Skip to main content

‘Viennese Bombshells’: Reactions to Language, Truth and Logic from Ayer’s Philosophical Contemporaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Historical and Philosophical Significance of Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic

Part of the book series: History of Analytic Philosophy ((History of Analytic Philosophy))

Abstract

In this chapter I consider the ways in which some of those who were philosophically active at the time of the publication of Language, Truth and Logic (LTL) reacted to the ideas that Ayer was propounding. My particular focus will be on issues relating to the study of language and its role in analytic philosophy. I concentrate on the work of three philosophers: J.L. Austin, Arne Naess and L. Susan Stebbing. Their reactions offer an interesting set of comparisons because they exemplify a significant range of philosophical attitudes to the study of language. Although there are similarities in how all three responded to Language, Truth and Logic, there are also striking differences in the conclusions they drew from their readings of Ayer’s book and the approaches to language they took in their own subsequent work. These different approaches remain pertinent to the philosophy of language and also to various different branches of present-day linguistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    I presented the ideas in this chapter at the conference on “The Historical and Philosophical Significance of Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic” at the Department of Sociology, University of Pécs, Hungary, in September 2018. I am grateful to my fellow delegates at that conference for their helpful and supportive discussion. I am also extremely grateful to Adam Tamas Tuboly and to an anonymous referee for their insightful and valuable comments on the first draft of this chapter. They helped me to improve it a great deal; those faults that remain are of course entirely my own. All page references to Language, Truth and Logic below are to the second edition of 1946; see Ayer (1936/1946), noted in the text as “LTL”.

  2. 2.

    See Sally Parker-Ryan’s chapter for further discussion.

  3. 3.

    See Adam Tamas Tuboly’s introductory chapter to this volume for more information of the immediate reception of LTL.

References

  • Austin, John Langshaw. 1962a. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962b. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, Alfred J. 1936/1946. Language, Truth and Logic. 2nd ed. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1940. Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Reflections on Language, Truth and Logic. In Logical Positivism in Perspective, ed. Barry Gower, 23–34. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, Alfred J., and Arne Naess. 1974. The Glass Is on the Table: An Empiricist Versus a Total View. In Reflexive Water: The Basic Concerns of Mankind, ed. Fons Elders, 15–44. London: Souvenier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baz, Avner. 2012. When Words Are Called for: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Caleb, David Schrock, and Patricia Dauterman. 2012. Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31 (2): 176–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cat, Jordi, and Adam Tamas Tuboly, eds. 2019. Neurath Reconsidered: New Sources and Perspectives. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Siobhan. 2008. Language and Empiricism: After the Vienna Circle. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Susan Stebbing and the Language of Common Sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Experimental and the Empirical: Arne Naess’s Statistical Approach to Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (5): 961–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Eugenia. 2018. The Art of Logic. London: Profile Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Guy. 2001. The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Eugen. 2014. Verbal Fallacies and Philosophical Intuitions: The Continuing Relevance of Ordinary Language Analysis. In J.L. Austin on Language, ed. Brian Garvey, 124–140. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Roger. 2002. On Critical Linguistics. In Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. Michael Toolan, 346–357. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Paul. 1986. Reply to Richards. In Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, ed. Richard Grandy and Richard Warner, 45–106. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Nat. 2014. Contemporary Ordinary Language Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 9 (8): 556–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Daniel W., and Elmar Unnsteinsson. 2018. Wittgenstein’s Influence on Austin’s Philosophy of Language. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26: 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Mark. 2018. Austin’s Way with Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, Joshua. 2003. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63: 190–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, Joshua, and Shaun Nichols. 2007. An Experimental Philosophy Manifesto. In Experimental Philosophy, ed. Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nichols, 3–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEnery, Tony, Richard Xiao, and Yukio Tono. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, Ved. 1965. Fly and the Fly-Bottle: Encounters with British Intellectuals. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, Arne. 1938. “Truth” as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1947/1951. Interpretation and Preciseness. Volumes 1–6. Oslo: Universitetets Studentkontor.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1953. An Empirical Study of the Expressions “True”, “Perfectly Certain” and “Extremely Probable”. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Ayer on Metaphysics, a Critical Commentary by a Kind of Metaphysician. In The Philosophy of A.J. Ayer, ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn, 329–340. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Logical Empiricism and the Uniqueness of the Schlick Seminar: A Personal Experience with Consequences. In Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments, ed. Friedrich Stadler, 11–25. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, Geoff. 2018. The Social Life of Slurs. In New Work on Speech Acts, ed. Daniel Fogal, Daniel Harris, and Matt Moss, 237–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Ben. 1999. A.J. Ayer: A Life. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, David, and David Danks. 2013. In Defense of a Broad Conception of Experimental Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 44: 512–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, David. 1993. Is It Painful to Think? Conversations with Arne Naess. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, Jerrold. 2004. Speech Acts. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 53–73. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampietro, Agnese. 2019. Emoji and Rapport Management in Spanish WhatsApp Chats. Journal of Pragmatics 143: 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2018. Think Again, How to Reason and Argue. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, Ernest. 2007. Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition. In Experimental Philosophy, ed. Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nichols, 231–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbing, L. Susan. 1930. A Modern Introduction to Logic. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1933. Logical Positivism and Analysis. Proceedings of the British Academy 19: 53–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936. Review of Language, Truth and Logic. Mind 45: 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1939. Thinking to Some Purpose. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Peter. 1998. Intellectual Autobiography. In The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson, ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn, 1–21. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Text, Corpora and the Problems of Interpretation: A Response to Widdowson. Applied Linguistics 22: 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma, Justin, and Jonathan Livengood. 2012. Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Disputes. Essays in Philosophy 13: 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred. 1944. The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4: 341–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teubert, Wolfgang. 2005. My Version of Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toolan, Michael. 2002. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uebel, Thomas. 2019. Verificationism and (Some of) its Discontents. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 7 (4): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, J.O., W.V.O. Quine, and Stuart Hampshire. 1969. A Symposium on Austin’s Method. In Symposium on J.L. Austin, ed. K.T. Fann, 76–97. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, Mary. 1960. Ethics Since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Alfred North, and Bertrand Russell. 1910. Principia Mathematica. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siobhan Chapman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chapman, S. (2021). ‘Viennese Bombshells’: Reactions to Language, Truth and Logic from Ayer’s Philosophical Contemporaries. In: Tuboly, A.T. (eds) The Historical and Philosophical Significance of Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic. History of Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50884-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics