Skip to main content

The Proportions of the Addizione Erculea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Draw Connections

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 107))

  • 742 Accesses

Abstract

The Addizione Erculea, Duke Ercole I’s expansion of Ferrara, has been the subject of numerous studies from historical, artistic, and geometrical-compositional standpoints. The reasoning underlying its design has been researched by examining both modern and historic plans and maps and comparing them against the knowledge of the period. Rossetti’s great work of urban design can easily be studied based on the geometry of the axes, the layout of the city walls, and the points they connect. Nonetheless, the grandeur of the work implies an equally impressive capacity to govern the territory through the use of topographical (land surveying) and cadastral (land registry) tools: the geometry of lengths and angles, on the one hand, and the geometry of surface areas, on the other. While the logic behind the linear geometries has been linked in previous studies to cultural paradigms (such as astrological alignments and symbolic references), the geometries of the surface areas were more closely driven by the forces of the administration of justice, the economy, and politics. In light of this model, references to Pellegrino Prisciani’s Proportionabilis et commensurata designatio urbis and comparative studies between his rendering and the present layout of the historic center of Ferrara begin to take on new meanings. The aim of this study is to provide a new key to interpret the work of Biagio Rossetti and Pellegrino Prisciani, highlighting the geometrical and topographical expertise of these intellectual figures to whom Ercole I d’Este, the Duke of Ferrara, entrusted the expansion of the city. Together they succeeded in giving concrete form to their urban design in a way that maintained symbolic and cultural values while at the same time satisfying demands of an economic and political nature.

From a survey of the surface areas, a new contribution to the research on Biagio Rossetti’s urban planning project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Martini [1].

  2. 2.

    Ibid.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    It is hypothesized that “staio” as the name of a unit of area derives from an indication of the amount of land that could be sown with one staio (unit of volume) of grain. For an explanation of the units of measure used for surface areas in the late medieval and proto-Renaissance periods, see Bartoli [2].

  5. 5.

    Høyrup [3].

  6. 6.

    Bartoli [2, 4].

  7. 7.

    Prisciani [5].

  8. 8.

    For an analysis of Prisciani’s plan, see Folin [6]; Incerti [7]; For an analysis of the events surrounding the construction of the Addizione Erculea, see Folin [8].

  9. 9.

    The analysis was carried out on a re-elaboration of the original drawing, proportioned according to the graphic scale. To fill in a missing portion of the drawing due to the fold in the page, a portion of the “transcription” by Borgatti was inserted [9]. In particular it was possible to observe that in Borgatti’s re-elaboration of Prisciani’s plan, the grid was dimensioned so that it forms (where entirely present) squares, and that Piazza Nuova appears in this grid precisely in the portion not present in Prisciani’s original drawing. This was also highlighted by Folin [6], p. 113. The plausibility of Borgatti’s reconstruction can also be deduced from the imperfect alignment, in Prisciani’s plan, of all the lines that cross obliquely from one side of the parchment to the other. This series of discontinuities suggests the presence of an area that was absent from Prisciani’s original version.

  10. 10.

    The author would like to thank the State Archives of Modena, and specifically its director, Dr. Patrizia Cremonini, for the measurement.

  11. 11.

    The graphic scale on the parchment was also previously studied by Folin, who interpreted it as “circa 1:8000” [6].

  12. 12.

    Carta Tecnica Regionale, Emilia Romagna (scala 1:5000) or regional technical map.

  13. 13.

    The tower is visible in Prisciani’s plan and is represented as an interruption in the historical city walls in Borgatti’s reconstruction [9].

  14. 14.

    The position of Porta di San Benedetto was reconstructed by superimposing the present-day plan onto the historic one re-eleborated by Borgatti [9].

    In the latter it is possible to see the bastion that was incorporated by Rossetti’s defensive structure in the fifteenth century. The west side of the Addizione Erculea was reconstructed in the same way, tracing a line that links the Torrione del Barco, which still exists today, with Porta San Benedetto.

  15. 15.

    Beyond these geometrical figures, there remains a small section of walls that run from the present-day Punta della Giovecca to the Torrione di San Giovanni. What is visible today is the result of numerous adaptations that have taken place over the centuries and which have cast doubt on their attribution to Rossetti. Today its shape is similar to a triangle, with the base coinciding with the minor cathetus of the right triangle described above, and a height of approximately 30 pt. The area enclosed by this section is approximately 60 staia.

  16. 16.

    There is no such instrument in the treatises on the subject. However, it can be hypothesized that in order to carry out a land surveying operation of this size, an existing instrument was modified for the purpose.

  17. 17.

    The use of a drone made it possible to confirm that at present only trees obstruct the view of the walls from the vertex of the triangle.

  18. 18.

    A rapid calculation gives a hypothesis of the total length of walls necessary to enclose the Addizione Erculea, minus the already existing portion. Starting with the minor base of the trapezoid, which measures 320 pt, and adding the two legs, 220 pt each, plus the length of the minor cathetus of the first right triangle, which measures 260 pt (in any case equal to the sum of the two bases of the trapezoid), the result is a total of 1020 pt.

  19. 19.

    Zevi [10].

References

  1. Martini A (1820) Manuale di metrologia: ossia, Misure, pesi e monete in uso attualmente e anticamente presso tutti i popoli, Torino, Loescher, 1884. Tavole di ragguaglio diretta e inversa fra la misura di Ferrara e la Censuale, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartoli MT (2007) Musso e non quadro. La strana figura di Palazzo Vecchio dal suo rilievo. Edifir, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  3. Høyrup J (1995) Linee larghe, un’ambiguità geometrica dimenticata. Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche 15:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stroffolino D (1999) La città misurata. Tecniche e strumenti di rilevamento nei trattati a stampa del Cinquecento. Salerno Editrice, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prisciani P (1494) Proportionabilis et commensurata designatio urbis Ferrariae suburbiorumque et continentium aedificiorum priora etiam tempora respiciens, in IDEM, Historiae Ferrarienses, 1494–1495 circa. Archivio di Stato di Modena, Manoscritti della Biblioteca, 130:20v–21r

    Google Scholar 

  6. Folin M (2010) La Proportionabilis et commensurata designatio urbis Ferrariae di Pellegrino Prisciani (1494–1495). In: Folin M (ed) Rappresentare la città. Topografie urbane nell’Italia di antico regime. Reggio Emilia, Diabasis, pp 99–120

    Google Scholar 

  7. Incerti M (2015) Orientamenti e riti: le Addizioni Erculee di Ferrara (1492) e Modena (1546). In: Disegno & Città/Drawing & City. 37° Convegno Internazionale dei Docenti della rappresentazione—Dodicesimo Congresso UID, Torino, 17–18–19 Settembre 2015, pp 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  8. Folin M (2006) Un ampliamento urbano della prima età moderna: l’addizione erculea di Ferrara. In: Folin M (ed) Sistole/Diastole. Episodi di trasformazione urbana nell’Italia delle città, Venezia, Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere e Arti, pp 51–174

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borgatti Filippo (1895) La pianta di Ferrara nel 1597. Tip. Sociale, Ferrara

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zevi B (1960) Biagio Rossetti architetto ferrarese. Il primo urbanista moderno europeo. Einaudi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Giannetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giannetti, S. (2021). The Proportions of the Addizione Erculea. In: Bianconi, F., Filippucci, M. (eds) Digital Draw Connections. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59743-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59743-6_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59742-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59743-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics