). Alltagsästhetik und Lebenssituation. Eine Analyse kultureller Segmentierungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In H.-G. Soeffner (Ed.), Kultur und Alltag (Soziale Welt, Sonderband 6) (pp. 71–92). Göttingen: Schwartz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G. (1992). Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G. (1997). Steigerungslogik und Erlebnisgesellschaft. Politische Bildung, 30, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 659–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, W. (1991). Critics and publics: Cultural mediation in highbrow and popular performing arts. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 347–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. E. A. (1997). Conceptual change and wine expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). The causes and consequences of the dependence of quality on Price. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velthuis, O. (2005). Talking prices. Symbolic meanings of prices on the market for contemporary art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboord, M. (2011). Market logic and cultural consecration in French, German and American bestseller lists, 1970–2007. Poetics, 39, 290–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (2014). After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(3), 279–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (1978). Human values and the market: The case of life insurance and death in 19th century America. American Journal of Sociology, 84(3), 591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (2005). Circuits within capitalism. In V. Nee & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The economic sociology of capitalism (pp. 289–322). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, W. (2008). Social categories, classification systems, and determinants of wine Price in the California and French wine industries. Sociological Perspectives, 51(1), 163–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Jörg Rössel & Sebastian Weingartner

  2. University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

    Patrick Schenk

Authors
  1. Jörg Rössel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick Schenk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Weingartner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Rössel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FB IV - Soziologie, Universitat Trier, Trier, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany

    Andrea Maurer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rössel, J., Schenk, P., Weingartner, S. (2021). The Aesthetic Moment in Markets. In: Maurer, A. (eds) Handbook of Economic Sociology for the 21st Century. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61619-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61619-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61618-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61619-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation