Skip to main content

Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
What Makes Effective Whistleblowing

Abstract

Apaza and Chang develop an analysis framework for effective whistleblowing that contains five crucial factors: (1) the type of whistleblowing (Internal and External Whistleblowing), (2) the role of the mass media (use of mass media to disclose corruption), (3) the documentation of evidence (collection of supporting documentation before blowing the whistle), (4) the form of retaliation (inappropriate work assignments or transfer, threats of physical harm, harassment, humiliation, or isolation, etc.), and (5) legal protections (whistleblowing protection laws issued and implemented).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoedo, D. (2017). Elementos Esenciales para un Sistema de Protección de Denunciantes. R.I.T.I. 4 (Mayo-Agosto 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Apaza, C. (2008, June). Whistleblowing and the federal employee: Effective legal protection, open communication and organizational attitude. PA Times, ASPA. Special Section, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apaza, C. (2017). Whistleblowing in Peru. In Chapter in whistleblowing in the world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apaza, C., & Chang, Y. (2011). What makes whistleblowing effective: Whistleblowing in Peru and South Korea. Public Integrity, 13(2), 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apaza, C., & Chang, Y. (2017). Whistleblowing in the world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banisar, D. (2006, March 23–25). Whistleblowing international standards and developments. Paper presented at the Primera Conferencia International Sobre Corruption y Transparencia, Ciudad de Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. A., & Ross, D. L. (1998). Sundstrand: A case study in transformation of cultural ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1517–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E. S., & Dworkin, T. M. (1994). Who blows the whistle to the media, and why organizational characteristics of media whistleblowers. American Business Law Journal, 32(2), 151–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassematis, P., & Wortley, R. (2013). Prediction of whistleblowing or non-reporting observation: The role of personal and situational factors. Econpapers, 117(3), 615–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Wilding, M., & Shin, M. C. (2017). Determinants of whistleblowing intention: Evidence from the South Korean government. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(4), 676–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. J., & Song, H. J. (2015). Determinants of whistleblowing within government agencies. Public Personnel Management, 44(4), 450–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culiberg, B., & Mihelic, K. (2017). The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4), 787–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. J., & Konishi, E. (2007). Whistleblowing in Japan. Nursing Ethics, 14(2), 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, T. (2017). Whistleblowing in the United States of America:“irrefragable proof” and the next generation of US government whistleblower rights. In Whistleblowing in the world (pp. 59–76). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devraj, R. (2003). Murder revives Indian whistleblowers’ bill. Asia Times Online, from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/EL12Df02.html.

  • Dworkin, T. M., & Baucus, M. S. (1998). Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowing processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1281–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T. M., & Brown, A. J. (2013). The money or the media? Lessons from contrasting developments in US and Australian whistleblowing Laws. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 11(2), 653–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, F., Keenan, J., Lockhart, P., & Schaick, J. V. (1985). Whistleblowing research: Methodological and moral issues. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figg, J. (2000). Whistleblowing. Internal Auditor, 57(2), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L., Bennett, A., Lynn-Jones, S. M., & Miller, S. E. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, C. (2018). Retos en México en Materia de Protección de Denunciantes con relación a Estándares Internacionales. R.I.T.I. 8 (Septiembre-Diciembre 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, D. B., Chen, Y., Staley, A. B., Tsai, Y., & Chu, C. L. (2013). A comparative study of the propensity of whistle-blowing: Empirical evidence from China, Taiwan, and the United States. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 3(2), 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakes, S. (2003). Jiang Yanyong. Time. Available at http://www.time.com/time/asia/2003/poypm2003/jiang_yanyong.html. Last visited on 27 Sep 2009.

  • Jensen, J. L., & Rodgers, R. (2001). Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A. (Ed.). (2004). The struggle against corruption. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jos, P. H. (1991). The nature and limits of the Whistleblower's contribution to administrative responsibility. American Review of Public Administration, 21(2), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jos, P. H., Tompkins, M. E., & Hays, S. W. (1989). In praise of difficult people: A portrait of the committed whistleblower. Public Administration Review, 49(6), 552–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. (2001). The international emergence of legal protections for whistleblowers (pp. 37–42). Fall/Winter: The Journal of Public Inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, K., Fotaki, M. & Scriver, S. (2019). Mental Heath as a Weapon: Whistleblower Retaliation and Normative. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(12). Published online: 17 April 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latan, H., Ringle, C. M., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2018). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 573–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liyanarachchi, G., & Newdick, C. (2009). The impact of moral reasoning and retaliation on whistle-blowing: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Whistleblower Center. (2019). Proposed national whistleblower protection act. Retrieved from https://www.whistleblowers.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/model.law_.pdf

  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective whistle-blowing. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. P. (2018). Reformed national security internal whistleblowing systems and external whistleblowing as countervailing ethics methods. Administration and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718760583.

  • OCDE. (2011). G20 anti-corruption action plan. Protection of whistleblowers. Study on whistleblower protection frameworks, compendium of best practices and guiding principles for legislation. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/anti-corruption/48972967.pdf

  • Park, H., Bjørkelo, B., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2018). External whistleblowers’ experiences of workplace bullying by superiors and colleagues. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3936-9.

  • Perez, J. (2018). Whistleblowing, Eunomia. 14(Abril 2018 – Septiembre 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, S., Ramphul, N., Dorasamy, N., & Meyer, D. (2018). Predictors of whistle-blowing intentions: An analysis of multi-level variables. Administration and Society, 50(2), 186–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehg, M. T., Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Van Scotter, J. R. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of retaliation against whistleblowers: Gender differences and power relationships. Organization Science, 19(2), 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B. (1998). Holding government bureaucracies accountable (3rd ed.). Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, D. H. (1994). The use of case studies in public administrative education in the USA. Journal of Management History, 1(1), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, D. H. (2003). Administrative law for public managers. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, D. H. (2015). Administrative law for public managers (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, J. (2008). Freedom of speech denied, dignity assaulted: What the whistleblowers experience in the US. Current Sociology, 56(6), 884–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, J., & Miethe, T. D. (1999). Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation. Work and Occupations, 26(1), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas A. (2017, May 8). Are Latin America’s new whistleblowing Laws working? Latin America Advisor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skivenes, M., & Trygstad, S. (2017). Explaining whistle blowing processes in the Norwegian labour market: Between individual power resources and institutional arrangements. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(1), 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove, W. (2010). European whistleblowing policies: Tiers or tears? In D. Lewis (Ed.), A global approach to public interest disclosure: What can we learn from existing whistleblowing legislation and research? (pp. 15–35). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Apaza, C.R., Chang, Y. (2020). Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework. In: Apaza, C., Chang, Y. (eds) What Makes Effective Whistleblowing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40200-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics