Abstract
The Arctic region has been characterised by some as an area of geopolitical competition and boundary disputes. However, as a matter of international law, these portrayals are misleading. In fact, when it concerns dividing the Arctic through the delimitation of maritime boundaries, the Arctic states have been remarkably successful. In this chapter, we examine the various maritime boundaries in the Arctic, as well as the practice of the Arctic states concerning baselines, maritime claims and extended continental shelves in the central Arctic Ocean. We find that in contrast to other maritime domains, most of the maritime boundaries in the Arctic have been settled. Moreover, the Arctic coastal states have declared their intentions to abide by the Law of the Sea, not least because it grants them broad maritime claims in the Arctic Ocean, and have stated that potential disputes will be solved through negotiations. Thus, when examining maritime disputes, the Arctic does not entail escalating conflicts; it is instead an example of a maritime space where states have settled disputes before real conflict could emerge and use the framework of agreed boundaries as a basis for transboundary cooperation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
As opposed to Arctic region countries, Finland, Iceland and Sweden, which lack coastal fronts on the Arctic Ocean.
- 4.
The reference to the seabed parts of the LOSC here relates to Part XI of the Convention dealing with the international seabed area (known simply as “the Area”), beyond national jurisdiction, the original terms of which the United States objected to.
- 5.
References
Alexander, L. M. (1993). Canada-Denmark (Greenland). In J. I. Charney & L. M. Alexander (Eds.), International maritime boundaries (Vol. I, pp. 371–385). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Anderson, D. H. (2009). The status under international law of the maritime areas around Svalbard. Ocean Development and International Law, 40(4), 373–384.
Ásgeirsdóttir, Á., & Steinwand, M. C. (2016). Distributive outcomes in contested maritime areas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(6), 1284–1313.
Baker, J. S., & Byers, M. (2012). Crossed lines: The curious case of the Beaufort Sea maritime boundary dispute. Ocean Development & International Law, 43, 70–95.
Barnes, J. E. (2015, March 25). Cold War echoes under the Arctic ice. The Wall Street Journal.
BBC News. (2007, August 2). Russia plants flag under N Pole. World. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6927395.stm.
Borgerson, S. (2008). Arctic meltdown: The economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Affairs, 87(2).
Boswell, R. (2010a, February 17). Beaufort Sea breakthrough. Vancouver Sun.
Boswell, R. (2010b, May 14). Canada ready to settle Beaufort Sea dispute with U.S.: Cannon. CanWest News Service.
Burkeman, O. (2008, April 5). A very Cold War indeed. The Guardian.
Byers, M. (2013). International law and the Arctic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byers, M., & Østhagen, A. (2017). Why does Canada have so many unresolved maritime boundary disputes? Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 54, 1–62.
Bykova, A. (2019, May 27). Canada makes substantial step in Arctic territory delimitation, submits claim which includes North Pole. High North News.
Calderbank, B., MacLeod, A. M., Gray, D. H., & McDorman, T. L. (2006). Canada’s offshore: Jurisdiction, rights, and management. Victoria, BC: Trafford Publishing.
Canada, Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development. (2012, November 28). Canada and Kingdom of Denmark reach tentative agreement on Lincoln Sea boundary. Press Release. www.international.gc.ca/media/aff/news-communiques/2012/11/28a.aspx.
Canada-Denmark. (1973, December 17). Agreement between Canada and Denmark relating to the delimitation of the continental shelf between Greenland and Canada. 950 U.N.T.S. 147.
Canada-Denmark. (2004, April 5, 20). Exchange of notes constituting an agreement to amend the 1973 Canada-Denmark continental shelf agreement. Canada Treaty Series 2009/27.
Canada–Denmark joint statement on Hans Island. (2005, September 19).
Cannon, A. (2016). The impact of sovereignty and boundary disputes on commercial investments. Herbert Smith Freehills. https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/latest-thinking/the-impact-of-sovereignty-and-boundary-disputes-on-commercial-investments.
Churchill, R. R. (1994). The Greenland–Jan Mayen Case and its significance for the international law of maritime boundary delimitation. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 9(1), 1.
Churchill, R. R. (2001). Claims to maritime zones in the Arctic—Law of the sea normality or polar peculiarity? In A. G. Oude Elferink & D. R. Rothwell (Eds.), The law of the sea and polar maritime delimitation and jurisdiction (pp. 105–124). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Churchill, R. R., & Ulfstein, G. (1992). Marine management in disputed areas: The case of the Barents Sea. London: Routledge.
Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). (2009, April 20). Statement of the chairman of the commission on the limits of the continental shelf on the progress of work in the commission. Twenty-third session, March 2–April 9, 2009. CLCS/62. https://undocs.org/en/clcs/62.
Cook, P. J., & Carleton, C. M. (Eds.). (2000). Continental shelf limits: The scientific and legal interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dadwal, S. R. (2014). Arctic: The next great game in energy geopolitics? Strategic Analysis, 38(6).
Denmark-Iceland-Norway. (2006, September 20). Agreed minutes on the delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles between the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Norway in the southern part of the Banana Hole of the Northeast Atlantic. www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/ud/dok/lover_regler/retningslinjer/2006/Agreed-Minutes.html?id=446839.
Denmark-Norway. (2006, February 20). Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway on the one hand and the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Home Rule Government of Greenland on the other hand, concerning the delimitation of the continental shelf and the fisheries zones in the area between Greenland and Svalbard. 2378 U.N.T.S. 21.
Fjærtoft, D., Arild, M., Smirnova, N., & Cherepovitsyn, A. (2018). Unitization of petroleum fields in the Barents Sea: Towards a common understanding? Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 9, 72–96.
Global Affairs Canada. (2018, May 23). Canada and the Kingdom of Denmark (with Greenland) announce the establishment of a joint task force on boundary issues. News Release. https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2018/05/canada-and-the-kingdom-of-denmark-with-greenland-announce-the-establishment-of-a-joint-task-force-on-boundary-issues.html.
Government of Canada. (1985). Territorial sea geographic coordinates (area 7) order of 10 September 1985. Canadian Gazette, Part II, of October 2, 1985, SOR/85-872.
Government of Canada. (1996). Oceans act, S. C. 1996, c. 31.
Government of Canada. (2010, March 3). Speech from the throne. http://www.speech.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1388.
Great Britain-Russia. (1825, February 16). Great Britain-Russia: Limits of their respective possessions on the north-west coast of America and the navigation of the Pacific Ocean. 75 Canada Treaty Series 95.
Grindheim, A. (2009). The scramble for the Arctic? A discourse analysis of Norway and the EU’s strategies towards the European Arctic. Oslo: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Henriksen, T., & Ulfstein, G. (2011). Maritime delimitation in the Arctic: The Barents Sea treaty. Ocean Development & International Law, 42, 1–21.
Hønneland, G. (2013). Hvordan Skal Putin Ta Barentshavet Tilbake? Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Iceland-Jan Mayen. (1981). Conciliation Commission. 20 ILM 787.
Iceland-Norway. (1981). Agreement on the continental shelf between Iceland and Jan Mayen. http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/ISL-NOR1981CS.PDF.
Iceland-Norway. (2008, November 3). Agreement between Iceland and Norway concerning transboundary hydrocarbon deposits. http://www.nea.is/media/olia/JM_unitisation_agreement_Iceland_Norway_2008.pdf.
Ilulissat Declaration. (2008, May 28). (2009). 48 I.L.M. 362.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2019). The ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate (Special Report). Summary for Policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/home/.
International Arctic Science Committee. (2011, April). State of the Arctic coast 2010: Scientific review and outlook. Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ), Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, International Permafrost Association. Geesthacht, Germany: LOICZ International Project Office. www.arcticcoasts.org/.
International Court of Justice (ICJ). (1993). Maritime delimitation in the area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v Norway). http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/78/6743.pdf.
International Law Association (ILA). (2012). Report of the baselines under the international law of the sea committee (Committee on Baselines, Sofia Conference). www.ila-hq.org/index.php/committees.
Inuvialuit Final Agreement (as amended), Annex A-1 [Adjusted Boundary]. (1984). Description of the Inuvialuit settlement region. https://yukon.ca/sites/yukon.ca/files/eco/eco-ar-western_arctic_claim_inuvialuit_final-agreement.pdf.
Jacobsen, M. (2015). The power and paradoxes of collective identity narration: Greenland’s way to a more autonomous foreign policy (2009–2014). Arctic Yearbook. https://arcticyearbook.com/arctic-yearbook/2015/2015-scholarly-papers/127-the-power-of-collective-identity-narration-greenland-s-way-to-a-more-autonomous-foreign-policy.
Jensen, Ø. (2014). Noreg Og Havets Folkerett [Norway and the law of the sea]. Trondheim: Akademia Forlag.
Kingdom of Denmark. (2004, October 15). Royal decree on amendment of royal decree on delimitation of the territorial waters of Greenland. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/doalos_publications/LOSBulletins/bulletinpdf/bulletin56e.pdf.
Linderfalk, U. (2016, May 24). The Jan Mayen Case (Iceland/Norway): An example of successful conciliation. SSRN, 1–26. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2783622.
Mackrael, K. (2012, November 29). Canada, Denmark closer to settling border dispute. Globe and Mail.
Macnab, R. (2004a). The outer limit of the continental shelf in the Arctic Ocean. In M. H. Nordquist, J. N. Moore, & T. H. Heidar (Eds.), Legal and scientific aspects of continental shelf limits. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Macnab, R. (2004b). The case for transparency in the delimitation of the outer continental shelf in accordance with LOSC Article 76. Ocean Development and International Law, 35, 1–17.
Mandraud, I. (2014, October 21). Russia prepares for ice-Cold War with show of military force in the Arctic. The Guardian.
McDorman, T. L. (2009). Salt water neighbors: International ocean law relations between the United States and Canada. New York: Oxford University Press.
McDorman, T. L., & Schofield, C. H. (2015). Maritime limits and boundaries in the Arctic Ocean: Agreements and disputes. In L. C. Jensen & G. Honneland (Eds.), Handbook of the politics of the Arctic (pp. 207–226). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
McDorman, T. L. (2002). The role of the commission on the limits of the continental shelf: A technical body in a political world. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 17(3), 301–324.
McDorman, T. L., & Schofield, C. H. (in press). The Arctic Ocean unscrambled: Competing claims and boundary disputes. In K. Scott & D. VanderZwaag (Eds.), Research handbook on polar law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Newman, N. (2018). Maritime boundary disputes. Eniday. https://www.eniday.com/en/human_en/maritime-boundary-disputes/.
Norway-Russian Federation. (2007, July 11). Agreement between the Russian Federation and Norway on the maritime delimitation in the Varangerfjord area. (2008), 67 Law of the Sea Bulletin 42.
Norway-Russian Federation. (2010, September 15). Treaty between Norway and the Russian Federation concerning maritime delimitation and cooperation in the Barents Sea and Arctic Ocean. 2791 U.N.T.S. 3.
Norway-Soviet Union. (1957, February 27). Agreement between Norway and the Soviet Union concerning the sea frontier in the Varangerfjord. 312 U.N.T.S. 289.
Norwegian Government. (2010). Joint statement on maritime delimitation and cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean. Press Release.
Østhagen, A. (2018). Geopolitics and security in the Arctic. In M. Nuttall, T. R. Christensen, & M. Siegert (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the polar regions (pp. 348–356). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Oude Elferink, A. G. (1998). Current legal developments: Denmark/Iceland/Norway. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 13(4), 607–616.
Oude Elferink, A. G. (2001). Arctic maritime delimitations: The preponderance of similarities with other regions. In A. G. Oude Elferink & D. R. Rothwell (Eds.), The law of the sea and polar maritime delimitation and jurisdiction (pp. 179–199). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Oude Elferink, A. G. (2007). Maritime delimitation between Denmark/Greenland and Norway. Ocean Development & International Law, 38(4), 375–380.
Parfitt, T. (2007, August 10). Russia’s Arctic claim. The Guardian.
Pedersen, T. (2008). The constrained politics of the Svalbard offshore area. Marine Policy, 32(6), 913–919.
Pedersen, T., & Henriksen, T. (2009). Svalbard’s maritime zones: The end of legal uncertainty? The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 24(1), 141–161.
Potts, T., & Schofield, C. H. (2008). An Arctic scramble? Opportunities and threats in the (formerly) frozen north, current legal developments: The Arctic. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 23(1), 201–226.
Prescott, J. R. V., & Schofield, C. H. (2005). The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World (2nd ed.). Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Reed, M. W. (2000). Shore and sea boundaries: The development of international maritime boundary principles through United States practice (3 Vols.). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
Reilly, T. (2013, May 24). China’s ambitions make Arctic a global hotspot. Financial Times.
RIA Novosti. (2007, August 3). Russia guided by international law in its polar shelf probe. RIA Novosti.
Roach, J. A., & Smith, R. W. (2012). Excessive maritime claims (3rd ed.). Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Russia-United States. (1867, March 30). Convention ceding Alaska between Russia and the United States. (Article I, reprinted in Consolidated treaty series, pp. 331–335, by C. Parry, Ed., Vol. 134, 1969, Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications).
Russian Federation. (1985, January 15). Decree 4450. www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/RUS.htm.
Sale, R., & Potapov, E. (2010). The scramble for the Arctic: Ownership, exploitation and conflict in the far north. London: Frances Lincoln.
Schofield, C. (2009). Blurring the lines: maritime joint development and the cooperative management of ocean resources. Issues Legal Scholarship, 7, i.
Schofield, C. H. (2012). Departures from the coast: Trends in the application of territorial sea baselines under the law of the sea convention. In D. Freestone (Ed.), The 1982 law of the sea convention at 30: Successes, challenges and new agendas (pp. 49–58). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schofield, C. H. (2015). Dividing and managing increasingly international waters: Delimiting the Bering Sea, strait and beyond. In J. Kraska & H. Scheiber (Eds.), Science, technology and new challenges to ocean law (pp. 313–344). Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schofield, C. H., & Arsana, A. (2009). Beyond the Limits? Outer Continental Shelf Opportunities and Obligations in East and Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia (Vol., 31(1), 28–63.
Schofield, C. H., & Sas, B. (2015). Uncovered and unstable coasts: Climate change and territorial sea baselines in the Arctic. In S. Lalonde & T. L. McDorman (Eds.), The Arctic Ocean: Essays in honour of Donat Pharand (pp. 291–334). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schofield, C. H., Potts, T., & Townsend-Gault, I. (2009). Boundaries, biodiversity, resources, and increasing maritime activities: Emerging oceans governance challenges for Canada in the Arctic Ocean. Vermont Law Review, 34(1), 35–55.
Smith, R. W. (1994). United States-Russia maritime boundary. In G. H. Blake (Ed.), Maritime boundaries, world boundaries (Vol. 5, pp. 91–99). London: Routledge.
Stoltenberg, J. (2010, April 27). Stoltenberg: A historic day! The Norway Post. http://www.norwaypost.no/news/stoltenberg-a-historic-day.html.
Svalbard Treaty. (1920). Treaty between Norway, The United States of America, Denmark, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Great Britain and Ireland and the British overseas dominions and Sweden concerning Spitsbergen. Signed in Paris 9th February 1920. Longyearbyen: The Governor of Svalbard. http://www.sysselmannen.no/Documents/Sysselmannen_dok/English/Legacy/The_Svalbard_Treaty_9ssFy.pdf.
Townsend-Gault, I. (2007). Not a carve-up: Canada, sovereignty and the Arctic Ocean. International Zeitschrift, 1(3). www.zeitschrift.co.uk/.
US Department of State. (1995). Public notice 2237: Exclusive economic zone and maritime boundaries.
United Nations. (1989). Baselines: An examination of the relevant provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. New York: Office for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, United Nations.
United Nations. (2019, June 27). Status of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, of the agreement relating to the implementation of part XI of the convention and of the agreement for the implementation of the convention relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. New York: United Nations. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/reference_files/status2019.pdf.
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC). (1983). Montego Bay, 10 December 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397 (in force 16 November 1994), Publication No. E97.V10. New York: United Nations.
United Nations, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (DOALOS). (2010, June 25). Table of claims to maritime jurisdiction. www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/claims.htm.
United States-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. (1990, June 1). Agreement between the United States of America and The Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics on the maritime boundary, provisionally in force 15 June 1990, (1990). 29 I.L.M. 941.
Verville, E. G. (1993). United States-Soviet Union. In J. I. Charney & L. M. Alexander (Eds.), International maritime boundaries (Vol. I, pp. 447–460). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schofield, C., Østhagen, A. (2020). A Divided Arctic: Maritime Boundary Agreements and Disputes in the Arctic Ocean. In: Weber, J. (eds) Handbook on Geopolitics and Security in the Arctic. Frontiers in International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45005-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45005-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45004-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45005-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)