Skip to main content

Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention: Interests and Consequences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Walzer and War

Abstract

This chapter situates Michael Walzer’s position on humanitarian intervention within a longer trajectory of theorizing and debate that stretches back to the creation of the modern state system. It then shows how his arguments on intervention in Just and Unjust Wars were shaped by both the restrictive legal framework on the use of force provided by the UN Charter, and his deep commitment to self-determination. Nonetheless, it also demonstrates the degree to which Walzer’s carefully reasoned exception to the “legalist paradigm,” which accepted humanitarian intervention in exceptional circumstances, also staked out controversial positions regarding the need for military victory over “oppressors,” the legitimacy of unilateral action, the importance of harnessing state interests, and the demands of post-intervention rebuilding. The chapter’s concluding section claims that our contemporary moral discussion of humanitarian intervention has evolved through more intense reflection on two issues: the role of state interests in motivating and shaping humanitarian intervention, and the need to (seriously) consider consequences in overall judgments of its legitimacy. It also argues that Walzer’s original position in Just and Unjust Wars, combined with his more recent writings on Libya and Syria, continues to provide us with the resources to grapple with these pressing ethical and political concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Vincent Pouliot. “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 4 (2014): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan, Kofi. In Larger Freedom: Toward Development, Security and Human Rights for All. UN doc. A/59/2005, March 21, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 53/35: The Fall of Srebrenica. A/54/549, November 15, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban Ki-Moon. Report of the Secretary-General on Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. UN doc. A/63/677, July 23, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, Gary. Freedom’s Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Alfred Knopf, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Alex J. “From Tripoli to Damascus? Lesson Learning and the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect.” International Politics 51, no. 1 (January 2014): 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeier, Sarah, Oliver Stuenkel, and Marcos Tourinho. “The Impact of the Libya Intervention Debates on Norms of Protection.” Global Society 30, no. 1 (2015): 113–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, Simon. Just War or Just Peace? Humanitarian Intervention and International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Michael. The Question of Intervention. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth. “The Responsibility to Protect: An Idea Whose Time Has Come… and Gone?” International Relations 22, no. 3 (September 2008): 283–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington: Brookings Institution, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The ‘RtoP’ Balance Sheet After Libya.” Available at http://www.globalr2p.org/publications/205. Accessed June 30, 2013.

  • Finnemore, Martha. The Purpose of Intervention. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotius, Hugo. De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Translation of 1646 edition by F. W. Kelsey et al. 1925. Reprint, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydar, Bashar. “The Bias Against Intervention.” Paper presented to the Symposium on “Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect.” American University of Beirut, January 26, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzgrefe, J. L., and Robert Keohane. Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent International Commission on Kosovo. The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Corporation, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Bruce. “Implementing ‘In Larger Freedom’.” In Irrelevant or Indispensible? The United Nations in the 21st Century, edited by Paul Heinbecker and Patricia Goff. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, Edward. “International Hierarchy and the Origins of the Modern Practice of Intervention.” Review of International Studies 39, no. 5 (December 2013): 1077–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperman, Alan. “NATO’s Intervention in Libya: A Humanitarian Success?” In Libya: The Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, edited by Aidan Hehir and Robert Murray, 191–221. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, John. “Intervention in the Modern World.” Review of International Studies 39, no. 5 (2013): 1039–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, Alison, and Tom Tugendhat. The Cost of Doing Nothing: The Price of Inaction in the Face of Mass Atrocities. London: Policy Exchange, 2017. Available at www.policyexchange.org.uk.

  • Mill, J. S. “A Few Words on Non-Intervention.” In Dissertation and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical, vol. III, 2nd ed., 153–78. London: Longmans, 1875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnear, Larry, Colin Scott, and Thomas G. Weiss. The News Media, Civil War, and Humanitarian Action. Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, Roland. “The ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and the Structural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention.” International Peacekeeping 21, no. 5 (2014): 569–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recchia, Stefano, and Jennifer J. Welsh, eds. Just and Unjust Military Intervention: European Thinkers from Vitoria to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, David. “R2P, R.I.P.” The New York Times, November 7, 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/opinion/r2p-rip.html.

  • Roberts, Adam. “The United Nations and Humanitarian Intervention.” In Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations, edited by Jennifer M. Welsh, 71–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodogno, Davide. Against Massacre: Humanitarian Interventions in the Ottoman Empire, 1815–1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Martin. Civil Society and the Media in Global Crises. London: Pinter Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Ekkehard. “A Bird in the Hand Is Worth Two in the Bush—On the Assumed Legal Nature of the Responsibility to Protect.” Global Responsibility to Protect 1, no. 3 (January 2009): 291–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, Oliver, and Marcos Tourinho. “Regulating Intervention: Brazil and the Responsibility to Protect.” Conflict, Security and Development 14, no. 4 (2014): 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, Ramesh. “Freedom from Fear.” In Irrelevant or Indispensable? The United Nations in the 21st Century, edited by Paul Heinbecker and Patricia Goff, 115–30. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trim, David. “Intervention in European History, c. 1520–1850.” In Just and Unjust Military Intervention: European Thinkers from Vitoria to Mill, edited by Stefano Recchia and Jennifer J. Welsh, 21–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations During the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. UN doc. S/1999/1257, December 16, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005 World Summit Outcome. UN doc. A/Res/60/1, September 16, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Rights Council. Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Libya. UN doc. A/HRC/19/68, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council. Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. UN doc. S/Res/1296, April 19, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. Arguing About War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Just and Unjust Wars. 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books, 2000 [1977].

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Syria.” Dissent, March 9, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Case Against Our Attack on Libya.” The New Republic, March 20, 2011. http://www.tnr.com/article/world/85509/the-case-against-our-attack-libya.

  • ———. “Were We Wrong About Syria?” Dissent, October 30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Thomas G. Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Jennifer M. Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Humanitarian Intervention.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Security, edited by Alexandra Gheciu and William Wohlforth, chapter 31. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect.” Global Responsibility to Protect 5, no. 4 (2013): 365–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Jennifer M., and Maria Banda. “International Law and the Responsibility to Protect: Clarifying or Expanding States’ Responsibilities?” Global Responsibility to Protect 2, no. 3 (2010): 213–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, Percy H. “The History of Intervention in International Law.” British Yearbook of International Law 4 (1922–1923): 131–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Welsh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Welsh, J.M. (2020). Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention: Interests and Consequences. In: Parsons, G., Wilson, M. (eds) Walzer and War. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41657-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics