Abstract
The merits, drawbacks, and paradoxes of toleration have been studied extensively in political theory. By contrast, we know comparatively little about the salience of toleration to the law. This chapter aims to address this gap in our knowledge by mapping what we do know about “legal toleration,” examining how the law relates to three central dichotomies: toleration/tolerance, toleration/neutrality, and toleration/respect. Throughout the chapter, two descriptive claims are made. First, the conceptualization of toleration is (even) murkier – and certainly looser – in law than it is in political theory. Second, the more pragmatic approach of the law enables state practices of toleration to persist in practice, even in the face of conceptually more coherent and normatively more desirable ideals such as neutrality and respect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adcock CS (2013) The limits of tolerance: Indian secularism and the politics of religious freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bajpai R (2008) Minority representation and the making of the Indian constitution. In: Bhargava R (ed) Politics and ethics of the Indian constitution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 354–391
Berger B (2008) The cultural limits of legal tolerance. Can J Law Jurisprud 21:245–277
Blasi V (1987) The teaching function of the first amendment. Columbia Law Rev 87:387–417
Brettschneider C (2012) When the state speaks, what should it say?: how democracies can protect expression and promote equality. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Brown W (2006) Regulating aversion: tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Carter I (2013) Are toleration and respect compatible? J Appl Philos 30:195–208
Darwall S (1977) Two kinds of respect. Ethics 88:36–49
Fredman S (2020) Tolerating the intolerant: religious freedom, complicity, and the right to equality. Oxford J Law Relig (advance access). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa017)
Galeotti A (2002) Toleration as recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Gray J (2000) Pluralism and toleration in contemporary political philosophy. Polit Stud 48:323–333
Heyd D (2008) Is toleration a political virtue? In: Williams MS, Waldron J (eds) Toleration and its limits. New York University Press, New York, pp 171–194
Horton J (2011) Why the traditional conception of toleration still matters. Crit Rev Int Soc Pol Phil 14:289–305
Jones P (2007) Making sense of political toleration. Br J Polit Sci 37:383–402
Jones P (2015) Toleration, religion and accommodation. Eur J Philos 23:542–563
Kislowicz H (2017) The court and freedom of religion. Supreme Court Law Rev 78:221–233
Leiter B (2013) Why tolerate religion? Princeton University Press, Princeton
McConnell M (1990) The origins and historical understanding of free exercise of religion. Harv Law Rev 103:1409–1517
Mendus S (1989) Toleration and the limits of liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Moon R (2012) Freedom of religion under the charter of rights: the limits of state neutrality. U.B.C. Law Rev 45:497–549
Nehushtan Y (2007) The limits of tolerance: a substantive-liberal perspective. Ratio Juris 20:230–257
Nehushtan Y (2013) What are conscientious exemptions really about? Oxf J Law Relig 2:393–416
Nussbaum M (2008) Liberty of conscience. In: Defense of America’s tradition of religious equality. Basic Books, New York
Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York
Richards D (1986) Toleration and the xonstitution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rosenfeld M (1996) Pragmatism, pluralism, and legal interpretation: Posner’s and Rorty’s justice without metaphysics meets hate speech. Cardozo Law Rev 18:97–151
Sen R (2010) Articles of faith: religion, secularism, and the Indian Supreme Court. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Smet S (2019a) The pragmatic case for legal tolerance. Oxf J Leg Stud 39:344–373
Smet S (2019b) Conscientious objection through the contrasting lenses of tolerance and respect. Oxf J Law Relig 8:93–120
Smet S (2020) Comparative constitutional interpretation of religious freedom. Int Comp Law Q 69:611–651
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Smet, S. (2022). Toleration and the Law. In: Sardoč, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42121-2_56
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42120-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42121-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences