Abstract
Current scenarios reveal new types of ever increasing dynamic and aggressive threats, which lead to a move from a traditional security management to a strategic vision for protecting citizens and assets in a more comprehensive way. In such an environment, the risk related to incidents involving the use of CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear) agents must be considered a cause of potentially devastating consequences. Non-proliferation and disarmament operations can make an essential contribution to combat terrorism by preventing or reducing the access of non-state actors or non-authorised persons to chemicals, biological and nuclear dual-use materials but this could be not enough. Illicit proliferation of chemical weapons, clandestine production of toxins and biological agents, ‘dirty bombs’ and trafficking of fissile material are just some examples of the use of CBRN agents for terrorist purposes. This chapter argues that, in order to address these issues, the integration of human, instrumental, technological and financial resources should be improved and reinforced. For that purpose, an effective strategy to mitigate and reduce the risk of using CBRN materials requires a high level of coordination across national agencies. Further development of interagency CBRN defence capabilities remains a top priority for global security.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
At the time of the preparation of the present text, the number of cases and deaths is continuously evolving, being in the order of ca. 1,300,000 confirmed infections and ca. 73,000 deaths in mid-April 2020, all over the world (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200407-sitrep-78-covid-19.pdf).
- 2.
For instance, the Major Incident Procedure Manual of the London Emergency Liaison Panel identifies the primary functions that police, fire brigade, ambulance services, national healthcare services, local government authorities and the Coast Guard must carry out.
References
Acton, J. M., Brooke Rogers, M., & Zimmerman, P. D. (2007). Beyond the dirty bomb: Re-thinking radiological terror. Survival, 49(3), 151–168.
American Medical Association. (2005). Management of public health emergencies, a resource guide for physicians and other community responders. Chicago, US: American Medical Association.
Bismuth, C., Borron, S. W., Baud, F. J., & Barriot, P. (2004). Chemical weapons: Documented use and compounds on the horizon. Toxicology Letters, 149(1–3), 11–18.
Capoun, T., & Krykorkova, J. (2014). Comparison of selected methods for individual decontamination of chemical warfare agents. Toxics, 2, 307–326.
Cavallini, S., Bisogni, F., & Mastroianni, M. (2014). Economic impact profiling of CBRN events: Focusing on biological incidents. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 62, 437–444.
CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Biological and chemical terrorism: strategic plan for preparedness and response. Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup, USA.
Cenciarelli, O., Rea, S., Carestia, M., D’Amico, F., Malizia, A., Gaudio, P., et al. (2013). Bioweapons and bioTerrorism: A review of history and biological agents. Defence Science and Technology, Technical Bulletin, 6(2), 111–129.
Cibulsky, S. M., Sokolowski, D., Lafontaine, M., Gagnon, C., Blain, P. G., Russell, D., et al. (2015). Mass casualty decontamination in a chemical or radiological/nuclear incident with external contamination: Guiding principles and research needs, PLoS Currents, 2, 7.
Clarke, S., Chilcott, R., Wilson, J., Kamanyire, R., Baker, D., & Hallett, A. (2008). Decontamination of multiple casualties who are chemically contaminated: A challenge for acute hospitals. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 23(2), 175–181.
COM 273 final. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Strengthening Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Security in the European Union—An EU Action Plan.
Danon, Y. L., & Shemer, J. (1994). Chemical warfare medicine: Aspects and perspectives from the Persian Gulf War. Jerusalem, Israel: Gefen Publishing House.
Dworkin, J., Prescott, M., Jamal, R., Hardawan, S. A., Abdullah, A., & Galea, S. (2008). The long-term psychosocial impact of a surprise chemical weapons attack on Civilians in Halabja, Iraqi Kurdistan. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(10), 772–775.
Ellis, P. D. (2014). Lone wolf terrorism and weapons of mass destruction: An examination of capabilities and countermeasures. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(1), 211–225.
Enserink, M. (2001). This time it was real: Knowledge of anthrax put to the test. Science, 294, 490–491.
FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2010). Effective communication independent study 242A. Washington, US: FEMA.
Geller, C., Varbanov, M., & Duval, R. E. (2012). Human coronaviruses: Insights into environmental resistance and its influence on the development of new antiseptic strategies. Viruses, 4, 3044–3068.
ICRP, International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1997). General principles for the radiation protection of workers. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Jansen, H. J., Breevel, F. J., Stijnis, C., & Grobusch, M. P. (2014). Biological warfare, bioterrorism, and biocrime. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 20(6), 488–496.
Johnston, W. R. (2017). Summary of historical attacks using chemical or biological weapons. https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/chembioattacks.html. Accessed April 13, 2020.
Kawana, N., Ishimatsu, S., & Kanda, K. (2001). Psycho-physiological effects of the terrorist sarin attack on the Tokyo subway system. Military Medicine, 166 (Sup. 2), 23–26.
Koenig, K. L., Boatright, C. J., Hancock, J. A., Denny, F. J., Teeter, D. S., Kahn, C. A., & Schultz, C. H. (2008). Health care facility-based decontamination of victims exposed to chemical, biological, and radiological materials. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 26(1), 71–80.
Levitin, H., Siegelson, H., Dickinson, S., Halpern, P., Haraguchi, Y., Nocera, A., & Turineck, D. (2003). Decontamination of mass casualties—Evaluating existing dogma. Prehospital Disaster Medicine, 18(3), 200–207.
Malizia, A. (2016). Disaster management in case of CBRNe events: An innovative methodology to improve the safety knowledge of advisors and first responders. Defense & Security Analysis, 32(1), 79–90.
McCarthy, M. (2003). US military prepares for Iraq to use chemical and biological weapons. Lancet, 361, 628.
Northington, W. E., Suyama, J., Goss, F. L., Randall, C., Gallagher, M., & Hostler, D. (2007). Physiological responses during graded treadmill exercise in chemical-resistant personal protective equipment. Prehospital and Emergency Care, 11(4), 394–398.
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OCPW). (1993). The chemical weapons convention. https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/Fact_Sheets/English/Fact_Sheet_2_-_CWC.pdf. Accessed April 13, 2020.
Pitschmann, V. (2014). Overall view of chemical and biochemical weapons. Toxins, 6(6), 1761–1784.
Ranghieri, M., Guidotti, M., & Rossodivita, A. (2010). Tools against terrorist threats: Considerations on how to be prepared. In NATO Science for Peace and Security Series—E: Human and Societal Dynamics. Pandemics and bioterrorism—Transdisciplinary information sharing for decision-making against biological threats (Vol. 62, pp. 91–98). Amsterdam: IOS-Press.
Richardt, A., Hülseweh, B., Niemeyer, B., & Sabath, F. (2013). CBRN protection: Managing the threat of chemical, biological, radioactive and nuclear weapons. Hoboken, US: Wiley.
Riches, J. R., Read, R. W., Black, R. M., Cooper, N. J., & Timperley, C. M. (2012). Analysis of clothing and urine from Moscow theatre siege casualties reveals carfentanil and remifentanil use. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 36(9), 647–656.
Rubin, G. J., Chowdhury, A. K., & Amlôt, R. (2012). How to communicate with the public about chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear terrorism: A systematic review of the literature. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 10(4), 383–395.
Rutala, W. A., & Weber, D. J. (2015). Disinfection, sterilization, and control of hospital waste. In J. E. Bennett, R. Dolin, & M. J. Blaser (Eds.), Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases (8th ed., pp. 3294–3309). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Saker, L., Lee, K., Cannito, B., Gilmore, A., & Campbell-Lendrum, D. (2004). Globalization and infectious diseases: A review of the linkages. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Sarin, R. (2011). Chernobyl, Fukushima, and beyond: A health safety perspective. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 7(2), 109–111.
Stone, H., See, D., Smiley, A., Ellingson, A., Schimmoeller, J., & Oudejans, L. (2016). Surface decontamination for blister agents Lewisite, sulfur mustard and agent yellow, a Lewisite and sulfur mustard mixture. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 314, 59–66.
Turcanu, C., Crouäil, P., Duranova, T., Camps, J., Schneider, T., & Raskob, W. (2016). Training courses on emergency preparedness, response and recovery: Theory, practice and application of newly developed tools. Radioprotection, 51(HS2), S171–S173.
US Code. (1925). Title 50, Chapter 40—Defense against weapons of mass destruction, § 2301. Definitions.
Wax, P. M., Becker, C. E., & Curry, S. C. (2003). Unexpected “gas” casualties in Moscow: A medical toxicology perspective. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41, 700–705.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2004). Public health response to biological and chemical weapons: WHO guidance. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for the COVID-19 virus. Technical brief. 3 March 2020. WHO reference number: WHO/2019-NcOV/IPC_WASH/2020.1
Wu, Z., & McGoogan, J. (2020). Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. Journal of the American Medical Association, 323(13), 1239–1242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benolli, F., Guidotti, M., Bisogni, F. (2021). The CBRN Threat. Perspective of an Interagency Response. In: Jacobs, G., Suojanen, I., Horton, K., Bayerl, P. (eds) International Security Management. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42523-4_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42523-4_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42522-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42523-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)