Abstract
This chapter discusses the ‘anthropocentrisation’ of political–economic governance in Indonesia through the establishment, expansion and evolution of the modern state. The process began with colonial state-building in the mid-nineteenth century, following efforts by colonial rulers to exploit their colonies more effectively in order to compete in the global market. The creation of a unified national political and economic governance system with rigidly defined territories gradually displaced ecological governance systems of indigenous communities, and Indonesia’s independence led to further institutionalisation of anthropocentric political–economic governance. The authoritarian and developmentalist New Order government (1965–1998) consolidated the power of the state and its control over people and nature, effectively marginalising indigenous communities, despite the formal recognition of Adat Law. State transformation in the age of globalisation, fragmentation, decentralisation and internationalisation of state apparatuses has gradually loosened the grip of the state since the 1980s. Indigenous communities, supported by transnational advocacy networks, used this opportunity to create a governance space for themselves. While these initiatives have been partially successful, the loosening grip of the state does not mean the reversal of anthropocentrisation.
Jika negara tidak mengakui kami, kami tidak mengakui negara
(If the state does not recognise us, we don’t recognise the state!)
Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara Declaration, 17 March 1999.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Van Vollenhoven explained Adat Laws as ‘the totality of the rules of conduct for natives and foreign Orientals that have, on the one hand, sanctions (therefore, law) and, on the other, are not codified (therefore, adat)’. Van Vollenhoven’s unique characterisation of Adat Law was explored by various scholars (von Benda-Beckmann & von Benda-Beckmann 2013; Holleman 1981).
References
Arman, M. (2018). Pengakuan bersyarat hambat implementasi hutan adat (Conditional recognition hinders the implementation of customary forest). Retrieved March 31, 2019, from https://www.mongabay.co.id/2018/07/02/pengakuan-bersyarat-hambat-implementasi-hutan-adat.
Arumingtyas, L. (2019). Penetapan hutan adat hanya 1% dari realisasi perhutanan sosial (Designation of customary forests only accounts for 1% of social forest realization). Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.mongabay.co.id/2019/03/27/penetapan-hutan-adat-hanya-1-dari-realisasi-perhutanan-sosial.
Avonius, L. (2004). Reforming adat: Indonesian indigenous people in the era of Reformasi. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology,4(1–2), 123–142.
Bosma, U. (2007). The cultivation system (1830–1870) and its private entrepreneurs on colonial Java. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,38(2), 275–291.
Chacko, P., & Jayasuriya, K. (2018). A capitalising foreign policy: Regulatory geographies and transnationalised state projects. European Journal of International Relations,24(1), 82–105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117694702.
Connor, C. M. (2012). Effects of central decisions on local livelihoods in Indonesia: Potential synergies between the programs of transmigration and industrial forest conversion. Population and Environment,25(4), 319–334.
Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., & Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters,11(4), 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
Crutzen, P., & Stoermer, E. (2000). The Anthropocene. IGBP Newsletter,41, 17–18.
de Vries, J. W., & Van der Woude, A. (1997). The first modern economy: Success, failure, and perseverance of the Dutch economy, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eckersley, R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Eilenberg, M. (2012). At the edges of states: Dynamics of state formation in the Indonesian borderlands. Leiden: KITLV Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253469.
Fasseur, C. (1986). The cultivation system and its impact on the Dutch colonial economy and the indigenous society in nineteenth-century Java. In C. A. Bayly & D. H. Kolff (Eds.), Two colonial empires: Comparative studies in overseas history. Dordrecht: Springer.
Fearnside, P. M. (1997). Transmigration in Indonesia: Lessons from its environmental and social impacts. Environmental Management,21(4), 553–570.
Friederich, M. C., & van Leeuwen, T. (2017). A review of the history of coal exploration, discovery and production in Indonesia: The interplay of legal framework, coal geology and exploration strategy. International Journal of Coal Geology,178, 56–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.04.007.
Glenn, P. (2014). A chthonic legal tradition: To recycle the world. In P. Glenn (Ed.), Legal traditions of the world (5th Edition, pp. 60–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199669837.003.0003.
Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2016). Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China. European Journal of International Relations,22(1), 72–98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115578952.
Hecht, S. B. (2011). The new Amazon geographies: Insurgent citizenship, “Amazon Nation” and the politics of environmentalisms. Journal of Cultural Geography,28(1), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2011.548500.
Henley, D., & Davidson, J. S. (2008). In the name of Adat: Regional perspectives on reform, tradition, and democracy in Indonesia. Modern Asian Studies,42(4), 815–852 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X07003083.
Hoey, B. A. (2003). Nationalism in Indonesia: Building imagined and intentional communities through transmigration. Ethnology,42(2), 109–126.
Holleman, J. F. (1981). Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian Adat Law. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jones, L. (2018). Theorizing foreign and security policy in an era of state transformation: A new framework and case study of China. Journal of Global Security Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy030.
Jones, L., & Zeng, J. (2019). Understanding China’s ‘belt and road initiative’: Beyond ‘grand strategy’ to a state transformation analysis. Third World Quarterly,40(8), 1415–1439 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1559046.
Kian, K. H. (2008). How strangers became kings: Javanese-Dutch relations in Java, 1600–1800. Indonesia and the Malay World,36(105), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639810802268064.
Linklater, A. (1998). The transformation of political community: Ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. Cambridge: Polity.
Luiten van Zanden, J. (2010). Colonial state formation and patterns of economic development in Java, 1800–1913. Economic History of Developing Regions,25(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2010.527689.
Marks, D. (2010). Unity or diversity? On the integration and efficiency of rice markets in Indonesia, c. 1920–2006. Explorations in Economic History,47(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2009.08.002.
McCarthy, J. F. (2005). Between adat and state: Institutional arrangements on Sumatra’s forest frontier. Human Ecology,33(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-005-2426-8.
Milman, O. (2019). 2018 was world’s fourth hottest year on record, scientists confirm. Retrieved March 30, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/06/global-temperatures-2018-record-climate-change-global-warming.
Moore, J. W. (2017). The Capitalocene, Part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies,44(3), 594–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036.
Morrison, K. D. (2018). Empires as ecosystem engineers: Toward a nonbinary political ecology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,52(March), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2018.09.002.
Myers, R., Intarini, D., Sirait, M. T., & Maryudi, A. (2017). Claiming the forest: Inclusions and exclusions under Indonesia’s ‘new’ forest policies on customary forests. Land Use Policy,66(May), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.039.
Palm Oil Agribusiness Strategic Policy Institute (PASPI) (2014). The sustainability of Indonesian palm oil industry: Its role in economic growth, rural development, poverty reduction, and environmental sustainability. Bogor: IPB Press.
Ravensbergen, S. (2018). Anchors of colonial rule: Pluralistic courts in Java, ca. 1803–1848. Itinerario,42(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165115318000323.
Resosudarmo, B. P. (Ed.). (2005). The politics and economics of Indonesia’s natural resources. Singapore: ISEAS.
Rye, S. A., & Kurniawan, N. I. (2017). Claiming indigenous rights through participatory mapping and the making of citizenship. Political Geography,61, 148–159 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.08.008.
Schroeder, H., & González P., N. C. (2019). Bridging knowledge divides: The case of indigenous ontologies of territoriality and REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics,100(March), 198–206.
Schwartz, J. (2018). More floods and more droughts: Climate change delivers both. Retrieved March 30, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/climate/climate-change-floods-droughts.html.
Srinivasan, K. (2013). The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: Dog control and care in the UK and India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,38(1), 106–119 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00501.x.
Tagliacozzo, E. (2010). The Indies and the world: State building, promise, and decay at a transnational moment, 1910. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde,166(2), 270–292.
Thaler, G. M. (2017). The land sparing complex: Environmental governance, agricultural intensification, and state building in the Brazilian Amazon. Annals of the American Association of Geographers,107(6), 1424–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1309966.
Thee, K. W. (2007). Indonesia’s economic performance under Soeharto’s new order. Seoul Journal of Economics,20(2), 263–281.
Tyson, A. (2011). Being special, becoming indigenous: Dilemmas of special adat rights in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science,39(5), 652–673.
Tyson, A., Varkkey, H., & Choiruzzad, S. A. B. (2018). Deconstructing the palm oil industry narrative in Indonesia: Evidence from Riau province. Contemporary Southeast Asia,40(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs40-3d.
Varkkey, H., Tyson, A., & Choiruzzad, S. A. B. (2018). Palm oil intensification and expansion in Indonesia and Malaysia: Environmental and socio-political factors influencing policy. Forest Policy and Economics,92, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.002.
Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015). “We are not animals!” Humanitarian border security and zoopolitical spaces in Europe. Political Geography,45, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.009.
Vaughan-Williams, N. (2016). The biopolitics of European border security. In S. Prozorov & S. Rentea (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of biopolitics (pp. 225–234). London: Routledge.
von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2013). Myths and stereotypes about adat law: A reassessment of Van Vollenhoven in the light of current struggles over adat law in Indonesia. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde/ Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia,167(2–3), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003588.
Vu, T. (2007). State formation and the origins of developmental states in South Korea and Indonesia. Studies in Comparative International Development,41(4), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02800470.
Weststeijn, A. (2014). The VOC as a company-state: Debating seventeenth-century dutch colonial expansion. Itinerario,38(1), 13–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165115314000035.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Choiruzzad, S.A.B. (2020). Anthropocentrisation and Its Discontents in Indonesia: Indigenous Communities, Non-Human Nature and Anthropocentric Political–Economic Governance. In: Pereira, J., Saramago, A. (eds) Non-Human Nature in World Politics. Frontiers in International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49495-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49496-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)