Skip to main content

The UNIDROIT Principles as Reference for the Uniform Interpretation of National Laws: Report on Hungarian Law

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Use of the UNIDROIT Principles to Interpret and Supplement Domestic Contract Law

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 51))

  • 452 Accesses

Abstract

The report is mainly based on the provisions of the new Hungarian Civil Code (hereafter HCC) which was enacted in 2013. The influence and inspiration of UPICC was expressly admitted by the Editorial Committee preparing the original draft of the HCC. The HCC Section on usages may become a gateway towards the inclusion of UPICC into contracts having an international dimension or can serve as an interpretative background. Despite of the above described influence of UPICC on law-making, we do not find express references to UPICC—as applicable rules of law or interpretative tool—in Hungarian jurisprudence. The HCC does not use expressly the term negotiations in bad faith, however it covers the situation described in UPICC. The HCC contains a general duty of good faith amongst its introductory provisions and the obligation to cooperate is a fundamental principle of contracts. There is a strong conceptual resemblance between UPICC and the HCC Section on standard contract terms becoming part of the contract. The HCC is less detailed on issues of interpretation, the UPICC may become an inspiring source of interpretation in this respect. Regarding the terms of payment of monetary debts, the approach of HCC is close to that of UPICC, focusing on the currency of the place for payment, although the Hungarian rules are again less detailed. The HCC does not use the concept of fundamental non-performance. However, the sophisticated rules of UPICC like the analysis whether the non-performance substantially deprives the aggrieved party of what it was entitled to expect under the contract could enrich Hungarian jurisprudence. Besides the general provisions on late payments there are special, stricter rules applicable to undertakings implementing Directive 2011/7/EU in HCC—demonstrating the strong impact of EU law in this field. Regarding the interest on damages HCC follows the same approach and leads to the same result as UPICC, however, it is necessary to take into consideration several provisions of HCC in order to establish this conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Act V of 2013.

  2. 2.

    Nemzetközi Kereskedelmi Szerződések Alapelvei (Principles of International Commercial Contracts) Budapest, Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, 1996. Fordította: Gehér József, Réczei László és Katona Péter.

  3. 3.

    Király (2014), p. 121.

  4. 4.

    Vékás (2008), p. 1281

  5. 5.

    Act LXXI of 1994 on Arbitration, Section 49 (1) “The arbitration tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordance with the provisions of the governing law selected by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute. Any designation of the law or legal system of a particular State shall be construed - unless the parties have agreed otherwise - as one referring to the law of the State in question, having a direct bearing on the points in issue.”

  6. 6.

    Act LX of 2017, Section 41 on the applicable law.

  7. 7.

    Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I).

  8. 8.

    This is clearly supported by Article 4 of Rome I Regulation, which provides rules on applicable law in the absence of choice, consequently refers to the “law of the country”.

  9. 9.

    Rome I Regulation, Preamble (13).

  10. 10.

    Vékás (2016) p. 380, p. 86. Referring to Court cases BH 2007. 48; BH 1997. 48.

  11. 11.

    Vékás and Gárdos (2014), p. 2587, p. 1392.

  12. 12.

    Vékás and Gárdos (2014), pp. 1416–1417.

  13. 13.

    Vékás (2016), p. 103.

  14. 14.

    Expert Proposal, 2008, p. 774. Similarly, Vékás and Gárdos (2014), p. 1424.

  15. 15.

    Vékás and Gárdos (2014), pp. 1422–1423.

  16. 16.

    Vékás (2016), p. 217.

  17. 17.

    Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions.

  18. 18.

    Vékás (2016), p. 240.

  19. 19.

    Vékás and Gárdos (2014), pp. 1416–1417.

References

  • Király M (ed) (2014) UNIDROIT Nemzetközi Kereskedelmi Szerződések Alapelvei, Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2010. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó Kft., Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Vékás L (2008) Szakértői Javaslat az új Polgári Törvénykönyv tervezetéhez (Expert Proposal to the New Hungarian Civil Code). Complex – Wolters Kluwer Group, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Vékás L (2016) Szerződési jog, Általános rész (Law of Contracts, General part) ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Vékás L, Gárdos P (2014) Kommentár a Polgári Törvénykönyvhöz, (Commentary to the Civil Code), Vol. 1–2. Wolters Kluwer, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miklós Király .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Király, M. (2021). The UNIDROIT Principles as Reference for the Uniform Interpretation of National Laws: Report on Hungarian Law. In: Garro, A., Moreno Rodríguez, J.A. (eds) Use of the UNIDROIT Principles to Interpret and Supplement Domestic Contract Law. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54322-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54322-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54321-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54322-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics