Abstract
With the emergence of electronic publishing, the open access model, and the use of social media, the study of the publishing process in scholarly peer-reviewed journals has acquired importance as a research topic. However, these studies are based on relatively small samples of publications. In this study, the publications between 2000 and 2016 in Elsevier journals are used to analyze the characteristics of the publication process at the level of disciplines, journals, and publishing model. Over the period, the work on the technical aspects of the publication process was substantially expedited. Although it was reduced for disciplines with the longest editorial delays, the peer review of publications remains the most time-consuming element and 100 days seems to be, on an average, the minimum for this element of the publication process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abt, H. A. (1992). Publication practices in various sciences. Scientometrics, 24(3), 441–447.
Alves-Silva, E., Porto, A. C. F., Firmino, C., Silva, H. V., Becker, I., Resende, L., et al. (2016). Are the impact factor and other variables related to publishing time in ecology journals? Scientometrics, 108(3), 1445–1453.
Amat, C. B. (2008). Editorial and publication delay of papers Submitted to 14 selected food research journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics, 74(3), 379–389.
Azar, O. H. (2004). Rejections and the importance of first response times. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(3), 259–274.
Bjork, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914–923.
Boyack, K. W., van Eck, N. J., Colavizza, G., & Waltman, L. (2018). Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 59–73.
Chen, H., Chen, C. H., & Jhanji, V. (2013). Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. Ophthalmology, 120(8), 1697–1701.
Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2006). Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical’s publishing model. Scientometrics, 69(2), 271–286.
Echeverria, M., Stuart, D., & Cordon-Garcia, J. A. (2017). The influence of online posting dates on the bibliometric indicators of scientific articles. Revista Espaňola de Documentación Cientifica, 40(3), e183.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2000). The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 158–165.
Fiala, D., Havrilova, C., Dostal, M., & Paralic, J. (2016). Editorial board membership, time to accept, and the effect on the citation counts of journal articles. Publications, 4(3), 21.
Garg, K. C. (2016). Publication delays in periodicals published by CSIR-NISCAIR. Current Science, 111(12), 1924–1928.
Gonzalez-Betancor, S. M., & Dorta-Gonzalez, P. (2019). Publication modalities ‘article in press’ and ‘open access’ in relation to journal average citation. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1209–1223.
Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D. & Costas, R. (2015). When is an article actually published? An analysis of online availability, publication, and indexation dates. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.00796.
Heneberg, P. (2013). Effects of the print publication lag in dual format journals on scientometric indicators. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e59877.
Hicks, D. M. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 473–496). Springer.
Kaufman, P. (1998). Structure and crisis: Markets and market segmentation in scholarly publishing. In B. L. Hawkins & P. Battin (Eds.), The mirage of continuity: Reconfiguring academic information resources for the 21st century (pp. 178–192). Washington DC: CLIR and AAU.
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502.
Lin, Z. Q., Hou, S. C., & Wu, J. S. (2016). The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers in nature, science and physical review letters. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1457–1464.
Lotriet, C. J. (2012). Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay. Australian Medical Journal, 5(1), 26–29.
Lozano, G. A., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). The weakening relationship between the impact factor and the papers’ citations in the digital age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2140–2145.
Luwel, M., & Moed, H. F. (1998). Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 29–40.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659.
Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of the ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.
Montgomery, S. L. (2013). Does science need a global language? English and the future of research. University of Chicago Press.
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., et al. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375.
Shen, S., Rousseau, R., Wang, D. B., Zhu, D. H., Liu, H. Y., & Liu, R. L. (2015). Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: The journals nature, science and cell. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1867–1873.
Shi, D., Rousseau, R., Yang, L., & Li, J. (2006). A journal’s impact factor is influenced by changes in the publication delays of the citing journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 780–789.
Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Essential Knowledge series.
Tort, A. B. L., Targino, Z. H., & Amaral, O. B. (2012). Rising publication delays inflate journal impact factors. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e53374.
Tosi, H. (2009). It’s about time!!!! What to do about long delays in the review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(2), 175–178.
van Leeuwen, T. N., van Wijk, E., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: A case study on the registered output of a Dutch university. Scientometrics, 106(1), 1–16.
van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the science citation index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335–346.
Van Orsdel, L., & Born, K. (2002). Doing the digital flip. Library Journal, 127(7), 51–56.
van Raan, A. F. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Visser, M. S. (2011). Non-English papers decrease rankings. Nature, 469(1), 34.
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for construction of a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378–2392.
Ware, M. & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report. An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. The Hague, Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf.
Wilcken, D. (1961). Delay in publication. Lancet, 1(7180), 1286.
Yegros, A. Y., & Amat, C. B. (2009). Editorial delay of food research papers is influenced by authors’ experience but not by country of origin of the manuscripts. Scientometrics, 81(2), 367–380.
Yu, G., Guo, R., & Li, Y. J. (2006). The influence of publication delays on three ISI indicators. Scientometrics, 69(3), 511–527.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luwel, M., van Eck, N.J., van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Characteristics of Publication Delays Over the Period 2000–2016. In: Daraio, C., Glänzel, W. (eds) Evaluative Informetrics: The Art of Metrics-Based Research Assessment . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47664-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47665-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)