Abstract
This paper suggests the adaptation of the phenomenological research method for the study of indigenous spirituality. As a method by which one clarifies obscure forms of experience, phenomenology developed in Western academia. For such a context, indigenous spirituality is understood as spirituality of an alien, in need of discovery and to be differentiated from the psychological sphere of meaning. Six principles of the method include historical reduction, intentional cultivation of wonder, attention to the embodied, attentive, enfleshed and affective unique “what it’s like” of experience, letting imagination run wild towards seemingly impossible options, experimenting with the transcendental and other forms of reduction, and aiming at a discovery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Attas, M. N. (2014). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam. Johor Bahru and Johor Darul Ta’zim: Penerbit UTM Press.
Allen, J. (1982). What is Husserl’s first philosophy? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 42(4), 610–620.
Ales Bello, A. (2009). “Brute being” and hyletic phenomenology: The philosophical legacy of Merleau-Ponty’s The visible and the invisible. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Phenomenology and existentialism in the twentieth century: Analecta Husserliana. The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research (Vol. 104). Dordrecht: Springer.
Barber, M. (2017a). Religion and humor as emancipating provinces of meaning. Contributions to Phenomenology. New York: Springer.
Barber, M. (2017b). Religion and the appresentative mindset. Open Theology, 3(1), 397–407. Retrieved 26 December 2018, from https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0031.
Barber, M. (2019). Schutzian resources for a comprehensive phenomenology of the holy. In O. Louchakova-Schwartz (Ed.), The problem of religious experience: Case studies in phenomenology (Vol. 1, pp. 123–139), ed. Contributions to Phenomenology. New York: Springer.
Brady, J. (2017, December 20). What is Dasein? Epoché. Retrieved from https://epochemagazine.org/what-is-dasein-e11c4232771.
Candea, M. (2017). We have never been pluralist: On lateral and frontal comparisons in the ontological turn. In P. Charbonnier, G. Salmon, & P. Skafish (Eds.), Comparative metaphysics (pp. 95–106). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Caston, V. (2018). Intentionality in ancient philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/intentionality-ancient/.
Chittick, W. C. (1998). The self-disclosure of God: Principles of Ibn al-ʻArabī’s cosmology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Corbin, H. (1998). Alone with the alone: Creative imagination in the Sūfism of Ibn ʻArabi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. F., & Swing, B. G. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142–179.
Dahl, E. (2010). Phenomenology and the holy: Religious experience after Husserl. Veritas. London: SCM Press.
Dahl, E. (2019). Preserving wonder through the reduction: Husserl, Marion, and Merleau-Ponty. In O. Louchakova-Schwartz (Ed.), The problem of religious experience: Case studies in phenomenology (pp. 57–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dallmayr, F. (1989). On Bernhard Waldenfels. Social Research, 56(3), 681–712. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970561.
DeRoo, N. (2018). What counts as a ‘religious experience?’: Phenomenology, spirituality, and the question of religion. Open Theology, 4(1), 292–307. Retrieved 7 January 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0022.
Dodd, J. (2005). Crisis and reflection. New York, NY: Kluwer.
Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The ideology of religious studies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Flood, G. (2013). The truth within: A history of inwardness in Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fodor, J. (2013). Hermeneutics. In N. Adams, G. Pattison, & G. Ward (Eds.), The Oxford book of theology and modern European thought (pp. 500–524). Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199601998.013.0025. Accessed 24 December 2018.
Frankfurt, H. (1988). The importance of what we care about: Philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gellman, J. (2018). Mysticism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/mysticism/.
Guenther, H. (1992). Meditation differently. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Henry, M. (1973). The essence of manifestation. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Henry, M. (1975). Philosophy and phenomenology of the body. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Henry, M. (2008). Material phenomenology. New York, NY: Fordham.
Henry, M. (2016). Ontological destruction of the Kantian critique of the paralogism of rational psychology. Analecta Hermeneutica, 8, 7–40. http://journals.library.mun.ca/ojs/index.php/analecta/article/view/1708.
Husserl, E. (1965). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (B. Brough, Trans.). Dordtrecht: Kluwer.
Husserl, E. (2001). Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis (A. J. Steinbock, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ibn al-ʻArabī. (1978). The Tarjumán al-Ashwáq: A collection of mystical odes (R. A. Nicholson, Trans.). London: Theosophical Publishing House.
James, W. (2007). Varieties of religious experience. Charleston, SC: BiblioBazaar.
James, W. (2015). The energies of men. Vancouver, BC: Read Books.
Jung, C. G. (1996). The psychology of Kundalini yoga: Notes of the seminar given in 1932 by C.G. Jung. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Katz, S. T. (1983). Mysticism and religious traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Käufer, S., & Chemero, A. (2015). Phenomenology: An introduction. Cambridge and New York: Polity.
Konopka, A. (2009). The role of Umwelt in Husserl’s Aufbau and Abbau of the Natur/Geist distinction. Human Studies, 32(3), 313–333. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25652826.
Laude, P. (2019). The silence of sound: Crystallizing nondual metaphysics through the invocation of a Divine Name or mantra. In O. Louchakova-Schwartz (Ed.), The problem of religious experience: Case studies in phenomenology (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Springer.
Louchakova, O.* (2005). Ontopoiesis and union in the prayer of the heart: Contributions to psychotherapy and learning. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana: Logos of phenomenology and phenomenology of the logos. Book four: The Logos of Scientific Interrogation. Participating in Nature–Life–Sharing in Life (Vol. 91, pp. 289–311). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Note *Louchakova and Louchakova-Schwartz is the same author.
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (2015). A phenomenological approach to illuminationist philosophy: Suhrawardī’s nūr mujarrad and Husserl’s reduction. Philosophy East and West, 64(2), 1052–1081.
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (2016). Theophanis the monk and Monoimus the Arab in a phenomenological-cognitive perspective. Cognitive Science of Religion Open Access: Open Theology, 2(1). Accessed online February 2016, from https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0005.
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (2017). Qualia of God: Phenomenological materiality in introspection, with a reference to Advaita Vedanta. Open Theology, 3(1), 257–273. Retrieved 2 January 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0021.
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (2018). Intersubjectivity and multiple realities in Zarathushtra’s Gathas. Open Theology, 4(1), 471–488. Retrieved 31 December 2018, from https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0036.
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (2019a). The primeval showing of religious experience. In O. Louchakova-Schwartz (Ed.), The problem of religious experience: Case studies in phenomenology (pp. 27–110). Contributions to Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (2019b). The way into transcendental philosophy from the argument in Suhrawardī’s philosophy of illumination. Open Theology, 5(1), 278–298. Retrieved 2 October 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0022.
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (Ed.). (2019c). The problem of religious experience: Case studies in phenomenology. Contributions to Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer.
Luhrmann, T. (2018). The faith frame: Or, belief is easy, faith is hard. Contemporary Pragmatism, 15(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-01503003.
Luhrmann, T. M., Nusbaum, H., & Thisted, R. (2010). The absorption hypothesis: Learning to hear God in evangelical Christianity. American Anthropologist, 112, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01197.
Mickey, S. (2019). Living the epoché: A phenomenological realism of religious experience. In O. Louchakova-Schwartz (Ed.), The problem of religious experience: Case studies in phenomenology (pp. 111–122). Dordrecht: Springer.
Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London and New York: Routledge.
Morris, H. (n.d.). On the soul. Philosophy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819118000517.
Otto, R. (1950). The idea of the holy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paić, Z. (2018). What does it mean to be an alien? Bernhard Waldenfels and politics of responsive interculturalism. Philosophy and Society, 29(3), 317–474. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1803355.
Porete, M. (1993). The mirror of simple souls (p. 191). Paulist Press.
Ratcliffe, M. (2012). Phenomenology as a form of empathy. Inquiry, 55(5), 473–495.
Richardson, R. D. (2006). William James: In the maelstrom of American modernism: A biography. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Roof, W. C. (1999). Spiritual marketplace: Baby boomers and the remaking of American religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roof, W. C. (2000). Contemporary American religion. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
Roof, W. C., & Silk, M. (2005). Religion and public life in the Pacific region: Fluid identities. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
Searle, J. R. (1997). The mystery of consciousness. New York: New York Review of Books.
Shweder, R., & Bourne, E. J. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Schweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion (pp. 159–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, E. (1964). On the problem of empathy. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Steinbock, A. J. (2007). Phenomenology and mysticism: The verticality of religious experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Suhrawardi, Y. (1999). The philosophy of illumination = Ḥikmat al-Ishraq: a new critical edition of the text of Hikmat al-Ishraq. Islamic Translation Series (J. Walbridge & H. Ziai, Trans.). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.
Taylor, E. (1999). Shadow culture: Psychology and spirituality in America from the great awakening to the new age. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.
Taylor, M. L. (2011). The theological and the political: On the weight of the world. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Taylor, M. L. (2013). Philosophical note: On Jean-Luc Nancy’s “transimmanence”. Retrieved from http://marklewistaylor.net/blog/philosophical-note-on-jean-luc-nancys-transimmanence/.
Tymieniecka, A.-T. (1987). Logos and life. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Tymieniecka, A.-T. (1991). The human condition within the unity-of-everything-there-is-alive—A challenge to philosophical anthropologies. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Husserlian phenomenology in a new key: Analecta Husserliana (The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research) (Vol. 35). Dordrecht: Springer.
Tymieniecka, A.-T. (2012). The transnatural destiny of the soul. In The fullness of the logos in the key of life: Analecta Husserliana (The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research), (Vol. 111, pp. 153–196). Dordrecht: Springer.
Waldenfels, B. (2012, December 13). Responsive ethics. In The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 13 January 2019, from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199594900.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199594900-e-21.
Waldenfels, B., & Steinbock, A. (1990). Experience of the alien in Husserl’s phenomenology. Research in Phenomenology, 20, 19–33. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24654451.
Zahavi, D. (2002). Anonymity and first-personal givenness: An attempt at reconciliation. In D. Carr & C. Lotz (Eds.), Subjektivität - Verantwortung – Wahrheit (pp. 75–89). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2017). Husserl’s legacy: Phenomenology, metaphysics, and transcendental philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2018a). Consciousness, self-consciousness, selfhood: A reply to some critics. The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, published online 8 June 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0403-6.
Zahavi, D. (2018b). Getting it quite wrong: Van Manen and Smith on phenomenology. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318817547.
Zahavi, D. (2019). Phenomenology: The basics (Original edition). London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Louchakova-Schwartz, O. (2021). The “Wonder to Behold”: Reflections on Phenomenological Research of Alienic Spirituality. In: Dueck, A. (eds) Indigenous Psychology of Spirituality. Palgrave Studies in Indigenous Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50869-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50869-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50868-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50869-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)