Abstract
Nowadays, many scientific efforts were carried out to produce eco-friendly biopolymers for diverse applications, such as food packaging and tissue engineering. Food packaging is a significant component of foodstuffs to enhance the safety and quality of foodstuffs. Such packaging materials must have enough mechanical strength, good barrier properties, thermal stability, biodegradability, and antibacterial- as well as antioxidant properties to extend the shelf life of foodstuffs. Presently, the industrially produced packaging materials are derived from petroleum-based plastic polymers as they are quite cheap and convenient to use with good technique proficiency and durability. However, owing to the non-biodegradable nature of plastics, the environmental pollution that is caused by conventional plastic packaging is harmful and not appropriate. Thus, there is a must to develop new packaging ingredients. With the recent development of alternative ingredients for environmentally benign products. This chapter reviews the food processing. The importance of using natural polymer in food packing rather than synthetic polymers. The presence of nanoparticles to form composites are discussed. We also review the characterization of nano-materials/polymer composites using for example powder X-ray diffraction, XPS, Fourier transmission infrared spectra, scanning electron microscopy and UV-Vis spectroscopy.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Regular fibers are considered as an environmentally friendly material that exhibits good physical properties comparing with petroleum-based plastics. In 2015, the global natural fiber reinforced polymer composites industry sector was about U$ 5.1 billion. The employment of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites has recently expanded in the shopper goods as developing packing sectors. As showed by evaluations over 2012–2017, the biodegradable fiber reinforced polymer composites industry is expected to grow 15% worldwide (Layth et al. 2015). Packaging is a significant subject in developed civilizations; especially, food packaging has experienced a great growth because most commercialized foodstuffs are marketed in packages (Lopez-Rubio et al. 2004). One of the most important roles of packaging technology is to avoid deterioration of food, thus, to extend shelf-life and maintain quality and safety of the packaged food. Starch is one of the most considered biopolymers owing to its wide availability, biodegradability, non-toxicity, and low cost. Despite advantages, starch films are moisture sensitive and very fragile in comparison to the conventional packaging materials (Flores et al. 2007). In order to recover their usability, incorporation of plasticizers, blending with other materials, chemical modifications, and the combinations of these treatments have been attempted (Colussi et al. 2017). On the other hand, natural fibers are neither artificial nor manmade; they can be extracted from animals or plants (Ticoalu et al. 2010). The use of natural fibers from resources, renewable and non-renewable including oil palm, flax, and sisal, gained significant attention in the last decades. Plants that can produce cellulose fibers are categorized into bast filaments (such as jute, ramie, flax, kenaf, and hemp), seed fibers (such as cotton, kapok, and coir), leaf fibers (such as sisal and abaca), and grass and reed fibers (such as rice, wheat, and corn), and core fibers (hemp, jute, and kenaf) as well as all other kinds as roots and wood (Faruk et al. 2012; Keshk 2014). The fiber-reinforced polymer matrix got extensive consideration in several aspects owing to their good physical properties and superior benefits over artificial fibers in term of its cost, low weight, less damage to handling equipment, good mechanical characterization as tensile and flexural modulus, improved surface finish of composites, being abundant, renewable resources, biodegradability, flexibility during processing, and least health risks (Shalwan and Yousif 2013; Keshk and Yahia 2018; Alghamdi et al. 2019). Natural fiber reinforced composites possess a high specific stiffness and strength that can be realized by adding the tough and light-weight fiber onto the synthetic polymer (thermoplastic and thermoset) (Xie et al. 2010). However, natural fibers are not problems-free, as they have deficits in physical properties. The structure of natural fibers is composed of cellulose, pectin, hemicelluloses, lignin, and waxy substances. They permit moisture absorption from the surroundings that may cause weak bindings between the polymer and fiber. Furthermore, the lacking compatibility between natural polymers and fibers is considered as a challenge since the chemical structures of both polymers and fibers are two different. Modifications of the natural fiber using certain treatments are required in order to compatibilized both polymers. Such modifications are focused on the use of reactive functional groups that have the capacity for reacting with the fiber structures and changing the chemical composition. Thus, fiber modifications may cause reduction of moisture absorption that lead to an excellent improvement of compatibility between the polymer and fiber (Ray and Bousmina 2005). Cellulose has been successfully shaped into nanoforms, namely nano-fibrillated cellulose (NFC) and micro-fibrillated cellulose (MFC) (Nogi et al. 2009). NFC can deliver reactive site and possess excellent mechanical and oxygen barrier properties. Whereas, high loading of MFC is commonly required to enhance the mechanical stability of the composite, because of the MFC is larger, and it decreases intrinsic energy and element ratio. MFC films displayed opportunity for food packing owing to its high rigidity together with the essential barrier properties (Zhang et al. 2011; Aulin et al. 2012). Current developments in packaging material have focused on high barrier performance with a minimal amount of material. Therefore, there is a need for functional coatings of cellulosic materials for special or enhanced properties in the field of food packaging (Gouda and Keshk 2010).
2 Starch
In order to recover starch usability, blending with other materials, chemical modifications, and the combinations of these treatments have been evaluated (Colussi et al. 2017; Keshk et al. 2018a, b). Starch films with clay nanoparticles were prepared and their tensile, barrier properties and transition temperature were investigated (Souza et al. 2012). The presence of clay affected the tensile and barrier properties; whereas, the glass transition temperature was not affected (Souza et al. 2012). In additional investigation, a biodegradable film obtained from acetylated starch displayed higher moisture content and water solubility in comparison to starch film (Colussi et al. 2017). Among various derivatives of starch, dialdehyde starch (DAS) that produced from the periodate oxidative cleavage of C2–C3 bond of the starch molecule. FT-IR spectroscopy data of starch and DAS are shown in Fig. (1) (Keshk et al. 2016a, b). In the fingerprint region from 800 cm−1 to 1500 cm−1, the spectral features of starch and DAS were dissimilar; where the peaks in starch at 1158 cm−1 and 930 cm−1 that are characteristic to a C–O stretching vibration were missing in DAS (Keshk et al. 2016a, b). Furthermore, a new absorption band at 1735 cm−1 appeared in the DAS spectrum, which was assigned to the C=O stretching vibration.
DAS is highly reactive and possesses higher thermal stability (T = 355 °C) than starch (T = 191 °C), hence, it is widely used as a cross-linking agent (Keshk et al. 2016a, b; Wisniewska et al. 2016). The rigidity of cross-linked DAS matrix formed due to hydrogen bonds confers a better thermal stability to DAS (Wisniewska et al. 2016). Nanotechnology can remarkedly recover the quality and safety of food packing. Different food concerns have used nanotechnology to develop safer and more attractive products with longer shelf-life and lower costs. Nanomaterials in food packing technology can alter permeation properties, increase barrier properties, improve mechanical and heat-resistance, confer active antimicrobial and antifungal surfaces, and detect and signal microbiological and biochemical changes (Cichello 2015). Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MNPs) have been used in various arenas owing to their unique properties including large specific surface area and simple separation with magnetic fields. For food-related applications, they have been used for enzyme immobilization, protein purification, and food analysis (Caoa et al. 2012). The incorporation of MNPs with a polymer packing film will modify barrier properties and prevent the destruction of basic structure of starting materials. Besides this, the addition of MNPs will significantly recover the mechanical (tensile strength, elongation at break) and thermal properties (Rešček et al. 2016). Furthermore, an MNPs/DAS composite showed good thermal stability, small particle size, low biological toxicity, and slow anticancer drug-releasing capability (Saikia et al. 2015). Recently, MNPs/ DAS composite film was fabricated for use in food packaging (Keshk et al. 2018a, b). Scan electron microscope showed that the starch granules were of ellipsoidal morphologies with smooth surfaces and were larger than those of the DAS and MNPs/DAS granules, as the latter were of irregular polygonal shape (Fig. 2).
A comparison of the DAS and MNPs/DAS granules at high magnifications (Fig. 2f and i) indicated that the DAS granules were smoother, while MNPs/DAS granules designed agglomerations owing to the magnetic properties of iron. It can also be caused by the crosslinking of DAS and MNPs. The average pore sizes in DAS and MNPs/DAS composite were 4.25 μm and 0.65 μm, respectively. Thus, the MNPs/DAS composite film was more compact with a higher thickness than DAS film (Fig. 3).
Furthermore, thermogravimetric analysis confirmed that the MNPs/DAS film was thermally stable up to 300 °C, and the maximum decomposition happened at 500 °C. Furthermore, SEM micrographs recognized the homogenous distribution of MNPs onto the DAS film. The MNPs/DAS composite film displayed lower water vapor transmission in comparison to DAS film, thus it can be decided that MNPs improved the hydrophobicity and mechanical properties of starch film. Therefore, the prepared MNPs/DAC composite film could be considered for oxygen sensitive foods like Chilled meat, as it contains a highly effective oxygen scavenger (Fe3O4) (Keshk et al. 2018a, b).
3 Cellulose
Cellulose fibres offer a large renewable raw material base for various kinds of products, e.g., from paper and board to various composite materials ranging from packaging applications to building materials. The physical modification of cellulose fibres has recently received attention in the field of composite applications (Alghamdi et al. 2019). The physicochemical modification of cellulose is important for making it more compatible with nonpolar polymers by introducing a hydrophobic polymer into its structure (Thielemans et al. 2008). Therefore, there is a need for new derivatives of cellulosic materials for special or enhanced properties in the field of food packaging. Zinc oxide is generally used in several applications, such as in the pharmaceutical, commodity chemical, and glass industries (Arrieta et al. 2010; Jia et al. 2012; Ko et al. 2014; Espitia et al. 2016). ZnO is presently listed as a safe food additive and preservative by the US Food and Drugs Administration. The reported synthetic methods of metal/cellulose composite preparation have poor metal stability in the composite and heterogeneous distributions of metals (Ma et al. 2013; Al-Sehemi et al. 2014). The preparation of metal/cellulose composites via the reduction of metal salts in aqueous suspensions of cellulose has been investigated (El-Kemary et al. 2013). In this method, a soluble metal salt is used with a suitable reducing agent in the presence of a co-stabilizer to avoid agglomeration and to improve the metal particle distribution on the cellulose (Yue et al. 2013). On the other hand, microwave-assisted synthesis of metal/cellulose composites have been reported, in which ionic liquids were used to obtain cellulose fibres coated with metal particles (Dinand et al. 2002; Keshk et al. 2016a, b). In the fact, the hydrophilicity of cellulose made it difficult to form a good composite with metals owing to hydrogen bonds between cellulose chains that hinder any other metal or metal oxide from forming a good composite. Sodium hydroxide treatment (mercerization) of natural cellulose (cellulose-(OH)3) fibres results in the structural transformation to sodium cellulose (cellulose-(ONa)3) (Keshk 2015; Keshk and Hamdy 2019). During mercerization, cellulose I proceeds through a crystal-to-crystal phase transformation. The intermediate structure between the parallel chains (cellulose I) and antiparallel chains (cellulose II) is sodium cellulose (Keshk et al. 2018a, b; Keshk and Hamdy 2019). Sodium cellulose increases the interplanar distance between cellulose chains owing to O− Na+ group formation. The mercerization affects the twisting and swelling of cellulose because of the presence of Na+ ions, which play a crucial role in widening the accessible regions between the lattice planes to allow diffusion of the Na+ ions into those planes (Keshk et al. 2018a, b; Keshk and Hamdy 2019). Zinc oxide/sodium cellulose composite with different ZnO loadings was prepared and characterized by FT-IR, XRD, XPS, SEM, and EDX Keshk and Hamdy 2019). ZnO/sodium cellulose showed a similar XRD pattern to that of cellulose II. The XPS spectrum emphasized the presence of Zn2+ and Na+ ions in the prepared composite (Fig. 4) (Keshk and Hamdy 2019).
Furthermore, the SEM analysis displayed the growth of ZnO crystals on the sodium cellulose surface. UV-Vis spectrometry of the ZnO/sodium cellulose spectrum exhibited a distinguished absorption band at 360 nm that was attributed to the presence of ZnO particles on the cellulosic fibres (Keshk and Hamdy 2019). Therefore, the ZnO/sodium cellulose fibres swelled, and their diameter increased from 15 μm to 30 μm. Furthermore, ZnO/sodium cellulose exhibited lower air and water vapor permeability than cellulose and sodium cellulose and can be perfectly utilized as food packing film to increase the shelf life of preserved foods (Table 1) (Keshk and Hamdy 2019).
4 Chitosan
Chitosan is considered as a safe natural polymer that possesses biocompatible and biodegradable properties. Chitosan is a polysaccharide produced by chemical or enzymatic deacetylation of chitin. There are at least four prepared methods presented: ionotropic gelation (Calvo et al. 1997), microemulsion (Maitra et al.1999), solvent emulsification diffusion (Niwa et al. 1993) and polyelectrolyte complex (Erbacher et al. 1998). The most widely developed methods are ionotropic gelation and self-assemble polyelectrolytes; as there are simple and mild preparation method without the use of organic solvent or high shear force (Tiyaboonchai 2003; Sudarshan et al. 1992). The nanofibers based on chitosan have large surfaces and high porosity therefore potentially working in the fields of enzyme immobilization (such as chitosan/PVA), filtration (chitosan/PEO, Chitosan/nylon-6…) wound dressing (chitosan/PVA, Chitosan/PET), tissue engineering (Chitosan/collagen) drug delivery (PEG-g-CS/ PLGA…) and catalysis (CS-g-AA) (Sun and Li 2011). Depending on the technique of preparation, chitosan-based nanofibers size can vary from 10 nm to 4 nm (Sun and Li 2011; Van et al. 2013). Chitosan-based nanofibers were prepared via acid hydrolysis of chitin whiskers (Lu et al. 2004; Sriupayo et al. 2005). The average dimensions of the whiskers obtained were 500–417 nm (length) and 50–33 nm (diameter) (Lu et al. 2004; Sriupayo et al. 2005). The suspension consisted of individual chitin fragments that having a spindle shape. As shown in the AFM image of a dilute suspension of chitin whiskers (Fig. 5).
These fragments have a broad distribution in length (L) ranging from 100 to 650 nm and diameter (D) ranging from 10 to 80 nm. SEM images of the fractured surface of the GSPI sheet and nanocomposites of SPI-5, SPI-15, and SPI-30 are shown in Fig. 6.
The GSPI sheet exhibits a relatively uniform surface. The chitin whiskers, as particles, are easily identified. A relatively uniform distribution of the chitin whisker in the SPI matrix can be observed when the chitin content is lower than 15 wt %. However, as the chitin content increases, the resulting nanocomposites show agglomerates of whiskers. The diameter of whiskers determined by SEM is larger than identified by AFM shown in Fig. 2, which resulted from a charge concentration effect due to the emergence of whiskers from the observed surface.
This suggests that the adhesion between SPI and chitin whisker is strong. Chitosan nanoparticles can be obtained by ionic gelation, where the positively charged amino groups of chitosan form electrostatic interactions with polyanions worked as cross-linkers, such as tripolyphosphate (López et al. 2005). Chitosan–tri-polyphosphate (CS–TPP) nanoparticles that incorporated with hydroxy propyl methylcellulose (HPMC) films was significantly improved the mechanical and barrier properties (Caner and Cansiz 2007; De Moura et al. 2009). Chitosan-based nanocomposites have several applications like food industry, medicine and paper manufacturing, etc. These nanocomposites, films and coating based on chitosan, offer capable improvement in food packaging industrial because of chitosan’s capability to hold up the life of food products (Shahidi et al. 1999). Different types of nanofillers with different nanoscale have been synthesized and investigated till now (Radhakrishnan et al. 2015). Therefore, physicochemical properties along with the types, size, and surface areas of nanofillers could significantly improve the chitosan. Clay-based nanocomposite enhanced oxygen barricade capacity of chitosan film (Radhakrishnan et al. 2015). Therefore, the integration of clay into the chitosan matrix enhances the transport and barrier characteristics. For the substitute of plastic resources to decrease the ecological contamination, chitosan/methyl cellulose nanocomposite can substitute the plastic in packaging foods (Mura et al. 2011).
5 Conclusion
Nanotechnology has revealed numerous advantages in food packaging industry, including better barriers; mechanical, thermal, and biodegradable properties. However, the use of nanocomposites in food packaging might be challenging owing to the reduced particle size of nanomaterials and the physicochemical characteristics of such nano- materials may be quite different from those of their macro-scale counterparts. Despite several advantages of nanomaterials, their use in food packaging may cause safety problems to human health since they exhibit different physicochemical properties from their macro-scale chemical counterparts. Different research disciplines including identification, characterization, and quantification of the nanoparticles are requested.
References
Alghamdi M, Awwad N, Al Sharaey A, Abd Rabboh H, Keshk SMAS (2019) Physicochemical characterization of the natural hydroxyapatite/ cellulose composite. Indian journal of fiber and textile technology 44:45–50
Al-Sehemi AG, Al-Shihri AS, Kalam A, Du G, Ahmad T (2014) Microwave synthesis, optical properties and surface area studies of NiO nanoparticles. J Mole Struct 1058:56–61
Arrieta MP, López J, López D, Kenny JM, Peponi L (2010) Polym Degrad Stab 95:2126–2146
Aulin C, Salazar-Alvarez G, Lindstr¨ T (2012) High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose–nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 4:6622–6628
Calvo P, Remunan-Lopez C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ (1997) Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers.J. Appl Poly Sci 63:125–132
Caner C, Cansiz O (2007) Effectiveness of chitosan-based coating in improving shelf-life of eggs. J Sci Food Agric 87:227–232
Caoa M, Lia Z, Wang J, Gea W, Yuea T, Li R, Colvin VL, Yu WW (2012) Food related applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Enzyme immobilization, protein purification, and food analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 27:47–56
Cichello SA (2015) Oxygen absorbers in food preservation: a review. J Food Sci Technol 52:1889–1895
Colussi R, Pinto VZ, El Halal SLM, Biduski B, Prietto L, Castilhos DD, Zavareze ER, Dias ARG (2017) Acetylated rice starches films with different levels of amylose: mechanical, water vapor barrier, thermal, and biodegradability properties. Food Chem 221:1614–1620
De Moura MR, Aouada FA, Avena-Bustillos RJ, McHugh TH, Krochta JM, Mattoso LHC (2009) Improved barrier and mechanical properties of novelhydroxypropyl methylcellulose edible films with chitosan/tripolyphosphatenanoparticlses. J Food Eng 92:448–453
Dinand E, Vignon M, Chanzy H, Heux L (2002) Mercerization of primary wall cellulose and its implication for the conversion of cellulose I→cellulose II. Cellulose 9:7–18
El-Kemary M, Nagy N, El-Mehasseb I (2013) Nickel oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and spectral studies of interactions with glucose. Mater. Sci. Semi.Cond. PRO 16:1747–1752
Erbacher P, Zou S, Steffan AM, Remy JS (1998) Chitosan-based vector/DNA complexes for gene delivery: biophysical characteristics and transfection ability. Pharm Res 15:1332–1339
Espitia PJP, Otoni CG, Soares NFF (2016) In: Barros-Velazquez J (ed) Antimicrobial Food Packaging. Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp 425–431
Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Bio-composites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000-2010. Prog Polym Sci 37:1552–1596
Flores S, Famá L, Rojas JM, Goyanes S, Gerschenson L (2007) Physical properties of tapioca-starch edible films: influence of filmmaking and potassium sorbate. Food Res Int 40:257–265
Gouda M, Keshk SMAS (2010) Evaluation of multifunctional properties of cotton fabric based on metal/chitosan film. Carbohydr Polym 80:504–512
Jia N, Li SM, Ma MG, Sun RC (2012) Rapid microwave-assisted fabrication of cellulose/F-substituted hydroxyapatite nanocomposites using green ionic liquids as additive. Mater Lett 68:44–46
Keshk SMAS (2014) Grafting of cellulose extracted from Kenaf using xanthate method. Journal of Basic & Applied Science 10:339–343
Keshk SMAS (2015) Effect of different alkaline solutions on crystalline structure of cellulose at different temperatures. Carbohydr Polym 115:658–662
Keshk SMAS, Ramadan AM, Sehemi AG, Yousef S, Bondock S (2016a) Peculiar behavior of starch 2, 3-dialdehyde towards sulfanilamide and sulfathiazole. Carbohydr Polym 152:624
Keshk SMAS, Abd-Rabboh HSM, Hamdy MS, Badr IH, (2016b). Physicochemical Characterization of Mercerized Cellulose-Supported Nickel-Oxide. 18th International Conference on Applied Chemistry. Zurich, Switzerland. January 12–13
Keshk SMAS, Syef AFA, El-Zahhar AA, Yousef S, Bondock S (2018a) Physicochemical characterization of calcium lignosulfonate/sodium cellulose composite and its application as food packaging film. Transylvanian Review 16:7609–7619
Keshk SMAS, Yahia IS (2018) Physicochemical characterization of graphene oxide/cellulose I and II composites and their antibacterial activity. Turk J Chem 42(2):561–572
Keshk SMAS, Zahar A, Bondock S (2018b) Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles /Dialdehyde starch-based composite film for food packaging applications. Starch 1800035:1–7
Keshk SMAS, Hamdy M (2019) Preparation and characterization of zinc oxide/sodium cellulose composite for food packaging. Turk J Chem 43:94–105
Ko H, Mun S, Min S, Kim G, Kim J (2014) Fabrication of cellulose ZnO hybrid nanocomposite and its strain sensing behavior. Materials 7:7000–7009
Layth M, Ansari MNM, Pua G, Jawaid M, M Islam S (2015) A Review on Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite and Its Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci.:1–15
López-León T, Carvalho ELS, Seijo B, Ortega-Vinuesa JL, Bastos-González D (2005) Physicochemical characterization of chitosan nanoparticles: electrokinetic and stability behavior. J COLLOID INTERF SCI 283:344–351
Lopez-Rubio A, Almenar E, Hernandez-Mun˜oz P, Lagaron R, Gavara R (2004) Overview of active polymer-based packaging Technologies for Food Applications. Food Rev Intl 20:357
Lu Y, Weng L, Zhang L (2004) Morphology and properties of soy protein isolatethermoplastics reinforced with chitin whiskers. Biomacromolecules 5:1046–1051
Ma MG, Qing SG, Li SM, Zhu JF, Fu LH, Sun RC (2013) Microwave synthesis of cellulose/CuO nanocomposites in ionic liquid and its thermal transformation to CuO. Carbohydr Polym 91:162–168
Maitra AN, Ghosh PK, De TK, Sahoo SK (1999). US patent 1999, 5,874,111
Mura S, Corrias F, Stara G, Piccinini M, Secchi N, Marongiu D, Innocenzi P, Irudayaraj J, Greppi GF (2011) Innovative composite films of chitosan, methylcellulose, and nanoparticles. J Food Sci 76(7)
Niwa T, Takeuchi H, Hino T, Kunou N, Kawashima Y (1993) Preparations of biodegradable nanospheres of water-soluble and insoluble drugs with D, L-lactide/glycolide copolymer by a novel spontaneous emulsification solvent diffusion method, and the drug release behavior. J Control Release 25:89–98
Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 20:1–4
Radhakrishnan Y, Gopal G, Lakshmanan CC, Nandakumar KS (2015) Chitosan nanoparticles for generating novel Systems for Better Applications: A review. J Mol Genet Med S4:005. https://doi.org/10.4172/1747-0862.1000S4-005
Ray SS, Bousmina M (2005) Prog Mater Sci 50:962–1079
Rešček A, Ščetar M, Hrnjak-Murgić Z, Dimitrov N, Galić K (2016) Polymer- Plastics Technology and Engineering 55:1450
Saikia C, Hussain A, Ramteke A, Sharma HK, Deb P, Maji TK (2015) Carboxymethyl starch-coated iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles: a potential drug delivery system for isoniazid. Iran Polym J 24:815
Shahidi F, Arachchi JK, Jeon YJ (1999) Food applications of chitin and chitosan. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:37–51
Shalwan A, Yousif BF (2013) In state of art: mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibre. Materials & Design 48:14–24
Souza AC, Benze R, Ferrão ES, Ditchfield C, Coelho ACV, Tadini CC (2012) Cassava starch biodegradable films: influence of glycerol and clay nanoparticles content on tensile and barrier properties and glass transition temperature. Food Sci Technol 46:110
Sriupayo J, Supaphol P, Blackwell J, Rujiravanit R (2005) Preparation and characterization of chitin whisker-reinforced chitosan nanocomposite films with or without heat treatment. Carbohydr Polym 62:130–136
Sudarshan NR, Hoover DG, Knorr D (1992) Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnol 6:257–272
Sun K, Li ZH (2011) Preparations, properties and applications of chitosan based. Express Polymer Letters 5:342–361
Thielemans B, Dufresne A, Chaussy D, Belgacem M (2008) Surface functionalization of cellulose fibres and their incorporation in renewable polymeric matrices. Compos Sci Technol 68:3193–3201
Ticoalu A, Aravinthan T, Cardona F (2010) Proceedings of the Southern Region Engineering Conference (SREC ‘10), Toowoomba, Australia, pp 113–117
Tiyaboonchai W (2003) Chitosan nanoparticles: A promising system for drug delivery. Naresuan University J 11:51–66
Van SN, Minh HD, Anh DN (2013) Study on chitosan nanoparticles on biophysical characteristics and growth of Robusta coffee in green house. Biocatalysis & Agricultural Biotechnology:289–294
Wisniewska JS, Drzymalska KW, Bajek A, Maj M, Sionkowska A (2016) J Mater Sci Mater Med:27
Xie Y, Hill CAS, Xiao Z, Militz H, Mai C (2010) Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 41:806–819
Yue Y, Gungping H, Qinglin W (2013) Bioresources 8:6460–6463
Zhang W, Yang X, Li C, Liang M, Lu C, Deng Y (2011) Mechanochemical activation of cellulose and its thermoplastic polyvinyl alcohol ecocomposites with enhanced physicochemical properties. Carbohydr Polym 83:257–263
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Keshk, S.M.A.S., Brahmia, A. (2020). Biopolymer Nanocomposite Based Food Packaging. In: Hebbar, U., Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Kumar Mishra, R. (eds) Nano-food Engineering. Food Engineering Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44552-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44552-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44551-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44552-2
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)