Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multinational Companies (MNCs), Small-to-Medium Enterprises (SMEs), and Small Businesses

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) debate has long focused on multinational corporations (MNCs) driven primarily by a western-centric conception, whereas the debate has remained largely limited for small-medium sized enterprises (SMEs) (Jamali et al. 2009). Even though SMEs may not have huge impacts on the economy individually, their collective power is quite significant (Pastrana and Sriramesh 2014) as they comprise over 90% of businesses worldwide and account for about 60% of employment (Jenkins 2004; Vives 2006). As such, SMEs and their specific attributes have recently attracted much attention in CSR research area (Jamali et al. 2009), although few studies have focused on the CSR behavior of SMEs (Grayson 2004; Spence 1999; Spence et al. 2000; Spence and Lozano 2000). Holliday (1995) and Spence (1999) describe SMEs as independent, owner-managed firms that are stretched by multitasking, have limited funds, are built on personal relationships, and controlled by informal mechanisms. As such, SMEs generally lack the resources to generate knowledge about CSR and need the guidance of external stakeholders to perform CSR activities (Russo and Perrini 2010). MNCs differ from SMEs in terms of CSR conceptions, motivations for engagement, decision-making processes, and challenges faced. According to Baumann-Pauly, Wickert, Spence and Scherer (2013), these differences regarding CSR actions between MNCs and SMEs stem from the relationship between firm size and organizational costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agan Y, Acar MF, Borodin A (2013) Drivers of environmental processes and their impact on performance: a study of Turkish SMEs. J Clean Prod 51:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghelie A (2017) Exploring drivers and barriers to sustainability green business practices within small medium sized enterprises: primary findings. Int J Bus Econ Dev (IJBED) 5:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera-Caracuel J, Aragón-Correa JA, Hurtado-Torres NE, Rugman AM (2012) The effects of institutional distance and headquarters’ financial performance on the generation of environmental standards in multinational companies. J Bus Ethics 105(4):461–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi K, Adi B, Ogbechie C, Olufemi O (2006) Corporate social responsibility in Nigeria: western mimicry or indigenous influences? J Corp Citizsh 24:83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi K, Adegbite E, Rajwani T (2016a) Corporate social responsibility in challenging and non-enabling institutional contexts: do institutional voids matter? J Bus Ethics 134(1):135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi K, Adegbite E, Ogbechie C, Idemudia U, Kan KAS, Issa M, Anakwue OI (2016b) Corporate social responsibility in SMEs: a shift from philanthropy to institutional works? J Bus Ethics 138(2):385–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baden DA, Harwood IA, Woodward DG (2009) The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: an added incentive or counter productive? Eur Manag J 27(6):429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu K, Palazzo G (2005) An inductive typology for corporate social responsibility. In: Academy of Management Proceedings (vol 2005, no 1, pp C1–C6). Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sensemaking. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Pauly D, Wickert C, Spence LJ, Scherer AG (2013) Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: size matters. J Bus Ethics 115(4):693–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertels S, Peloza J (2011) Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corp Reput Rev 11(1):56–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomgren A (2011) Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? A case study of executive perceptions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18(5):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier RG (2014) Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 32(4):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S, Hoejmose S, Marchant K (2012) Environmental management in SME s in the UK: practices, pressures and perceived benefits. Bus Strateg Environ 21(7):423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broccardo L, Truant E, Zicari A (2019) Internal corporate sustainability drivers: what evidence from family firms? A literature review and research agenda. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JT, Eden L, Miller SR (2012) Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: does distance matter? J Int Bus Stud 43(1):84–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (2016) Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. Int J Corp Soc Responsib 1(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Castejón PJM, López BA (2016) Corporate social responsibility in family SMEs: a comparative study. Eur J Fam Bus 6(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti F, Pontrandolfo P, Scozzi B (2008) Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: a SME perspective. J Clean Prod 16(15):1579–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti F, de Haan J, de Groot G, Pontrandolfo P (2011) CSR codes and the principal-agent problem in supply chains: four case studies. J Clean Prod 19(8):885–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppa M, Sriramesh K (2013) Corporate social responsibility among SMEs in Italy. Public Relat Rev 39(1):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer J, Jonker J, Van der Heijden A (2004) Making sense of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 55:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz LB, Boehe DM (2010) How do leading retail MNCs leverage CSR globally? Insights from Brazil. J Bus Ethics 91(2):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darendeli IS, Hill TL (2016) Uncovering the complex relationships between political risk and MNE firm legitimacy: insights from Libya. J Int Bus Stud 47(1):68–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das M, Rangarajan K (2017, July) Corporate sustainability as a business strategy in SMEs-A literature review in the emerging market context. In: Proceedings of international conference on strategies in volatile and uncertain environment for emerging markets, pp 505–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R, Franks DM (2011, October) The costs of conflict with local communities in the extractive industry. In: Proceedings of the first international seminar on social responsibility in mining, Santiago, Chile, vol 30, pp 7576–7581

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfahani MD, Rahman AA, Zakaria NH (2015) Green IT/IS adoption as corporate ecological responsiveness: an academic literature review. J Soft Comput Decis Support Syst 2(1):35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans N, Sawyer J (2010) CSR and stakeholders of small businesses in regional South Australia. Soc Responsib J 6(3):433–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eweje G (2006) The role of MNEs in community development initiatives in developing countries: corporate social responsibility at work in Nigeria and South Africa. Bus Soc 45(2):93–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin Y (2008) SMEs and the fallacy of formalising CSR. Bus Ethics 17(4):364–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher K, Geenen J, Jurcevic M, McClintock K, Davis G (2009) Applying asset-based community development as a strategy for CSR: a Canadian perspective on a win–win for stakeholders and SMEs. Bus Ethics 18(1):66–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote J, Gaffney N, Evans JR (2010) Corporate social responsibility: implications for performance excellence. Total Qual Manag 21(8):799–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman E (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Cabrera AM, Durán-Herrera JJ (2016) MNEs as institutional entrepreneurs: a dynamic model of the co-evolutionary process. Eur Manag J 34(5):550–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould H (2016) Can tech give the fashion industry a sustainability makeover? – live chat. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/apr/08/can-tech-give-fashion-industry-sustainability-makeover-live-chat

  • Graafland J, Van de Ven B, Stoffele N (2003) Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands. J Bus Ethics 47(1):45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland J, Mazereeuw C, Yahia A (2006) Islam and socially responsible business conduct: an empirical study of Dutch entrepreneurs. Bus Ethics 15(4):390–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson D. (2004). How CSR contribute to the competitiveness of Europe in a more sustainable world. The world Bank Institute and the CSR Resource Centre, Netherlands, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson D (2006) Inspiring smaller firms with the responsible business mindset. In: Epstein M, Hansen K (eds) The accountable corporation: corporate social responsibility. Praeger, London, pp 279–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus Soc 39(3):254–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimón J, Salazar-Elena JC (2015) Collaboration in innovation between foreign subsidiaries and local universities: evidence from Spain. Ind Innov 22(6):445–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hah K, Freeman S (2014) Multinational enterprise subsidiaries and their CSR: a conceptual framework of the management of CSR in smaller emerging economies. J Bus Ethics 122(1):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MW, Pedersen T, Petersen B (2009) MNC strategies and linkage effects in developing countries. J World Bus 44(2):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harness D, Ranaweera C, Karjaluoto H, Jayawardhena C (2018) The role of negative and positive forms of power in supporting CSR alignment and commitment between large firms and SMEs. Ind Mark Manag 75:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway CA, Maclagan PW (2004) Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 50(1):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess D, Rogovsky N, Dunfee TW (2002) The next wave of corporate community involvement: corporate social initiatives. Calif Manag Rev 44(2):110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday R (1995) Investigating small firms: nice work? Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted BW, Allen DB (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):838–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilhan-Nas T, Koparan E, Okan T (2015) The effects of the CSR isomorphism on both CSP and CFP. J Asia Bus Stud 9(3)251–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Inyang BJ (2013) Defining the role engagement of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Int Bus Res 6(5):123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson G, Rathert N (2016) Private governance as regulatory substitute or complement? A comparative institutional approach to CSR adoption by multinational corporations. In: Multinational corporations and organization theory: post millennium perspectives. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 445–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D (2008) A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: a fresh perspective into theory and practice. J Bus Ethics 82(1):213–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D (2010) The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: global, local, substantive or diluted? J Bus Ethics 93(2):181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Carroll A (2017) Capturing advances in CSR: Developed versus developing country perspectives. Bus Ethics. A European Review 26(4):321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Mirshak R (2007) Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context. J Bus Ethics 72(3):243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Mirshak R (2010) Business-conflict linkages: revisiting MNCs, CSR, and conflict. J Bus Ethics 93(3):443–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Safieddine AM, Rabbath M (2008) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corp Gov 16(5):443–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Lund-Thompsen P, Jeppesen S (2017) SMEs and CSR in developing countries. Bus Soc 56(1):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Makarem Y, Willi A (2019) From diffusion to translation: implementation of CSR practices in MNC subsidiaries. Soc Responsib J

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang H, Lee K, Yoon B (2017) Development of an open innovation model for R&D collaboration between large firms and small-medium enterprises (SMEs) in manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Manag 21(01):1750002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H (2006) Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 67:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen AL, Knudsen JS (2006) Sustainable competitiveness in global value chains: how do small Danish firms behave? Corp Gov 6(4):449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karam CM, Jamali D (2017) A cross-cultural and feminist perspective on CSR in developing countries: uncovering latent power dynamics. J Bus Ethics 142(3):461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kechiche A, Soparnot R (2012) CSR within SMEs: literature review. Int Bus Res 5(7):97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessy F, Melyoki L, Nyamrunda G (2018) The social license to operate in Tanzania: case studies of the petroleum and mining sectors. UONGOZI Institute, Tanzania

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan Z, Lew YK, Park BI (2015) Institutional legitimacy and norms-based CSR marketing practices: insights from MNCs operating in a developing economy. Int Mark Rev 32(5):463–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T, Palepu KG (2010) Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A, Lenfant F (2013) Multinationals, CSR and partnerships in central African conflict countries. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 20(1):43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin MT (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Acad Manag Rev 33(4):994–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Lee N (2005) Corporate social responsibility. Doing the Most good for your company and your cause. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger DA, Ding B (2009) Ethical analysis and challenges of two international firms in China. J Bus Ethics 89(2):167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusyk SM, Lozano JM (2007) Corporate responsibility in small and medium-sized enterprises. Corp Gov 7(4):502–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lähdesmäki M (2012) Construction of owner–manager identity in corporate social responsibility discourse. Bus Ethics 21(2):168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai Cheng W, Ahmad J (2010) Incorporating stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility (CSR): a case study at multinational corporations (MNCs) in Penang. Soc Responsib J 6(4):593–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos GP (2001) The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. J Consum Mark 18(7):595–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Herold DM, Yu AL (2016) Small and medium enterprises and corporate social responsibility practice: a Swedish perspective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 23(2):88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenssen G, Blagov Y, Bevan D, Arevalo JA, Aravind D (2011) Corporate social responsibility practices in India: approach, drivers, and barriers. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre J, Heene A (2006) Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: a critical review. J Bus Ethics 67(3):257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li MH, Cui L, Lu J (2018) Varieties in state capitalism: outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countries. In: State-owned multinationals. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 175–210

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen A, Swaen V, Harness D, Hoffmann M (2012) The role of ‘high potentials’ in integrating and implementing corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 99(1):73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Looser SU (2019) Intrinsic and extrinsic corporate social responsibility. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen P, Jamali D, Vives A (2014) CSR in SMEs: an analysis of donor-financed management tools. Soc Responsib J 10(4):602–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor SP, Espinach X, Fontrodona J (2007) Social innovation: using design to generate business value through corporate social responsibility. University of Gerona, Spain, IESE Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Marano V, Kostova T (2016) Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. J Manag Stud 53(1):28–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Conesa I, Soto-Acosta P, Palacios Manzano M (2017) Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: an empirical research in SMEs. J Clean Prod 142(4):2374–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KE, Peng MW (2016) Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. J Int Bus Stud 47(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihailova I (2015) Outcomes of learning through JVs for local parent firms in transition economies: evidence from Russia. J World Bus 50(1):220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva D, Pedersen T, Björkman I, Fey CF, Park HJ (2014) MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. J Int Bus Stud 45(1):38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miska C, Witt MA, Stahl GK (2016) Drivers of global CSR integration and local CSR responsiveness: evidence from Chinese MNEs. Bus Ethics Q 26(3):317–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousiolis DT, Zaridis AD, Karamanis K, Rontogianni A (2015) Corporate social responsibility in smes and mnes. The different strategic decision making. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 175:579–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyeen A (2018) CSR management strategies, stakeholder engagement and MNE subsidiaries efforts to foster sustainable development. In: The goals of sustainable development. Springer, Singapore, pp 43–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muller A (2006) Global versus local CSR strategies. Eur Manag J 24(2–3):189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo D, Lozano JM (2006) SMEs and CSR: an approach to CSR in their own words. J Bus Ethics 67(3):227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mzembe AN, Meaton J (2014) Driving corporate social responsibility in the Malawian mining industry: a stakeholder perspective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 21(4):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen D (2005) CSR after Enron: a role for the academic accounting profession? Eur Accounting Rev 14(2):393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdora-Aksak E, Atakan-Duman S (2016) Gaining legitimacy through CSR: an analysis of Turkey’s 30 largest corporations. Bus Ethics 25(3):238–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park BI (2016) The future journey of international journal of multinational corporation strategy. Int J Multinatl Corp Strategy 1(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park BI, Ghauri PN (2015) Determinants influencing CSR practices in small and medium sized MNE subsidiaries: a stakeholder perspective. J World Bus 50(1):192–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park BI, Chidlow A, Choi J (2014) Corporate social responsibility: stakeholders influence on MNEs’ activities. Int Bus Rev 23(5):966–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastrana NA, Sriramesh K (2014) Corporate social responsibility: perceptions and practices among SMEs in Colombia. Public Relat Rev 40(1):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F (2006) SMEs and CSR theory: evidence and implications from an Italian perspective. J Bus Ethics 67(3):305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Towers N (2009) Determining the antecedents for a strategy of corporate social responsibility by small-and medium-sized enterprises in the UK fashion apparel industry. J Retail Consum Serv 16(5):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham S, Birkinshaw J (2019) MNE–SME cooperation: an integrative framework. J Int Bus Stud 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaguru R, Matanda MJ (2011) Role of inter-organizational compatibility and IOIS integration in large firms and SMEs retailing chains. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 23(2):177–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, Lawson R, Nicholls J (2006) Generating regional-scale improvements in SME corporate responsibility performance: lessons from responsibility northwest. J Bus Ethics 67(3):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DC (1991) Corporate ethics programs: The impact of firm size. Market morality and company size, 119–136. In: Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 50(1):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar MP, Garde Sánchez R, López Hernández AM (2015) Managers as drivers of CSR in state-owned enterprises. J Environ Plan Manag 58(5):777–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo A, Perrini F (2010) Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. J Bus Ethics 91(2):207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salavou H, Lioukas S (2003) Radical product innovations in SMEs: the dominance of entrepreneurial orientation. Creat Innov Manag 12(2):94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Hörisch J (2017) In search of the dominant rationale in sustainability management: legitimacy-or profit-seeking? J Bus Ethics 145(2):259–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MS, Carroll AB (2003) Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Bus Ethics Q 13(4):503–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soppe A (2002) Ethical theory of the firm. In Zsolnai L (ed) Ethics in the Economy. Handbook of Business Ethics. Peter Lang, Bern, Switzerland, pp 81–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Cowley J (2013) The relevance of stakeholder theory and social capital theory in the context of CSR in SMEs: an Australian perspective. J Bus Ethics 118(2):413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence LJ (1999) Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Bus Ethics 8:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence LJ (2016) Small business social responsibility: expanding core CSR theory. Bus Soc 55(1):23–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence LJ, Lozano JF (2000) Communicating about ethics with small firms: experiences from the U.K and Spain. J Bus Ethics 27(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence L, Rutherfoord R (2003) Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics: editorial. J Bus Ethics 47(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence LJ, Jeurissen R, Rutherfoord R (2000) Small business and the environment in the UK and the Netherlands: toward stakeholder cooperation? Bus Ethics Q 10(4):945–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence LJ, Schmidpeter R, Habisch A (2003) Assessing social capital: small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the UK. J Bus Ethics 47(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoian C, Gilman M (2017) Corporate social responsibility that “pays”: a strategic approach to CSR for SMEs. J Small Bus Manag 55(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studer S, Tsang S, Welford R, Hills P (2008) SMEs and voluntary environmental initiatives: a study of stakeholders_perspectives in Hong Kong. J Environ Plan Manag 51(2):285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szczanowicz J, Saniuk S (2016) Evaluation and reporting of CSR in SME sector. Management 20(1):96–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan J, Wang L (2011) MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure: an institutional logic perspective. J Bus Ethics 98(3):373–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Z, Tang J (2012) Stakeholder-firm power difference, stakeholders’ CSR orientation, and SMEs’ environmental performance in China. J Bus Ventur 27(4):436–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theyel G, Hofman K (2012) Stakeholder relations and sustainability practices of US small and medium–sized manufacturers. Manag Res Rev 35(12):1110–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley F (2000) Small firm environmental ethics: how deep do they go? Bus Ethics 9(1):31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turyakira PK (2017) Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) engagement in corporate social responsibility (CSR) in developing countries: literature review. Afr J Bus Manag 11(18):464–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uduji JI, Okolo-Obasi EN (2018) Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) impact on development of women in small-scale fisheries of sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from coastal communities of Niger Delta in Nigeria. Marine policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner LM, Goor-Balk HJM, Masurel E (2004) Family business and corporate social responsibility in a sample of Dutch firms. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 11(2):186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallentin S, Morsing M (2008) Social responsibility in Danish SMEs: mapping the territory. CSR in SMEs, pp 8–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke A, Asmussen CG (2016) Global, local, or regional? The locus of MNE strategies. J Manag Stud 53(6):1051–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser W (2006) Revisiting Carroll’s CSR pyramid: an African perspective. In Huniche M, Pedersen ER (eds) Corporate Citizenship in Developing Countries – New Partnership Perspectives. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, pp 29–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives A (2006) Social and environmental responsibility in small and medium enterprises in Latin America. J Corp Citizsh 21:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo LC (2011) Corporate social responsibility and SMEs: a literature review and agenda for future research. Probl Perspect Manag 9(4):89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Vormedal I, Ruud A (2009) Sustainability reporting in Norway–an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio-political drivers. Bus Strateg Environ 18(4):207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S, Bodwell C (2002) From TQM to TRM: total responsibility management approaches. J Corp Citizsh 7:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock SA, Bodwell C, Graves SB (2002) Responsibility: The new business imperative. Acad Manage Perspect 16(2):132–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickert C, Scherer AG, Spence L (2016) Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: implications of firm size and organizational cost. J Manag Stud 53(7):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilburn KM, Wilburn R (2011) Achieving social license to operate using stakeholder theory. J Int Bus Ethics 4(2):3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson D, Lynch-Wood G, Ramsay J (2006) Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. J Bus Ethics 67:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor D (2006) Corporate social responsibility: three key approaches. J Manag Stud 43(1):93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manage Rev 16 (4):691–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Jamali D (2016) Strategic corporate social responsibility of multinational companies subsidiaries in emerging markets: evidence from China. Long Range Plan 49(5):541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Wu J (2014) Compete at the expense of responsibility? Firm’s alliance responsibility in innovation process for SMEs. Int Entrep Manag J 10(3):845–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M (2012) CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. J Bus Ethics 111(4):439–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

Key References

  • Baumann-Pauly D, Wickert C, Spence LJ, Scherer AG (2013) Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. J Bus Ethics 115(4):693–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Neville B (2011) Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: an embedded multi-layered institutional lens. J Bus Ethics 102(4):599–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Zanhour M, Keshishian T (2009) Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. J Bus Ethics 87(3):355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H (2004) A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. J General Manag 29(4):37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudal T (2011) Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Soc Responsib J 7(2):234–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev 33(2):404–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing M, Perrini F (2009) CSR in SMEs: do SMEs matter for the CSR agenda? Bus Ethics. A European Review 18(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller A, Kolk A (2010) Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. J Manag Stud 47(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F, Russo A, Tencati A (2007) CSR Strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. J Bus Ethics 74(3):285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo A, Tencati A (2009) Formal vs. Informal CSR strategies: Evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large firms. J Bus Ethics 85:339–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9736-x

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Dilvin Taşkın .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aras-Beger, G., Taşkın, F.D. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multinational Companies (MNCs), Small-to-Medium Enterprises (SMEs), and Small Businesses. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42465-7_69

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics