Abstract
This chapter studies the impact of the recent multicultural approach to comparative legal studies on comparative law teaching, with a focus on British debates and literature. I will argue that the multicultural turn of (comparative) legal teaching, reflected for example in a greater diversity of teaching techniques, a greater emphasis on minority issues and law &… disciplines, responds to a multiplicity of motivations. Pedagogically, it is a response to the increasingly diverse backgrounds of students and their differing intellectual starting-points. Pragmatically, it is a means to boost students’ employability and intellectual versality in a job market that now values “cultural awareness skills”. Finally, conceptually, it is a tool designed to unravel the pluralistic nature of law. From these diverse drivers to the multicultural turn in (comparative) legal teaching, it is possible to identify similarities with other recent trends of globalisation and internationalisation of legal education. However, this article will submit that differences remain. Having analysed these differences, I will go on to argue and reveal that in them lie the core features of a multicultural approach to legal teaching and its intrinsic connections to comparative law, as the multicultural classroom itself becomes a comparative law site.
I am indebted to Jean-Frédéric Ménard for his research assistance and suggestions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Varga (1992), p. xv.
- 3.
- 4.
Sacco (1991a), p. 15.
- 5.
Friedman (2006), p. 189. See also the definition of legal culture given by Nelken (2004), p. 1, as ranging from “facts about institutions such as the number and role of lawyers or the way judges are appointed and controlled to various forms of behaviour such as litigation or prison rates, and, at the other extreme, more nebulous aspects of ideas, values, aspirations and mentalities. Like culture itself, legal culture is about who we are, not just what we do”.
- 6.
Sacco (1991b).
- 7.
- 8.
Using Roger Cotterell’s directives, the concept of legal culture when applied to a particular comparative exercise should therefore be split into its distinct components, Cotterrell (2004), p. 9.
- 9.
See infra.
- 10.
Menski (2006a), pp. 70–81.
- 11.
Menski (2013), p. 43.
- 12.
Shah (2003), p. 18.
- 13.
On the discussion of the specific importance of this multicultural turn for comparative law, see infra.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
Arjona et al. (2015), p. 267.
- 17.
Platsas and Marrani (2016).
- 18.
Gidoomal et al. (2001).
- 19.
Husa (2009).
- 20.
- 21.
Ballard (1992).
- 22.
Flood (2011).
- 23.
Flood (2011), pp. 6–7.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
Valcke (2004).
- 27.
Valcke (2004).
- 28.
Flood (2007), p. 54.
- 29.
Platsas and Marrani (2016), p. 304.
- 30.
Basedow (2014), pp. 10–11.
- 31.
Ibid.
- 32.
Silver (2013).
- 33.
Galloway (2016), pp. 18–19.
- 34.
Twining (2009), p. 368.
- 35.
Galloway (2016), pp. 24–25.
- 36.
Jouannet (2011).
- 37.
For a definition of transnational law as a form of socio-legal pluralism, Scott (2009), p. 873.
- 38.
- 39.
Douglas-Scott (2013).
- 40.
Joerges and Falke (2011).
- 41.
Jamin and van Caenegem (2016).
- 42.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2016).
- 43.
Platsas and Marrani (2016), pp. 299–300.
- 44.
Anthea (2018), p. 3.
- 45.
Frankenberg (2019), p. 42.
- 46.
- 47.
See how the approach to what constitutes a source of comparative law has shifted, Vogenauer (2006), p. 869.
- 48.
Lambert (1905), p. 47.
- 49.
Muir Watt (2006).
- 50.
Husa (2004).
- 51.
Sacco (2001).
- 52.
Muir Watt (2006).
- 53.
- 54.
Siems (2007).
- 55.
Sacco (1991a), p. 15.
- 56.
- 57.
- 58.
Frankenberg (2019).
- 59.
Samuel (2014).
- 60.
Bhabha (2015), p. 93.
- 61.
Macdonald and Glover (2013).
- 62.
Frankenberg (1985), p. 411.
References
Anthea R (2018) Cross-border student flows and the construction of international law as a transnational legal field. UC Irvine J Int Transnational Comp Law 3(1):1–38
Arjona C, Anderson J, Meier F, Robart S (2015) What law for transnational legal education? A cooperative view of an introductory course to transnational law and governance. Transnational Leg Theory 6(2):253–286
Ballard R (1992) New clothes for the emperor? The conceptual nakedness of Britain’s race relations industry. New Community 18(3):481–492
Ballard R (2006) Ethnic diversity and the delivery of justice: the challenge of plurality. In: Prakash S, Menski WG (eds) Migration, diasporas and legal systems in Europe. Routledge Cavendish, London, pp 29–56
Banakas EK (1994) The method of comparative law and the question of culture today. Tilburg Foreign Law Rev 3:113–153
Basedow J (2014) Breeding lawyers for the global village: the internationalisation of law and legal education. In: van Caenegem W, Hiscock M (eds) The internationalisation of legal education: the future practice of law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–17
Bell J (2002) French legal cultures. Butterworths, London
Berman PS (2007) Global legal pluralism. South Calif Law Rev 80:1155–1238
Bhabha F (2015) Towards a pedagogy of diversity in legal education. Osgoode Hall Law J 52(1):59–108
Bruinsma F (2003) Dutch law in action. Ars Aequi, Nijmegen
Cotterell R (1997) The concept of legal culture. In: Nelken D (ed) Comparing legal cultures. Dartmouth, Aldershot, pp 13–32
Cotterrell R (2004) Law in culture. Ratio Juris 17(1):1–14
Curran VG (1998) Cultural immersion: difference and categories in US comparative law. Am J Comp Law 46:43–92
Del Vecchio G (1909) Sullʼidea di uns scienza del diritto universale comparato. Estratto dalla Rivista italiana per le scienze giuridiche XLV(II–III). Fratelli Bocca, Torino
Douglas-Scott S (2013) Law after modernity. Hart Publishing, London
Fletcher GP (1998) Comparative law as a subversive discipline. Am J Comp Law 46(4):683–700
Flood J (2007) Lawyers as sanctifiers: the role of elite law firms in international business transactions. Indiana J Global Leg Stud 14(1):35–66
Flood J (2011) Legal education in the global context: challenges from globalization, technology and changes in government regulation. University of Westminster School of Law Research Paper No. 11–16. Available via SSRN ID 1906687 https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1906687. Accessed 28 July 2019
Foblets M-C, Bradney A, Woodman G (eds) (2017) The trials and triumphs of teaching legal anthropology. Ashgate, Oxford
Frankenberg G (1985) Critical comparisons: re-thinking comparative law. Harv Int Law J 26(2):411–456
Frankenberg G (2019) Comparative law as critique, paperback 2nd edn. Elgar studies in legal theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Friedman LM (2006) The place of legal culture in the sociology of law. In: Freeman M (ed) Law and sociology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 185–199
Galloway K (2016) Getting back to our roots: global law schools in local context. In: Gane C, Hui Huang R (eds) Legal education in the global context: opportunities and challenges. Routledge, London, pp 17–30
Gidoomal R, Mahtani D, Porter D (2001) The British and how to deal with them. Doing business with Britain’s ethnic communities. Middlesex University Press, London
Glenn HP (2001) Are legal traditions incommensurable? Am J Comp Law 49:133–145
Glenn P (2004) Legal cultures and legal traditions. In: van Hoeck M (ed) Epistemology and methodology of comparative law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 7–20
Hunter-Henin M (2013) Teaching comparative law in order to understand law itself. In: Meulders-Klein MT, Klein A (eds) Law and anthropology workshop. Department of Law and Anthropology (Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology), Halle, 27–28 November 2013
Husa J (2004) Classification of legal families today: is it time for a memorial hymn? Revue internationale de droit comparé 56(1):11–38
Husa J (2009) Turning the curriculum upside down: comparative law as an educational tool for constructing pluralistic legal mind. German Law J 10(7):913–926
Jamin C, van Caenegem W (eds) (2016) The internationalisation of legal education. Springer, Basel
Joerges C, Falke J (2011) Introduction. In: Joerges C, Falke J (eds) Karl Polanyi: globalisation and the potential of law in transnational markets. Hart Publishing, London, pp 1–18
Jouannet E (2011) Qu’est-ce qu’une société internationale juste? Le droit international entre développement et reconnaissance. Pedone, Paris
Jutras D (2000) Énoncer l’indicible: Le droit entre langues et traditions. Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 52(4):781–796
Kahn P (1999) The cultural study of law: reconstructing legal scholarship. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Lambert E (1905) Conception générale, définition, méthode et histoire du droit comparé. Le droit comparé et l’enseignement du droit. In: Congrès international de droit comparé, tenu à Paris du 31 juillet au 4 août 1900, Procès verbaux, vol 1. LGDJ, Paris, pp 26–61
Legrand P (2010) Antivonbar. J Comp Law 1:13–40
Macdonald RA, Glover K (2013) Implicit comparative law. Revue de droit de l'Université de Sherbrooke 43:123–192
Markesinis B (1997) Foreign law and comparative methodology: a subject and a thesis. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Markesinis B, Fedtke J (2009) Engaging with foreign law. Hart Publishing, London
Menski WF (2006a) Comparative law in a global context: the legal systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Menski WF (2006b) Rethinking legal theory in the light of South–North migration. In: Prakash S, Menski WG (eds) Migration, diasporas and legal systems in Europe. Routledge Cavendish, London, pp 13–28
Menski WF (2013) Governance and governability in South Asian family laws and in diaspora. J Leg Pluralism Unofficial Law 45:42–57
Merryman J (1999) The loneliness of the comparative lawyer and other essays in foreign and comparative law. Kluwer Law International, The Hague
Muir Watt H (2000) La fonction subversive du droit comparé. Revue internationale de Droit comparé 52(3):503–527
Muir Watt H (2006) Globalization and comparative law. In: Reimann M, Zimmermann R (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 579–607
Nelken D (2004) Using the concept of legal culture. Aust J Leg Philos 29:1–26
Platsas AE, Marrani D (2016) On the evolving and dynamic nature of UK legal education. In: Jamin C, van Caenegem W (eds) The internationalisation of legal education. Springer, Basel, pp 299–310
Reimann M (2001) Beyond national systems: a comparative law for the international age. Tulane Law Rev 75:1103–1120
Reisman WM (1996) Designing law curricula for a transnational industrial and science-based civilization. J Leg Educ 46(3):322–328
Sacco R (1991a) La comparaison juridique au service de la connaissance du droit. Economica, Paris
Sacco R (1991b) Legal formants: a dynamic approach to comparative law. Am J Comp Law 39(1):1–34
Sacco R (2001) One hundred years of comparative law. Tulane Law Rev 75:1159–1176
Samuel G (2014) An introduction to comparative law theory and method. Hart Publishing, London
Scott C (2009) Transnational law as proto-concept: three conceptions. German Law J 10(6/7):859–876
Sexton JE (1996) The global law school program at New York University. J Leg Educ 46:329
Shah PA (2003) Preliminary reflections on teaching about ethnic minorities in law. Law Teacher 37(1):18–35
Siems M (2007) The end of comparative law. J Comp Law 2:133–150
Silver C (2013) Holding onto “too many lawyers”: bringing international graduate students to the front of the class. In: How many lawyers are too many lawyers: perspectives, context and place. Oñati Socio Leg Series 3(3):533–560. Available via SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2298682. Accessed 28 July 2019
Twining W (2009) General jurisprudence: understanding law from a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2016) Global flow of tertiary-level students. Available via http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow. Accessed 24 July 2019
Valcke C (2004) Global law teaching. J Leg Educ 54(2):160–182
van Hoecke M, Warrington M (1998) Legal cultures, legal paradigms and legal doctrine: towards a new model for comparative law. Int Comp Law Q 47(3):495–536
Varga C (1992) Introduction. In: Varga C (ed) Comparative legal cultures. The New York University Press, New York, pp xv–xxiv
Vogenauer S (2006) Sources of law and legal method. In: Reimann M, Zimmermann R (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 869–896
Whitman JQ (2003) The Neo-romantic turn. In: Legrand P, Munday R (eds) Comparative legal studies: traditions and transitions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 315–326
Zampetti PL (1949) A filosofia giuridica di Giorgio del Vecchio. Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica 41(2):209–246
Zumbansen P (2010) Transnational legal pluralism. Transnational Leg Theory 1(2):141–189
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunter-Henin, M. (2020). The Multicultural Classroom As a Comparative Law Site: A United Kingdom Perspective. In: Varga, C. (eds) Comparative Law and Multicultural Legal Classes: Challenge or Opportunity?. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46898-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46898-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46897-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46898-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)