Skip to main content

Rural Territories in Spatial Development of a Region

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence: Anthropogenic Nature vs. Social Origin (ISC Conference - Volgograd 2020)

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to determine the essential differences and interconnection between the categories of spatial development and spatial inequality, their measuring, and means of overcoming in the conditions of growth of territorial competition in the markets of investments, labor, and capital (R11, R12).

Determining the opportunities for development of rural territories is based on the idea that each territorial entity is a subject of competition and could create competitive advantages by means of combination of external and internal sources of development. Overcoming the inequality of development of territories is considered within the search for own “windows of opportunities” (R11, R12).

Rural territories are considered as elements of a region’s spatial system, interconnected with adjacent territories based on exchange of the results of economic activities. Forming local economic spaces, they create intra-regional economic areas (R11, R12). The authors study the factors that influence the differences in the level of socio-economic development of rural territories (R13) and determine the trends that are peculiar for economic and social development of rural territories in a region’s space. The authors show the growing significance of the factors of the “second nature” from the point of view of opportunities of future development (R13). The authors also determine the necessity for changing the approaches from tough leveling by means of external sources to formation of a “window of opportunities” for development by means of internal sources (R28). Local growth poles are determined, and the cores of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd order as to the level of influence on the surrounding territories are determined (R12). The necessity for formation of institutes of joint management of socio-economic development of rural territories is substantiated (R58). The research object is rural territories of Krasnodar Krai.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Krugman, P.R.: Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?. Accessed 19 July 2019

  • Avdeeva, T.T., Skripal, I.A.: Interaction of Urban and Rural Territories in Region’s Economic Space: Monograph. Kuban State University, Krasnodar (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • State program “Complex development of rural territories” for 2020–2025, adopted by the Government dated 31 May 2019, no. 696. http://www.consultant.ru/. Accessed 21 July 2019

  • Zubarevich, N.V.: Regions of Russia: Inequality, Crisis and Modernization. Independent Institute of Social Politics, Moscow (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Complex evaluation of the socio-economic position of city districts and municipal districts of Krasnodar Krai in 2014–2019. https://economy.krasnodar.ru/. Accessed 27 July 2019

  • Kuznetsova, O.V.: Economic development of regions. The theoretical and practical aspects of state regulation, 6th edn. URSS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantino, F.: Rural development in Europe. Politics, institutes and main players since 1970’s until now. Translated from Italian by I. Khramova. B-g (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Patsiorkovsky, V.V.: Nature and content of self-employment. http://rusrand.ru/tv/lections/. Accessed 19 July 2019

  • Socio-economic position of city districts and municipal districts of Krasnodar Krai: Statistical collection. Krasnodarstat, Krasnodar (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategy of socio-economic development of Krasnodar Krai until 2030. https://economy.krasnodar.ru/. Accessed 17 July 2019

  • South Shadow: more than 30% of population works in the shadow economy of Kuban. https://kuban.rbc.ru/krasnodar/20/04/2017. Accessed 20 July 2019

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was performed with financial support from the Russian Fund for Fundamental Research, grant No. 18-410-230020\18 “Inter-sectorial interconnections in a multi-level system of management of development of rural territories” (2018–2020). The paper was supported by the Russian Found for Fundamental Research, grant No. 18-410-230020\19 «Intersectoral Relations in a Multilevel Rural Development Management System» (2018-2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana T. Avdeeva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Avdeeva, T.T., Lavrova, T.G., Urmanov, D.V. (2020). Rural Territories in Spatial Development of a Region. In: Popkova, E., Sergi, B. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Anthropogenic Nature vs. Social Origin. ISC Conference - Volgograd 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39319-9_90

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics