Skip to main content

Accessing Academic Citizenship: Excellence or Micropolitical Practices?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gendered Academic Citizenship

Part of the book series: Citizenship, Gender and Diversity ((FEMCIT))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the concept of ‘academic excellence’, analysing its repercussions for academic citizenship. It challenges assumptions about the universal and objective nature of excellence and highlights the importance of informal power relations in the definition of ‘excellence’ as a meritocratic metric. Based on data from three empirical studies, the chapter identifies four micropolitical practices in relation to ‘academic excellence’, including: procedural subversion and selective gender blindness; gendered devaluation and stereotypes; relational practices involving sponsorship by individual power holders and, finally, inbreeding favouring ‘insiders’. Micropolitical practices reflect the operation of informal power and arise in a context where constructions of excellence are neither as universal nor as objective as they are depicted. Finally it recognises that academic citizens are not de-gendered automatons that exist outside informal power, but agents with identities and interests who engage in everyday practices with consequences for access to academic citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class and Race in Organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlqvist, V., Andersson, J., Hahn Berg, C., Kolm, C., Söderqvist, L., & Tumpane, J. (2013). Jämställdhetsobservationer i ett urval av vetenskapsrdets beredningsgrupper 2012 [Observations on Gender Equality in a Selection of the Swedish Research Council’s Evaluation Panels]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet. www.vr.se/nyheterpress/nyheter2013/jamstalldhetsobservationerietturvalavvetenskapsradetsberedningsgrupper2012.5.7e727b6e141e9ed702b2b90.html.

  • Anninos, L. N. (2014). Research Performance: Some Critical Thoughts on Standard Bibliometric Indicators. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9), 1542–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1987). The Micropolitics of the School: Towards a Theory of School Organization. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2004). Beyond All Reason: Living with Ideology in the University. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzanell, P. M., & D’Enbeau, S. (2009). Stories of Caregiving: Intersections of Academic Research and Women’s Everyday Experiences. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(7), 1199–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P. (2018). Editorial. Nature, 554, 403–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power. Blackwell: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2010). Mobility Versus Job Stability: Assessing Tenure and Productivity Outcomes. Research Policy, 39, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., Thiele, B., & Harris, P. (2002). Gendered Universities in Globalised Economies. Oxford: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hilliard, S., & Reed, M. (2008). Knowledge, Higher Education and the New Managerialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J., & Binns, J. (2018). Sponsorship: Creating Career Opportunities for Women in Higher Education. Universities Australia Executive Women (UAEW). Canberra, ACT, Australia. https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/UAEW/SponsorGuide. Accessed 17 December 2018.

  • Eagly, A. H. (2011 [2007]). Female Leadership Advantage and Disadvantage: Resolving the Contradictions. In D. Collinson, K. Grint, & B. Jackson (Eds.), Leadership: Volume 4, 2005–2009 (pp. 251–271). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2004). Gender and Excellence in the Making. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/bias_brochure_final_en.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2014.

  • ETAN. (2000). Science Policies in the European Union: Promoting Excellence Through Mainstreaming Gender Equality. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2016). She Figures, 2015: Gender in Research and Innovation, Statistics and Indicators. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/she_figures_2015-final.pdf.

  • EU. (2019). She Figures, 2018: Gender in Research and Innovation, Statistics and Indicators. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/she-figures-2018_en.

  • Ferretti, F., Guimaraes Pereira, A., Vertesy, D., & Hardeman, S. (2018). Research Excellence Indicators: Time to Reimagine the ‘Making of’. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scho.

  • Grummell, B., Lynch, K., & Devine, D. (2009). Appointing Senior Managers in Education: Homosociability, Local Logics and Authenticity in the Selection Process. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 37(3), 329–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson, M. (2005). The Impact of Gender on Citations: An Analysis of College and Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship and Library Quarterly. College Research Library, 66(4), 312–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2015). (Ed.). Introduction: The Geopolitics of Rankings. In Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World Class Excellence (2nd ed., pp. 1–20). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husu, L. (2014). Research Funding Gap: Her Excellence Dwarfed by His Excellence. http://euroscientist.com/2014/06/research-funding-gap-excellence-dwarfed-excellence/.

  • Ibarra, H., Carter, N., & Silva, C. (2010). Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, J. (2015). In the Wings and Backstage: Exploring the Micropolitics of Leadership in Higher Education. London: Leadership Foundation: Research and Development Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, J. (2018, April 2). Leadership and Power in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1619–1629. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1458221.

  • Lynch, K. (2014). New Managerialism: The Impact on Education. Concept, 5(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K., Gummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New Managerialism in Education: Commercialisation, Carelessness and Gender. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, F. (2011). Conclusion: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. In M. L. Krook & F. Mackay (Eds.), Gender, Politics and Institutions (pp. 81–196). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, F., Kenny, M., & Chappell, L. (2010). New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. International Political Science Review, 31(5), 573–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie Davey, K. (2008). Women’s Accounts of Organisational Politics as a Gendering Process. Gender, Work and Organisation, 15(6), 650–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2003). ‘Said and Done’ ‘Versus’ ‘Saying and Doing’: Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work. Gender and Society, 17(3), 342–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practicing Gender at Work: Further Thoughts on Reflexivity. Gender Work and Organization, 13(3), 254–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montes Lopez, E., & O’Connor, P. (2019). Micropolitics and Meritocracy: Improbable Bedfellows. EMAL, 47(5), 678–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L. (1999). Organising Feminisms: The Micropolitics of the Academy. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, W. M. (2016). Limits to Meritocracy? Gender in Academic Recruitment and Promotion Processes. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 386–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir, A. E., & Zilberstein-Levy, R. (2006). Planning for Academic Excellence: Tenure and Professional Considerations. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 537–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (2014). Management and Gender in Higher Education. Manchester: MUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (2018). Gender Imbalance in Senior Positions: What Is the Problem? What Can be Done? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(1), 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P., & Fauve-Chamoux, A. (2016). European Policies and Research Funding: A Case Study of Gender Inequality and Lack of Diversity in a Nordic Research Programme. Policy and Politics, 44(4), 627–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P., Montez López, E., O’ Hagan, C., Wolffram, A., Aye, M., Chizzola, V., et al. (2017). Micropolitical Practices in Higher Education: A Challenge to Excellence as a Rationalising Myth? Critical Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1381629.

  • O’Connor, P., & O’Hagan, C. (2016). Excellence in University Academic Staff Evaluation: A Problematic Reality? Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1943–1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P., O’Hagan, C., Myers, E. S., Baisner, L., Apostolov, G., Topuzova, I., et al. (2019). Mentoring and Sponsorship in Higher Education Institutions: Men’s Invisible Advantage in STEM? Higher Education Research and Development, 39 (4), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-González, L. E., Metcalfe, A. S., Galaz-Fontes, J. F., Fisher, D., & Snee, I. (2011). Gender Gaps in North American Research Productivity: Examining Faculty Publication Rates in Mexico, Canada and the US. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(5), 649–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio, B. (2010). Vertical Segregation and Gender Practices: Perspectives of Analysis and Action. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25(6), 428–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • QS. (2017). World University Rankings 2016–17. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2016.

  • Ramirez, F. O., & Tiplic, D. (2014). In Pursuit of Excellence? Discursive Patterns in European Higher Education Research. Higher Education, 67, 439–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B. J., & Davis, G. (2013). From Sex Roles to Gender Structure. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 733–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. D., & Sonnert, G. (2010). The Costs and Benefits of ‘Red Tape’: Anti-bureaucratic Structure and Gender Inequity in a Science Research Organization. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 385–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2012). Managerialism Rhetorics in Portuguese Higher Education. Minerva, 50, 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz-Menéndez, L., Cruz-Castro, L., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Time to Tenure in Spanish Universities: An Event History Analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077028.

  • Sax, L., Hagerdon, L., Arrendondo, M., & DiCrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty Research Productivity: Exploring the Role of Gender and Family Related Factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, S. (2018). Managerialism: An Ideal Type. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1668–1678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teelken, C., Taminiau, Y., & Rosenmoller, C. (2019). Career Mobility from Associate to Full Professor in Academia: Micropolitical; Practices and Implicit Gender Stereotypes. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1655725.

  • Vabø, A., Padilla-González, L., Waagene, E., & Næss, T. (2014). Gender and Faculty Internationalization. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (2018, October 11). Two Nobels for Women-why so Slow? Nature, 562, 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Arensbergen, P., van Der Weijden, I., & van Den Besselaar, P. (2014). Different Views on Scholarly Talent: What Are the Talents We Are Looking for in Science? Research Evaluation, 23, 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Brink, M. (2010). Behind the Scenes of Science: Gender Practices in Recruitment and Selection of Professors in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs. Organisation, 19(4), 507–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Cupeiro, S., & Elston, M. A. (2006). Gender and Academic Career Trajectories in Spain: From Gendered Passion to Consecration in a sistema endogámico? Employee Relations, 28(6), 588–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verge, T., Ferrer-Fons, M., & Gonzalez, M. J. (2018). Resistance to Mainstreaming Gender into the Higher Education Curriculum. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettese, T. (2019). Sexism in the Academy. Head Case, 34 n+1. Spring. https://nplusonemag.com/issue-34/essays/sexism-in-the-academy/.

  • Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and Sexism in Peer Review. Nature, 387(6631), 341–343. http://sciencethatmatters.com/wp,content/uploads/2007/04/wenneras97nepotism.pdf.

  • White, K. (2014). Keeping Women in Science. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, J. (2005). Crimes Against Logic. London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolffram, A., Aye, M., Apostolov, G,. Andonova, S., O’Hagan, C., O’Connor, P., et al. (2015). Perceptions of Excellence in Hiring Processes. FESTA. http://www.festa-europa.eu.

  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence About an Old Puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63, 847–870.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for the cross-national FESTA project was provided by the EC Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: Grant number 287,526. The Riksbankens Jubileumsfond: the Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences, Stockholm funded the Nordic Spaces evaluation. The Spanish study received financial support from the University of Salamanca through a research grant to Estrella Montes Lopez. The contributions of all those involved in these projects are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pat O’Connor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Connor, P. (2020). Accessing Academic Citizenship: Excellence or Micropolitical Practices?. In: Sümer, S. (eds) Gendered Academic Citizenship. Citizenship, Gender and Diversity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52600-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52600-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52599-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52600-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics