Skip to main content

Opportunities and Challenges of Social Innovation Practices in Urban Development and Public Real Estate Management. Italy as a Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (NMP 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 178))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The reuse of public real estate assets has long been at the core of the political agendas of various governments, called upon to develop strategies to restore functionality to a substantial number of buildings and open spaces subjected to divestment phenomena. This is an arduous challenge because of the effects generated by the 2008 economic and financial crisis, but also because of the difficulty of public entities in identifying new uses that meet the needs of contemporary society. To deal with these issues, Italian politics has implemented a series of initiatives aimed at applying the principle of subsidiarity, introduced by the Constitution itself. Horizontal subsidiarity is the basis for testing new social innovation practices aimed at promoting social inclusion, creativity and youth employment. This contribution aims to demonstrate that public real estate can represent an extraordinary resource to support bottom-up initiatives and to redesign the urban geography of a new collaborative welfare system.

After examining the state of the art, the contribution analyzes the main tools adopted to regulate forms of care and collaborative management of urban common goods, which constitute the basis for supporting new social innovation practices. The QuxQu project represents an interesting experiment of applied design thinking that opens up new reflections on the possibility of guaranteeing an economic sustainability of the process and its diffusion in the local context, also in order to activate virtuous processes of reuse of public real estate assets and regeneration of entire neighborhoods (The paper derives from the join reflections of authors. However, Sects. 1 and 2 can be attributed to Ladu M.; Sects. 3 and 4 to Bernardini S.; Sects. 5 to Ladu M., Bernardini S.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manase, D.: Public Sector Property Asset Management. Wiley, UK (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaganova, O., Telgarsky, J.: Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey. Int. J. Strateg. Property Manag. 22(2), 143–156 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Migliore, A.: Valorisation of public real estate. From strategies selection to the proposal of a procedural model for enhancement (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Imbesi, P.N.: Il “riqualificar facendo” e le aree dismesse. Il senso di un’esperienza di progettazione partecipata. Gangemi Editore, Roma (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abis, E., Ladu, M.: Il paesaggio della città pubblica. Il patrimonio immobiliare e il sistema del verde nella città storica. In: Abis, E. (eds.) Paesaggio storico urbano. Progetto e qualità per il castello di Cagliari, pp. 266–299. Gangemi, Roma (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. UNGA (United Nations General Assembly): Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. A/RES/70/1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaganova, O.: Managing government property assets: international experiences. The Urban Institute (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marona, B., van den Beemt, A.: Impact of public management theory on municipal real estate management in Netherlands and Poland. European Real Estate Society (ERES), p. 317 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Falanga, C., Cuzzola, E., Nasso, I.: La dismissione del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico. Guida pratica per gli enti locali. Maggioli Editore, Rimini (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gaeta, L., Savoldi, P., (eds.): Orientamenti per la gestione del patrimonio pubblico. Documento Società Italiana degli Urbanisti (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ladu, M.: Strategie e strumenti per rigenerare il patrimonio immobiliare pubblico nell’era della Smart City. In: Atti della XXII Conferenza Nazionale ASITA, Bolzano, 27-29/11/2018, pp. 609-616. ASITA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ladu, M., Borruso, G., Balletto, G.: Il ruolo delle piattaforme digitali nei processi di valorizzazione del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico. In: Atti della XXIII Conferenza Nazionale ASITA, Trieste, 12-14/11/2019, pp. 587–594. ASITA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Passalacqua, M.: La gestione patrimoniale: i beni pubblici (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turchini, A. (ed.): Terzo settore e servizi di welfare. Indagine sui provider non profit di servizi sociali. INAPP, Roma (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marchetti, M.C., Millefiorini, A. (eds.): Partecipazione civica, beni comuni e cura della città. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ladu, M.: Creatività e partecipazione nel governo della Smart City. Il riuso temporaneo e la gestione condivisa del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico per la rigenerazione della città storica del futuro. Smart for City, 1, pp. 6–11 (2019a)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Longoni, M.: La Riforma del Terzo Settore: Il nuovo codice del no profit. Class Editori (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mangialardo, A., Micelli, E.: New bottom-up approaches to enhance public real estate properties. In: Stanghellini, S., Morano, P., Bottero, M., Oppio, A. (eds.) Appraisal: From theory to practice, pp. 53–62. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ladu, M.: Pratiche innovative di riuso del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico per una città inclusiva. In: Atti della XXII Conferenza Nazionale SIU. L’urbanistica italiana di fronte all’Agenda 2030 per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile, Matera 5–7/06/2019. SIU (2019b). in Press

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons. The evolution of Institution for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Tricarico, L. (eds.): Innovazione sociale. In: Califano, A. (eds.) Cittadini, territori, economie alla prova del digitale Linee guida per trasformare la rivoluzione tecnologica in un’opportunità, pp. 37–45. Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli, Milano (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tricarico, L.: Impresa culturale, impatto sociale e territorio: nuovi approcci e strategie di sviluppo. In: Caroli, G.M. (ed.) Evidenze sull’innovazione sociale e sostenibilità in Italia: IV Rapporto CERIIS sull’Innovazione Sociale, pp. 107–127. Franco Angeli, Milano (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morollo, F.: Valorizzazione del patrimonio culturale: sussidiarietà orizzontale e prospettive di “democrazia diretta” per lo sviluppo dei territori. DPCE Online 39(2) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mattei, I.: Beni comuni. Un manifesto. Editori Laterza, Bari (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cantaluppi, G., Inti, I., Persichino, M. (eds.): Temporiuso. Manuale per il riuso temporaneo di spazi in abbandono, in Italia. Altra economia, Milano (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Labsus, Comune di Bologna: Regolamento sulla collaborazione tra cittadini e amministrazione per la cura e la rigenerazione dei beni comuni urbani (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Labsus: Regolamento sulla collaborazione tra cittadini e amministrazioni per la cura, la rigenerazione e la gestione condivisa dei beni comuni urbani (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Medici, S., Pinto, M.R.: Valorizzazione dei beni culturali pubblici e strategie di riuso. Techne 03, 140–147 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Labsus. http://www.labsus.org. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

  30. Agenzia del Demanio. http://www.agenziademanio.it/opencms/it/progetti/temporaryuse/. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

  31. Beltrame Mario Linkedin. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mario-beltrame-93331669/. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

  32. QuxQu. http://www.quxqu.org/. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

  33. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Thinking. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

  34. Nextdoor. https://it.nextdoor.com/. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

  35. Toogoodtogo. https://toogoodtogo.it/it. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mara Ladu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ladu, M., Bernardini, S. (2021). Opportunities and Challenges of Social Innovation Practices in Urban Development and Public Real Estate Management. Italy as a Case Study. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_95

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics