Skip to main content

Developing Evidence-Based Co-production: A Research Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes

Abstract

This chapter discusses how a more evidence-based approach might be taken to co-production. It outlines a range of developments which mean that public policy and practice urgently require a richer knowledge base and suggests that a fuller understanding of co-production must embrace its key characteristics, namely that it is holistic, contextual, multi-faceted, bridge-building, creative, dynamic, complex, emergent, behaviour-influencing and tacitly understood. It summarises key research recommendations from each chapter of the Handbook, highlighting the potential for a long-term systematic research programme into weakly-evidenced aspects of co-production. It then outlines how co-production might be evaluated, focusing on the whole causal chain from co-production inputs to outcomes. Finally, it explores a more creative approach to this research agenda, incorporating action research and tapping of tacit knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2019). Good Economics for Hard Times: Better Answers to Our Biggest Problems. London, UK: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (2012). Attributing outcomes to social policy interventions – ‘gold standard’ or ‘fool’s gold’ in public policy and management? Social Policy and Administration, 48(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23(4): 1119–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2016). Learning about public service co-production when real quality is that which lies beyond language and number. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (2019–2020). A new ideological era. RSA Journal (4): 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlatti, A., et al. (2018). Co-production and cost-efficiency: An awkward couple? A structured literature review. Paper presented at the International Symposium Resilience, Sustainability and Innovation in Public Services, Venice, 7th June 2018 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2018). Assessing the effect of co-production on outcomes, service quality and efficiency. In Brandsen‚ T.‚ Steen‚ T. and Verschuere‚ B. (eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public service delivery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K., Kothari, A., & Mays, N. (2019). The dark side of coproduction: Do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Policy and Systems Research 17, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirsig, R. (1974). Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirsig, R. (1991). The Metaphysics of Quality. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, C. (2014). “The Transformation of Services for Young People in Surrey County Council”, Governance International Case Study. https://www.govint.org/good-practice/case-studies/the-transformation-of-services-for-young-people-in-surrey-county-council/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Bovaird .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E. (2021). Developing Evidence-Based Co-production: A Research Agenda. In: Loeffler, E., Bovaird, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics