Abstract
Time is the most precious resource we have (This article is a long version of the keynote speech the author gave at the International Peace Research Association (IPRA) in Istanbul in August 2014, on the occasion of IPRA’s 50th anniversary. This text was first published as: “Time, Temporament, and Sustainable Peace: The Essential Role of Time in Conflict and Peace”, in: Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 3,1 (2015): 19–41. The permission to republish this text here was granted by the original copyright-holder.). It is irreversible and non-renewable. It makes the difference, more than ever, between the best and worst scenarios of climate change, energy competition, economic development, poverty, and security. Despite this, an incredible amount of time is wasted, especially the time of others and of nature. These latter resources are needed to prevent violence, build sustainable security, and ensure the well-being of all. Therefore, is it high time to radically change the way we deal with time and to develop a more adaptive ‘Temporament’? This article defines time, surveys temporal deficiencies, and presents the parameters of a more responsible way of dealing with time in conflict transformation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A term used and coined by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in an interview during the Gaza war of 2014. https://www.haaretz.com/netanyahu-gaza-must-be-demilitarized-1.5257042 (accessed 19 February 2015).
- 2.
A complete cost assessment considers humanitarian, economic, political, material, social, cultural, psychological, ecological, and spiritual costs (Reychler/Paffenholz 2001: 4).
- 3.
The promise of military intervention encouraged the armed rebellion and the refusal to negotiate. The NATO intervention also increased the number of casualties significantly.
- 4.
See also Wikipedia. “Double bind”, at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind (accessed 5 January 2015).
- 5.
Shock therapy involved a sudden privatization of Russia’s 225,000 or so state owned businesses, a sudden release of price and currency controls, withdrawal of state subsidies, and sudden trade liberalization. See Smith (n.d.) and Wikipedia, “Shock therapy”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_therapy_(economics), accessed on 20 March 2020.
- 6.
The legitimacy of a government depends on effectiveness and democracy. Political legitimacy = democracy × effectiveness.
- 7.
For Rothman (1997: 33–52), this is a slowed-down and self-conscious analysis of the interactive nature of reactions that allows actors to be proactive agents in a conflict instead of reactive victims, and which furthers analytic empathy.
References
Adger, W. N., & Jordan, A. (Eds.). (2009). Governing Sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Atwater, P. M. H. (1999). Future Memory. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing Company.
Axelrod, R. (2006). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Backer, P. (2014). Confidence Ebbs as Americans See Missteps Mount. International New York Times (23 October).
Begley, S. (2011). I Can’t Think. Newsweek (7 March).
Benkler, Y. (2011). The Penguin and the Leviathan: The Triumph of Cooperation over Self-Interest. New York: Crown Business.
Brooks, D. (2014). The Quality of Fear. International New York Times (22 October).
Brown, A. (1998). Doing Time: The Extended Present of the Long-Term Prisoner. Time & Society, 7(1): 93–103.
Cloke, K, & Goldsmith, L. (2002). The End of Management and the Rise of Organizational Democracy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cohen, R., & Mihalka. M. (2001). Cooperative Security: New Horizons for International Order. Garmisch-Partenkirchen: George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies.
Cohen, R. (2013). Diplomacy is Dead. International Herald Tribune (22 January).
Emanuel, G. (2013). Time Poverty. State of Opportunity (3 September). Retrieved from https://stateofopportunity.michiganradio.org/post/time-poverty (accessed 15 February 2015).
Galtung, J., & MacQueen, G. (2008). Globalizing God: Religion, Spirituality and Peace. Grenzach-Whylen: Transcend University Press.
George, S. (2010). Whose Crisis, Whose Future? Cambridge: Polity.
GISHA – Legal Center for Freedom and Movement (2009). Restrictions and Removal: Israel’s Double Bind Policy for Palestinian Holders of Gaza IDs in the West Bank. Fact Sheet. Tel Aviv: GISHA. Retrieved from https://gisha.org/ (accessed 5 January 2015).
Higgens, A. (2014). Fear Itself Rather than Risk Underlies Ebola Alarm. International New York Times (18 October).
Ionescu, F. (1960). Rhinoceros. New York: Grove Press.
Jones, O. (2014). Occupying can often Corrupt an Occupier. The Guardian Weekly (25 July): 18.
Judt, T. (2012). Thinking the Twentieth Century. London: Random House.
Kapur, S. (2014). Scholar Behind Viral ‘Oligarchy’ Study Tells You What It Means. TPM (22 April).
Kuperman, A. (2013). A Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing NATOs Libya Campaign. International Security, 38(1): 105–136.
Lanier, J. (2013). Who Owns the Future? New York: Allen Lane.
Lao T. (2002). Tao Te Ching: A New Translation and Commentary, Translated by Ralph Alan Dale. New York: Karnes & Noble Books.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Mainelli. M., & Harris, I. (2011). The Price of Fish: A New Approach to Wicked Economics and Better Decisions. London: Nicholas Brea Publishers.
McNally, K. (2012). Global Security and the Intervention Double Bind. Global Policy (23 October).
Mintz, A., & DeRouen Jr., K. (2011). Understanding Foreign Policy Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moisi, D. (2009). De Geopolitiek van Emotie [The Geopolitics of Emotion]. Amsterdam: Nieuw Amsterdam.
Nanni. G. (2012). The Colonization of Time: Ritual, Routine and Resistance in the British Empire. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Oberg, J. (2014). Sweden’s Submergency. TFF Associates & Themes Blog (24 October). Lund, Sweden: Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research.
Regev, A. (2014). Return Gaza to the Stone Age. Israel Hayom (9 July).
Reychler, L. (1999). Democratic Peace-building and Conflict Prevention: The Devil is in the Transition. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Reychler, L., & Paffenholz, T. (2001). Peace Building: A Field Guide. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Reychler, L., & Langer, A. (2003). The Software of Peace Building. Canadian Journal of Peace Studies, 35(2): 53–73.
Reychler, L., & Stellamans, A. (2003). Peace Building Leaders and Spoilers (Cahiers of the Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies No. 66). Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies.
Reychler, L., & Stellamans, A. (2005). Researching Peace Building Leadership (Cahiers of the Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies No. 71). Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies.
Reychler, L. (2006). Challenges of Peace Research. International Journal of Peace Studies, 11(1): 1–16.
Reychler, L. (2015). Time for Peace: The Essential Role of Time in Conflict and Peace Processes. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
Rifkin, J. (1987). Time Wars: The Primary Conflict in Human History. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Roht-Arriaza, N. (2012). The Spanish Civil War, Amnesty, and the Trials of Judge Garzon. Insights: American Society of Internal Law, 16(24): 1–5.
Rothman, J. (1997). Resolving Identity-based Conflict in Nations, Organizations and Communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schmidt, E., & Cohen, J. (2014). The New Digital Age: Transforming Nations, Businesses, and Our Lives. New York: Vintage Books.
Seib, P. (2012). Real-Time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Smith, E. (2012). Won Over by Social Enterprise. Financial Times (25 March). Accessed 5 January 2015).
Smitha, F. E. (n.d.). Transition to a Market Economy, End of the Cold War and Soviet Union (9 of 9). Macro History and World Timeline. Retrieved from http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch33-9.htm (accessed 21 January 2015).
Tolfler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Bantam Books.
Tuchman, B. (1984). The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. London: Abacus-Shere Books.
Warner, C., & Schmincke, D. (2009). High Altitude Leadership: What the Worlds Most Forbidding Peaks Teach Us. San Francisco: Jossey-Kass.
Wedge, M. (2011). The Double Binds of Everyday Life: Everything We Do to Grow Our Economy Disrupts the Environment. Psychology Today (13 October).
Whillans, J. (2011). Book Review: Time Poverty: The Unequal Distribution of Temporal Autonomy. Time & Society, 20(1): 137–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reychler, L., Langer, A. (2020). Time, Temporament, and Sustainable Peace: The Essential Role of Time in Conflict and Peace. In: Reychler, L., Langer, A. (eds) Luc Reychler: A Pioneer in Sustainable Peacebuilding Architecture. Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40208-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40208-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40207-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40208-2
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)