Skip to main content

Theoretical Developments in Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a complex subject, as are theoretical developments within it. It is multidisciplinary, as are many disciplines in the social sciences. Perhaps because CSR is a relatively new area within the field of business and management (Crowther and Lauesen 2017), dealing, as will be seen, with a variety of issues and approaches, it spans many fields, theoretical perspectives, and research methodologies. One of the dialectics in writings on CSR has been between a “functionalist” approach, often seeing CSR policies as one among other corporation policies, and effective to a greater or lesser extent. A radical approach on the other hand regards corporations as being always mindful of the bottom line. CSR policies would then be tools to achieve that goal, be it with effective socially responsible outcomes or possibly as simply branding exercises to gain legitimacy and consumer support. With recent global developments, there are again different views as to the directions CSR will take. With the corona virus pandemic and the climate change crisis, broader questions have been brought into focus regarding the roles of the state and of international institutions, and their future relationships with corporations. The hitherto neoliberal ideology and practices which had weakened many governments in favor of private companies, including their taking over public services, is now under challenge. Environmental disasters and Covid-19 have exposed the need for strong governmental action both nationally and also through global cooperation. This raises questions about the future roles of corporations and other private organizations, and therefore of CSR, the ways in which it will develop, and the possible effects on societies world over.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2009) Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity? J Bus Ethics 87:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2012) Accounting, sustainability and equity. In: Aras G, Crowther D (eds) Business strategy and sustainability. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Ingley C (2017) Introduction: dong well by being good for sustainable business. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate Behavior and Sustainability: Doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Williams P (2017) Agency theory: explaining or creating problems? Good governance and ethical behaviour for sustainable business. In: Aras, G and Ingley C (eds) Corporate Behavior and Sustainability: Doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ami S (2020) https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/covid19-different-than-previous-pandemics-by-shlomo-ben-ami-2020-04

  • Blundell R (2020) Respondent at online webinar to Philippon T (2019) The great reversal reversal: how America gave up on free markets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 11 May 2020, Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 11 May 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice (trans: Nice R). Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1998) Practical reason: on the theory of action. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Broomes V (2016) Organisational governance and strategic CSR to strengthen local supply chains: navigating the maze. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Accountability and social responsibility: international perspectives. Emerald, Bingley, pp 3–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (2005) Neoliberalism and the end of liberal democracy. In: Brown W (ed) Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 37–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G (2020) On Covid-19, the G20 has gone awol. The Guardian, 2 June 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell G, Morgan G (2016) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury A (1992) The financial aspects of corporate governance. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2007

  • Chambers A (2012) The global financial crisis: a failure of corporate governance? In: Aras G, Crowther D (eds) Business strategy and sustainability. Emerald, Bingley, pp 23–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther D (2017) Ethics in the research process. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 63–75

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther D (2018) A social critique of corporate reporting: a semiotic analysis of financial and corporate reporting. Routledge Revivals, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther D, Lauesen LM (2016) Introduction: sustainability and social responsibility. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Accountability and social responsibility: international perspectives. Emerald, Bingley, pp ix–xxi

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther D, Lauesen LM (2017) Introduction. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dermer JD, Lucas RG (1986) The illusion of managerial control. Acc Organ Soc 11(6):471–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte FP (2017) Analytic autoethnography as a tool to enhance reflection, reflexivity and critical thinking in CSR research. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 231–240

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Zhu Q, Lai K-H (2017) Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.018

  • Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2005) Economics language and assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):8–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend P (1993) Against method, 3rd edn. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Filek J (2015) CSR: between management strategy and a new paradigm of thought. In: Fryzel B (ed) The true value of CSR: corporate identity and stakeholder perceptions. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management – a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Frynas JG, Stephens S (2014) Politial corporate responsibility: reviewing theories and setting new agendas. Int J Manag Rev 17(4):483–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12049

  • Frynas JG, Yamahaki C (2016) Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Bus Ethics 25(3):258–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosh J (2020) One crisis leads to another: challenges and responses across emerging economies in the time of Covid-19, Speaker at online webinar, Institute of Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 26 May 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Green M (2016) Neoliberalism and management scholarship: educational implications. Philos Manag 15(3):183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-016-0042-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green M (2017a) Research methods in organization, management and management accounting: an evaluation of quantitative and qualitative approaches. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 76–93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Green M (2017b) Behaviour in academe: an investigation into the sustainability of mainstream scholarship in management studies. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 42–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Green M (2019) Management scholarship and organisational change: representing burns and stalker. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green M (2020) Science, ‘scientificity’ (Bourdieu) or politics? UK responses to Covid-19, abstract submitted for 19th international conference on corporate social responsibility and 10th organisational governance conference, September 8–10, 2020, Solo City, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Green M, Vandekerckhove W, Bessire D (2008) Accountability discourses in advanced capitalism: who is now accountable to whom? Soc Respon J 4(1/2):198–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh M, Jones MT (2006) The drivers of corporate social responsibility: a critical review. In: GBER 2006: proceedings of the 2006 global business and economics research conference, Turkey, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon G (2007) Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of the Firm – On the Denial of Politics. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J and Seigel, D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 156–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Harari YN (2020) @harari yuval

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey DA (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iatridis K, Kesidou E (2013) Transcending the debate: what motivates the comprehensive implementation of corporate social responsibility? BAM conference proceedings, Liverpool, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingley C, Aras G (2017) Conclusion. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 252–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones O (2014) The establishment: and how they get away with it. Penguin Random House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2014) This changes everything. Penguin Random House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauesen LM (2015) Sustainable governance in hybrid organizations: an international case study of water companies. Gower Publishing, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauesen LM (2016) Stakeholder dissonance: corporate social responsibility versus regulation – a study of a trust-recovery process. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Accountability and social responsibility: international perspectives. Emerald, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauesen LM (2017) Ethnographic research methods in CSR research: building theory out of people’s everyday life with materials, objects, practices, and symbolic constructions. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 265–277

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence F, Pegg D, Garside J, Conn D, Carrell S, Davies H (2020) From austerity to Covid-19: how a decade of NHS cuts and privatisation left the UK exposed to a pandemic. The Guardian, 1 June 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato M (2020) Public purpose in the time of Covid-19, Speaker at online webinar, Institute of Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 1 June 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Morf D, Flesher D, Hayek M, Pane S, Hayek C (2013) Shifts in corporate accountability reflected in socially responsible reporting: a historical review. J Manag Hist 19(1):87–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341311286213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordberg D, McNulty T (2013) Creating better boards through codification: possibilities and limitations in UK corporate governance, 1992–2010. Bus Hist 55(3):348–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0076791.2012.712694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ospina DER, Ospina JFM (2017) Methodological and epistemological perspectives in the study of corporate social responsibility in Colombia. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 94–106

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Panozzo F (1997) The making of the good academic accountant. Acc Organ Soc 22(5):447–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistor K (2020) Public purpose in the time of Covid-19, Speaker at online webinar, Institute of Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 1 June 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff JD (2017) Beyond strategic CSR: the concept of responsibility as the foundation of ethics – political, technological and economic responsibility for the future of humanity. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 428–436

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson F (2015) https://www.icas.com/professional-resources/sustainability/practical-tools-and-links/integrated-reporting/what-is-integrated-reporting-why-it-matters. Accessed 6 Apr 2020

  • Said R, Crowther D, Amran A (2014) Introduction: corporate crime and its constraint. In: Said R, Crowther D, Amran A (eds) Ethics, governance and corporate crime: challenges and consequences. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Samy M, Robertson F (2017) From positivism to social constructivism: an emerging trend for CSR researchers. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 437–461

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seifi S (2017) Game theory as a research tool for sustainability. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 111–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seifi S, Crowther D (2014) Business ethics in society. In: Said R, Crowther D, Amran A (eds) Ethics, governance and corporate crime: challenges and consequences. Emerald, Bingley, pp 253–267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seifi S, Crowther D (2018) The need to reconsider CSR: introduction. In: Crowther D, Seifi S (eds) Redefining corporate social responsibility. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw HJ (2017a) Food deserts in British cities: comparing food access, obesity, and ethnicity in Leicester and Stoke on Trent. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 159–176

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw JJA (2017b) A phenomenological study of moral discourse, social justice and CSR. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 377–390

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thunberg G (2019) No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin Random House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Stede S, Young M, Chen CX (2005) Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: the case of survey studies. Acc Organ Soc 30(7–8):655–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells P, Ingley C (2017) The walls between us: governance for sustainability. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner B (2012) The future of human-landscape systems II (video), You Tube

    Google Scholar 

  • Yekini KC (2017) Insights regarding the applicability of semiotics to CSR communication research. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 241–264

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1978) Economy and society: and outline of interpretive sociology. In:Roth, G and Wittich, C (eds). University of California Press, Berkeley USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Green .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Green, M. (2021). Theoretical Developments in Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42465-7_78

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics