Skip to main content

Constituting Vegetarian Audiences: Orchestrations of Egocentric, Anthropocentric, Ecocentric Exigencies in Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Veg(etari)an Arguments in Culture, History, and Practice

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series ((PMAES))

  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

Employing Jonathan Safran Foer’s bestseller Eating Animals as a case study, this chapter forwards the rhetorical technique of “orchestrated appeals,” as a persuasive strategy for communicating vegetarianism to potentially resistant audiences. Orchestration, an overlaying of egocentric, anthropocentric, and ecocentric appeals, addresses a seemingly singular issue like food choice from multiple perspectives. In Foer’s case, the argument for vegetarianism resonates more broadly by way of its connections to family, ethics, health, and the environment. By mapping the web of relationships between food and varied life areas, rhetors can identify with values already held by audiences with diverse ideological commitments and explore alignments between existing beliefs and exigencies for change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Marx specifically distinguishes between human and animal suffering when he defines alienation as an impoverishment of a human worker’s gattungswesen or “species being” (1994, 62–63).

  2. 2.

    Referred to as “the last poultry farmer” because he avoids the industrial model of selective breeding and antibiotic use.

Bibliography

  • Adams, Carol J. 1996. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Ira J. 2018. Composition Is the Ethical Negotiation of Fantastical Selves. College Composition and Communication 70 (2): 169–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, Erin. 2015. ‘Taste Analytically’: Julia Child’s Rhetoric of Cultivation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 45 (2): 164–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kenneth. 1937. Attitudes Toward History. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. A Rhetoric of Motives. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charland, Maurice. 1987. Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Quebecois. Quarterly Journal of Speech 73 (2): 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 2018. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Vol. 4. Frankfurt am Main: Outlook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, Doug. 2016. Communicating Climate Change to Religious and Conservative Audiences: The Case of Katherine Hayhoe and Andrew Farley. Reflections 16 (1): 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks, Philip. 2015. The Troubled Rhetoric and Communication of Climate Change. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foer, Jonathan Safran. 2009. Eating Animals. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. We Are the Weather: Saving the Planet Begins at Breakfast. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, Sonia K. 2018. Rhetorical Criticism. Long Grove: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Laura K., and Michael S. Bruner. 2012. Politics on Your Plate. In The Rhetoric of Food: Discourse, Materiality, and Power, ed. Joshua J. Frye and Michael S. Bruner, 42–57. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, Beth. 2015. To Meat or Not to Meat? An Analysis of On-line Vegetarian Persuasive Rhetoric. Poroi 11 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurafsky, Dan. 2014. The Language of Food: A Linguist Reads the Menu. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 2010. Why It Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication 4 (1): 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1994. In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, ed. Lawrence Simon. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, Alexis, Sarah K. Lingo, and Peter Royal. 2016. ‘The Worst Offense Here Is the Misrepresentation’: Thug Kitchen and Contemporary Vegan Discourse. In Critical Perspectives on Veganism, ed. Jodey Castricano and Rasmus R. Simonsen, 349–371. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quintillian, Marcus Fabius. 2001. Institutes of Oratory. In The Rhetorical Tradition, ed. Patricia Bizzell and Bruce Herzberg, 2nd ed., 364–428. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romo, Lynsey Kluever, and Erin Donovan-Kicken. 2012. ‘Actually, I Don’t Eat Meat’: A Multiple-Goals Perspective of Communication About Vegetarianism. Communication Studies 63 (4): 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Case for the Green New Deal. MSNBC. https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/the-case-for-the-green-new-deal-1468170819829. Last Modified 29 Mar 2019.

  • Waddell, Craig. 1994. Perils of a Modern Cassandra: Rhetorical Aspects. Social Epistemology 8 (3): 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Saving the Great Lakes: Public Participation in Environmental Policy. In Green Culture: Environmental Rhetoric in Contemporary America, ed. Carl G. Herndl and Stuart C. Brown, 141–165. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oren Abeles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abeles, O., Lozon, E. (2021). Constituting Vegetarian Audiences: Orchestrations of Egocentric, Anthropocentric, Ecocentric Exigencies in Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals. In: Hanganu-Bresch, C., Kondrlik, K. (eds) Veg(etari)an Arguments in Culture, History, and Practice. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53280-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics