Abstract
One response to the numerous governance challenges faced with respect to the oceans, a shared space, is the creation of international organizations. Typically comprising of representations from member States and with pre-defined mandates, international organizations strive to resolve specific issues. This chapter will provide a categorical overview of these organizations and examine how they operate in isolation, as well as interact with each other, in striving to protect the marine environment. Given the institutional complexity surrounding the individual regimes that create them, the outcomes arrived at by most international organizations occasionally do not represent the collective interests of all member States. Nevertheless, the existence of a common avenue in which marine environmental problems can be raised and discussed as a whole has indeed resulted in the adoption of notable measures to address those problems. Such outcomes would not have been possible without the mechanics that are peculiar to international organizations. Ultimately, this analysis demonstrates the extent to which international organizations formulate the law of the sea and discern some patterns on how their efforts has advanced the protection of the marine environment in recent years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Art. 136, UNCLOS.
- 4.
Markus and Singh (2016).
- 5.
Art. 145, UNCLOS.
- 6.
Rothwell and Stephens (2016), pp. 20–21.
- 7.
- 8.
Franckx (2010).
- 9.
Annex II, Article 2, UNCLOS. See also Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (2018).
- 10.
Jenisch (2010).
- 11.
Tanaka (2015a), p. 34.
- 12.
Rothwell and Stephens (2016), p. 21.
- 13.
Harrison (2015a), pp. 389–390.
- 14.
Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 22.
- 15.
- 16.
See UNGA (2015) Resolution A/RES/70/1.
- 17.
Bodansky (2010).
- 18.
See UNGA (2017) Resolution A/RES/69/292.
- 19.
Barnes (2016).
- 20.
Tanaka (2015a), p. 36.
- 21.
See UNGA (1999) Resolution A/RES/54/33.
- 22.
Tanaka (2015a), p. 36.
- 23.
de La Fayette (2006).
- 24.
Rothwell and Stephens (2016), p. 366.
- 25.
Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 23.
- 26.
de La Fayette (2001).
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
VanderZwaag (2015), p. 143.
- 30.
Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 23.
- 31.
Boyle (2006), p. 50.
- 32.
Tanaka (2015a), p. 36.
- 33.
World Heritage Convention and UNESCO (2018).
- 34.
- 35.
Ivanova (2007).
- 36.
UNEP (2018).
- 37.
Pfeiffer (2006), p. 197.
- 38.
Braethan (1998), p. 29.
- 39.
Willetts (2011), pp. 72–73.
- 40.
See Order 2013/2 dated 24 May 2013, Case No. 21 of ITLOS (Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission).
- 41.
UNEP (2018).
- 42.
Namely, the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution 1976 (Barcelona Convention), the Regional Convention for Cooperation on the Protection of the Marine Environment from Pollution 1978 (Kuwait Convention), the Convention for Cooperation in the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the Atlantic Coast of the West, Central and Southern Africa Region 1981 (Abidjan Convention), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and Coastal Zones of the South-East Pacific 1981 (Lima Convention), the Regional Convention for the Conservation of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Environment 1982 (Jeddah Convention), the Convention for the Protection and Development of the Marine Environment of the Wider Caribbean Region 1983 (Cartagena Convention), the Convention of the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the Eastern African Region 1985, (Nairobi Convention), the Convention for the Protection of the Natural Resources and Environment of the South Pacific Region 1986 (Noumea Convention), the Convention on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution 1992 (Bucharest Convention), and the Convention for Cooperation in the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the North-East Pacific 2002 (Antigua Convention).
- 43.
Such as the East Asian Seas Action Plan (EASAP), Northwest Pacific Action Plan 1994 (NOWPAP), and the South Asian Seas Action Plan 1995 (SASAP).
- 44.
Freestone and Salman (2007), p. 349.
- 45.
Notably, the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea 1992 (Helsinki Convention), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic 1992 (OSPAR Convention), the Framework Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Caspian Sea 2003 (Tehran Convention), and the Antarctic Treaty System (comprising of the Antarctic Treaty 1959, the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals 1972, the Convention for the Conservation of the Antarctic Marine Living Resources 1980, and the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty 1991).
- 46.
Rayfuse (2015), p. 440.
- 47.
Unterweger (2015).
- 48.
Rayfuse (2015), p. 450.
- 49.
Harrison (2011), p. 233.
- 50.
- 51.
Oral (2015), pp. 361–362.
- 52.
Churchill and Lowe (1999), pp. 23–24.
- 53.
Molenaar (2003).
- 54.
Gillespie (2011), p. 446.
- 55.
Palma-Robles (2016), pp. 151–152.
- 56.
Gillespie (2005).
- 57.
Sielen (2009).
- 58.
Boyle (2005).
- 59.
Harrison (2011), pp. 237–242.
- 60.
Bodansky (2010), p. 35.
- 61.
Van Dyke and Broder (2015), pp. 69–71.
- 62.
Boetius and Matthias (2018).
- 63.
International Institute for Sustainable Development (2017).
- 64.
Accordingly, upon greater reflection, the granting of a mineral exploration license in that part of the Area might not be contrary to its status as an EBSA, provided a license for exploitation is not granted over the said area subsequently. Given the status of the area as an EBSA, it seems to be unlikely that the ISA will eventually grant an exploitation license over that area.
- 65.
Gillespie (2002).
- 66.
- 67.
Wolfrum and Matz (2003), pp. 159–175.
- 68.
Hey (2007), p. 753.
- 69.
de La Fayette (2006), p. 74.
- 70.
Boyle (2006), pp. 61–62.
- 71.
- 72.
Churchill and Lowe (1999), p. 24.
- 73.
Tanaka (2015b), p. 53.
- 74.
Rothwell (2007), p. 1023.
References
Barnes R (2016) The proposed LOSC implementation agreement on areas beyond national jurisdiction and its impact on international fisheries law. Int J Mar Coast Law 31:1–37
Birnie P, Boyle A, Redgwell C (2009) International law and the environment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bodansky D (2010) The art and craft of international environmental law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Boetius A, Matthias H (2018) Mind the seafloor. Science 359:34–36
Boyle A (2005) Further development of the Law of the Sea Convention: mechanisms for change. Int Comp Law Q 54:563–584
Boyle A (2006) Further development of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea: mechanisms for change. In: Freestone D, Barnes R, Ong DM (eds) The law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 40–62
Boyle A (2007) The environmental jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Int J Mar Coast Law 22(3):369–381
Boyle A, Chinkin C (2007) The law making of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Braethan J (1998) International co-operation on fisheries and environment. TemaNord, Copenhagen
Churchill R, Lowe V (1999) The law of the sea, 3rd edn. Manchester University Press, Manchester
de La Fayette L (2001) The Marine Environment Protection Committee: the conjunction of the law of the sea and international environmental law. Int J Mar Coast Law 16(2):155–238
de La Fayette L (2006) The role of the United Nations in international ocean governance. In: Freestone D, Barnes R, Ong DM (eds) The law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 63–74
Franckx E (1998) Regional marine environment protection regimes in the context of UNCLOS. Int J Mar Coast Law 13:307–324
Franckx E (2010) The International Seabed Authority and the Common Heritage of Mankind: the need for States to establish the outer limits of their continental shelf. Int J Mar Coast Law 25(4):543–567
Freestone D, Salman SMA (2007) Ocean and freshwater resources. In: Bodansky D, Brunee J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 337–361
Gillespie A (2002) Forum shopping in international environmental law: the IWC, CITES, and the management of cetaceans. Ocean Dev Int Law 33:17–56
Gillespie A (2005) Whaling diplomacy: defining issues in international environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Gillespie A (2011) Conservation, biodiversity and international law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Haas P (1989) Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. Int Organ 43:377–403
Harden-Davies H (2016) Marine science and technology transfer: can the International Oceanographic Commission advance governance of biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction. Mar Policy 74:260–267
Harrison J (2011) Making the law of the sea: a study in the development of international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Harrison J (2015a) The law of the sea convention institutions. In: Rothwell D et al (eds) The Oxford handbook on the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 373–393
Harrison J (2015b) Actors and institutions for the protection of the marine environment. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 57–80
Hey E (2007) International institutions. In: Bodansky D, Brunee J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 749–769
Hulm P (1983) The regional seas program: what fate for UNEP’s crown jewels. Ambio 12:2–13
International Institute for Sustainable Development (2017) International Seabed Authority: 23rd session highlights. Earth Negot Bull 25:145. Available at http://enb.iisd.org/download/pdf/enb25145e.pdf
Ivanova M (2007) Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: a story of compromise and confrontation. Integr Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 7(4):337–361
Jaeckel A (2017) The International Seabed Authority and the precautionary principle. Brill, Leiden
Jenisch U (2010) Renaissance des meeresbodens: mineralische rohstoffe und seerecht–Teil 1. NordÖR 10:373–382
Kachel M (2008) Particularly sensitive sea areas: the IMO’s role in protecting vulnerable marine areas. Springer, Heidelberg
Karim MS (2015) Prevention of pollution of the marine environment from vessels: the potential and limits of the International Maritime Organization. Springer, Heidelberg
Lodge M (2015a) The deep seabed. In: Rothwell D et al (eds) The Oxford handbook on the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 226–253
Lodge M (2015b) Protecting the marine environment of the deep seabed. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 151–169
Makgill R, Linhares AP (2016) Deep seabed mining: key obligations in the emerging regulation of exploration and development in the Pacific. In: Warner R, Kaye S (eds) Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement. Routledge, New York, pp 231–261
Markus T, Ginzky H (2011) Regulating climate engineering: paradigmatic aspects of the regulation of ocean fertilization. Carbon Clim Law Rev 5(4):477–490
Markus T, Singh P (2016) Promoting consistency in the deep seabed: addressing regulatory dimensions in designing the International Seabed Authority’s exploitation code. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 25(3):347–362
Molenaar EJ (2003) Participation, allocation and unregulated fishing: the practice of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations. Int J Mar Coast Law 18:457–480
Oral N (2015) Forty years of the UNEP Regional Seas Programme: from past to future. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 339–362
Palma-Robles MA (2016) Fisheries enforcement and the concept of compliance and monitoring, control and surveillance. In: Warner R, Kaye S (eds) Routledge handbook of maritime regulation and enforcement. Routledge, New York, pp 139–160
Pfeiffer S (2006) The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO): how to successfully modernize an international organisation. In: Ehlers P, Lagoni R (eds) International maritime organisations and their contribution towards a sustainable marine development. Lit Verlag, Hamburg, pp 197–217
Rayfuse R (2015) Regional fisheries management organizations. In: Rothwell D et al (eds) The Oxford handbook on the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 439–462
Redgwell C (2006) From permission to prohibition: the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea and protection of the marine environment. In: Freestone D, Barnes R, Ong DM (eds) The law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 180–191
Redgwell C (2007) National implementation. In: Bodansky D, Brunee J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 922–946
Rothwell D (2007) The contribution of ITLOS to ocean governance through marine environmental dispute resolution. In: Ndiaye TM, Wolfrum R (eds) Law of the sea, environmental law and settlement of disputes: liber amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp 1007–1024
Rothwell D, Stephens T (2016) The international law of the sea, 2nd edn. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Scott K (2013) Regulating ocean fertilization under international law. Carbon Clim Law Rev 7(2):108–116
Sielen A (2009) The new international rules on ocean dumping: promise and performance. Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 21(2):295–336
Stephens T (2009) International courts and environmental protection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tanaka Y (2015a) The international law of the sea, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tanaka Y (2015b) Principles of international marine environmental law. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 31–56
Unterweger I (2015) International law on tuna fisheries management: is the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission ready for the challenge? Nomos, Baden-Baden
Van Dyke JM, Broder SP (2015) International agreements and customary international principles providing guidance for national and regional ocean policies. In: Cicin-Sain B, VanderZwaag DL, Balgos MC (eds) Routledge handbook of national and regional ocean policies. Routledge, Oxon, pp 49–84
VanderZwaag DL (2015) The international control of ocean dumping: navigating from permissive to precautionary shores. In: Rayfuse R (ed) Research handbook on international marine environmental law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 132–140
Wedding LM et al (2013) From principles to practice: a spatial approach to systematic conservation planning in the deep sea. Proc R Soc B 280:1–10
Willetts P (2011) Non-governmental organizations in world politics: the construction of global governance. Routledge, Oxon
Williamson P et al (2012) Ocean fertilization for geoengineering: a review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging governance. Process Saf Environ Prot 90(6):475–488
Wolfrum R, Matz N (2003) Conflicts in international environmental law. Springer, Heidelberg
Documents
Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (2018) Members of the Commission: http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_members.htm#Subsidiary%20bodies
IMO (2014) Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea for the International Maritime Organization: Study by the Secretariat of the IMO (LEG/MISC.8, 30 January 2014). Available at http://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/legal/documents/leg%20misc%208.pdf
IMO (2019) Ocean fertilization under LC/LP. Available at http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/LCLP/EmergingIssues/geoengineering/OceanFertilizationDocumentRepository/OceanFertilization/Pages/default.aspx
UNEP (2018) Working with regional seas. Available at https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/oceans-seas/what-we-do/working-regional-seas
UNGA (1999) Resolution A/RES/54/33 adopted by the General Assembly on 24 November 1999: results of the review by the Commission on Sustainable Development of the sectoral theme of “Oceans and seas”: international coordination and cooperation. Available at https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/237/93/PDF/N0023793.pdf?OpenElement
UNGA (2015) Resolution A/RES/70/1 adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015: transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available at http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf
UNGA (2017) Resolution A/RES/69/292 adopted by the General Assembly on 24 December 2017: International legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. Available at https://undocs.org/en/a/res/72/249
World Heritage Convention and UNESCO (2018) Marine world heritage: 2018 annual report. Available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/marine-programme
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, P.A. (2020). International Organizations and the Protection of the Marine Environment. In: Ribeiro, M., Loureiro Bastos, F., Henriksen, T. (eds) Global Challenges and the Law of the Sea. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42671-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42670-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42671-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)