Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mathematical Clinamen in the Encyclopedic Novel: Pynchon, DeLillo, Wallace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics

  • 683 Accesses

Abstract

Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow, Don DeLillo’s Ratner’s Star, and David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest are examples of the encyclopedic novel: evoking the encyclopedia’s hermetically sealed vessel of knowledge while resisting and challenging ideas of epistemological totalisation. Moreover, rather than being hermetically sealed texts, these circling narratives encourage subsequent generative readings, emphasising their resistance to encircled totalisation and rectilinear determinism. This motion of resistance evokes the clinamen, the unexpected swerve of atoms that results from the inherent indeterminacy of the physical universe and, for Lucretius, a foundation for individual free will. Examining Pynchon, DeLillo and Wallace’s mathematical imagery (respectively, precession, reflection and inversion), this chapter explores how these authors activate the clinamen through mathematics as part of a liberating movement within an apparently closed literary system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernethy, Peter. 1972. “Entropy in Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49.” Critique: Studies in Modern Fiction 14 (2): 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Glen Scott. 1994. “Raids on the Conscious: Pynchon’s Legacy of Paranoia and the Terrorism of Uncertainty in Don DeLillo’s Ratner’s Star.” Postmodern Culture: An Electronic Journal of Interdisciplinary Criticism 4 (2): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn, Stephen J. 2012. David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest: A Reader’s Guide. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carus, Titus Lucretius. 1977. The Nature of Things. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, John L., and Wernder DePauli. 2001. Gödel: A Life of Logic, the Mind, and Mathematics. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Hilary. 1990. The Fictional Encyclopaedia: Joyce, Pound, Sollers. London: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, David. 1981. “Science and Arts in Pynchon’s ‘Entropy’.” CLA Journal 24 (1): 108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. “‘More Advanced the Deeper We Dig’: Ratner’s Star.” Modern Fiction Studies 45 (3): 600–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, Caleb. 2008. “The Great Postmodern Uncertainty That We Live In.” Steamboats Are Ruining Everything, September 14. steamthing.com/2008/09/the-great-postm.html.

  • ———. 2012. “Approaching Infinity.” In Conversations with David Foster Wallace, edited by Stephen J. Burn, 121–26. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. “Interview with David Foster Wallace, 17 October 2003, side 2.” Steamboats Are Ruining Everything, July 24. steamthing.com/2013/07/audio-files-of-my-2003-interview-with-david-foster-wallace.html.

  • DeLillo, Don. 1991. Ratner’s Star. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, Scott. 2010. “Resisting Totalizing Structures: An Aesthetic Shift in Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 and Gravity’s Rainbow.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 51 (3): 233–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, Nina. 2013a. “Formulas of Change, Alternative, and Fiction: Mathematics in Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow and Against the Day.” Variations 21: 131–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. “The Role of Mathematics in Modernist Utopia: Zamyatin’s We and Pynchon’s Against the Day.” In Utopianism, Modernism, and Literature in the Twentieth Century, edited by Alice Reeve-Tucker and Nathan Waddell, 130–47. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. “Gravity in Gravity’s Rainbow—Force, Fictitious Force, and Frame of Reference; or: The Science and Poetry of Sloth.” Orbit: Writing Around Pynchon 2: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, Nina, and Harald Engelhardt. 2018. “The Momentum of Pynchon’s Secret Formula: Gravity’s Rainbow’s Second Equation Between Archival Sources and Fiction.” Orbit: A Journal of American Literature 6 (1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Alan J., and Manfred Puetz. 1974. “Science as Metaphor: Thomas Pynchon and ‘Gravity’s Rainbow’.” Contemporary Literature 15 (3): 345–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Robert R. 1982. “A Talk with Don DeLillo.” The New York Times, October 10. nytimes.com/books/97/03/16/lifetimes/del-v-talk1982.html.

  • Hutcheon, Linda. 1988. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, Arthur. 1959. The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man’s Changing Vision of the Universe. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuusisto, Pekka. 2009. “Gregory Benford’s Against Infinity and the Literary, Historical and Geometric Formation of the Encyclopedic Circle of Knowledge.” In Science Fiction and the Two Cultures: Essays on Bridging the Gap Between the Sciences and the Humanities, edited by Gary Westfahl and George Slusser, 140–59. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClair, Tom. 1987. In the Loop: Don DeLillo and the Systems Novel. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letzler, David. 2015. “Crossed-Up Disciplinarity: What Norbert Wiener, Thomas Pynchon, and William Gaddis Got Wrong About Entropy and Literature.” Contemporary Literature 56 (1): 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, George. 1978. “V-2.” In Pynchon: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Edward Mendelson, 178–91. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, David. 2012. “The Lost Years and Last Days of David Foster Wallace.” In Conversations with David Foster Wallace, edited by Stephen J. Burn, 161–81. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, Anne. 1971. “Maxwell’s Demon, Entropy, Information: The Crying of Lot 49.” TriQuarterly 20: 194–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattessich, Stefan. 2002. Lines of Flight: Discursive Time and Countercultural Desire in the Work of Thomas Pynchon. London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, Larry. 2012. “An Expanded Interview with David Foster Wallace.” In Conversations with David Foster Wallace, edited by Stephen J. Burn, 21–52. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, Brian. 2000. “Mason & Dixon in the Zone, or, A Brief Poetics of Pynchon-Space.” In Pynchon & Mason & Dixon, edited by Brooke Horvath and Irving Malin, 43–62. Newark: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, Edward. 1976. “Encyclopedic Narrative: From Dante to Pynchon.” MLN 91 (6): 1267–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motte, Warren F., Jr. 1986. “Clinamen Redux.” Comparative Literature Studies 23 (4): 263–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, Katie. 2015. “Archival Report.” American Studies in Britain: The BAAS Newsletter. baas.ac.uk/muthfoundersaward2015.

  • Natalini, Roberto. 2013. “David Foster Wallace and the Mathematics of Infinity.” In A Companion to David Foster Wallace Studies, edited by Marshall Boswell and Stephen J. Burn, 43–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. “David Foster Wallace e la Matematica.” Lettera Matematica Pristem 95: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozier, Lance W. 1974. “Antipointsman/Antimexico: Some Mathematical Imagery in Gravity’s Rainbow.” Critique: Studies in Modern Fiction 16 (2): 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. “The Calculus of Transformation: More Mathematical Imagery in Gravity’s Rainbow.” Twentieth Century Literature 21 (2): 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perec, Georg, and Ewa Pawlikowska. 1983. “Entretien.” Littératures 7: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikulin, E.P., and Stanislav I. Pohozaev. 2001. Equations in Mathematical Physics: A Practical Course. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pynchon, Thomas. 1984. “Is It O.K. to Be a Luddite?” New York Times, October 28:1, 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. “Introduction.” In Slow Learner: Early Stories, 1–23. Boston: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Gravity’s Rainbow. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Against the Day. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Kenneth Ian Trevor. 1954. The Gyroscope Applied. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savet, Paul H. 1961. Gyroscopes: Theory and Design with Applications to Instrumentation, Guidance and Control. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachterle, Lance, and P. K. Aravind. 2000. “The Three Equations in Gravity’s Rainbow.” Pynchon Notes 46–49: 157–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed, David. 1981. “Order in Thomas Pynchon’s ‘Entropy’.” Journal of Narrative Technique 11 (2): 135–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverblatt, Michael. 1996. “David Foster Wallace: Infinite Jest.” In Bookworm. KCRW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sissman, L. E. 1973. “Heironymus and Robert Bosch: The Art of Thomas Pynchon.” The New Yorker, May 19: 138–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, Joseph W. 1974. Thomas Pynchon. New York: Warner Paperback Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, Steve. 2011. “The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon’s the Crying of Lot 49.” Interdisciplinary Literary Studies: A Journal of Criticism and Theory 13 (1–2): 160–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, David Foster. 1997. Infinite Jest. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. “Richard Taylor’s ‘Fatalism’ and the Semantics of Physical Modality.” In Fate, Time, and Language: An Essay on Free Will, edited by Steven M. Cahn and Maureen Eckert, 141–216. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Matthew. 1975. “The Quest for Pynchon.” Twentieth Century Literature 21 (3): 278–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnicki, Adrian. 2000–2001. “A Trove of New Works by Thomas Pynchon? Bomarc Service News Rediscovered.” Pynchon Notes 46–49: 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

    Stuart Taylor

Authors
  1. Stuart Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

    Robert Tubbs

  2. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

    Alice Jenkins

  3. Department for English Literatures, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Nina Engelhardt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Taylor, S. (2021). Mathematical Clinamen in the Encyclopedic Novel: Pynchon, DeLillo, Wallace. In: Tubbs, R., Jenkins, A., Engelhardt, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55478-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation