Abstract
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) infect squamous epithelia and can induce hyperproliferative lesions. More than 220 different HPV types have been characterized and classified into five different genera. While mucosal high-risk HPVs have a well-established causal role in anogenital carcinogenesis, the biology of cutaneous HPVs is less well understood.
From patients with the rare genetic disorder epidermodysplasia verruciformis (EV) and animal models, evidence is accumulating that cutaneous PV of genus β synergize with ultraviolet (UV) radiation in the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). In 2009, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified the genus β-HPV types 5 and 8 as “possible carcinogenic” biological agents (group 2B) in EV disease. Epidemiological and biological studies indicate that genus β-PV infection may also play a role in UV-mediated skin carcinogenesis in non-EV patients. However, they rather act at early stages of carcinogenesis and become dispensable for the maintenance of the malignant phenotype, compatible with a “hit-and-run” mechanism.
This chapter will give an overview on genus β-PV infections and discuss similarities and differences of cutaneous and genus α mucosal high-risk HPV in epithelial carcinogenesis.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Human papillomavirus
- HPV
- E6/E7 oncogenes
- Cutaneous infection
- Carcinogenesis
- Skin cancer
- Keratinocyte carcinoma
- Epidermodysplasia verruciformis
- C/EBP
- p63
- miR-203
- S100
- Immune escape
Introduction: Human Papillomaviruses and Cancer
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are double-stranded DNA viruses that infect epithelial cells of skin or mucosa in a species-specific manner and cause hyperproliferative lesions. More than 220 HPV types are classified into five genera on a genetic basis [1] with differences in biology and pathogenicity. Depending on the oncogenic potential of particular HPV types and body-specific sites of infection, lesions induced by HPVs range from benign warts to invasive carcinoma. The genus α mucosal high-risk HPV types has a well-established causal role in anogenital carcinogenesis. In particular, HPV16 and 18 are involved in about 70% of all cervical cancers. In 2008 the discovery of this important link between viral infection and malignant disease was recognized with the Nobel Prize in Medicine to Prof. Harald zur Hausen. Benign anogenital condylomas are predominantly caused by the genus α-HPV types 6 and 11. Prophylactic vaccines against these most prominent high- and low-risk mucosal HPV types have been developed to prevent infection as well as HPV-induced diseases [2]. Recent epidemiologic studies have demonstrated the high efficacy of HPV vaccination on mucosal HPV-associated disease burden in countries with vaccination programs [3].
A link between HPV infection and skin cancer was first demonstrated in patients suffering from epidermodysplasia verruciformis (EV), a rare inherited disease. EV patients display a particular susceptibility to productive and persistent infection with cutaneous genus β-PV. As a consequence, they have a high risk to develop keratinocyte carcinomas at sun-exposed sites [4]. Two genus β-PV types, HPV5 and HPV8, were classified as “possibly carcinogenic” in patients with EV [5]. Studies in EV patients and animal models have provided evidence for the cocarcinogenic potential of HPV8 together with UV irradiation, and epidemiological studies suggest an association between β-HPV infection and keratinocyte carcinoma development also in the general human population. However, their “commensalic nature” and the fact that they are apparently dispensable for the maintenance of the malignant phenotype in skin cancer raise difficulties to proof this hypothesis [6, 7].
While the mucosal high-risk HPVs and their involvement of the microenvironment in carcinogenesis have been extensively studied [8], the biology of cutaneous genus β-PV is less well understood.
In order to gain more information of the mechanistic role of HPV in skin carcinogenesis, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) working group expressed the need for further research on potentially oncogenic cutaneous HPV types [5].
This chapter will give an overview on infections with genus β-PV and their roles in skin carcinogenesis in EV patients, in murine models, and in studies in vitro.
Human Papillomaviruses in Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis Patients
Epidermodysplasia verruciformis is a rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis first described by Lewandowsky and Lutz in 1922 [9,10,11]. EV-specific symptoms start early in life with the development of disseminated persisting flat warts or macular, red or brownish plaques, occasionally with a scaly surface. EV patients are at high risk to develop precancerous lesions and invasive cancer, particularly at sun-exposed areas of the skin [12]. Understanding fundamental mechanisms of β-PV during infection and skin carcinogenesis in EV patients may provide a better understanding of their potential impact on skin cancer in the general population.
Histology of EV Lesions and β-PV Genotypes
Histological analysis of EV lesions reveals large clear dysplastic cells with a granular cytoplasm and vacuolated nuclei found in clusters within the upper layers of the epidermis. This characteristic cytopathic effect is indicative of viral infection. Auto- and heteroinoculation experiments proved the infectious nature of the lesions [13]. Viral particles were then demonstrated in benign lesions by electron microscopy studies [14, 15]. Specific viral genomes were detected and later on characterized as human genus β-PV. In benign lesion of EV patients, the HPV types 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17, and 19–25 were detected most frequently. Most cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) in EV patients were shown to be associated with infection by the HPV types 5 and 8 pointing to a prominent role of these β-PV types in carcinogenic progression [16]. HPV types 5 and 8 were thus classified as “possibly carcinogenic” in patients with EV [5]. In contrast to earlier in situ hybridization data, highly sensitive techniques have allowed the detection of viral genomes also in malignant lesions. β-PV positive nuclei were found heterogeneously distributed in the tumor tissues [17]. Also viral gene expression may still be detectable in atypical cells of SCC, albeit at a lower level than in the benign lesions [18]. It can be concluded that viral gene expression is strongest during early stages of skin carcinogenesis. However, in EV skin HPV may persist in the epithelium throughout the process of carcinogenesis.
Genus β-PV Epidemiology
Family transmission studies have shown that genus β-PV populate the skin of healthy individuals already very early in life. The majority of HPV types found in children were also detected in one or both parents indicating intrafamilial transmission [19, 20]. Due to their ubiquity and diversity, a “commensalic nature” of these viruses has been suggested [21]. Thus, β-PVs are found not only in SCC and actinic keratosis of non-EV patients but also in clinically normal skin and plucked hairs [16, 21, 22]. In the various studies, detection rates strongly depended on the methods applied.
Long-term immunosuppressed patients are at particular risk to develop keratinocyte carcinoma [23]. Of note, in plucked hairs from this patient group, HPV was detected more frequently and with increased probability of high viral loads [22, 24]. From this, it was suggested that higher viral loads may contribute to the risk of skin cancer development. Moreover, several recent (sero)epidemiological studies point to an association between genus β-PV infection, UV susceptibility, and skin cancer in organ transplant recipients as well as in the general population [25,26,27,28].
Quantification of viral loads in skin lesions in the general population revealed that precancerous lesions contain higher HPV copy numbers than keratinocyte carcinomas [29]. In addition, transcriptome analysis indicated that HPV is no more actively transcribed in non-EV SCC [30]. This suggested that genus β-PV might play an early role during the initiation phase of skin carcinogenesis rather than a role in sustaining the carcinogenic process at later stages of the disease. In fact, animal models using natural infection, conditional transgenic mice, and human explant cultures [31,32,33] support this hypothesis, compatible with a “hit-and-run” mechanism [34].
The β-PV Life Cycle
HPV infect keratinocytes of the basal layer, and it is assumed that they also reside within the hair follicle compartment comprising epidermal stem cells. As with other HPVs, the life cycle of genus β-PV is tightly linked to the differentiation program of the stratifying epithelium. To indicate the sequence of viral gene expression during the HPV life cycle, viral gene products have been classified as early (E) and late proteins (L). β-PVs encode E1, 2, 4, 6, 7 proteins but lack an E5 ORF. In benign EV lesions, the viral genome is actively transcribed in a differentiation-dependent manner, as demonstrated for HPV5 [35].
E1 and E2 transcription start in the basal cells and particularly E2 expression increases with differentiation in the middle layers of the epithelium. Both proteins play an important role in viral transcription and replication. The nuclear transcription factor E2 interacts with a variety of cellular factors involved in transcriptional regulation [36] and influences cellular gene transcription in favor of the viral life cycle [37]. β4-integrin is the first cellular gene shown to be transcriptionally regulated through specific E2-binding sites. It anchors basal keratinocytes to the basement membrane. Loss of β4-integrin leads to the detachment of keratinocytes from the underlying structures. HPV8 E2 was shown to downregulate β4-integrin transcription in human keratinocytes by displacing the cellular transcriptional activator AP-1 from its promoter [37, 38]. In vivo, β4-integrin downregulation in keratinocytes may initiate their egress from the basal to suprabasal layers. Thus, it is assumed that E2 expression pushes the virally infected cells into the transit-amplifying compartment, a prerequisite for differentiation [37].
In suprabasal cells cellular transcription factors of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family are expressed in a coordinated manner. HPV8 E2 is able to bind to these proteins and to enhance their transcriptional activity. This ensures the expression of a distinct profile of cellular differentiation-dependent genes in the middle layers of the epidermis [39, 40]. Notably, E2 exploits the same pathway to induce the differentiation-associated S100 proteins A8 and A9. Once they are released, S100 A8/A9 can recruit myeloid cells to the lesion contributing to an inflammatory microenvironment, which may support the viral life cycle and potentially also carcinogenesis [40]. In the nucleus, β-PV E2 proteins bind to pericentromeric regions of cellular DNA and tether viral DNA to host mitotic chromosomes [41]. Interactions of E2 with structural maintenance of chromosome 5 (SMC5) and SMC6 help to maintain viral episomal DNA [42]. E1 together with E2 initiates a DNA damage response [43]. As a consequence, DNA damage and repair proteins are recruited to viral replication foci, which may support vegetative viral DNA replication [44]. This may preferentially occur in suprabasal cells, where cellular DNA replication is normally shut down.
In benign HPV5-positive EV lesions E6 and E7 transcripts are abundantly detected. E7 expression is highest in the terminally differentiated epidermal layers [35]. Functions and roles of these putative oncoproteins in cutaneous HPV infection and skin carcinogenesis have been investigated in vivo as well as in vitro. In view of the viral life cycle, it is assumed that early proteins of cutaneous HPV ensure a cellular environment that allows viral DNA replication in differentiated layers [45].
Replication of the dsDNA genome of β-PV and viral transcription are controlled by the noncoding control region (NCR). This region is located between the 3′ end of the late gene region and the 5′ end of the early gene region. The NCR of EV-associated HPVs differs from that of other HPVs. It is characterized by its small size of about 400 bp. E2 and cellular transcription factors bind to the NCR and regulate its activity. UV irradiation, the major skin carcinogen, activates the NCR of several β-PV [46,47,48]. Of note, it was shown that UV light induces and activates nuclear expression of the cellular interferon regulatory factor-7 (IRF-7) [49]. IRF-7 then directly binds to the HPV8 NCR and transmits the UV-signal [48]. IRF-7 itself is induced by type I IFN and enhances IFN-α and IFN-β gene expression [50]. Thus, HPV8 utilizes a central part of the natural antiviral IFN pathway for its own gene expression. In contrast, IRF-3, another related interferon regulatory factor, strongly suppresses the HPV8 NCR. IRF-3-mediated suppression prevails over IRF-7-mediated activation of HPV8 transcription. Similarly, suppression is observed in keratinocytes treated with the potent IRF-3 activators, poly(I:C) or RNA bearing 5` phosphates [48]. Thus, local application of IRF-3-activating compounds might be a novel therapeutic concept against cutaneous β-PV infection particularly for EV patients [7].
The Genetic Defect in EV Patients
An important susceptibility locus of EV patients has been mapped to chromosome 17q25 comprising two adjacent genes EVER1/TMC6 and EVER2/TMC8 [51,52,53]. EVER genes are expressed in keratinocytes and leukocytes. EV patients are not generally prone to infection and EVER2 deficiency is associated only with mild changes in T lymphocytes [54]. Therefore, it is assumed that the EVER proteins function mainly as keratinocyte-intrinsic restriction factors for β-PV [55]. The transmembrane channel-like proteins are located in the endoplasmic reticulum [56], where they form a complex with one of the zinc transporters ZnT-1. However, it was controversially discussed whether EVER proteins regulate zinc homeostasis [57, 58].
Recently, a third EV susceptibility gene encoding the pleiotropic factor calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1) [59] has been identified [58]. In normal cells, CIB1 forms a complex with EVER1 and EVER2, while in EVER1- or EVER2-mutated keratinocytes, CIB1 protein levels are low. The E5 protein encoded by the α-HPV16 and the γ-HPV4 E8 protein were shown to interact with CIB1, and it is hypothesized that they interfere with CIB1-dependent restriction. β-PVs, however, are lacking an E5 ORF, and therefore CIB1 may specifically restrict β-PVs [58]. Conversely, keratinocytes with reduced levels of CIB1 or CIB1-specific defects may efficiently support β-PV replication.
EV-Like Disease
Common Gamma-c or Jak3 Deficiency
In 50% of patients with severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) due to gamma-c cytokine receptor subunit (gamma-c) or Jak3 mutations, EV-like pathologies (“atypical EV”) can occur as a late-onset disease after successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [60]. They are either as a consequence of a natural killer (NK) cell or a keratinocyte-intrinsic defect.
Immunosuppression in Organ Transplant Recipients (OTRs), Inherited T-Cell Defects, and HIV
Molecular or seroepidemiological studies of OTRs who receive immunosuppressive treatments point to a crucial role of adaptive T-cell immunity for the control of β-PV infection and disease [27]. OTRs display infections with multiple β-PVs, higher viral loads than in the general population, and a more than 100-fold increased incidence of cSCCs [6, 61]. Although no overt EV-like disease is observed [55], β-PVs actively replicate in actinic keratosis and epithelium adjacent to cSCCs of these patients [62]. In addition, low penetrance of EV-like disease and infections with other pathogens are observed in patients with inherited primary T-cell deficiencies (summarized in [55]).
EV-like disease has also been described in HIV-positive individuals. Worsening of symptoms in these patients has been repeatedly observed during immune reconstitution associated with an inflammatory syndrome [63,64,65]. The relationship between the immune reconstitution syndrome and EV-like disease is, however, not yet fully understood.
Local Immune Control and Immune Escape in EV Patients
Although EV patients are able to mount a pronounced humoral response directed against the L1 major capsid protein [66], genus β-PV persists in the skin of EV patients for long periods of time. An important question is how these viruses, once expressed, manage to escape cutaneous immune control. It is assumed that cellular immunity against the virally infected cells is not efficiently elicited.
In this regard, a striking observation was the dramatic reduction of Langerhans cell numbers (Langerin-positive cells) in lesional areas of EV epidermis where viral replication and gene expression occurs [67]. This finding confirmed previous reports demonstrating the virtual absence of MHC class II or CD1a-positive cells in EV lesions [68, 69]. Skin immunity critically depends on the activity of Langerhans cells, specialized antigen-presenting cells residing in the epidermis. They locally take up antigen and migrate to local lymph nodes. In a homeostatic situation, they may dampen immune responses to self-antigens. However, depending on the microenvironmental stimuli, they will be able to cross-present soluble and cell-associated antigen from neighboring keratinocytes to CD8+ effector cells [70]. Thus, Langerhans cells are key regulators of immune responses in the skin.
Upon UV-light exposure, Langerhans cells leave the skin, which is known as a part of UV-mediated immunosuppression [71]. Under normal conditions the epidermis will then be repopulated again with Langerhans precursor cells migrating along a chemotactic gradient toward the chemokine CCL20 [72,73,74]. CCL20 was found to be expressed in the most differentiated layers of human epidermis. Of note, lesional areas of EV epidermis devoid of Langerhans cells express only low or no CCL20 protein [67]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of the CCL20 promoter and functional studies identified the differentiation-associated transcription factor C/EBPβ as a novel critical regulator of CCL20 gene expression in normal human keratinocytes. In situ studies demonstrated that the expression patterns of CCL20 and nuclear C/EBPβ converge spatially in the most differentiated layers of human epidermis. Of note, the E7 oncoprotein of HPV8 was shown to co-localize and interact with C/EBPβ in the nucleus. The interaction site could be mapped to a FQELL motif within the putative C-terminal zinc-finger loop. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the interaction between the viral and the cellular factor has important functional consequences. E7 interferes with the binding of C/EBPβ to the CCL20 promoter in vivo and specifically suppresses CCL20 gene expression. In fact, keratinocytes expressing the HPV8 E7 protein produce only very low amounts of the chemokine CCL20 and display strongly reduced chemotactic activity toward Langerhans cells [67]. As a consequence, EV lesions may not be properly repopulated with Langerhans cells after UV exposure resulting in impaired antigen presentation.
Thus, once expressed at sufficiently high levels, HPV8 is able to disrupt the epithelial immune barrier allowing viral persistence.
UV Light and β-PV as Cocarcinogens in EV Patients
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation and β-PVs cooperate as cocarcinogens in EV patients. Recently, investigations of EV lesions have shed light into the molecular mechanism underlying this multistep process, i.e., β-PV-mediated (1) expansion of the epithelial progenitor cell compartment, (2) enhancement of UV-mediated DNA damage, and (3) of chronic inflammation.
β-PV-Mediated Expansion of the Epithelial Progenitor Cell Compartment in EV Lesions
A seminal observation in skin lesions of EV patients was the HPV8-mediated expansion of the ΔNp63-positive stem cell compartment via suppression of the stemness-repressing microRNA-203 [75]. This was particularly interesting, since this compartment displays an enhanced susceptibility to carcinogenic progression [76]. As the underlying mechanism, the cellular differentiation-regulating transcription factor C/EBPα was identified as a novel regulator of microRNA-203. C/EBPα is strongly downregulated by the major β-HPV oncoprotein E6 and, like miR-203, potently suppressed in EV lesions [75]. In addition, β-HPV E6 also binds to Mastermind-like protein 1 (MAML1), thereby interfering Notch, another important regulator of keratinocyte differentiation [77, 78]. Notably, C/EBPα is not only a key regulator of epidermal differentiation, but it also suppresses UV-induced skin carcinogenesis in mice [79, 80]. Thus, this novel β-HPV E6-driven C/EBPα/microRNA-20/ΔNp63 profoundly disturbs epidermal homeostasis in EV patients and expands the stem cell compartment, a critical step paving the way for UV-mediated skin carcinogenesis.
UV-Induced p53 Mutations in EV Lesions
UVB displays significant mutagenic activity [81]. An important target gene of UV-induced mutagenesis is the tumor suppressor protein p53 [82, 83]. Upon genotoxic stress wild-type p53 activates cell cycle checkpoints in normal keratinocytes. This leads to growth arrest, which allows DNA repair or initiates the execution of programmed cell death [84]. UV-induced pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproducts and unrepaired cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers may result in C to T or CC to TT mutations in the p53 gene [85, 86]. p53 mutations may arise causing the inactivation of p53 functions. As a consequence, this eventually results in genomic instability, a major step in carcinogenesis.
In a retrospective study of two EV patients during an 8-year period, p53 mutations were detected in five (62.5%) SCC, two actinic keratoses, and one benign lesion. These comprised UV-signature mutations as well as mutations that might correspond to DNA replication errors. It was speculated that unrepaired DNA lesions caused by other exogenous or endogenous mutagens such as reactive oxygen species might also play a role [87]. β-PV E6 interferes with the DNA damage response and UV-induced apoptosis in vitro [88, 89], potentially allowing the accumulation of UV-mediated DNA mutations (summarized in [90]). Obviously, p53 mutations are common in HPV-associated skin cancer in EV patients. This is in strong contrast to cervical carcinogenesis, where p53 mutations are rarely detected. A major oncogenic activity of mucosal high-risk genus α-PV involves proteolytic degradation of p53 by the E6 protein forming a complex with the ubiquitin ligase E6-AP [91, 92]. Most β-PV E6 proteins, however, do not bind p53 or lead to p53 degradation [45, 93, 94]. This indicates that oncogenic mechanisms of human genus β-PV are distinct from those of mucosal high-risk genus α-PV. In genus β-PV-initiated carcinogenesis, rather the increased burden of critical mutations, which also affect p53, may substantially contribute to disease progression at later stages.
β-HPV-Mediated Amplification of Inflammation in EV Lesions
While mucosal HPVs suppress inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (summarized in [8, 95]) HPV8-positive skin of EV patients is infiltrated with myeloid cells, starting in the stroma of productive lesions. In the epithelium of EV lesions, S100A8/A9 proteins are tremendously upregulated in cells showing virus-induced cytopathic effects [40]. These differentiation-associated S100A8/A9 proteins form a calprotectin complex. Once released, calprotectin serves as a potent neutrophil chemoattractant [96]. Notably, the β-PV-encoded transcription factor E2 exploits the same C/EBPβ-dependent mechanism to upregulate S100A8/A9 [40] as previously shown for the premature enhancement of differentiation [39]. Also other neutrophil-attracting chemokines including interleukin-8 (IL-8), ENA-78, and NAP-2 are produced by keratinocytes co-expressing HPV8 E2 and C/EBPβ, which may further increase neutrophil infiltration [40].
The ability of β-PV E2 to promote differentiation thus appears to be intimately linked to the induction of inflammation [37,38,39,40], and the resulting inflammatory microenvironment may pave the way for tumorigenesis as observed in HPV8 E2 transgenic mice [97].
Functional Studies of Cutaneous PV in Animal Models
Τransgenic Mouse Models
The oncogenic potential of β-PV has been explored in transgenic mouse models. Mice expressing the complete early region of HPV8 under the keratin-14 promoter, which directs transgene expression to the basal compartment, spontaneously developed skin tumors. In 6% of the mice, SCC arose without any need for physical or chemical carcinogens [98]. Of note, it was shown that the cellular signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays an important role in HPV8-induced skin tumor formation [99]. STAT3 is also activated in the epithelium and inflammatory infiltrate in preneoplastic lesions of the cervix uteri [100, 101]. Thus, STAT3 activation plays a major role in HPV-induced tumorigenesis.
Expression of the HPV8 E6 protein under the keratin-14 promoter generated essentially the same phenotype as seen in mice transgenic for the complete early region of HPV8 [102]. From these experiments it has been deduced that E6 is the major oncoprotein of HPV8 sufficient to induce skin cancer. Application of UV light or skin wounding strongly accelerated and enhanced tumor formation [102].
Under both conditions, UV exposure or wounding, tumors displayed a strong inflammatory infiltrate. Chronic inflammation has an important role in neoplastic progression [103]. This notion is compatible with the observation of EV-like disease during the immune reconstitution phase in HIV patients. Of note, chronic inflammatory infiltrates were also observed in lesional skin from EV patients, and a link between β-HPV E2, keratinocyte differentiation, and inflammation has recently been identified [40]. In vitro experiments have demonstrated that high E2 expression not only initiates premature differentiation of keratinocytes [37,38,39], it also upregulates the differentiation-associated S100A8/A9 proteins and thereby leads to the recruitment of myeloid inflammatory cells [40]. Accordingly, in mice expressing the HPV8 E2 protein under the keratin-14 promoter, the epidermis was virtually thin predisposing to ulcerations, similar to a “chronic, non-healing wound” [104]. Lesions in these mice showed chronic inflammation, in 6% severe dysplasia, and some even progressed to skin cancer [97]. Thus, evidence is increasing that the β-PV E2 protein contributes to a chronic protumorigenic inflammatory response observed in vivo.
Expression of HPV38 E6 and E7 under the control of the keratin-14 promoter did not result in spontaneous tumor formation, but precancerous lesions and SCC developed after chronic UV irradiation [105]. Using a heterologous keratin-10 promoter directing HPV38 or HPV20 E6 and E7 transgene expression to the suprabasal compartment did not lead to spontaneous tumor formation, either [106, 107]. Comparison of the different models demonstrated that the oncogenic potency of genus β-PV is highest, if their major oncogene E6 is expressed in the basal layer of the epidermis. Chronic UVB irradiation of HPV20 transgenic mice increased papilloma formation and led to the rare occurrence of SCCs [107]. These animal models clearly demonstrated the oncogenic potential of genus β-PV in vivo when continuously expressed under the keratin-14 promoter. They also underscore a synergism between genus β-PV and UV light as well as the importance of inflammatory responses in β-PV-mediated skin tumor induction.
Evidence for a “Hit-and-Run” Mechanism
Using a novel mastomys coucha model with natural PV infection [108], conditional transgenic mice, as well as human explant cultures, the question has been investigated whether or not cutaneous PV are necessary throughout carcinogenesis [31,32,33]. Together, all these studies provided evidence that β-PVs have an early role in skin carcinogenesis, and at later stages, they become dispensable for the maintenance of the malignant phenotype, compatible with a “hit-and-run” mechanism [34].
Molecular and Functional Studies of Human Genus β-Papillomaviruses In Vitro
Comparative analyses demonstrated that several genus β-PV have transforming potential in vitro. For this, an oncogene (activated EJ-ras) cooperation assay in rodent cells was used [109, 110]. A subset of genus β-PVs was shown to extend the life span of primary human keratinocytes. For E6/E7 oncogenes of HPV49, HPV38, and HPV8, although weaker, immortalization of keratinocytes was demonstrated [111,112,113]. Thus, β-PV oncoproteins clearly have the potential to transform their natural host cells. However, the molecular mechanisms by which genus β-PV oncoproteins support the oncogenic process in skin can strongly differ from α-PVs. This part describes the major functional differences and similarities between mucosal genus α-PV and cutaneous β-PV.
The β-PV E6 Oncoprotein
There is evidence that β-PV E6 proteins have a profound impact on the regulation of epithelial homeostasis, UV-induced DNA damage responses and cell death in keratinocytes.
HPV oncoproteins lack enzymatic activity. Recent studies have unraveled important pathways targeted by genus β-PV E6 proteins. Thus, HPV8 E6 has been shown to transcriptionally suppress C/EBPα [75], a potent inducer of keratinocyte differentiation and suppressor of UV-induced carcinogenesis [79, 80]. C/EBPα was identified as a novel suppressor of this microRNA controlling the stemness factor ΔNp63 [75]. It directly binds to the microRNA-203 gene, and, via the novel C/EBPα/microRNA-20/ΔNp63 pathway, HPV8 E6 potently alters keratinocyte homeostasis. This leads to the expansion of the ΔNp63-expressing epithelial progenitor compartment keratinocytes, which is highly susceptible to carcinogenic progression [76].
In addition, β-PV E6 proteins specifically bind to the Mastermind-like coactivator MAML1. As a consequence, this leads to suppression of Notch signaling [77, 114,115,116]. Notch is a key regulator of keratinocyte differentiation. Of note, MAML1 binding was highly specific for the cutaneous E6 proteins and was not observed for eight different genus α-PV E6 proteins. The latter E6 proteins neither interact with MAML1 nor with Notch1, Notch2, or RBPJ, a Notch-regulated transcription factor [45]. In mice, Notch also suppresses skin tumor formation [117]. Thus, interference of β-PV E6 with both, the C/EBPα/microRNA-20/ΔNp63 and the MAML1/Notch pathways, may contribute to tumorigenesis.
A key mechanism of the high-risk mucosal genus α-PV E6 oncoproteins is seen in its interaction with the tumor suppressor protein p53 as well as the ubiquitin ligase E6-AP, which targets p53 to proteasomal degradation [118,119,120]. In strong contrast, most genus β-PV E6 including HPV8 E6 do not bind to p53. Exceptions from this rule are HPV49 E6, as well as E6 proteins from two further β-PV, HPV38 and 92, which are able to interact with p53 [45, 93, 94, 113]. A comprehensive E6 interaction analysis, however, demonstrated that the p53 protein was rather stabilized by a posttranslational mechanism in keratinocytes expressing HPV38 or 92 E6 proteins. A similar effect was observed by HPV17a E6, a “p53 nonbinder” [45]. The functional significance of these findings and their consequences still has to be elucidated.
As outlined above, mutations of p53 are frequently found during skin carcinogenesis in the general population as well as in HPV-associated skin cancer in EV patients, which is a profound difference to cervical carcinogenesis. Moreover, several other ways might exist how β-PV E6 proteins interfere with p53 function. For example, HPV77 E6 selectively inhibits p53-dependent transcription of proapoptotic genes following UVB irradiation in cell lines [121]. HPV23 E6 was shown to prevent p53 phosphorylation through an interaction with the homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 [122]. In case of HPV38, the E6 protein was shown to affect p53 signaling indirectly, by inducing the expression of the deltaN isoform of p73 [123].
β-PV E6 proteins can extend the life span of human keratinocytes, and this was strongest for HPV38 and 8 [124, 125]. Particularly in cells expressing the latter E6 proteins, activation of telomerase was observed, and this occurred in an E6-AP-dependent manner [124], although no stable physical interaction of E6-AP and β-PV E6 proteins was observed in a different study [45]. Another important feature of different β-PV E6 proteins is seen in their ability to abrogate UV-mediated apoptosis. In vitro studies suggested that p53 degradation was not required, and inhibition of apoptosis was also observed in p53 null cells. One mechanism how β-PV E6 proteins exert their antiapoptotic activity is the proteolytic degradation of the proapoptotic molecule Bak [88]. This observation was later on confirmed for HPV5, 8, 20, 22, 38, 76, 92, and 96 in normal human keratinocytes [89].
β-PV E6 was shown to have variety of novel interaction partners including proteins containing PDZ motifs as well as proteins of the Ccr4-Not complex. Moreover, HPV5, 8, 20, and 25 E6 proteins specifically bind the acetyltransferases and transcriptional coactivators p300/CBP [45, 126, 127]. Several studies indicate that p300 binding by β-PV E6 affects important downstream signaling events most relevant for tumorigenesis, such as C/EBPα suppression [75], acetylation of p53, and p53-dependent transcription [128]. Thus, in HPV-associated skin carcinogenesis, p53 might either be mutated or inhibited at a functional level by β-PV E6 proteins.
P300 binding of E6 also contributes to suppression of keratinocyte differentiation and expression of the kinase ATR (ataxia telangiectasia, mutated and Rad3-related), a key regulator of the checkpoint pathway in the DNA damage response [127, 129]. Reduced ATR levels in β-PV HPV5 or 8 E6 expressing keratinocytes can increase the occurrence of UVB-induced double-stranded DNA breaks and thymine dimer persistence [129] summarized in [90]. These data confirmed previous observations demonstrating a compromised repair of UV-induced thymine dimers in cell lines expressing β-PV E6 proteins [121]. The in vitro observations are also in line with the in vivo finding that HPV8 and 38 oncoproteins can significantly promote UV-induced tumorigenesis in transgenic mice [102, 105]. The fact that E6 enhances UV-induced mutagenesis may explain the accumulation of DNA mutations found in EV lesions including those within the p53 gene [87].
Thus, genus β-PV E6 proteins engage various strategies to promote tumorigenesis. At later stages of carcinogenesis, when E6 expression has promoted UV-induced genomic DNA alterations, p53 may itself be mutated and thereby inactivated. From this stage on, cellular mechanisms driving progression to cancer may dominate, and further persistence of the virus and maintenance of viral oncogene expression may become dispensable.
The β-PV E7 Protein
A key function of the mucosal high-risk E7 protein is seen in binding to and degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein pRb. The G1-S phase checkpoint is bypassed, and cell cycle regulation is disrupted. This allows viral DNA replication in differentiating keratinocytes and contributes to the oncogenic activity. A recent systematic interaction analysis confirmed previous studies showing that genus α- and β-PV E7 proteins from different HPV species share the ability to bind to pRb as well as CUL3, a cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase [130]. Most cutaneous E7 proteins bind pRb with lower affinities; however, HPV5 and 38 E7 were also shown to destabilize pRb [111, 112, 131].
β-PV E7 proteins may promote epithelial proliferation by further paracrine mechanisms altering the response to the local microenvironment. It has been demonstrated that the antiproliferative cytokine TGF-β is strongly upregulated in keratinocyte-fibroblast cocultures [132]. Keratinocytes expressing the E7 protein, however, showed strongly reduced responsiveness to TGF-β signaling . This was explained by their binding to Smad factors mediating the intracellular TGF-β signal. Again, this was a common feature of mucosal and cutaneous high- and low-risk HPV types [133, 134].
Another feature shared by the β-PV HPV8 and mucosal high-risk HPV16 but not the cutaneous low-risk HPV1 E7 protein is induction of the membrane-bound matrix metalloproteinase MT-1 MMP at mRNA and protein levels [135, 136]. There is a long list of MT-1 MMP substrates including MT-1 MMP itself, plasminogen, chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors promoting keratinocyte proliferation and angiogenesis (for review see [137]).
In addition, the genus β-HPV8 E7 protein may alter the microenvironment in a completely different manner. By binding to the transcription factor C/EBPβ in the granular layer, it specifically suppresses CCL20 expression and impairs Langerhans cell recruitment. This provides an explanation for the deficiency of Langerhans cells in EV lesions [67]. Thus, β-PV E7 proteins apparently do not directly promote carcinogenesis in vivo. However, it has been convincingly demonstrated that they can affect virus-host interactions critical for evading host immune defense and providing a microenvironment that is conducive for skin carcinogenesis.
Conclusions
Evidence is accumulating that cutaneous genus β-PVs are important cocarcinogens in UV-induced skin carcinogenesis. However, underlying mechanisms differ significantly from the carcinogenic process driven by high-risk mucosal genus α-PVs.
In the general population, β-PVs are found in the commensal skin flora. Their expression is tightly controlled by host restriction factors and extrinsic immunity. Patients with disturbed control mechanisms, i.e., mutations in restriction factors or impaired immune control, however, show higher disease penetrance, i.e., EV or EV-like symptoms or development of skin cancer.
Once expressed, β-PV undergoes a life cycle that is highly adapted to the skin, UV exposure, UV damage, and an inflammatory host microenvironment. They expand the cutaneous epithelial progenitor cell compartment, which is highly susceptible to carcinogenic progression, disturb cutaneous immune homeostasis, fuel tumor-promoting inflammation, and lower the threshold to UV-induced DNA damage while promoting the life span of their host cells through preventing UV-induced apoptosis. This may lead to an enhanced accumulation of genomic mutations in infected cells. In vivo animal studies and ex vivo human studies imply that β-PV can act as powerful cocarcinogens at early stages of skin carcinogenesis. It is reasonable to assume that once genetic alterations, such as p53 mutations, have become established, the continuous presence of the virus may be dispensable for the maintenance of malignancy, compatible with a “hit-and-run” mechanism.
For the development of novel therapeutic strategies specifically interfering with β-PV at early stages of carcinogenesis, more research is needed to better understand the cross talk with their host keratinocytes and the local microenvironment.
References
Bernard HU, et al. Classification of papillomaviruses (PVs) based on 189 PV types and proposal of taxonomic amendments. Virology. 2010;401(1):70–9.
Schiller JT, Lowy DR. Understanding and learning from the success of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(10):681–92.
Patel, C., et al. The impact of 10 years of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Australia: what additional disease burden will a nonavalent vaccine prevent? Euro Surveill, 2018;23(41).
Jablonska S, Majewski S. Epidermodysplasia verruciformis: immunological and clinical aspects. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1994;186:157–75.
Bouvard V, et al. A review of human carcinogens--Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(4):321–2.
Howley PM, Pfister HJ. Beta genus papillomaviruses and skin cancer. Virology. 2015;479-480:290–6.
Venuti A, et al. Cross-talk of cutaneous beta human papillomaviruses and the immune system: determinants of disease penetrance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2019;374(1773):20180287.
Smola, S. Immunopathogenesis of HPV-associated cancers and prospects for immunotherapy. Viruses, 2017;9(9).
Lewandowsky F, Lutz W. Ein Fall einer bisher nicht beschriebenen Hauterkrankung (Epidermodysplasia verruciformis). Arch Dermatol Syph. 1922;141:193–203.
Lutzner MA. Epidermodysplasia verruciformis. An autosomal recessive disease characterized by viral warts and skin cancer. A model for viral oncogenesis. Bull Cancer. 1978;65(2):169–82.
Rajagopalan K, et al. Familial epidermodysplasia verruciformis of Lewandowsky and Lutz. Arch Dermatol. 1972;105(1):73–8.
Orth G. Genetics of epidermodysplasia verruciformis: insights into host defense against papillomaviruses. Semin Immunol. 2006;18(6):362–74.
Jablonska S, Milewski B. Information on epidermodysplasia verruciformis Lewandowsky-Lutz; positive results of auto- and heteroinoculation. Dermatologica. 1957;115(1):1–22.
Ruiter M, van Mullem PJ. Behavior of virus in malignant degeneration of skin lesion in epidermodysplasia verruciformis. J Invest Dermatol. 1970;54(4):324–31.
Yabe Y, et al. Virus particles in epidermodysplasia verruciformis with carcinoma. Dermatologica. 1969;139(2):161–4.
Pfister H. Chapter 8: human papillomavirus and skin cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2003;31:52–6.
Dell'Oste V, et al. High beta-HPV DNA loads and strong seroreactivity are present in epidermodysplasia verruciformis. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(4):1026–34.
Borgogna C, et al. Characterization of Beta papillomavirus E4 expression in tumours from Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis patients and in experimental models. Virology. 2012;423(2):195–204.
Weissenborn SJ, et al. Intrafamilial transmission and family-specific spectra of cutaneous beta papillomaviruses. J Virol. 2009;83(2):811–6.
Antonsson A, et al. General acquisition of human papillomavirus infections of skin occurs in early infancy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(6):2509–14.
Antonsson A, et al. The ubiquity and impressive genomic diversity of human skin papillomaviruses suggest a commensalic nature of these viruses. J Virol. 2000;74(24):11636–41.
Boxman IL, et al. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in plucked hairs from renal transplant recipients and healthy volunteers. J Invest Dermatol. 1997;108(5):712–5.
Jensen P, et al. Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(2 Pt 1):177–86.
Weissenborn S, et al. Beta-papillomavirus DNA loads in hair follicles of immunocompetent people and organ transplant recipients. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2012;201(2):117–25.
Karagas MR, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and incidence of squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas of the skin. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(6):389–95.
Karagas MR, et al. Genus beta human papillomaviruses and incidence of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of skin: population based case-control study. BMJ. 2010;341:c2986.
Proby CM, et al. A case-control study of beta papillomavirus infection and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(7):1498–508.
Iannacone MR, et al. Case-control study of cutaneous human papillomaviruses in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2012;21(8):1303–13.
Weissenborn SJ, et al. Human papillomavirus-DNA loads in actinic keratoses exceed those in non-melanoma skin cancers. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125(1):93–7.
Arron ST, et al. Transcriptome sequencing demonstrates that human papillomavirus is not active in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(8):1745–53.
Hasche D, et al. The interplay of UV and cutaneous papillomavirus infection in skin cancer development. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(11):e1006723.
Viarisio D, et al. Beta HPV38 oncoproteins act with a hit-and-run mechanism in ultraviolet radiation-induced skin carcinogenesis in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(1):e1006783.
Borgogna C, et al. beta-HPV infection correlates with early stages of carcinogenesis in skin tumors and patient-derived xenografts from a kidney transplant recipient cohort. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:117.
Hasche D, Vinzon SE, Rosl F. Cutaneous papillomaviruses and non-melanoma skin cancer: causal agents or innocent bystanders? Front Microbiol. 2018;9:874.
Haller K, Stubenrauch F, Pfister H. Differentiation-dependent transcription of the epidermodysplasia verruciformis-associated human papillomavirus type 5 in benign lesions. Virology. 1995;214(1):245–55.
Muller M, et al. Large scale genotype comparison of human papillomavirus E2-host interaction networks provides new insights for e2 molecular functions. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(6):e1002761.
Oldak M, et al. The human papillomavirus type 8 E2 protein suppresses beta4-integrin expression in primary human keratinocytes. J Virol. 2004;78(19):10738–46.
Oldak M, et al. Human papillomavirus type 8 E2 protein unravels JunB/Fra-1 as an activator of the beta4-integrin gene in human keratinocytes. J Virol. 2010;84(3):1376–86.
Hadaschik D, et al. The papillomavirus E2 protein binds to and synergizes with C/EBP factors involved in keratinocyte differentiation. J Virol. 2003;77(9):5253–65.
Podgorska M, et al. Chronic inflammatory microenvironment in epidermodysplasia VERRUCIFORMIS skin lesions: role of the synergism between HPV8 E2 and C/EBPbeta to induce pro-inflammatory S100A8/A9 proteins. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:392.
Oliveira JG, Colf LA, McBride AA. Variations in the association of papillomavirus E2 proteins with mitotic chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(4):1047–52.
Bentley P, et al. The SMC5/6 complex interacts with the papillomavirus E2 protein and influences maintenance of viral episomal DNA. J Virol. 2018:92(15).
Sakakibara N, Mitra R, McBride AA. The papillomavirus E1 helicase activates a cellular DNA damage response in viral replication foci. J Virol. 2011;85(17):8981–95.
McBride AA, et al. Hitchhiking on host chromatin: how papillomaviruses persist. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1819(7):820–5.
White EA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of host cellular interactions with human papillomavirus E6 proteins identifies new E6 binding partners and reflects viral diversity. J Virol. 2012;86(24):13174–86.
Ruhland A, de Villiers EM. Opposite regulation of the HPV 20-URR and HPV 27-URR promoters by ultraviolet irradiation and cytokines. Int J Cancer. 2001;91(6):828–34.
Akgul B, et al. UV-B irradiation stimulates the promoter activity of the high-risk, cutaneous human papillomavirus 5 and 8 in primary keratinocytes. Arch Virol. 2005;150(1):145–51.. Epub 2004 Oct 5
Oldak M, et al. Differential regulation of human papillomavirus type 8 by interferon regulatory factors 3 and 7. J Virol. 2011;85(1):178–88.
Kim TK, et al. Chemotherapeutic DNA-damaging drugs activate interferon regulatory factor-7 by the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-4-cJun NH2-terminal kinase pathway. Cancer Res. 2000;60(5):1153–6.
Takaoka A, Tamura T, Taniguchi T. Interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors and regulation of oncogenesis. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(3):467–78.. Epub 2008 Jan 9
Ramoz N, et al. A susceptibility locus for epidermodysplasia verruciformis, an abnormal predisposition to infection with the oncogenic human papillomavirus type 5, maps to chromosome 17qter in a region containing a psoriasis locus. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;112(3):259–63.
Ramoz N, et al. Evidence for a nonallelic heterogeneity of epidermodysplasia verruciformis with two susceptibility loci mapped to chromosome regions 2p21-p24 and 17q25. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;114(6):1148–53.
Ramoz N, et al. Mutations in two adjacent novel genes are associated with epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Nat Genet. 2002;32(4):579–81.
Crequer A, et al. EVER2 deficiency is associated with mild T-cell abnormalities. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(1):14–21.
de Jong SJ, et al. Epidermodysplasia verruciformis: inborn errors of immunity to human beta-papillomaviruses. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1222.
Keresztes G, Mutai H, Heller S. TMC and EVER genes belong to a larger novel family, the TMC gene family encoding transmembrane proteins. BMC Genomics. 2003;4(1):24.
Lazarczyk M, et al. The EVER proteins as a natural barrier against papillomaviruses: a new insight into the pathogenesis of human papillomavirus infections. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73(2):348–70.
de Jong SJ, et al. The human CIB1-EVER1-EVER2 complex governs keratinocyte-intrinsic immunity to beta-papillomaviruses. J Exp Med. 2018;215(9):2289–310.
Leisner TM, et al. CIB1: a small protein with big ambitions. FASEB J. 2016;30(8):2640–50.
Laffort C, et al. Severe cutaneous papillomavirus disease after haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with severe combined immune deficiency caused by common gammac cytokine receptor subunit or JAK-3 deficiency. Lancet. 2004;363(9426):2051–4.
Bouwes Bavinck JN, et al. Human papillomavirus and posttransplantation cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(5):1220–30.
Borgogna C, et al. Improved detection reveals active beta-papillomavirus infection in skin lesions from kidney transplant recipients. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(8):1101–15.
da Silva LC, et al. Post-ART epidermodysplasia verruciformis in a patient with AIDS. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2010;9(1):10–4.
Huiras E, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2008;3(4):453–60.
Mermet I, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia associated with epidermodysplasia verruciformis HPV in an HIV-infected patient: a manifestation of immune restoration syndrome. Eur J Dermatol. 2007;17(2):149–52.
Michael KM, et al. Seroreactivity of 38 human papillomavirus types in epidermodysplasia verruciformis patients, relatives, and controls. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(3):841–8.
Sperling T, et al. Human papillomavirus type 8 interferes with a novel C/EBP beta-mediated mechanism of keratinocyte CCL20 chemokine expression and Langerhans cell migration. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(7):e1002833.
Cooper KD, et al. Antigen presentation and T-cell activation in epidermodysplasia verruciformis. J Invest Dermatol. 1990;94(6):769–76.
van Voorst Vader PC, et al. Epidermodysplasia verruciformis: langerhans cells, immunologic effect of retinoid treatment and cytogenetics. Arch Dermatol Res. 1987;279(6):366–73.
Stoitzner P, et al. Langerhans cells cross-present antigen derived from skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(20):7783–8.
Dandie GW, et al. Effects of UV on the migration and function of epidermal antigen presenting cells. Mutat Res. 1998;422(1):147–54.
Charbonnier AS, et al. Macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha is involved in the constitutive trafficking of epidermal langerhans cells. J Exp Med. 1999;190(12):1755–68.
Dieu-Nosjean MC, et al. Macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha is expressed at inflamed epithelial surfaces and is the most potent chemokine known in attracting Langerhans cell precursors. J Exp Med. 2000;192(5):705–18.
Le Borgne M, et al. Dendritic cells rapidly recruited into epithelial tissues via CCR6/CCL20 are responsible for CD8+ T cell crosspriming in vivo. Immunity. 2006;24(2):191–201.
Marthaler AM, et al. Identification of C/EBPalpha as a novel target of the HPV8 E6 protein regulating miR-203 in human keratinocytes. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(6):e1006406.
Missero C, Antonini D. p63 in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: more than a stem cell/progenitor marker. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(2):280–1.
Tan MJ, et al. Cutaneous beta-human papillomavirus E6 proteins bind Mastermind-like coactivators and repress Notch signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(23):E1473–80.
Meyers JM, Spangle JM, Munger K. The human papillomavirus type 8 E6 protein interferes with NOTCH activation during keratinocyte differentiation. J Virol. 2013;87(8):4762–7.
Thompson EA, et al. C/EBP alpha expression is downregulated in human nonmelanoma skin cancers and inactivation of C/EBP alpha confers susceptibility to UVB-induced skin squamous cell carcinomas. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(6):1339–46.
Schuster MB, Porse BT. C/EBPalpha: a tumour suppressor in multiple tissues? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1766(1):88–103.
Sinha RP, Hader DP. UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2002;1(4):225–36.
Roshan A, Jones PH. Chronic low dose UV exposure and p53 mutation: tilting the odds in early epidermal preneoplasia? Int J Radiat Biol. 2012;88(10):682–7.
Brash DE, et al. A role for sunlight in skin cancer: UV-induced p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(22):10124–8.
Amundson SA, Myers TG, Fornace AJ Jr. Roles for p53 in growth arrest and apoptosis: putting on the brakes after genotoxic stress. Oncogene. 1998;17(25):3287–99.
Ziegler A, et al. Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature. 1994;372(6508):773–6.
Ziegler A, et al. Mutation hotspots due to sunlight in the p53 gene of nonmelanoma skin cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(9):4216–20.
Padlewska K, et al. Mutation and abnormal expression of the p53 gene in the viral skin carcinogenesis of epidermodysplasia verruciformis. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117(4):935–42.
Jackson S, et al. Role of Bak in UV-induced apoptosis in skin cancer and abrogation by HPV E6 proteins. Genes Dev. 2000;14(23):3065–73.
Underbrink MP, et al. E6 proteins from multiple human beta papillomavirus types degrade Bak and protect keratinocytes from apoptosis after UVB irradiation. J Virol. 2008;82(21):10408–17.
Wendel SO, Wallace NA. Loss of genome fidelity: beta HPVs and the DNA damage response. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2250.
Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M, Howley PM. A cellular protein mediates association of p53 with the E6 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus types 16 or 18. EMBO J. 1991;10(13):4129–35.
Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M, Howley PM. Cloning and expression of the cDNA for E6-AP, a protein that mediates the interaction of the human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein with p53. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13(2):775–84.
Steger G, Pfister H. In vitro expressed HPV 8 E6 protein does not bind p53. Arch Virol. 1992;125(1–4):355–60.
Elbel M, et al. A comparative analysis of the interactions of the E6 proteins from cutaneous and genital papillomaviruses with p53 and E6AP in correlation to their transforming potential. Virology. 1997;239(1):132–49.
Smola S. Immune deviation and cervical carcinogenesis. Papillomavirus Res. 2019;7:164–7.
Ryckman C, et al. Proinflammatory activities of S100: proteins S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/A9 induce neutrophil chemotaxis and adhesion. J Immunol. 2003;170(6):3233–42.
Pfefferle R, et al. The human papillomavirus type 8 E2 protein induces skin tumors in transgenic mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(9):2310–5.. Epub 2008 Apr 10
Schaper ID, et al. Development of skin tumors in mice transgenic for early genes of human papillomavirus type 8. Cancer Res. 2005;65(4):1394–400.
De Andrea M, et al. Keratinocyte-specific stat3 heterozygosity impairs development of skin tumors in human papillomavirus 8 transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2010;70(20):7938–48.
Schroer N, et al. Molecular pathobiology of human cervical high-grade lesions: paracrine STAT3 activation in tumor-instructed myeloid cells drives local MMP-9 expression. Cancer Res. 2011;71(1):87–97.
Walch-Ruckheim B, et al. STAT3/IRF1 pathway activation sensitizes cervical cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs. Cancer Res. 2016;76(13):3872–83.
Marcuzzi GP, et al. Spontaneous tumour development in human papillomavirus type 8 E6 transgenic mice and rapid induction by UV-light exposure and wounding. J Gen Virol. 2009;90(Pt 12):2855–64.. Epub 2009 Aug 19
Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860–7.
Dvorak HF. Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1986;315(26):1650–9.
Viarisio D, et al. E6 and E7 from beta HPV38 cooperate with ultraviolet light in the development of actinic keratosis-like lesions and squamous cell carcinoma in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(7):e1002125.
Dong W, et al. Skin hyperproliferation and susceptibility to chemical carcinogenesis in transgenic mice expressing E6 and E7 of human papillomavirus type 38. J Virol. 2005;79(23):14899–908.
Michel A, et al. E6/E7 expression of human papillomavirus type 20 (HPV-20) and HPV-27 influences proliferation and differentiation of the skin in UV-irradiated SKH-hr1 transgenic mice. J Virol. 2006;80(22):11153–64.
Hasche D, Rosl F. Mastomys species as model systems for infectious diseases. Viruses. 2019;11(2).
Massimi P, et al. Comparative transforming potential of different human papillomaviruses associated with non-melanoma skin cancer. Virology. 2008;371(2):374–9.
Yamashita T, et al. Biological and biochemical activity of E7 genes of the cutaneous human papillomavirus type 5 and 8. Oncogene. 1993;8(9):2433–41.
Caldeira S, et al. The E6 and E7 proteins of the cutaneous human papillomavirus type 38 display transforming properties. J Virol. 2003;77(3):2195–206.
Schmitt A, et al. Comparison of the properties of the E6 and E7 genes of low- and high-risk cutaneous papillomaviruses reveals strongly transforming and high Rb-binding activity for the E7 protein of the low-risk human papillomavirus type 1. J Virol. 1994;68(11):7051–9.
Cornet I, et al. Comparative analysis of transforming properties of E6 and E7 from different beta human papillomavirus types. J Virol. 2012;86(4):2366–70.
Brimer N, et al. Cutaneous papillomavirus E6 oncoproteins associate with MAML1 to repress transactivation and NOTCH signaling. Oncogene. 2012;31(43):4639–46.
Rozenblatt-Rosen O, et al. Interpreting cancer genomes using systematic host network perturbations by tumour virus proteins. Nature. 2012;487(7408):491–5.
Meyers JM, Spangle JM, Munger K. The HPV8 E6 protein interferes with NOTCH activation during keratinocyte differentiation. J Virol. 2013;87:4762.
Nicolas M, et al. Notch1 functions as a tumor suppressor in mouse skin. Nat Genet. 2003;33(3):416–21.
Scheffner M, et al. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell. 1990;63(6):1129–36.
Scheffner M, et al. The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase in the ubiquitination of p53. Cell. 1993;75(3):495–505.
Werness BA, Levine AJ, Howley PM. Association of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 E6 proteins with p53. Science. 1990;248(4951):76–9.
Giampieri S, Storey A. Repair of UV-induced thymine dimers is compromised in cells expressing the E6 protein from human papillomaviruses types 5 and 18. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(11):2203–9.
Muschik D, et al. Cutaneous HPV23 E6 prevents p53 phosphorylation through interaction with HIPK2. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27655.
Accardi R, et al. Skin human papillomavirus type 38 alters p53 functions by accumulation of deltaNp73. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(3):334–40.
Bedard KM, et al. The E6 oncoproteins from human beta papillomaviruses differentially activate telomerase through an E6AP-dependent mechanism and prolong the lifespan of primary keratinocytes. J Virol. 2008;82(8):3894–902.
Gabet AS, et al. Impairment of the telomere/telomerase system and genomic instability are associated with keratinocyte immortalization induced by the skin human papillomavirus type 38. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):622–32.
Muller-Schiffmann A, Beckmann J, Steger G. The E6 protein of the cutaneous human papillomavirus type 8 can stimulate the viral early and late promoters by distinct mechanisms. J Virol. 2006;80(17):8718–28.
Howie HL, et al. Beta-HPV 5 and 8 E6 promote p300 degradation by blocking AKT/p300 association. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(8):e1002211.
Muench P, et al. Cutaneous papillomavirus E6 proteins must interact with p300 and block p53-mediated apoptosis for cellular immortalization and tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2010;70(17):6913–24.
Wallace NA, et al. HPV 5 and 8 E6 abrogate ATR activity resulting in increased persistence of UVB induced DNA damage. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(7):e1002807.
White EA, et al. Systematic identification of interactions between host cell proteins and E7 oncoproteins from diverse human papillomaviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(5):E260–7.
Buitrago-Perez A, et al. A humanized mouse model of HPV-associated pathology driven by E7 expression. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41743.
Shephard P, et al. Myofibroblast differentiation is induced in keratinocyte-fibroblast co-cultures and is antagonistically regulated by endogenous transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-1. Am J Pathol. 2004;164(6):2055–66.
Habig M, et al. E7 proteins from high- and low-risk human papillomaviruses bind to TGF-beta-regulated Smad proteins and inhibit their transcriptional activity. Arch Virol. 2006;151(10):1961–72.
Lee DK, et al. The human papilloma virus E7 oncoprotein inhibits transforming growth factor-beta signaling by blocking binding of the Smad complex to its target sequence. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(41):38557–64.
Smola-Hess S, et al. Expression of membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase in papillomavirus-positive cells: role of the human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV8 E7 gene products. J Gen Virol. 2005;86(Pt 5):1291–6.
Akgul B, et al. The E7 protein of cutaneous human papillomavirus type 8 causes invasion of human keratinocytes into the dermis in organotypic cultures of skin. Cancer Res. 2005;65(6):2216–23.
Sternlicht MD, Werb Z. How matrix metalloproteinases regulate cell behavior. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:463–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smola, S. (2020). Human Papillomaviruses and Skin Cancer. In: Reichrath, J. (eds) Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1268. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46227-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46227-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46226-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46227-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)