Abstract
There is a global movement to describe the natural environment as a set of ecosystem services that have economic value . Increasingly, the approach has been adopted by governments and, in response, by non-profit organizations to inform decisions about the provision and allocation of resources. The subjection of nature to an economic rationale has been much criticised. Some of the arguments are philosophical, pointing to the inability of economics to capture the extraordinary, intrinsic character of nature. Other arguments are more practical and highlight the difficulty of determining the economic value of a good – nature – that is not traded. These criticisms have considerable force. But a different perspective on valuing nature is adopted in this chapter by considering what is done to nature in order to make it amenable to calculation. So, rather than taking the numbers that are attached to nature as given – and then debating the shortcomings of quantifying nature – we explore the actions necessary to generate these numbers in the first place. The accepted means of qualifying, quantifying and valuing nature is the product of a huge amount of social, cultural, political and economic work: work that is necessary to maintain the primacy of such an approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
These categories may, in turn, fit into one or several hierarchies (Lamont 2012).
- 2.
Although there is great variation in the detailed development and in the application of the typology to suit different objectives and contexts.
- 3.
Vivid Economics is an applied economics consultancy (see http://www.vivideconomics.com/)
- 4.
- 5.
The NPV is the present value of the future benefits arising from an investment minus the present value of the future costs, derived by applying an appropriate discount rate to each cash flow (in this case the social discount rate of 3.5% per annum).
- 6.
The IRR equates to the discount rate that when applied to the future costs and benefits arising from an investment produces a NPV of zero.
References
Araujo L (2007) Markets, market-making and marketing. Mark Theory 7(3):211–226
Bakker K (2007) 8 Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. In: Heynen N, McCarthy J, Prudham S et al (eds) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 101–113
Barrey S, Cochoy F, Dubuisson-Quellier S (2000) Designer, packager et merchandiser: trois professionnels pour une meme scène marchande. Sociologie du Travail 42(3):457–482
BHF, British Heart Foundation (2015) Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2015. British Heart Foundation, London. https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/publications/statistics/cvd-stats-2015. Accessed 23 Apr 2019
Bird W (2004) Natural Fit. Can green space and biodiversity increase levels of physical activity? Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; s.l. https://ww2.rspb.org.uk/images/natural_fit_full_version_tcm9-133055.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2018
Boyz J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):616–626
Callon M (1998) Introduction: the embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In: Callon M (ed) The Laws of markets. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–57
Callon M, Meadel C, Rabeharisoa V (2002) The economy of qualities. Econ Soc 31(2):194–217
Callon M, Muniesa F (2005) Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organ Stud 26(8):1229–1250
CABE, Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (2010) Urban green nation: building the evidence base. CABE, London
CEBR, Centre for Economic and Business Research (2014) The economic cost of cardiovascular disease from 2014–2020 in six European Economies. www.cebr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Short-Report-18.08.14.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2015
CEH, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (2017a) Land Cover Map 2015. CEH, Wallingford https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LCM2015_legend_and_logos_150%20web.png. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
CEH, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (2017b) Land Cover Map 2015: Dataset documentation. CEH, Wallingford, Oxon https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LCM2015_Dataset_Documentation_22May2017.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
Christensen T, Lægreid P (2017) Transcending new public management: the transformation of public sector reforms. Routledge, London
Christopherson S, Martin R, Pollard J (2013) Financialisation: roots and repercussions. Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc 6:351–357
CMH, Centre for Mental Health (2010) The economic and social costs of mental health problems in 2009/10, Centre for Mental Health, London. https://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/publications/economic-and-social-costs-mental-health-problems-200910. Accessed 23 Apr 2019
Crump T (1990) The anthropology of numbers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dawson N, Martin A (2015) Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human wellbeing: a disaggregated study in western Rwanda. Ecol Econ 117:62–72
Dempsey J, Robertson M (2012) Ecosystem services: tensions, impurities, and points of engagement within neoliberalism. Prog Hum Geogr 36(6):758–779
Department of Health (2011) Start active, stay active: a report on physical activity from the four home countries’ Chief Medical Officers, DoH, London
Ernstson H, Sorlin S (2013) Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: on articulating values in urban nature. Ecol Econ 86:274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.012
Evers CR, Wardropper CB, Branoff B et al (2018) The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: a literature review. Glob Ecol Conserv 13:e00362
Farré L, Fasani F, Mueller H (2015) Feeling useless: the effect of unemployment on mental health in the great recession, Discussion paper no. 9235. IZA, Bonn, Germany
Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68(3):643–653
Franklin B, McCullough P (2009) Cardiorespiratory fitness: an independent and additive marker of risk stratification and health outcomes. Mayo Clin Proc 84(9):776–779
Gomez-Baggethun E, Barton D (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ 86:235–245
Hansen H, Porter T (2012) What do numbers do in transnational governance? Int Political Sociol 6:409–426
Heynen N, McCarthy J, Prudham S et al (2007) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, Abingdon
HMG, Her Majesty’s Government (2011) The Natural Choice: securing the value of nature. CM8082, TSO, London https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228842/8082.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
IWUN, Improving Wellbeing through Urban Nature. http://iwun.uk/. Accessed 8 Apr 2019
Lamont M (2012) Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annu Rev Sociol 38:201–221
Lampland L (2010) False numbers as formalizing practices. Soc Stud Sci 40(3):377–404
Law J (2002) Economics as interference. In: DuGay P, Pryke M (eds) Cultural economy: cultural analysis and commercial life. Sage, London, pp 21–38
Lawson C, Rothero E, Gowing D et al (2018) The natural capital of floodplains: management, protection and restoration to deliver greater benefits: Valuing Nature Natural Capital Synthesis Report VNP09. http://valuing-nature.net/sites/default/files/images/VNP09-NatCapSynthesisReport-Floodplains-A4-16pp-144dpiV2.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2018
Lele S, Springate-Baginski O, Lakerveld R et al (2013) Ecosystem services: origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives. Conserv Soc 11(4):343–358
Lovell H, Smith S (2010) Agencement in housing markets: the case of the UK construction industry. Geoforum 41:457–468
Macartney H (2011) Variegated neoliberalism: EU varieties of capitalism and international political economy. Routledge, London
Mace G, Norris K, Fitter A (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27(1):19–26
MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.48.aspx.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2019
MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human Well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.766.aspx.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2019
Miller P (1994) Accounting as social and institutional practice: an introduction. In: Hopwood AG, Miller P (eds) Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–39
Miller P (2001) Governing by numbers: why calculative practices matter. Soc Res 68(2):377–396
Natural England (2010) Nature nearby: accessible natural greenspace guidance. Natural England, Peterborough
Noor NM, Asmawi MZ, Abdullah A (2015) Sustainable Urban Regeneration: GIS and Hedonic Pricing Method in determining the value of green space in housing area. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 170:669–679
ONS, Office for National Statistics (2017) Principles of natural capital accounting. https://wwwonsgovuk/economy/environmentalaccounts/methodologies/principlesofnaturalcapitalaccounting. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
Parker RH (1968) Discounted cash flow in historical perspective. J Accounting Res 6:58–71
Pauleit S, Slinn P, Handley J et al (2003) Promoting the natural greenstructure of towns and cities: English Nature’s accessible natural greenspace standards model. Built Environ 29(2):157–170
Polanyi K (1957) The economy as instituted process. In: Polanyi K, Arensberg C, Pearson H (eds) Trade and market in the early empires. Free Press, New York, pp 243–270
Porter T (1994) Making things quantitative. Sci Context 7(3):389–407
Porter T (1995) Trust in Numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Posner SM, McKenzie E, Ricketts TH (2016) Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(7):1760–1765
Power M (2004) Counting, control and calculation: reflections on measuring and management. Hum Relat 57(6):765–783
Ring I, Hansjurgens B, Elmqvist T et al (2010) Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Curr Opin Environ Sustain:1–12
Robertson M (2006) The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environ Plan D 24:367–387. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3304
Robertson M (2007) 9 The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and the problem of measurement. In: Heynen N, McCarthy J, Prudham S et al (eds) Neoliberal Environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 114–125
Robertson M (2012) Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. T I Brit Geogr 37:386–401
Robson K (1992) Accounting numbers as “inscription”: action at a distance and the development of accounting. Account Org Soc 17(7):685–708
Salles J-M (2013) Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: why put economic values on nature? C R Biol 334(5–6):469–482
Scales I (2015) Paying for nature: what every conservationist should know about political economy. Oryx 49(2):226–231
Scott J (1998) Seeing like a state. Yale University Press, New Haven/London
Small N, Munday M, Durance I (2017) The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits. Global Environ Chang 44:57–67
Sturm R, Cohen D (2014) Proximity to urban parks and mental health. J Ment Health Policy Econ 17(1):19–24
Sunderland T, Waters R, Marsh D et al (2019) Accounting for National Nature Reserves: a natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report NERR078. http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/4535403835293696. Accessed 18 Apr 2019
TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. http://www.teebweb.org/our-publications/teeb-study-reports/synthesis-report/#.Ujr2cX9mOG8. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
UN, United Nations (2014) System of environmental-economic accounting 2012 – experimental ecosystem accounting. UN, New York https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/eea_final_en.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2019
UN, United Nations (2018) Technical Recommendations in support of the SEEA 2012. UN, New York. https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/technical_recommendations_in_support_of_the_seea_eea_final_white_cover.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2019
Vivid Economics (2016) The contribution made by Sheffield’s parks to the wellbeing of the city’s citizens. Vivid Economics, London. http://www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Briefing-The-value-of-Sheffields-parks.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2017
Vivid Economics (2017a) Natural capital accounts for public green space in London. http://www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Natural-Capital-Accounts-Report-GLA-NT-HLF.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2019
Vivid Economics (2017b) Natural capital accounts for public green space in London: methodology document. http://www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Natural-Capital-Account-for-London-Methodology-Appendix.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2018
White M, Alcock I, Wheeler B et al (2013) Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol Sci 24(6):920–928
Wilk R (1996) Economies and cultures; foundations of economic anthropology. Westview Press, Boulder
Wilson J, Swyngedouw E (2014) The post-political and its discontents: spaces of Depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henneberry, J., Ma, J., Privitera, R. (2020). Making a Governable, Value-able Nature: Calculative Practices and Eco-system Services. In: Dempsey, N., Dobson, J. (eds) Naturally Challenged: Contested Perceptions and Practices in Urban Green Spaces. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44480-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44480-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44479-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44480-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)