Abstract
Today large parts of Eastern Europe can be considered as strikingly species-poor “agrarian-deserts”. Nevertheless, the region also retains relatively large areas of species-rich farmland. Changes in the weed flora in this region, with special regard to the disappearing weed species, is the subject of relatively small numbers of international scientific studies compared to the western part of Europe. The average weed species number per plot seems to have declined less in eastern than in western countries since the Second World War. However, by the turn of the Millennium the number of threatened weed species had increased considerably, which is apparent in the recently updated national weed red lists. Many studies indicate that lower farming intensity and diversified farming systems at higher altitudes provided better conditions for the occurrence of rare species and greater diversity than intensively farmed lowlands. Unfortunately, only a few traditionally managed small fields remain in extreme habitats, and they are continuously being abandoned. Regrettably, Eastern Europe mostly lacks any conservation initiatives which directly target the preservation of rare and threatened arable weeds, consequently further declines are anticipated.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Collectivisation
- Land abandonment
- Stubbles
- Extensive farming
- Marginal habitats
- Urbanisation
- Agricultural intensification
1 Setting the Scene
The current status of arable plant diversity in Eastern Europe is a product of two contrasting patterns. In this region, the agricultural intensification which dramatically changed the European weed flora after the Second World War (Storkey et al. 2012; Richner et al. 2015; Albrecht et al. 2016), was also associated with forced collectivization (Constantin and Bauerkämper 2013). In the newly consolidated, large fields of big cooperatives, industrialized methods of plant production quickly led to the rapid decline of weed diversity (Pinke and Pál 2005). At the same time, some countries like Poland and the former Yugoslavia escaped collectivisation and, in more or less remote Eastern European regions, traditional farming systems still remain. Consequently, although today large parts of Eastern Europe can be considered as strikingly species-poor “agrarian-deserts” with weed infestations of, at most, a few troublesome weeds, nevertheless, according to Sutcliffe et al. (2015) it also retains relatively large areas of species-rich farmland of international importance for weed conservation; fields in any transitional state between these two extremities also exist.
Changes in the weed flora in Eastern Europe, with special regard to the disappearing weed species, is the subject of relatively small numbers of international scientific studies compared to the western part of Europe. However, in Poland where farms managed to resist collectivization but generally could not avoid intensification, the response of weed communities gained the interest of many botanists. A decreasing trend in weed diversity was first reported by Kornas (1961) who highlighted the disappearance of specialized flax weeds (e.g. Lolium remotum, Silene linicola, Camelina alyssum, Spergula maxima and Cuscuta epilinum) in a mountainous district in southern Poland ten years after traditional flax growing had ceased. In the following decades these species were also no longer found within intensively cultivated flax crops and considered to be extinct in the entire country (Heller 2010). The main causes of broader declines in arable plants were roughly the same as elsewhere in Europe (Storkey et al. 2012) – Sicinski and Sieradzki (2010) identified the following factors as being particularly responsible for the changes in Poland: herbicides, mineral fertilizers, seed cleaning, simplification of crop rotation and intensive soil cultivation. According to Lazarski (2015) the introduction of new, more competitive, high-yielding varieties of cereals is an additional threat to rare weeds. High-yielding crops in conjunction with the use of mineral fertilizers result in higher crop densities which increases the shading of lower vegetation layers. This has resulted in species that are poor competitors for light, such as Scandix pecten-veneris (Fig. 6.1), disappearing from crop habitats. Skrajna et al. (2012) highlighted that on acidic soils, the number of sites of occurrence as well as population abundance of Illecebrum verticillatum and Radiola linoides have also drastically decreased after the turn of the Millennium in Eastern Poland. This retreat and the decline of other acidophilous species were associated with increasing nitrophilous species caused by the increase of intensive maize production in the region.
Early stubble ploughing has also been a decisive factor responsible for the declines of farmland biodiversity observed in some Eastern European cropping systems. Formerly, weeds on stubbles were grazed by livestock and also provided resources for bees, representing a high nature value type of farming. Since the 1950s, however, farms have tended to plough the stubble as soon as possible after the harvesting of cereals. As a consequence, the range and population size of weeds typical of stubble fields has reduced significantly, because these species fail to flower and set seeds. An example of one such typical stubble-weed species is Stachys annua (Fig. 6.2), which before agricultural intensification in Hungary frequently covered stubble fields in dominant stands during late summer and early autumn (Fig. 6.2). This species is an outstanding nectar-producer and it was one of the most important honey plants in Hungary providing beekeepers with profitable stubble-honey until the 1950s (Fig. 6.2). Studies revealed that where remnants of this habitat remain, it provides significant food sources for pollinating insects and farmland birds (Pinke and Pál 2009). Even though stubble weed communities are clearly of high conservation priority for biodiversity, the decline in the area it covers has dramatically accelerated in the last two decades, mainly due to the large expansion of the invasive competitive weed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Fig. 6.3). On the one hand this species is invading and overwhelming more and more habitats of Stachys annua. On the other hand, the allergenic pollen of this invasive plant has resulted in greater emphasis being placed on the importance of early ploughing of stubbles. Authorities can even impose financial penalties in case farmers fail to plough stubbles at the right time. The impact of this invasive plant is, therefore, impacting biodiversity through indirect effects on management as well as direct biotic effects.
2 Historical Changes in Weed Communities in Eastern Europe
According to Richner et al. (2015) the average weed species number per plot seems to have declined less in eastern than in western countries since the Second World War. However, by the turn of the Millennium the number of threatened weed species had increased considerably in the region, which is apparent in the recently updated national weed red lists. The continental part of Croatia has 78 endangered weed species (Hulina 2005), while Slovakia has 150 (Eliás et al. 2007), Poland 105 (Bomanowska 2010) and Hungary 149 (Pinke et al. 2011) threatened weed species, respectively. As reported by these lists, specialized flax weeds can be regarded extinct in all these countries, but mainly because of the modern seed cleaning technologies specialised cereal weeds, like Agrostemma githago and Bromus secalinus (Fig. 6.4) are also among the most symbolic endangered weeds, with varying conservation status across the countries. Weeds, typical for acidic soils, like Arnoseris minima and Papaver argemone (Fig. 6.4) have become vulnerable mainly because of liming and the application of fertilizers. One of the most threatened and fascinating arable weed communities of this region is the Caucalidion alliance, with species like Adonis flammea (Fig. 6.4), Caucalis platycarpos, Turgenia latifolia, Scandix pecten-veneris, Vaccaria hispanica, Bupleurum rotundifolium and Galium tricornutum. These communities are distributed from the Balkans up to Poland, tending to become more specialized to the north, where they occupy ever more calcareous, warmer and drier habitats and become especially susceptible to the methods of modern agriculture (Pinke 2004; Wegrzynek and Nowak 2010, Silc et al. 2014). After 1950, the number of occurrences of this weed community decreased significantly, but surprisingly in the 1990s, some new sites for these weed species were recorded in the Czech Republic. This trend is presumably associated with a reduction in the application of herbicides and fertilizers after the socio-economic changes in 1989 (Lososová 2003).
A similar phenomenon has also been observed in Hungary, partly because of the chaotic changes in farming practices following the collapse of many large cooperatives in the post-communist period after 1990. The distribution of one of the most emblematic endangered weeds, Agrostemma githago significantly retreated after the 1950s; this once common arable weed had only 22 known localities in Hungary at the end of the 1980s. However, between 1995 and 2005 it was reported from 366 Hungarian localities. Although, it should also be noted that at this time field botanical research was also significantly boosted. Therefore, it is difficult to assess whether the temporary reduction in the intensity of farming or the more thorough surveys were to a greater extent responsible for this increase in observations (Pinke et al. 2006). Most of the new occurrences were discovered in extensively cultivated small fields from the hilly and sandy regions of Hungary, which mostly avoided the attention of botanists in the former decades. Unfortunately, there are no records of the share of permanent low intensity farming habitats, which already existed before the 1990s, and were not the temporary products of the economic crisis in the early 1990s that allowed the possible beneficial effects of changes in farming practice on arable weeds to be quantified with certainty.
3 Important Habitats for Arable Plant Conservation in Eastern Europe and Future Threats
Arable mosaics combined with grasslands and other semi-natural habitats usually result in the greatest arable plant diversity in Eastern Europe, particularly in hilly regions (Kovács-Hostyánszki et al. 2011; Loos et al. 2015). Mountainous areas tend to preserve traditional farming practices in contrast with the great plains, where crop production has been easier to intensify. Many studies indicate that lower farming intensity and diversified farming systems at higher altitudes provided better conditions for the occurrence of rare species and greater diversity than intensively farmed lowlands. This trend has been reported by Vrbnicanin et al. (2009) in Serbia, by Kolarová et al. (2013) in the Czech Republic, by Nagy et al. (2018) in Romania and by Májeková et al. (2019) in Slovakia. Barina et al. (2017) reported that, in Albania, both at higher and lower altitudes small cultivated fields are still typical (Fig. 6.5) and weeds that have become threatened at a European scale, like Agrostemma githago, Vaccaria pyramidata, Scandix pecten-veneris and Adonis flammea are still relatively frequent. Further eastwards outside Europe, closer to the centre of their distribution area, many of these weed species can still occur even in large populations (Nowak et al. 2014).
In extensive, or in other words in the “traditional low-intensity farming systems” intensification of arable land use is usually unprofitable due to extreme soil conditions or difficult topography. In these habitats the absence or low use of agro-chemicals benefits a wide range of flora and fauna throughout the food chain (Beaufoy et al. 1994). To validate this assumption, the floristic composition and conservation value of the weed vegetation of winter cereal fields on base-rich soils in western Hungary was compared between extensively and intensively managed fields. The findings showed that total weed cover was, on average, six times higher in extensively compared with intensively managed fields (Pinke and Gunton 2014). In addition, Red List and insect-pollinated plant species occurred more frequently in extensively managed fields (Pinke et al. 2009). Community responses to arable intensification using functional trait analyses were also characterized. The response of weeds to intensification in these cereal fields was best described by a functional classification based on species’ flowering duration, maximum height and seed weight. One of the groups particularly associated with the extensive fields is characterized by medium stature, the largest seeds and the shortest flowering duration. This could be identified as a particular conservation concern and includes many of the most threatened and declining arable weed species in Hungary (e.g. Agrostemma githago, Caucalis platycarpos, Galium tricornutum, Ranunculus arvensis, Turgenia latifolia, Melampyrum arvense and M. barbatum (Fig. 6.6)). The medium stature reflects competitive exclusion of weeds of similar height to cereal crops in intensive fields, seed size is negatively correlated with persistence in the seed bank and low seed production, and short flowering period also represents a short phenology making this species unable to re-emerge after herbicide applications (Pinke and Gunton 2014). This shows some congruence with the rare weed trait syndrome of short stature, large seeds and late flowering proposed by Storkey et al. (2010) – see also Chap. 2 in this volume.
These results show that extensively managed fields have greater conservation value compared with intensively managed fields. Therefore, extensively managed arable habitats should have a high priority for biodiversity conservation. Unfortunately, only a few traditionally managed small fields remain in extreme habitats (Fig. 6.7), and they are continuously being abandoned. Extensive fields are usually owned by old farmers, who grow cereals to feed their own livestock. There is no market orientation in their farm business and they do not receive any financial support for this environment-friendly cropping. After the demise of this older generation, who are the last members of the traditional peasant culture, there will be no younger generation continuing this traditional lifestyle. Extensive fields are, therefore, likely to be abandoned (Fig. 6.8), intensified or built up. This is a dramatically accelerating trend; more than 90% of the extensive fields, which were sampled for the study of Pinke et al. (2009) in 2007, were lost in the following decade in North-Western Hungary. Expanding Hungarian towns are also increasingly incorporating small fields in their vicinity (Fig. 6.8), while around villages once extensively managed fields turn to be more and more intensified or abandoned. A considerable part of the Eastern European region is likely to be involved in this land use trend with negative impacts on arable plant habitats. For instance, Nobis et al. (2011) reported that although extensively managed fields provided suitable habitats for the threatened Lathyrus aphaca (Fig. 6.4), a species of Mediterranean-Irano-Turanian origin around the Polish city of Kraków; the progressive development of the city, and especially by numerous building investments as well as the discontinuation of cultivation threaten its survival. Mehmeti et al. (2009) noted that the abandonment of cultivation, especially on shallow calcareous soils threaten the existence of rare weed species in Kosovo. According to Öllerer (2013) small-sized subsistence household farms in Romania are continuously being abandoned due to economic constraints. Furthermore, Batáry et al. (2015) highlighted that Eastern European agriculturally marginal areas, where the productivity of land is limited by biophysical or socioeconomic constraints and are currently home to the highest concentrations of biodiversity and host the largest populations of threatened species are also under the highest pressure from agricultural intensification and abandonment. Storkey et al. (2012) also pointed out that the factor most commonly identified as causing national declines in arable floras in Eastern Europe was the abandonment of marginal land.
There are some examples of specialised cropping systems that remain important refugia for threatened plant species. Before the intensification of rice production, flooded paddy fields in the region provided habitat for a great diversity of wetland species, which have also drastically diminished since the 1960s. Nevertheless, studies suggest that waterlogged arable fields, including temporary pools and rice paddy fields even today can harbour many endangered plants (e.g. Elatine triandra, E. alsinastrum, E. hungarica, Lindernia procumbens, Alisma gramineum) and high species diversity, especially when the fields are cultivated less intensively (Lukács et al. 2013; Pinke et al. 2014). The weed vegetation of oil pumpkin fields in the region can be also remarkable, because it is often cultivated in “eco-friendly” ways. Even in conventional farms growers usually rely on mechanical weed management rather than herbicides. They regularly do not control weeds from midsummer, partly because they consider them beneficial, as they can provide some shelter from wind and heliosis for the ripening pumpkin fruits (Pinke et al. 2018). Although most of the weed flora are recruited from the commonest plants in these fields, they can possibly supply farmland birds with important seed food sources and cover (Fig. 6.9).
4 The Future of Arable Plant Habitats in Eastern Europe
Unfortunately, Eastern Europe lacks any conservation initiatives which directly target the preservation of rare and threatened arable weeds. Even in Poland, where scientists have payed attention to this issue for a long time (Dostatny 2004, Sicinski and Sieradzki 2010), the concepts of arable conservation areas in national and landscape parks, as well in botanical gardens and open air museums have still remained largely unimplemented proposals. In Hungary, the applied agri-environment schemes do contain certain elements that indirectly could be beneficial for the weed flora, although not directly targeted at these taxa. They include subsidies for long lasting green fallow as well as the bee-foraging margins and farmland bird protection zones (Sztahura and Rezneki 2015). Although these programs are benign in terms of arable plants, they are not focussing on the last remnants of the vanishing extensively managed fields, thus they fail to account for and preserve the most important “biodiversity hotspots” of rare and threatened arable weeds. Among the applied conservation options reviewed by Albrecht et al. (2016) the most appropriate way to save these habitats in Eastern Europe would be to create new programs similar to the German project “100 Fields for Diversity”, in which a sustainable network of sanctuaries for permanent conservation of endangered arable weed species is established through long lasting maintenance of extensive farming practices (Meyer et al. 2010) – see Chap. 5 in this volume. Finally, it should be noted again that agricultural biodiversity and its conservation strategies in Eastern Europe is also relatively under-represented in the international literature (Sutcliffe et al. 2015). In addition, the adopted western European type agri-environment schemes seem to be generally ineffective in this region and there is a great need for better locally adapted strategies (Babai et al. 2015; Sutcliffe et al. 2015; Reif and Hanzelka 2016; Spulerová et al. 2017). Sutcliffe et al. (2015) also emphasised that the biodiversity benefits for Europe of existing low-intensity farmland, particularly in the eastern states, should be harnessed before they are lost as they represent important biodiversity hotspots at the European scale. Instead of waiting for species-rich farmland to further decline, targeted research and monitoring to create locally appropriate conservation strategies for these habitats is needed now.
References
Albrecht H, Cambecèdes J, Lang M, Wagner M (2016) Management options for the conservation of rare arable plants in Europe. Bot Lett 163:389–415
Babai D, Tóth A, Szentirmai I et al (2015) Do conservation and agri-environmental regulations effectively support traditional small-scale farming in East-Central European cultural landscapes? Biodivers Conserv 24:3305–3327
Barina Z, Mullaj A, Pifkó D et al (2017) Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Albania. Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest
Batáry P, Dicks LV, Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2015) The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 29:1006–1016
Beaufoy G, Baldock D, Clark J (1994) The nature of farming: low intensity farming systems in nine European countries. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London
Bomanowska A (2010) Threat to arable weeds in Poland in the light of national and regional red lists. Plant Breed Seed Sci 61:55–74
Constantin I, Bauerkämper A (2013) The collectivization of agriculture in communist Eastern Europe: comparison and entanglements. CEU Press, Budapest
Dostatny DF (2004) Preservation of weed diversity in protected areas. Bull Bot Gard 13:79–83
Eliás P, Eliás P, Baranec T (2007) The new red list of Slovak endangered weeds. In: Proceedings of traditional agroecosystems – 1st international conference. Threatened Weedy Plant Species. Nitra, Slovakia, pp 23–28
Heller K (2010) “Flax specialists” – weed species extinct in Poland? Plant Breed Seed Sci 61:36–40
Hulina N (2005) List of threatened weeds in the continental part of Croatia and their possible conservation. Agric Conspec Sci 70:37–41
Kolarová M, Tyser L, Soukup J (2013) Impact of site conditions and farming practices on the occurrence of rare and endangered weeds on arable land in the Czech Republic. Weed Res 53:489–498
Kornas J (1961) The extinction of the association Sperguleto-Lolietum remoti in flax cultures in the Gorce (Polish Western Carpathian Mountains). Bulletin De L’Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Ser Sci Biol 9:37–40
Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Batáry P, Báldi A, Harnos A (2011) Interaction of local and landscape features in the conservation of Hungarian arable weed diversity. Appl Veg Sci 14:40–48
Lazarski G (2015) Scandix pecten-veneris L. (Apiaceae) in the Małopolska Upland (S Poland) – regional changes in the distribution and population resources of declining weed species. Biodivers Res Conserv 40:13–20
Loos J, Turtureanu PD, von Wehrden H et al (2015) Plant diversity in a changing agricultural landscape mosaic in Southern Transylvania (Romania). Agric Ecosyst Environ 199:350–357
Lososová Z (2003) Estimating past distribution of vanishing weed vegetation in South Moravia. Preslia 75:71–79
Lukács BA, Sramkó G, Molnár A (2013) Plant diversity and conservation value of continental temporary pools. Biol Conserv 158:393–400
Májeková J, Zaliberová M, Skodová I (2019) Weed vegetation of arable land in Slovakia: diversity and species composition. Acta Soc Bot Pol 88:3637
Mehmeti A, Demaj A, Waldhardt R (2009) Plant species richness and composition in the arable land of Kosovo. Landsc Online 11:1–29
Meyer S, Wesche K, Leuschner C et al (2010) A new conservation strategy for arable weed vegetation in Germany – the project “100 fields for biodiversity”. Plant Breed Seed Sci 61:25–34
Nagy K, Lengyel A, Kovács A et al (2018) Weed species composition of small-scale farmlands bears a strong crop-related and environmental signature. Weed Res 58:46–56
Nobis A, Nobis M, Urbisz A (2011) Lathyrus aphaca L.: the distribution, habitats and remarks on the status of the species in Poland. Acta Soc Bot Pol 80:237–244
Nowak A, Nowak S, Nobis M, Nobis A (2014) A report on the conservation status of segetal weeds in Tajikistan. Weed Res 54:635–648
Öllerer K (2013) On the spatio-temporal approaches towards conservation of extensively managed rural landscapes in Central-Eastern Europe. J Land Ecol 6:32–46
Pinke G (2004) Last occurrence of Caucalion species in North-Western Hungary. J Plant Dis Prot Spec Issue 19:73–82
Pinke G, Gunton RM (2014) Refining rare weed trait syndromes along arable intensification gradients. J Veg Sci 25:978–989
Pinke G, Pál R (2005) Gyomnövényeink eredete, termőhelye és védelme. Alexandra Kiadó, Pécs
Pinke G, Pál R (2009) Floristic composition and conservation value of the stubble-field weed community, dominated by Stachys annua in western Hungary. Biologia 64:279–291
Pinke G, Pál R, Schmidt D et al (2006) The current occurrences of Agrostemma githago in Hungary. Magyar Gyomkutatás és Technológia 7:63–81
Pinke G, Pál R, Botta-Dukát Z, Chytry M (2009) Weed vegetation and its conservation value in three management systems of Hungarian winter cereals on base-rich soils. Weed Res 49:544–551
Pinke G, Király G, Barina Z et al (2011) Assessment of endangered synanthropic plants of Hungary with special attention to arable weeds. Plant Biosyst 145:426–435
Pinke G, Csiky J, Mesterházy A et al (2014) The impact of management on weeds and aquatic plant communities in Hungarian rice crops. Weed Res 54:388–397
Pinke G, Karácsony P, Czúcz B, Botta-Dukát Z (2018) When herbicides don’t really matter: weed species composition of oil pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) fields in Hungary. Crop Prot 110:236–244
Reif J, Hanzelka J (2016) Grassland winners and arable land losers: the effects of post-totalitarian land use changes on long-term population trends of farmland birds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 232:208–217
Richner N, Holderegger R, Linder HP, Walter T (2015) Reviewing change in the arable flora of Europe: a meta-analysis. Weed Res 55:1–13
Sicinski J, Sieradzki J (2010) Protection of segetal flora and vegetation in Poland (historical outline). Plant Breed Seed Sci 61:123–131
Silc U, Lososová Z, Vrbnicanin S (2014) Weeds shift from generalist to specialist: narrowing of ecological niches along a north-south gradient. Preslia 86:35–46
Skrajna T, Kubicka H, Rzymowska Z (2012) Illecebrum verticillatum L. – endangered species in agrocenoses of eastern Poland: assessment of ecological and genetic indicators for protection goal. Pol J Ecol 60:577–589
Spulerová J, Bezák P, Dobrovodská M et al (2017) Traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia: why should we preserve them? Landsc Res 42:891–903
Storkey J, Moss SR, Cussans JW (2010) Using assembly theory to explain changes in a weed flora in response to agricultural intensification. Weed Sci 58:39–46
Storkey J, Meyer S, Still KS, Leuschner C (2012) The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:1421–1429
Sutcliffe LME, Batáry P, Kormann U et al (2015) Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland. Divers Distrib 21:722–730
Sztahura E, Rezneki R (2015) Agrár-környezet-gazdálkodás. Nemzeti Agrárgazdasági Kamara, Budapest
Vrbnicanin S, Stevanovic ZD, Radovanov KJ, Uludag A (2009) Weed vegetation of small grain crops in Serbia: environmental and human impacts. Turk J Agric For 33:325–337
Wegrzynek B, Nowak T (2010) Rare and endangered segetal weed species in the Silesian Upland (s Poland) recorded in the last twenty years. Plant Breed Seed Sci 61:75–84
Acknowledgments
The work of Gyula Pinke was supported by the EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00008 “Innovative Scientific Institutions in Domestic Agricultural Higher Education” project. The project is co-financed by the European Union and the European Social Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinke, G. (2020). The Status of Arable Plant Habitats in Eastern Europe. In: Hurford, C., Wilson, P., Storkey, J. (eds) The Changing Status of Arable Habitats in Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59875-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59875-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59874-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59875-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)