Abstract
This chapter analyzes Mr. Hamada’s whistleblowing case which happened in a private company in Japan. Mr. Hamada found illegal recruitment committed by his boss and internally blew the whistle to an in-house compliance office. After the whistleblowing, he experienced serious retaliations from the company. He filed a lawsuit against the company’s retaliation and won the suit finally. This is a rare case that a whistleblower won a legal battle against an organization in Japan. This chapter describes the whole process of the whistleblowing case and highlights retaliations caused by Japanese corporate culture and loopholes of the Whistleblower Protection Act.
This work was partly supported by Social Science Korea Program through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A3A2075609).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apaza, C. R., & Chang, Y. (2011). What makes whistleblowing effective: Whistleblowing in Peru and South Korea. Public Integrity, 13(2), 113–130.
Brody, R. G., Coulter, J. M., & Mihalek, P. H. (1998). Whistle-blowing: A cross-cultural comparison of ethical perceptions of US and Japanese accounting students. American Business Review, 16(2), 14–21.
Coney, P., & Coney, C. (2016). The Whistleblower Protection Act (Japan) 2004: A critical and comparative analysis of corporate malfeasance in Japan. Monash University Law Review, 42(1), 41–71.
Davis, A. J., & Konishi, E. (2007). Whistleblowing in Japan. Nursing Ethics, 14(2), 194–202.
Gray, J. A. (2004). The scope of whistleblower protection in the state of Maryland: A comprehensive statute is needed. University of Baltimore Law Review, 33(2), 225–256.
Hamada, M. (2012). Orinpus no yami to tatakai tsuzukete [The continuous battle with Olympus’s dark side]. Tokyo: Kobunsha.
Jensen, J. V. (1987). Ethical tension points in whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 321–328.
Kageyama, Y. (2012, June 30). Whistleblower wins in Supreme Court in Japan first. Retrieved from https://www.foxnews.com/world/whistleblower-wins-in-supreme-court-in-japan-first
Kageyama, Y. (2013, July 29). Japan whistleblower still fighting after Supreme Court ruling on Olympus, joined by employee. Star Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.startribune.com/whistleblower-olympus-ignores-japan-court-order/217361671/
Mizutani, H. (2007). Whistleblower Protection Act. Japan Labor Review, 4(3), 95–119.
Olympus Settles with Whistleblower Over ‘Abuse of Authority’. (2016, February 19). The Japan Times. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/02/19/national/crime-legal/olympus-settles-whistleblower-abuse-authority/#.XQGcDS17E7x
Olympus Whistleblower Files Rights Case. (2009, March 4). Yomiuri Shimbun. Retrieved from https://ameblo.jp/jpmax/entry-10736181118.html
Osawa, J. (2012, June 30). Olympus faces setback in Court. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://ameblo.jp/jpmax/image-12489823742-12086065094.html
Prusa, I. (2006). Corporate scandal in Japan and the case study of Olympus. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies, 16(3). Retrieved from https://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/ejcjs/vol16/iss3/prusa.html.
Reconciliation Protocol, 2016 No. 25114 & No. 33859, Tokyo Local Court Civil action. (2016). Retrieved from https://ameblo.jp/jpmax/entry-12130627174.html
Ryall, J. (2016, April 26). Michael Woodford’s fellow whistleblower ends Olympus battle. Japan Today. Retrieved from https://japantoday.com/category/business/michael-woodfords-fellow-whistleblower-ends-olympus-battle
Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, 5 USC §§ 101–202 (2012).
Whistleblower’s Personal Sanction. (2009, February 27). Yomiuri Shimbun. Retrieved from https://ameblo.jp/jpmax/image-12424437257-11049294432.html
Wolff, L. (2004). New whistleblower protection laws for Japan. Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht, 9(17), 209–213.
Xin, L. I. U. (2014). The influence of national culture on whistle-blowing: A cross-cultural investigation. Cross-Cultural Communication, 10(6), 91–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, Y. (2020). Whistleblowing in Japan: The Case of Masaharu Hamada. In: Apaza, C., Chang, Y. (eds) What Makes Effective Whistleblowing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40200-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40200-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40199-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40200-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)