Abstract
This chapter discusses how a more evidence-based approach might be taken to co-production. It outlines a range of developments which mean that public policy and practice urgently require a richer knowledge base and suggests that a fuller understanding of co-production must embrace its key characteristics, namely that it is holistic, contextual, multi-faceted, bridge-building, creative, dynamic, complex, emergent, behaviour-influencing and tacitly understood. It summarises key research recommendations from each chapter of the Handbook, highlighting the potential for a long-term systematic research programme into weakly-evidenced aspects of co-production. It then outlines how co-production might be evaluated, focusing on the whole causal chain from co-production inputs to outcomes. Finally, it explores a more creative approach to this research agenda, incorporating action research and tapping of tacit knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2019). Good Economics for Hard Times: Better Answers to Our Biggest Problems. London, UK: Allen Lane.
Bovaird, T. (2012). Attributing outcomes to social policy interventions – ‘gold standard’ or ‘fool’s gold’ in public policy and management? Social Policy and Administration, 48(1): 1–23.
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23(4): 1119–1138.
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2016). Learning about public service co-production when real quality is that which lies beyond language and number. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. Washington, DC.
Freeden, M. (2019–2020). A new ideological era. RSA Journal (4): 22–27.
Garlatti, A., et al. (2018). Co-production and cost-efficiency: An awkward couple? A structured literature review. Paper presented at the International Symposium Resilience, Sustainability and Innovation in Public Services, Venice, 7th June 2018 (unpublished).
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2018). Assessing the effect of co-production on outcomes, service quality and efficiency. In Brandsen‚ T.‚ Steen‚ T. and Verschuere‚ B. (eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public service delivery. London: Routledge.
Oliver, K., Kothari, A., & Mays, N. (2019). The dark side of coproduction: Do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Policy and Systems Research 17, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
Pirsig, R. (1974). Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. London: The Bodley Head.
Pirsig, R. (1991). The Metaphysics of Quality. New York: Bantam Books.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Tisdall, C. (2014). “The Transformation of Services for Young People in Surrey County Council”, Governance International Case Study. https://www.govint.org/good-practice/case-studies/the-transformation-of-services-for-young-people-in-surrey-county-council/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E. (2021). Developing Evidence-Based Co-production: A Research Agenda. In: Loeffler, E., Bovaird, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53704-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53705-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)