Skip to main content

Logistics Service Quality of Dry Ports Within Land-Based Transport Corridors: A Case Study “Khorgos Gateways”

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (RelStat 2019)

Abstract

This paper aims to develop the assessment tool of logistics service quality of dry ports. Based on this, evaluations was aimed to assess the “Khorogos Gate-ways” dry port. Dimensions of assessment tool includes the availability of physical infrastructure; the reliability, safety and security, timeliness of operations and processes; the responsiveness of management and staff; the appropriating price; the comprehensive use of ICT applications; the multimodality and availability of value-added services. Based on the expert panel assessment, weights of these sub-dimensions were determined. Further, the semi-structured interview was conducted with the port-users, the quality of the dry port logistics services was assessed. According to the results of this study, practical recommendations for further research and development of the dry port of “Khorgos Gateways” were proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ethical approval of The Ethical Committee of al-Farabi Kazakh National University (IRB00010790 al-Farabi Kazakh National University IRB # 1).

References

  1. Chang, Z., Yang, D., Wan, Y., Han, T.: Analysis on the features of Chinese dry ports: ownership, customs service, rail service and regional competition. Transp. Policy 82, 107–116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. UNESCAP: Planning, development and operations of dry ports of international importance (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beresford, A.K.C., Dubey, R.C.: Handbook of the management and operations of dry ports (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roso, V.: Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38, 782–798 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810926493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, G.C.: Optimization of hub-and-spoke two-stage logistics network in regional port cluster. Syst. Eng. - Theory Pract. 28, 152–158 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1874-8651(09)60040-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yildirir, K.H.: Importance of transport corridors in regional development: the case of TRACECA. Sosyoekonomi 24, 163–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17233/se.96735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Banomyong, R.: Logistics Development Study of the Indonesia, Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT), pp. 1–71. Thammasat University, Bangkok (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mulenga, G.: Regional integration brief. Reg. Integr. Br. 1, 1–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, J.J., Yau, S.: Case studies on transport infrastructure projects in belt and road initiative: an actor network theory perspective. J. Transp. Geogr. 71, 213–223 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, D., Jiang, L., Ng, A.K.Y.: One belt one road, but several routes: a case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the far east to Europe. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 117, 190–204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park, Y.A., Medda, F.: Hub status and indexation of container ports. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 31, 253–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2015.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beifert, A., Shcherbanin, Y., Vinokurov, E.: Challenges and opportunities of economic integration within a wider European and Eurasian space. Trans-Eurasian Land Transport Corridors: Assessment of Prospects and Barriers (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wei, H., Sheng, Z., Lee, P.T.W.: The role of dry port in hub-and-spoke network under belt and road initiative. Marit. Policy Manag. 45, 370–387 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2017.1396505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng, A.K.Y., Gujar, G.C.: Government policies, efficiency and competitiveness: the case of dry ports in India. Transp. Policy 16, 232–239 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolanović, I., Dundović, Č., Jugović, A.: Customer-based port service quality model. PROMET – Traffic Transp. 23, 495–502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v23i6.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thai, V.V.: The impact of port service quality on customer satisfaction: the case of Singapore. Marit. Econ. Logist. 18, 458–475 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hemalatha, S., Dumpala, L., Balakrishna, B.: Service quality evaluation and ranking of container terminal operators through hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 34, 137–144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Almotairi, B., Flodén, J., Stefansson, G., Woxenius, J.: Information flows supporting hinterland transportation by rail: applications in Sweden. Res. Transp. Econ. 33, 15–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gogas, M., Adamos, G., Nathanail, E.: Assessing the performance of intermodal city logistics terminals in Thessaloniki. Transp. Res. Procedia 24, 17–24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ha, M., Yang, Z., Siu, J., Lam, L.: Port performance in container transport logistics: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Transp. Policy 73, 25–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., Berry, L.: SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 64, 12–40 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Standard, I.: Quality Management Systems - Requirements (ISO 9001:2015) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zografos, K.G., Regan, A.C.: Current challenges for intermodal freight transport and logistics in Europe and the United States. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1873, 70–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/1873-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aisulu Moldabekova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moldabekova, A., Beifert, A., Sabden, O. (2020). Logistics Service Quality of Dry Ports Within Land-Based Transport Corridors: A Case Study “Khorgos Gateways”. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (eds) Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. RelStat 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 117. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44610-9_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics