Skip to main content

Fichte and Existentialism: Freedom and Finitude, Self-Positing and Striving

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism ((PHGI))

  • 604 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter exhibits and explains a range of claims, each of which is central to Fichte’s “theory of science” (Wissenschaftslehre) and all of which importantly anticipate existentialism. The claims in question are the following: (1) The nature of selfhood or subjectivity is an issue of fundamental philosophical importance. (2) The self is not a thinking substance or knowing subject; it is a self-conscious project of self-actualization. (3) Qua self-conscious project, the being of the self is an ongoing interrelating of freedom and finitude. (4) Qua project of self-actualization, the self is not a causally conditioned object but a self-transparently self-realizing activity. (5) This activity involves a striving for the self’s actuality. (6) Knowing is an activity founded upon and steered by that striving. (7) Qua striving for the self’s actuality, the self’s activity harbors an orientation toward authenticity. (8) Qua striving for the self’s actuality, this activity aims for a humanly unreachable goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    All quotations that reference Fichte 1982 are my own translations; I provide the references for the benefit of Anglophone readers who wish to examine the indicated claims in context.

  2. 2.

    In later writings, Fichte supplements this idea of a merely sensory “check” or “affront” (Anstoß) with which the I finds itself confronted, with the more complex notion of a conceptually structured “summons” (Aufforderung) or “demand” (Anforderung), by which the I finds itself addressed. This is a noteworthy innovation, but it introduces complications that need not detain us here (see Hoeltzel 2020a).

  3. 3.

    Incidentally, it appears that Fichte himself first coined the term “Facticität,” around 1800 or 1801, and that Heidegger picked up the term from Emil Lask’s 1902 dissertation, Fichte’s Idealism and History (Kisiel 2000, p. 243). However, facticity is stressed even in the first (1794–1795) presentation of Fichte’s system, long before the coinage of the term.

Bibliography

  • Breazeale, Daniel. 2010. How to Make an Existentialist? In Search of a Shortcut from Fichte to Sartre. In Fichte and the Phenomenological Tradition, ed. Violetta L. Waibel, Daniel Breazeale, and Tom Rockmore, 277–312. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Thinking Through the Wissenschaftslehre: Themes from Fichte’s Early Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denker, Alfred. 2000. The Young Heidegger and Fichte. In Heidegger, German Idealism, and Neo-Kantianism, ed. Tom Rockmore, 103–122. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1971. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Vol. II, 3: Nachgelassene Schriften 1793–1795. Ed. Hans Jacob and Reinhard Lauth. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. The Science of Knowledge. Ed. and Trans. Peter Heath and John Lachs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The Vocation of Man. Trans. Peter Preuss. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Fichte: Early Philosophical Writings. Ed. and Trans. Daniel Breazeale. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings. Ed. and Trans. Daniel Breazeale. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Foundations of Natural Right. Ed. Frederick Neuhouser, Trans. Michael Baur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The System of Ethics. Ed. and Trans. Daniel Breazeale and Günter Zöller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Paul. 2016. Fichte’s Position: Anti-Subjectivism, Self-Awareness, and Self-Location in the Space of Reasons. In The Cambridge Companion to Fichte, ed. David James and Günter Zöller, 374–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. San Francisco: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Trans. Alfred Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Gesamtausgabe: Abteilung II, Band 28: Der deutsche Idealismus (Fichte, Schelling, Hegel). Ed. Claudius Strube. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. Trans. Ted Sadler. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeltzel, Steven. 2018. Fichte and Kant on Reason’s Final Ends and Highest Ideas. Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte 16. https://journals.openedition.org/ref/827. Accessed 1 April 2019.

  • ———. 2020a. Anstoß and Aufforderung (‘Check’ and ‘Summons’). In The Bloomsbury Handbook to Fichte, ed. Marina F. Bykova, 353–361. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020b. The Three Basic Principles (drei Grundsätze). In The Bloomsbury Handbook to Fichte, ed. Marina F. Bykova, 327–335. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, David. 2007. J. G. Fichte: From Transcendental Ego to Existence. In Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries, Tome I, Philosophy, Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources, ed. Jon Stewart, vol. 6, 49–66. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. 1983. The Sickness unto Death: A Christian Psychological Exposition for Upbuilding and Awakening. Ed. and Trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs. Ed. and Trans. Alastair Hannay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, Theodore. 2000. Heidegger—Lask—Fichte. In Heidegger, German Idealism, and Neo-Kantianism, ed. Tom Rockmore, 239–270. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosch, Michelle. 2018. Fichte’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loncar, Samuel. 2011. From Jena to Copenhagen: Kierkegaard’s Relations to German Idealism and the Critique of Autonomy in The Sickness unto Death. Religious Studies 47 (2): 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhouser, Frederick. 1990. Fichte’s Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1985. Existentialism Is a Humanism. Trans. Bernard Frechtman, Reprinted as “Existentialism”. In Existentialism and Human Emotions, 9–51. New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Allen W. 2016. Deduction of the Summons and the Existence of Other Rational Beings. In Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide, ed. Gabriel Gottlieb, 72–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller, Günter. 1998. Fichte’s Transcendental Philosophy: The Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right and the Mind-Body Problem. In Rights, Bodies, and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right, ed. Daniel Breazeale and Tom Rockmore, 90–106. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Hoeltzel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoeltzel, S. (2020). Fichte and Existentialism: Freedom and Finitude, Self-Positing and Striving. In: Stewart, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44571-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics