Abstract
The Swedish government has been an ambitious contributor to the sustainability discourse. Especially in its attempts to make citizens aware of human-induced climate change, create compliance, and speed up solutions, notably by the commercialization of renewable energy technology. In this merger of ecological modernization and democratic deliberation, we investigate an implementation of the Triple and Quadruple Helix innovation models. Despite an inclusion of ‘civil society’ in the latter, we expose how the commercialization in these models fails to encompass sustainability, which has motivated a development of the so-called Quintuple Helix model. We contribute to this development by turning to posthuman theory, specifically the work of Karen Barad. We thus advance the Quintuple Helix and thereby align it more fully with calls for sustainability by a shift in focus, from ‘interactions’ to studies of ‘intra-actions’. Our shift questions what we find to be a rather too idealized, causal, and static innovation model, and lets us analytically affirm how an innovation and commercialization process unfolds through the human–non-human nexus. We conclude that our approach allows a better understanding of the non-linearity and uncertainty involved in the implementation of innovation systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Anshelm, Jonas, and Martin Hultman. 2014. Discourses of Global Climate Change: Apocalyptic Framing and Political Antagonisms. London: Routledge.
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28 (3): 801–831.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway, Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Brange, Lisa, Jessica Englund, and Patrick Lauenburg. 2016. “Prosumers in District Heating Networks–A Swedish Case Study.” Applied Energy 164: 492–500.
Carayannis, Elias G., and David F. J. Campbell. 2009. “‘Mode 3’and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3–4): 201–234.
Carayannis, Elias G., and David F. J. Campbell. 2010. “Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate to Each Other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology.” International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 1 (1): 41–69.
Carayannis, Elias G., and David F. J. Campbell. 2011a. “Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the ‘Mode 3’ Knowledge Production System.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2 (3): 327.
Carayannis, Elias G., and David F. J. Campbell. 2011b. “Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems.” In Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems, edited by Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell, 1–63. New York, NY: Springer.
Carayannis, Elias G., and Ruslan Rakhmatullin. 2014. “The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond.” Journal of Knowledge Economy 5 (2): 212–239.
Carayannis, Elias G., Thorsten D. Barth, and David F. J. Campbell. 2012. “The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as a Challenge and Driver for Innovation.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 1 (1): 2.
Darier, Éric, ed. 1999. Discourses of the Environment. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Erdős, Katalin, and Attila Varga. 2012. “The Academic Entrepreneur: Myth or Reality for Increased Regional Growth in Europe.” In Creative Knowledge Cities: Myths, Visions and Realities, edited by Marina van Geenhuizen and Peter Nijkamp, 157–181. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.
Etzkowitz, Henry. 2003. “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Social Science Information 42 (3): 293–337.
Etzkowitz, Henry, and Chunyan Zhou. 2017. The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London and New York: Routledge.
Felman, Shoshana. 2002. The Scandal of the Speaking Body. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fowler, Nina, Marcus Lindahl, and David Sköld. 2015. “The Projectification of University Research: A Study of Resistance and Accommodation of Project Management Tools & Techniques.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 8 (1): 9–32.
García-Terán, Jessica, and Annika Skoglund. 2018. “A Processual Approach for the Quadruple Helix Model: The Case of a Regional Project in Uppsala.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 10 (3): 1–25.
Grundel, Ida, and Margareta Dahlström. 2016. “A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-based Bioeconomy.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 7 (4): 963–983.
Gustavsson, Eva, Ingemar Elander, and Mats Lundmark. 2009. “Multilevel Governance, Networking Cities, and the Geography of Climate-Change Mitigation: Two Swedish Examples.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 (1): 59–74.
Helin, Jenny, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth, and Robin Holt. 2015. “Process Is What Process Does.” In The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies, edited by Jenny Helin, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth, and Robin Holt, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hildingsson, Roger. 2010. “The Deliberative Turn in Swedish Sustainability Governance: Participation from Below or Governing from Above?” In Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy, Examining the Promises of New Modes of Governance, edited by Karin Bäckstrand, Jamil Khan, Annica Kronsell, and Eva Lövbrand, 145. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.
Hock Heng, Low, Nuratika Fatima Mohd Othman, Amran Mohammed Rasli, and Muhammad Jawad Iqbald. 2012. “Fourth Pillar in the Transformation of Production Economy to Knowledge Economy.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 40: 530–536.
Hoggett, Paul. 2011. “Climate Change and the Apocalyptic Imagination.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 16 (3): 261–275.
Höijer, Birgitta 2010. “Emotional Anchoring and Objectification in the Media Reporting on Climate Change.” Public Understanding of Science 19 (6): 717–731.
Holford, David 2013. “Boundary (Re-)Constructions as Human-Nonhuman Intra-actions Within the Workplace.” International Journal of Business Anthropology 4 (1): 15–37.
Hulme, Mike 2008. “The Conquering of Climate: Discourses of Fear and Their Dissolution.” The Geographical Journal 174 (1): 5–16.
Iedema, Rick. 2007. “On the Multi-modality, Materiality and Contingency of Organizational Discourse.” Organization Studies 28 (6): 931–946.
Langlais, Richard. 2009. “Swedish Municipal Responses to Climate Change.” In Planning for Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners, edited by Simin Davoudi, Jenny Crawford, and Abid Mehmood, 262. London: Routledge.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lee, Young Hoon, and Young Jun Kim. 2016. “Analyzing Interaction in R&D Networks Using the Triple Helix Method: Evidence from Industrial R&D Programs in Korean Government.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 110: 93–105.
Leydesdorff, Loet. 2010. “The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?” Journal of Knowledge Economy 3: 25–35.
Lindgren, Monica, and Johann Packendorff. 2002. “Interactive Entrepreneurship: On the Study of Innovative Social Processes.” EURAM 2nd Annual Conference: Innovative Research in Management, 9–11 May 2002, Stockholm School of Entrepreneurship, Sweden.
Naturvetarna. 2019. “Jobba för Klimatet i Stället för att Strejka.” https://www.naturvetarna.se/vi-erbjuder/tidning-och-nyheter/2019/agera-for-klimatet-i-stallet-for-att-strejka/.
Newell, Peter. 2020. “The Business of Rapid Transition.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change: e670.
Nyberg, Daniel. 2009. “Computers, Customer Service Operatives and Cyborgs: Intra-actions in Call Centres.” Organization Studies 30 (11): 1181–1199.
Öhrlund, Isak, Mårten Schultzberg, and Cajsa Bartusch. 2019. “Identifying and Estimating the Effects of a Mandatory Billing Demand Charge.” Applied Energy 237: 885–895.
Packer, Jeremy, and Stephen B. Crofts Wiley, eds. 2012. Communication Matters: Materialist Approaches to Media, Mobility and Networks. New York: Routledge.
Peris-Ortiz, Marta, Jõao J. Ferreira, Luís Farinha, and Nuno O. Fernandes, eds. 2016. Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness. Cham: Springer.
Ringrose, Jessica, and Victoria Rawlings. 2015. “Posthuman Performativity, Gender and ‘School Bullying’: Exploring the Material-discursive Intra-actions of Skirts, Hair, Sluts, and Poofs.” Confero 3 (2): 80–119.
Sarpong, David, Azley Abd Razak, Elizabeth Alexander, and Dirk Meissner. 2017. “Organizing Practices of University, Industry and Government That Facilitate (or Impede) the Transition to a Hybrid Triple Helix Model of Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 123: 142–152.
Shotter, John. 2006. “Understanding Process From Within: An Argument for ‘Withness’-Thinking.” Organization Studies 27 (4): 585–602.
Shotter, John. 2013. “Reflections on Sociomateriality and Dialogicality in Organization Studies: from ‘Inter-’ to ‘Intra-thinking’… in Performing Practices.” In How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies, 32–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steiber, Annika, and Sverker Alänge. 2013. “The Formation and Growth of Google: a Firm-Level Triple Helix Perspective.” Social Science Information 52 (4): 575–604.
Steyaert, Chris 1997. “A Qualitative Methodology for Process Studies of Entrepreneurship: Creating Local Knowledge Through Stories.” International Studies of Management & Organization 27 (3): 13–33.
Thunberg, Greta. 2019. “Sweden Is Not a Role Model,” translated into English by We Don’t Have Time.
Tsoukas, Haridimos, and Robert Chia. 2002. “On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change.” Organization Science 13 (5): 567–582.
Uggla, Ylva. 2008. “Strategies to Create Risk Awareness and Legitimacy: The Swedish Climate Campaign.” Journal of Risk Research 11 (6): 719–734.
Wittneben, B. F. Bettina, Chukwumerije Okereke, Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee, and David L. Levy. 2012. “Climate Change and the Emergence of New Organizational Landscapes.” Organization Studies 33 (11): 1431–1450.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skoglund, A., García-Terán, J. (2020). Public Participation and Intra-Actions in the Swedish Energy Transition. In: Shabliy, E.V., Kurochkin, D., Crawford, M.J. (eds) Discourses on Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53121-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53121-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53120-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53121-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)