Skip to main content

On Distributive Join Semilattices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Algebraic Perspectives on Substructural Logics

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 55))

Abstract

Motivated by Gentzen’s disjunction elimination rule in his Natural Deduction calculus and reading inequalities with meet in a natural way, we conceive a notion of distributivity for join semilattices. We prove that it is equivalent to a notion present in the literature. In the way, we prove that all notions of distributivity for join semilattices we have found in the literature are linearly ordered. We finally consider the notion of distributivity in join semilattices with arrow, that is, the algebraic structure corresponding to the disjunction-conditional fragment of intuitionistic logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A non-empty set I of a meet semillatice is called strong ideal if for any finite subset \(S \subseteq I\), it holds that \(S^{ul} \subseteq I\).

  2. 2.

    Note that the original Hickman’s statement can be misleading since the condition “there exists \((x \wedge a_1) \vee (x \wedge a_2) \vee \cdots \vee (x \wedge a_n)\)” is missing.

  3. 3.

    We thank the author of this PhD thesis for communicating this example.

  4. 4.

    We thank the referee for pointing out this short proof.

References

  1. R. Balbes, A representation theory for prime and implicative semilattices. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 136, 261–267 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Bezhanishvili, R. Jansana, Duality for distributive and implicative semilattices. Preprints of University of Barcelona, Research Group in Non-Classical Logics (2008). http://www.ub.edu/grlnc/docs/BeJa08-m.pdf

  3. I. Chajda, J. Rachůnek, Forbidden configurations for distributive and modular ordered sets. Order 5, 407–423 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Chajda, R. Halaš, J. Kühr, Semilattice Structures. Research and Exposition in Mathematics, vol. 30 (Heldermann Verlag, Lemgo, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Chajda, H. Länger, Relatively pseudocomplemented posets. Math. Bohem. 89–97 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Gentzen, Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen I. Math. Z. 39, 176–210 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. González, Topological dualities and completions for (distributive) partially ordered sets. PhD Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Grätzer, Lattice Theory: Foundation (Springer/Birkhäuser, Berlin, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Grätzer, E. Schmidt, On congruence lattices of lattices. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 13, 179–185 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Halaš, Pseudocomplemented ordered sets. Arch. Math. (Brno) 29, 153–160 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hickman, Mildly distributive semilattices. J. Aust. Math. Soc. (Ser. A) 36, 287–315 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Katriňák, Pseudokomplementäre Halbverbände. Mat. Časopis 18, 121–143 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Kearns, The class of prime semilattices is not finitely axiomatizable, Semigroup Forum, vol. 55 (1997), pp. 133–134

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Larmerová, J. Rachůnek, Translations of distributive and modular ordered sets. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc. Fac. Rerum Nat. Math. XXVII(91), 13–23 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Rachůnek, A characterization of o-distributive semilattices. Acta Sci. Math. 54, 241–246 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Schein, On the definition of distributive semilattices. Algebr. Univers. 2, 1–2 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Serra Alves, Distributivity and wellfounded semilattices. Port. Math. 52(1), 25–27 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Shum, M. Chan, C. Lai, K. So, Characterizations for prime semilattices. Can. J. Math. 37(6), 1059–1073 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Skolem, Untersuchungen über die Axiome des Klassenkalküls und über Produktations- und Summationsprobleme, welche gewisse Klassen von Aussagen betreffen. Skr. Utg. Videnskapsselsk. Kristiania I Mat.-Naturvidenskabelig Kl. 3, 1–37 (1919)

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Skolem, in Selected Works in Logic, ed. by J.E. Fenstad (Universitetforlaget, Oslo, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous referee for his/her helpful comments. They also acknowledge partial support by the H2020 MSCA-RISE-2015 project SYSMICS. Esteva and Godo also acknowledge the FEDER/MINECO project RASO (TIN2015-71799-C2-1-P).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodolfo C. Ertola-Biraben .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ertola-Biraben, R.C., Esteva, F., Godo, L. (2021). On Distributive Join Semilattices. In: Fazio, D., Ledda, A., Paoli, F. (eds) Algebraic Perspectives on Substructural Logics. Trends in Logic, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52163-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics