Abstract
European integration has been driven by crisis since the 1950s. What distinguishes the most recent crisis context in Europe is its degree of complexity, duration, and interdependence. To understand the current chapter in European integration, one must first evaluate the unusual, combined effects of the five overlapping crises that have surfaced since 2008. I develop a general framework of analysis designed to help us understand Europe’s novel crisis context, and then apply it to the Eurozone crisis, the Russia–Ukraine crisis, the crisis of migration, Brexit, and the crisis in the transatlantic relationship. What emerges from the comparative analysis is that the level of interactive complexity generated by this succession of crises has prompted the EU to respond in ways that has brought the Union incrementally closer to “stateness.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For an excellent overview of these traditional European integration theories, see Rosamond (2000).
- 2.
See for example the discussion of “intergovernmental institutionalism” in Moravcsik (1991).
- 3.
Sandholtz, in a later piece, advances a similar argument, one that stresses the importance of the geopolitical security crisis resulting from the unification of Germany and the end of the Cold War in providing the main impetus for the Maastricht Treaty in the early 1990s (Sandholtz 1993).
- 4.
For an overview of postfunctionalism and the new intergovernmentalism, see Hooghe and Marks (2019).
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
For a discussion of crisis that focuses on two dimensions—time and intensity—see Seabrooke and Tsingou (2019).
- 8.
For an overview and analysis of the Eurozone crisis, see Bermeo and Pontusson (2012).
- 9.
Contrast this with the two signature crises of the pre-Maastricht period (the changing international economy in the 1980s and the end of the Cold War in 1989/90), which were primarily if not exclusively experienced at the elite level.
- 10.
As we shall see below, a marked drop-off in intensity accompanied by lingering uncertainty is a feature of subsequent crises in Europe, most notably the Russia/Ukraine crisis and the Trump crisis.
- 11.
A second line of conflict was between members and non-members of the Eurozone, although this ultimately proved to be less salient over the course of the Eurozone crisis.
- 12.
“… Austrian banks have extensive business relations with Russia, the Czech Republic fears for its engineering exports, Poland is concerned about the food export, Finland and the Baltic countries are dependent on Russian gas supplies…” (Veebel and Markus 2016: 137).
- 13.
- 14.
For an overview of these and other issues relating to the EU’s refugee crisis, see the JCMS Special issue edited by Niemann and Zaun (2018).
- 15.
The list includes the U.S. abandonment of the Paris Climate Accords in 2017 and of the Iran nuclear treaty in 2018, as well as the levying of tariffs on aluminum and steel in 2018.
- 16.
For a review and analysis of transatlantic relations between 2008 and 2016, see Anderson (2018).
References
Allison, R. (2014). Russian ‘Deniable’ Intervention in Ukraine: How and Why Russia Broke the Rules. International Affairs, 90(6), 1255–1297.
Anderson, J. (2018). Rancor and Resilience in the Atlantic Political Order: The Obama Years. Journal of European Integration, 40(5), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1488841.
Art, A. (2018). The AfD and the End of Containment in Germany? German Politics and Society. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2018.360205.
Bermeo, N., & Pontusson, J. (Eds.). (2012). Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Bickerton, C., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722.
Cadier, D. (2014). Eastern Partnership vs. Eurasian Union: The EU–Russia Competition in the Shared Neighborhood and the Ukraine Crisis. Global Policy, 5(1), 76–85.
Cameron, D. (2012). European Fiscal Responses to the Great Recession. In N. Bermeo & J. Pontusson (Eds.), Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession (pp. 91–129). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.
Cortell, A., & Petersen, S. (1999). Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change. British Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 177–203.
Goldthorpe, J. (Ed.). (1984). Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gourevitch, P. (1986). Politics in Hard Times. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gourevitch, P., et al. (1984). Unions and Economic Crisis: Britain, West Germany, and Sweden. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, A. (2015, August 24). Germany Opens Its Gates. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germany-opens-its-gates-berlin-says-all-syrian-asylum-seekers-are-welcome-to-remain-as-britain-is-10470062.html.
Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2019). The European Union in Disequilibrium: New Intergovernmentalism, Postfunctionalism, and Integration Theory in the Post-Maastricht Period. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1569712.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2019). Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711.
Hope, K. (2018, July 13). Russia Meddles in Greek Town to Push Back the West. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/b5728090-86b0-11e8-96dd-fa565ec55929.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). Explaining Crisis and Change in Atlantic Relations: An Introduction. In J. Anderson, G. J. Ikenberry, & T. Risse (Eds.), End of the West? Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order (pp. 1–27). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Jones, E., Kelemen, R. D., & Meunier, S. (2016). Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 1010–1034.
Katzenstein, P. (Ed.). (1978). Between Power and Plenty. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Katzenstein, P. (1984). Corporatism and Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Katzenstein, P. (1985). Small States and World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Keeler, J. T. S. (1993). Opening the Window for Reform: Mandates, Crises, and Extraordinary Policymaking. Comparative Political Studies, 25(4), 433–486.
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
Konstandaris, N. (2018, July 23). Athens and Moscow’s Stunning Falling Out. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/opinion/athens-moscow-greece-russia-tensions.html.
Lange, P., Ross, G., & Vannicelli, M. (1982). Unions, Change, and Crisis: French and Italian Union Strategy and the Political Economy, 1945–1980. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Martin, A. (2019, February 18). MPs Call for Government to Examine Russian Influence on Brexit. Sky News. https://news.sky.com/story/mps-call-for-government-to-examine-russian-influence-on-brexit-11640694.
McTague, T. (2019, March 27). How the UK Lost the Brexit Battle. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/how-uk-lost-brexit-eu-negotiation/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=6ce3f2f806-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_03_28_05_45&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-6ce3f2f806-189581421.
Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45(1), 19–56.
Niemann, A., & Zaun, N. (Eds.). (2018). EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives [Special Issue]. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12650.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: Historical Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Sandholtz, W. (1993). Choosing Union: Monetary Politics and Maastricht. World Politics, 47(1), 1–39.
Sandholtz, W., & Zysman, J. (1989). 1992: Recasting the European Bargain. World Politics, 42(1), 95–128.
Seabrooke, L., & Tsingou, E. (2019). Europe’s Fast- and Slow-Burning Crises. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1446456.
Speck, U. (2016). The West’s Response to the Ukraine Conflict: A Transatlantic Success Story. Transatlantic Academy 2015–16 Paper Series No. 4. Washington, DC: German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Stelzenmuller, C. (2019, March 12). Order from Chaos: A New Franco-German Narrative for Europe. Foreign Affairs. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/03/12/a-new-franco-german-narrative-for-europe/.
Veebel, V., & Markus, R. (2016). At the Dawn of a New Era of Sanctions: Russian-Ukrainian Crisis and Sanctions. Orbis, 60(1), 128–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, J.J. (2021). A Series of Unfortunate Events: Crisis Response and the European Union After 2008. In: Riddervold, M., Trondal, J., Newsome, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51791-5_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51791-5_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51790-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51791-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)