Skip to main content

AIM and the Nexus of Security and Technology

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has played a key role in innovating modern medicine over the course of the twenty-first century. As a result, technology has greatly impacted and revolutionized the field of healthcare. However, despite all the progress that has been made by technology, it must be emphasized that with any form of new technology comes some degree of risk; whether this is from existing technology or from the emergence of future technologies. In order to highlight the security challenges that may derive from increased technological development, I will be drawing upon two prominent and relevant security issues. The first issue is the development and potential use of human enhancement technologies. It will be explored how the increase of enhancement technologies may lead to further issues and inequalities within society. Drawing from historical case-studies, it will be explicitly highlighted how the use of human enhancement technologies may lead to the irresponsible misuse of technology. To further highlight how technology can increase security risks, it will also be discussed how cyberattacks can impact the healthcare industry. Looking at the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) in healthcare, it will be analyzed how existing technologies can also increase security challenges. The overall purpose of this chapter is to highlight the symbiotic relation between technology and security and to further draw attention to prominent security threats in healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jack C. Top 6 AI breakthroughs in healthcare. https://www.docwirenews.com/docwire-pick/the-top-6-ai-breakthroughs-in-healthcare/. Accessed 11 Nov 2020.

  2. Fukuyama F. Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. London: Profile Books; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farber SA. US Scientists’ role in the Eugenics Movement (1907–1939): a contemporary biologists perspective. Zebrafish. 2008;5(4):243–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grodin MA, et al. The Nazi physicians as leaders in eugenics and “Euthanasia”: lessons for today. AJPH. 2018;108(1):53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Gobineau A. The inequality of human races (trans: Collins A). 1915; London: Heinemann. p. 205–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Medical experiments. 2020. https://www.ushmm.org/collections/bibliography/medical-experiments. Accessed 16 Nov 2020.

  7. Meyers W. The abuse of man: an illustrated history of dubious medical experimentation. New York: Ardor Scribendi Ltd; 2003. p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Interview with Mr. Rene Slotkin and Ms. Irene Hizme, 19th April 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kors E. This questionnaire with my personal answers (Candles Holocaust Museum and Education center). https://candlesholocaustmuseum.org/file_download/inline/2ffd2717-e5e9-4b64-9e92-5361aa0fcbc1. Accessed 27 Nov 2020.

  10. Blacker CP. Eugenic experiments conducted by the Nazis on human subjects. Eugen Rev. 1952;44:9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Agar N. Liberal eugenics: in defense of human enhancement. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raposo VL. The first Chinese edited babies: a leap of faith in science. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019;23(3):197–9. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190042. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724388/. Accessed 29 Nov 2020.

  13. Liang P, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human triponuclear zygotes. Protein Cell. 2015;6(5):363–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25894090/. Accessed 28 Nov 2020.

  14. New Scientist. What is CRISPR? https://www.newscientist.com/term/what-is-crispr/. Accessed 28 Nov 2020.

  15. NOVA PBS Official. September 9th 2020. The realities of Gene editing With CRSIPR | NOVA | PBS. YouTube Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8vi_PdGrKg. Accessed 16 Dec 2020.

  16. Boardman F. Human genome editing and the identity politics of genetics disability. J Community Genet. 2019;11:125–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shinozaki A. ‘Electronic medical records and machine learning in approaches to drug development. https://www.intechopen.com/books/artificial-intelligence-in-oncology-drugdiscovery-and-development/electronic-medical-records-and-machine-learning-in-approaches-to-drugdevelopment. Accessed 24 Dec 2020.

  18. Dash S, et al. Big Data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. J Big Data. 2019;6(54):2–25.

    Google Scholar 

  19. OECD. The impact of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the insurance sector. https://www.oecd.org/finance/The-Impact-Big-Data-AI-Insurance-Sector.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2020.

  20. Politico. Hackers seeks to extort Finnish Mental Health patients after data breach. https://www.politico.eu/article/cybercriminal-extorts-finnish-therapy-patients-in-shocking-attack-ransomwareblackmail-vastaamo/. Accessed 28 Dec 2020.

  21. Gromek M. Ransom Hackers in Finland are using psychotherapy medical record as ammunition. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michalgromek/2020/10/31/ransom-hackers-in-finland-are-usingpsychotherapy-medical-records-as-ammunition/?sh=98b22df2f2eb. Accessed 28 Dec 2020.

  22. Acronis International GmbH. The NHS Cyber Attack. https://www.acronis.com/en-gb/articles/nhs-cyberattack/. Accessed 29 Dec.

  23. The Economist. The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data. Accessed 30 Dec 2020.

  24. Conaty-Buck S. Cybersecurity and healthcare records: tips for ensuring patient safety and privacy. Am Nurse Today. 2017;12(9):62–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Guardian. Shocking hack of psychotherapy records in Finland affect thousands. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/26/tens-of-thousands-psychotherapy-records-hacked-infinland?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other. Accessed 2 Jan 2020.

  26. Martin G, et al. Cybersecurity and healthcare: how safe are we? BMJ. 2017;358:j3179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Coventry L, Branley D. Cybersecurity in healthcare: a narrative review of trends, threats and ways forward. Maturitas. 2018;113:48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen HS, et al. Blockchain in healthcare: a patient centered- model. Biomed J Sci Tec Res. 2019;20(3):15017–22.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Heer Kaur, K. (2021). AIM and the Nexus of Security and Technology. In: Lidströmer, N., Ashrafian, H. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58080-3_301-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58080-3_301-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58080-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58080-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    AIM and the Nexus of Security and Technology
    Published:
    16 September 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58080-3_301-2

  2. Original

    AIM and the Nexus of Security and Technology
    Published:
    06 August 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58080-3_301-1