Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a complex subject, as are theoretical developments within it. It is multidisciplinary, as are many disciplines in the social sciences. Perhaps because CSR is a relatively new area within the field of business and management (Crowther and Lauesen 2017), dealing, as will be seen, with a variety of issues and approaches, it spans many fields, theoretical perspectives, and research methodologies. One of the dialectics in writings on CSR has been between a “functionalist” approach, often seeing CSR policies as one among other corporation policies, and effective to a greater or lesser extent. A radical approach on the other hand regards corporations as being always mindful of the bottom line. CSR policies would then be tools to achieve that goal, be it with effective socially responsible outcomes or possibly as simply branding exercises to gain legitimacy and consumer support. With recent global developments, there are again different views as to the directions CSR will take. With the corona virus pandemic and the climate change crisis, broader questions have been brought into focus regarding the roles of the state and of international institutions, and their future relationships with corporations. The hitherto neoliberal ideology and practices which had weakened many governments in favor of private companies, including their taking over public services, is now under challenge. Environmental disasters and Covid-19 have exposed the need for strong governmental action both nationally and also through global cooperation. This raises questions about the future roles of corporations and other private organizations, and therefore of CSR, the ways in which it will develop, and the possible effects on societies world over.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aras G, Crowther D (2009) Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity? J Bus Ethics 87:279–288
Aras G, Crowther D (2012) Accounting, sustainability and equity. In: Aras G, Crowther D (eds) Business strategy and sustainability. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–21
Aras G, Ingley C (2017) Introduction: dong well by being good for sustainable business. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate Behavior and Sustainability: Doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp 1–6
Aras G, Williams P (2017) Agency theory: explaining or creating problems? Good governance and ethical behaviour for sustainable business. In: Aras, G and Ingley C (eds) Corporate Behavior and Sustainability: Doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp 9–20
Ben-Ami S (2020) https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/covid19-different-than-previous-pandemics-by-shlomo-ben-ami-2020-04
Blundell R (2020) Respondent at online webinar to Philippon T (2019) The great reversal reversal: how America gave up on free markets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 11 May 2020, Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 11 May 2020
Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice (trans: Nice R). Polity Press, Cambridge
Bourdieu P (1998) Practical reason: on the theory of action. Polity Press, Cambridge
Broomes V (2016) Organisational governance and strategic CSR to strengthen local supply chains: navigating the maze. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Accountability and social responsibility: international perspectives. Emerald, Bingley, pp 3–21
Brown W (2005) Neoliberalism and the end of liberal democracy. In: Brown W (ed) Edgework: critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 37–59
Brown G (2020) On Covid-19, the G20 has gone awol. The Guardian, 2 June 2020
Burrell G, Morgan G (2016) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. Routledge, Abingdon
Cadbury A (1992) The financial aspects of corporate governance. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2007
Chambers A (2012) The global financial crisis: a failure of corporate governance? In: Aras G, Crowther D (eds) Business strategy and sustainability. Emerald, Bingley, pp 23–44
Crowther D (2017) Ethics in the research process. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 63–75
Crowther D (2018) A social critique of corporate reporting: a semiotic analysis of financial and corporate reporting. Routledge Revivals, Abingdon
Crowther D, Lauesen LM (2016) Introduction: sustainability and social responsibility. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Accountability and social responsibility: international perspectives. Emerald, Bingley, pp ix–xxi
Crowther D, Lauesen LM (2017) Introduction. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–24
Dermer JD, Lucas RG (1986) The illusion of managerial control. Acc Organ Soc 11(6):471–482
Duarte FP (2017) Analytic autoethnography as a tool to enhance reflection, reflexivity and critical thinking in CSR research. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 231–240
Feng Y, Zhu Q, Lai K-H (2017) Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.018
Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2005) Economics language and assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):8–24
Feyerabend P (1993) Against method, 3rd edn. Verso, London
Filek J (2015) CSR: between management strategy and a new paradigm of thought. In: Fryzel B (ed) The true value of CSR: corporate identity and stakeholder perceptions. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, pp 29–48
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management – a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Frynas JG, Stephens S (2014) Politial corporate responsibility: reviewing theories and setting new agendas. Int J Manag Rev 17(4):483–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12049
Frynas JG, Yamahaki C (2016) Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Bus Ethics 25(3):258–285
Gosh J (2020) One crisis leads to another: challenges and responses across emerging economies in the time of Covid-19, Speaker at online webinar, Institute of Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 26 May 2020
Green M (2016) Neoliberalism and management scholarship: educational implications. Philos Manag 15(3):183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-016-0042-x
Green M (2017a) Research methods in organization, management and management accounting: an evaluation of quantitative and qualitative approaches. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 76–93
Green M (2017b) Behaviour in academe: an investigation into the sustainability of mainstream scholarship in management studies. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 42–63
Green M (2019) Management scholarship and organisational change: representing burns and stalker. Routledge, London
Green M (2020) Science, ‘scientificity’ (Bourdieu) or politics? UK responses to Covid-19, abstract submitted for 19th international conference on corporate social responsibility and 10th organisational governance conference, September 8–10, 2020, Solo City, Indonesia
Green M, Vandekerckhove W, Bessire D (2008) Accountability discourses in advanced capitalism: who is now accountable to whom? Soc Respon J 4(1/2):198–208
Haigh M, Jones MT (2006) The drivers of corporate social responsibility: a critical review. In: GBER 2006: proceedings of the 2006 global business and economics research conference, Turkey, pp 1–8
Hanlon G (2007) Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of the Firm – On the Denial of Politics. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J and Seigel, D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 156–172
Harari YN (2020) @harari yuval
Harvey DA (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Iatridis K, Kesidou E (2013) Transcending the debate: what motivates the comprehensive implementation of corporate social responsibility? BAM conference proceedings, Liverpool, UK
Ingley C, Aras G (2017) Conclusion. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 252–253
Jones O (2014) The establishment: and how they get away with it. Penguin Random House, London
Klein N (2014) This changes everything. Penguin Random House, London
Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Lauesen LM (2015) Sustainable governance in hybrid organizations: an international case study of water companies. Gower Publishing, Farnham
Lauesen LM (2016) Stakeholder dissonance: corporate social responsibility versus regulation – a study of a trust-recovery process. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Accountability and social responsibility: international perspectives. Emerald, Bingley
Lauesen LM (2017) Ethnographic research methods in CSR research: building theory out of people’s everyday life with materials, objects, practices, and symbolic constructions. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 265–277
Lawrence F, Pegg D, Garside J, Conn D, Carrell S, Davies H (2020) From austerity to Covid-19: how a decade of NHS cuts and privatisation left the UK exposed to a pandemic. The Guardian, 1 June 2020
Mazzucato M (2020) Public purpose in the time of Covid-19, Speaker at online webinar, Institute of Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 1 June 2020
Morf D, Flesher D, Hayek M, Pane S, Hayek C (2013) Shifts in corporate accountability reflected in socially responsible reporting: a historical review. J Manag Hist 19(1):87–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341311286213
Nordberg D, McNulty T (2013) Creating better boards through codification: possibilities and limitations in UK corporate governance, 1992–2010. Bus Hist 55(3):348–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0076791.2012.712694
Ospina DER, Ospina JFM (2017) Methodological and epistemological perspectives in the study of corporate social responsibility in Colombia. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 94–106
Panozzo F (1997) The making of the good academic accountant. Acc Organ Soc 22(5):447–480
Pistor K (2020) Public purpose in the time of Covid-19, Speaker at online webinar, Institute of Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), 1 June 2020
Rendtorff JD (2017) Beyond strategic CSR: the concept of responsibility as the foundation of ethics – political, technological and economic responsibility for the future of humanity. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 428–436
Robertson F (2015) https://www.icas.com/professional-resources/sustainability/practical-tools-and-links/integrated-reporting/what-is-integrated-reporting-why-it-matters. Accessed 6 Apr 2020
Said R, Crowther D, Amran A (2014) Introduction: corporate crime and its constraint. In: Said R, Crowther D, Amran A (eds) Ethics, governance and corporate crime: challenges and consequences. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–17
Samy M, Robertson F (2017) From positivism to social constructivism: an emerging trend for CSR researchers. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 437–461
Seifi S (2017) Game theory as a research tool for sustainability. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 111–124
Seifi S, Crowther D (2014) Business ethics in society. In: Said R, Crowther D, Amran A (eds) Ethics, governance and corporate crime: challenges and consequences. Emerald, Bingley, pp 253–267
Seifi S, Crowther D (2018) The need to reconsider CSR: introduction. In: Crowther D, Seifi S (eds) Redefining corporate social responsibility. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–11
Shaw HJ (2017a) Food deserts in British cities: comparing food access, obesity, and ethnicity in Leicester and Stoke on Trent. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 159–176
Shaw JJA (2017b) A phenomenological study of moral discourse, social justice and CSR. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 377–390
Thunberg G (2019) No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin Random House, London
Van der Stede S, Young M, Chen CX (2005) Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: the case of survey studies. Acc Organ Soc 30(7–8):655–684
Wells P, Ingley C (2017) The walls between us: governance for sustainability. In: Aras G, Ingley C (eds) Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 67–82
Werner B (2012) The future of human-landscape systems II (video), You Tube
Yekini KC (2017) Insights regarding the applicability of semiotics to CSR communication research. In: Crowther D, Lauesen LM (eds) Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 241–264
Weber M (1978) Economy and society: and outline of interpretive sociology. In:Roth, G and Wittich, C (eds). University of California Press, Berkeley USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Green, M. (2021). Theoretical Developments in Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42465-7_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42465-7_78
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42464-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42465-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences