Abstract
This chapter combines sociological and International Relations (IR) approaches in order to show how IR thinking redirects the researcher’s attention to actors, venues, and processes that might otherwise remain neglected. One version of a classic IR approach would focus on the way in which states interact within international organizations in order to globalize their domestically produced definitions and measures. State power in the definition and management of global problems might prove to be one way in which powerful states reimagine and rule the world. This chapter explores the identity of the actors and the types of processes and venues which are involved in the social construction of problems in a global setting. It provides an invitation to give back strong importance to IR scholarship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2002). Values and interests: International legalization in the fight against corruption. Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), 141–178.
Andreas, P., & Nadelmann, E. (2006). Policing the globe: Criminalization and crime control in international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barkin, J. S. (2003). Realist constructivism. International Studies Review, 5(3), 325–342.
Barkin, J. S. (2011). Realist constructivism: Rethinking international relations theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartley, T. (2007a). How foundations shape social movements. The Construction of an organisational field and the rise of forest certification. Social Problems, 54(3), 229–255.
Bartley, T. (2007b). Institutional emergence in an era of Globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2), 297–351.
Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Becker, H. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.
Berny, N. (2008). Le Lobbying des ONG Internationales d’environnement à Bruxelles. Revue Française de Science Politique, 58(1), 97–121.
Best, J. (Ed.). (2001). How Claims Spread: Cross-National Diffusion of Social Problems. New-York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Blanchard, O., & Jaumotte, F. (2013). Labor market policies and IMF advice in advanced economies during the great recession. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, Research Department.
Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18(3), 298–306.
Boli, J., & Thomas, G. (1997). World culture in the world Polity. A century of international non governmental organisations. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 171–190.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Deux impérialismes de l’universel. In C. Fauré & T. Bishop (Eds.), L’Amérique des français (pp. 149–155). Paris: François Bourin.
Braun, D., & Gilardi, F. (2006). Taking ‘Galtung’s problem’ seriously: Towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3), 298–322.
Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation in the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cîrstocea, I., Lacombe, D., & Marteu, E. (Eds.). (2017). La globalisation du genre: mobilisation, cadres d’action, savoirs. PUR, Archives du Féminisme: Rennes.
Culpepper, P. (2011). Quiet politics and business Power. Corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Dale, R. (2001). Constructing a long spoon: Charting the carreer of the ‘New Zealand model’. Comparative Education, 37(4), 493–500.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Engeli, I., Green-Pedersen, C., & Thorup-Larsen, L. (2012). Morality politics in Western Europe. Parties, agendas and policy choices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391–416.
Freudenburg, W. (2000). Social constructions and social constrictions: Toward analyzing the social construction of ‘the naturalized’ as well as ‘the natural’. In G. Spaargaren, A. P. G. Mol, & F. G. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and global modernity (pp. 103–119). London: Sage.
Gali, J., & Blanchard, O. (2010). Labor markets and monetary Policy: A new Keynesian model with unemployment. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 1–30.
Gilardi, F. (2012). Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 453–477). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
GlobeScan. (2011). Unemployment rises as ‘Most talked-about’ problem: Global poll. http://www.globescan.com/news-and-analysis/press-releases/press-releases-2011/94-press-releases-2011/126-unemployment-rises-as-qmost-talked-aboutq-problem-global-poll.html. Accessed 25 November 2018.
Glynn, J., Hohm, C., & Glenn, J. (1997). Global social problems. Reading, Addison: Wesley Longman.
Gopalan, S. (2008). A demandeur-centric approach to regime design in transnational commercial law. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 39(2), 22–51.
Gusfield, J. (1963). Symbolic crusades. Status politics and the American temperance movement. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public Problems. Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796.
Jaffee, D. (2012). Weak coffee: Certification and co-optation in the fair trade movement. Social Problems, 59(1), 94–116.
Jakobi, A. (2013). Common goods and evils: The formation of global crime governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jenness, V. (1990). From sex as sin to sex as work. COYOTE and the reorganization of prostitution as a social problem. Social Problems, 37, 403–420.
Katzarova, E. (2018). The social construction of global corruption: From utopia to neoliberalism. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Katzarova, E., & Ansart, J. (2020). The Americanization of anti- corruption law: The influence of the FCPA on the OAS and OECD conventions. In R. Bismuth, et al. (Eds.), The transnationalization of anti-corruption law. Brussels: Bruylant.
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New-York: Harper and Collins.
Kott, S. (Ed.). (2011). Une autre approche de la globalisation: socio-histoire des organisations internationales (1900–1940) [Numéro spécial]. Critique Internationale, 3(52).
Latour, B. (1984). Les microbes. Guerre et Paix. Paris: AM Metailié.
Lawson, G., & Shilliam, R. (2010). Sociology and international relations: Legacies and prospects. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(1), 69–86.
Linders, A. (1998). Abortion as a social problem: The construction of “opposite” solutions in Sweden and the United States. Social Problems, 45(4), 488–509.
Lippert, R. (1990). The construction of Satanism as a social problem in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 15(4), 417–439.
Liu, D. (2006). When do national movements adopt or reject International agendas. A comparative analysis of the Chinese and Indian Women’s movement. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 921–942.
Mazur, A. (1991). Global social problems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
McCoy, J. L., & Heckel, H. (2001). The emergence of a global anti-corruption norm. International Politics, 38(1), 65–90.
Meyer, D., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, counter-movements and the structure of political opportunities. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1628–1660.
Michel, H. (2006). Lobbyistes et lobbying de l’Union Européenne. Strasbourg: PUS.
Morley, D. (2017). Communication and mobility the Migrant, the mobile phone and the container-box. London: Willey-Blackwell.
Najam, A. (2005). Developing countries and global environmental governance: From contestation to participation to engagement. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5(3), 303–321.
Neveu, E. (2015). Sociologie politique des problèmes publics. Paris: Armand Colin.
Paternotte, D. (2016). The NGOization of LGBT activism: ILGA Europe and the treaty of Amsterdam. Social Movement Studies, 15(4), 388–402.
Petiteville, F. (2016). Les Organisations internationales dépolitisent-elles les relations internationales? Gouvernement et Action Publique, 3, 113–129.
Petiteville, F., & Smith, A. (2006). Analyser les politiques publiques internationales. Revue Française de Science Politique, 56(3), 357–366.
Pons, X. (2012). Going beyond the ‘PISA shock’ discourse: An analysis of the cognitive reception of PISA in six European Countries, 2001–8. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 206–225.
Rasmussen, A. (2001). Tournant, inflexion, rupture: Le moment internationaliste. Mil Neuf Cent, 19, 27–41.
Rosenau, J., & Wang, H. (2001). Transparency international and corruption as an issue of global governance. Global Governance, 7(1), 25–49.
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization, 52(4), 855–885.
Rutherford, K. (2010). Disarming states: The global movement to ban landmines. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Simmons, B., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. (1973). Toward a sociology of social problems. Social Problems, 20, 407–419.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. (1975). Social problems and deviance: Some parallels. Social Problems, 22, 584–594.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. (2009). Constructing social problems (4th ed.). Rutgers, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22, 487–511.
Strang, D., & Soule, S. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.
Tallberg, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J. A. (2018). Legitimacy in global governance: Sources, processes and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Väyrynen, R. (1999). Globalization and global governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Walker, E. (2014). Grassroots for hire: Public affairs consultants in american democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Katzarova, E., Neveu, E. (2020). The Forgotten Guest: International Relations and the Globalization of Social Problems. In: Neveu, E., Surdez, M. (eds) Globalizing Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52044-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52044-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52043-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52044-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)