Skip to main content

Motivations for Land Reform in Contemporary South Africa: The Case of Balobedu in Tzaneen, Province of Limpopo

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The New Political Economy of Land Reform in South Africa

Abstract

Land reform is an overdue process in various African states and South Africa is no exception. Due to its historical antecedents, post-apartheid South Africa is typically defined by entrenched inequalities, which encompass both social to economic disparities, of which land access is the most apparent. The Bolobedu community that was displaced to less fertile and overcrowded land epitomises the land conflict and the need for land, in South Africa. Just like Zimbabwe, the ineffectiveness of prevailing land reform, particularly the failure of the willing buyer, willing seller approach, has accelerated government’s calls for the adoption of land expropriation without compensation (LEWC). This policy of the ruling party is motivated by the restoration of people’s identity and justice on the other. This chapter adopts the Afrocentric perspective to engage LEWC and unravels the scepticism around the proposed policy. Contrary to the antagonists of this populist and radical policy, LEWC will reverse land-related inequality and resolve the lingering, major and national land issue. While the LEWC’s debate has become very sensitive, the state has the responsibility to address the root of the land conflict, and afford the masses the opportunity to enjoy the ‘real’ dividends of democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akinola, A. O. (2018). South African land reform: An appraisal. Africa Review, 10(1)‚ 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliber, M. (2013). Land reform in South Africa and its emerging challenges. Pretoria: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biney, A. (2018). Fanonist ‘pitfalls’ in the Pan African movement since 1945. Africa Insight, 48(3), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. P. (1999). Reflection on land reform and farm size. In C. Eicher & J. Straatz (Eds.), International agricultural development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitanga, D. (2018). Land reform and the calculus for power in Zimbabwe’s democratic transition. In A. O. Akinola & H. Wissink (Eds.), Trajectory of land reform in post-colonial African states: The quest for sustainable development and utilization. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Co-Pierre, G. (2016). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. African Institute for Financial Markets and Risk Management. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, B., & Mahenehene, P. (2013). Land rights conflicts. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denene, E. (2018, September 22). Land: Access versus ownership. Farmers Weekly. Available https://www.farmersweekly.co.za/opinion/blog/letter-from-the-editor/land-access-vs-ownership/.

  • Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth (Philcox, R., Trans., 2004). Paris: Franҫois Maspero édituer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordillo, G. B. F. (1999, May). Latin American land reforms in the 1990s. Paper presented at the Workshop on Land: New Context, New Claims, New Concepts, organized by CEDLA, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grix, J. (2010). The foundations of research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (2013). Farm workers and farm dwellers in Limpopo province, South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (2014). Land reform and its aftermath in South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 14(1), 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. (1870). On the geographical distribution of the chief modifications of mankind. Journal of the Ethnological Society of London, 4, 124–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhado, R. A. (2012, November). South Africa’s land reform debate: Progress and challenges. SSRN Electronic Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawoe, M. (2018). Land policies in Africa: A case study of Nigeria and Zambia. In A. O. Akinola & H. Wissink (Eds.), Trajectory of lang reform in post-colonial African states: The quest for sustainable development and utilization. New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • More, M. P. (2011). Fanon and the land question in (post) apartheid South Africa. In N. C. Gibson (Ed.), Living Fanon: Global perspectives. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S. (2000). The political economy of Zimbabwe: Land acquisition and redistribution in Zimbabwe. Harare: Sapes Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S. (2005). Land reform under structural adjustment in Zimbabwe: Land use challenge. Harare: Sapes Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., & Mohamed, F. K. (2009). Scoping Mission Report: Key tenure issues and reform processes for Sierra Leone. Report commissioned for the Ministry of Land, Country Planning and the Environment, by the United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nel, Y. (2015). Land grabs to take off in South Africa. The Observer, Polokwane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okumbor, J. C. (2010). Land reform and development. A case study of Manavhela Ben Lavin Nature Reserve, Limpopo province (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Limpopo, Turfloop, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardoe, C. (2006). Becoming Australian. Before farming and claiming. Kow Swamp, southern Australia: Correl.

    Google Scholar 

  • SA Links. (2016) Land claims in South Africa. The past, present and future. Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., Marongwe, N., Mavedzenge, B., Mahenehene, J., Murimbarimba, F., & Sukume, C. (2010). Zimbabwe’s land reform: Myths and realities. Cape Town: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • South African History Online. (2018). Grade 11 - Apartheid South Africa 1940s to 1960s. Available https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/grade-11-apartheidsouth-africa-1940s-1960s.

  • Valente, C. (2008). Land redistribution in South Africa: A Q2 analysis of its impact on beneficiaries’ welfare. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yingi, L. (2019). The chasm between sexes in accessing land and its produce: The case of rural women in Zimbabwe. In A. O. Akinola & H. Wissink (Eds.)‚ The trajectory of land reform in post-Cclonial African states: The quest for sustainable development and utilization. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yingi, L. (2021). Motivations for Land Reform in Contemporary South Africa: The Case of Balobedu in Tzaneen, Province of Limpopo. In: Akinola, A.O., Kaseeram, I., Jili, N.N. (eds) The New Political Economy of Land Reform in South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51129-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics