Abstract
With a growing majority of the world’s population residing in cities, it is vital to advance a shift to low-emission urban mobility in order to mitigate climate change. Despite the fundamental role played by infrastructure, daily decisions and routines of individuals ultimately generate traffic. When people choose a conventionally fueled private car, it causes externalities detrimental for both individuals and the urban system as a whole: congestion, noise, greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution. Empirical studies show that the awareness of and exposure to those do not provide enough motivation for people to shift to more sustainable travel modes. Convenience overpowers environmental values. To break the habits and manage emissions, authorities must deploy incentives or sanctions – structural, regulative, economic, persuasive – that can increase the comparative advantage of low-carbon traffic modes. The potential of different initiatives to reduce traffic emissions is invaluable information for decision makers. Our contribution investigates the variety of possible ways to advance the desired shift, and highlights the importance, challenges, and key factors of high quality impact evaluations. A functional approach to test and evaluate traffic initiatives is multidisciplinary, with ways to quantify people’s behavior and preferences, traffic emerging from them, and the resulting atmospheric emissions. By shedding light on reliable approaches to reveal the real impacts of traffic initiatives, the efforts for climate change management may be reinforced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aittasalo M, Tiilikainen J, Tokola K, Suni J, Sievänen H, Vähä-Ypyä H, Vasankari T, Seimelä T, Metsäpuro P, Foster C, Titze S (2019) Socio-ecological natural experiment with randomized controlled trial to promote active commuting to work: process evaluation, behavioral impacts, and changes in the use and quality of walking and cycling paths. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(9):1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091661
Bachand-Marleau J, Lee BHY, El-Geneidy AM (2012) Better understanding of factors influencing likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use. Transp Res Rec 2314(1):66–71. https://doi.org/10.3141/2314-09
Bamberg S, Ajzen I, Schimdt P (2003) Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 25(3):175–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2593_01
Böcker L, Dijst M, Faber J (2016) Weather, transport mode choices and emotional travel experiences. Transp Res A Policy Pract 94:360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.021. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416306206
Brand C, Goodman A, Ogilvie D (2014) Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: a controlled longitudinal study. Appl Energy 128:284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.072. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914004358
Butterworth E, Pojani D (2018) Why isn’t Australia a cycling mecca? European Transport – Trasporti Europei 69
Croci E (2016) Urban road pricing: a comparative study on the experiences of London, Stockholm and Milan. Transp Res Proc 14:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05.062. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235214651630062X
de Souza AA, Sanches SP, Ferreira MA (2014) Influence of attitudes with respect to cycling on the perception of existing barriers for using this mode of transport for commuting. Proc Soc Behav Sci 162:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.12.191. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814062922
Diffenbaugh NS, Field CB, Appel EA et al. (2020) The COVID-19 lockdowns: a window into the Earth System. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1:470–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0079-1
Fearnley N (2013) Free fares policies: impact on public transport mode share and other transport policy goals. Int J Transp 1(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijt.2013.1.1.05
Fishman E (2016) Bikeshare: a review of recent literature. Transp Rev 34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ttrv20
Fishman E, Washington S, Haworth N (2014) Bike share’s impact on car use: evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transp Res D Transp Environ 31:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2014.05.013. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920914000480#b0165
Fujii S, Gärling T, Kitamura R (2001) Changes in drivers’ perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma. Environ Behav 33(6):796–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973241
Gärling T, Axhausen KW (2003) Introduction: habitual travel choice. Transportation 30(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021230223001
Graham-Rowe E, Skippon S, Gardner B, Abraham C (2011) Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transp Res A Policy Pract 45(5):401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2011.02.001. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856411000309
Guell C, Pantner J, Jones N, Ogilvie D (2012) Towards a differentiated understanding of active travel behaviour: using social theory to explore everyday commuting. Soc Sci Med 75(1):233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.038. http://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953612001700
Hackl R, Raffler C, Friesenecker M, Kramar H, Kalasek R, Soteropoulos A, Wolf-Eberl S, Posch P, Tomschy R (2019) Promoting active mobility: evidence-based decision-making using statistical models. J Transp Geogr 80:102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102541. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692318303077
Hatzopoulou M, Hao JY, Miller EJ (2011) Simulating the impacts of household travel on greenhouse gas emissions, urban air quality, and population exposure. Transportation 38(6):871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9362-9
Heinen E, van Wee B, Maat K (2010) Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp Rev 30(1):59–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903187001
Hensher DA, Ton TT (2000) A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 36(3):155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(99)00030-7
Hulkkonen M, Mielonen T, Prisle NL (2020) The atmospheric impacts of initiatives advancing shifts towards low-emission mobility: a scoping review. Sci Total Environ 713:136133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136133. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719361297
Hunecke M, Haustein S, Böhler S, Grischkat S (2010) Attitude-based target groups to reduce the ecological impact of daily mobility behavior. Environ Behav 42(1):3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319587
International Transport Forum (2017) ITF transport outlook 2017. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789282108000-en. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/transport/itf-transport-outlook-2017 9789282108000-en
IPCC (2014) In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York
Kaaronen RO, Strelkovskii N (2020) Cultural evolution of sustainable behaviors: pro-environmental tipping points in an agent-based model. One Earth 2(1):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332220300038
Karagulian F, Belis CA, Dora CFC, Prüss-Ustün AM, Bonjour S, Adair-Rohani H, Amann M (2015) Contributions to cities’ ambient particulate matter (PM): a systematic review of local source contributions at global level. Atmos Environ 120:475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2015.08.087. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231015303320
Kole PJ, Löhr AJ, Van Belleghem FG, Ragas AM (2017) Wear and tear of tyres: a stealthy source of microplastics in the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(10):1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101265
Lanzini P, Khan SA (2017) Shedding light on the psychological and behavioural determinants of travel mode choice: a meta-analysis. Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 48:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2017.04.020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847816302406?via%3Dihub
Leblanc R, Walker JL (2013) Which is the biggest carrot? Comparing non-traditional incentives for demand management. Transportation Research Board 92nd annual meeting, Washington, DC. http://connected-corridors.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Comparing Non-Traditional Incentives for Demand Management.pdf
Li W, Kamargianni M (2018) Providing quantified evidence to policy makers for promoting bike-sharing in heavily air-polluted cities: a mode choice model and policy simulation for Taiyuan-China. Transp Res A Policy Pract 111:277–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2018.01.019. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856417301003
Mateo-Babiano I (2016) Pedestrian’s needs matters: examining Manila’s walking environment. Transp Policy 45:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008
Matsumoto N, King P, Mori H (2007) Policies for environmentally sustainable transport. Int Rev Environ Strateg 7:97–116
Matthies E, Kuhn S, Klöckner CA (2002) Travel mode choice of women. Environ Behav 34(2):163–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034002001
Mei H, Poslad S, Du S (2017) A game-theory based incentive framework for an intelligent traffic system as part of a smart city initiative. Sensors 17(12):2874. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122874
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R (2011) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 6(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Nieuwenhuijsen M, Bastiaanssen J, Sersli S, Waygood EOD, Khreis H (2019) Implementing car-free cities: rationale, requirements, barriers and facilitators. In: Nieuwenhuijsen M, Khreis H (eds) Integrating human health into urban and transport planning: a framework. Springer, Cham, pp 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9
Poslad S, Ma A, Wang Z, Mei H (2015) Using a smart city IoT to incentivise and target shifts in mobility behaviour – is it a piece of pie? Sensors 15(6):13069–13096. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150613069. http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/6/13069
Pucher J, Dill J, Handy S (2010) Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev Med 50:S106–S125. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YPMED.2009.07.028. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743509004344#bib170
Riggs W (2017) Painting the fence: social norms as economic incentives to non-automotive travel behavior. Travel Behav Soc 7:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TBS.2016.11.004. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X16300357
Shaheen SA, Zhang H, Martin E, Guzman S (2011) China’s Hangzhou public bicycle: understanding early adoption and behavioral response to bikesharing. Transp Res Rec 2247(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.3141/2247-05
Song Y, Preston J, Ogilvie D (2017) New walking and cycling infrastructure and modal shift in the UK: a quasi-experimental panel study. Transp Res A Policy Pract 95:320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2016.11.017. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416301495
Spotswood F, Chatterton T, Tapp A, Williams D (2015) Analysing cycling as a social practice: an empirical grounding for behaviour change. Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 29:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2014.12.001. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847814001776?via%3Dihub
Steinbach R, Green J, Datta J, Edwards P (2011) Cycling and the city: a case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Soc Sci Med 72(7):1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2011.01.033. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611000785
Thøgersen J (2014) Social marketing in travel demand management. In: Gärling T, Ettema D, Friman M (eds) Handbook of sustainable travel. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7034-8
Thøgersen J, Møller B (2008) Breaking car use habits: the effectiveness of a free one-month travelcard. Transportation 35:329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9160-1
Tucker B, Manaugh K (2018) Bicycle equity in Brazil: access to safe cycling routes across neighborhoods in Rio de Janeiro and Curitiba. Int J Sustain Transp 12(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1324585
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018) World urbanization prospects, 2018 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). United Nations, New York. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
Wang L, Xu J, Qin P (2014) Will a driving restriction policy reduce car trips? – the case study of Beijing, China. Transp Res A Policy Pract 67:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.07.014. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856414001797
Wardman M, Tight M, Page M (2007) Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transp Res A Policy Pract 41(4):339–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2006.09.011. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856406001212
Weinberger R (2012) Death by a thousand curb-cuts: evidence on the effect of minimum parking requirements on the choice to drive. Transp Policy 20:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2011.08.002. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X11001028
Winslow J, Mont O (2019) Bicycle sharing: sustainable value creation and institutionalisation strategies in Barcelona. Sustainability 11(3):728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030728. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/728
Wright L, Fulton L (2005) Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transp Rev 25(6):691–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500360951
Wu Y, Yang Z, Lin B, Liu H, Wang R, Zhou B, Hao J (2012) Energy consumption and CO2 emission impacts of vehicle electrification in three developed regions of China. Energy Policy 48:537–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.05.060. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512004739
Zahabi SAH, Chang A, Miranda-Moreno LF, Patterson Z (2016) Exploring the link between the neighborhood typologies, bicycle infrastructure and commuting cycling over time and the potential impact on commuter GHG emissions. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 47:89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2016.05.008. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136192091630270X
Zhang D, Schmöcker JD, Fujii S, Yang X (2016) Social norms and public transport usage: empirical study from Shanghai. Transportation 43(5):869–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9625-y
Acknowledgments
M. Hulkkonen and N. L. Prisle gratefully acknowledge funding from the Academy of Finland program Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Physical Sciences and Engineering (AIPSE), Grant No. 316743. N. L. Prisle furthermore acknowledges funding from the Academy of Finland, Grant No. 308238. This research has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Project SURFACE (Grant Agreement No. 717022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hulkkonen, M., Prisle, N.L. (2021). Managing Urban Traffic Emissions with Focus on People and Atmospheric Impacts. In: Luetz, J.M., Ayal, D. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57280-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57281-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences