Skip to main content

The Ethics of Care: Valuing or Essentialising Women’s Work?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Gender Can Transform the Social Sciences
  • 879 Accesses

Abstract

A major theme of ethics, introduced by feminist philosophers in the 1980s, concerns the role of care in human life. While the importance of care has historically been neglected by philosophy, some argue that it should be placed at the centre of our ethical systems and understood as a locus of distinctive virtues that have been wrongly devalued as feminine. Whether caring reflects a characteristically feminine set of virtues has been a source of controversy, with some arguing that women have different ethical approaches from men, while others argue this has no basis in an essential sexual or gender difference. Despite these important questions, it is valuable to explore what an ethics looks like that places central importance on relations of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Key Readings

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2016. ‘Contradictions of Capitalism and Care’. New Left Review, July–August: 100. https://newleftreview.org/issues/II100/articles/nancy-fraser-contradictions-of-capital-and-care.

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1993 (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel. 1986. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Fiona. 2011. The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Jenkins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jenkins, F. (2020). The Ethics of Care: Valuing or Essentialising Women’s Work?. In: Sawer, M., Jenkins, F., Downing, K. (eds) How Gender Can Transform the Social Sciences. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43236-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43236-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43235-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43236-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics