Abstract
Pain has been defined as a “mutually recognizable somatic experience that reflects a person’s apprehension of threat to their bodily or existential integrity.” Under normal circumstances, pain helps the body respond to a source of danger or tissue damage and facilitates protection for tissue repair.
Burn pain combines features of nociceptive, neuropathic, and inflammatory mechanisms together with peripheral and central components.
The management of postburn pain is exceedingly complex. For once, it depends on the patient factors such as physical, biological, and social status, but also the burn characteristics and mechanisms of injury. Furthermore, burn pain varies in the same individual throughout the different phases of recovery.
Untreated or inadequately treated pain can lead to anxiety, fear, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. It can cause peripheral and central sensitization, resulting in chronic pain. Lastly, pain can also impair the healing process due to multiple factors, including metabolic, humoral, endocrine, and immunological derangements.
Management of burn pain requires a multimodal management strategy. Despite the current “opioid crisis” and concerns about opioid tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, opioid abuse, misuse and diversion, intravenous opioids are the cornerstone of burn pain management. This chapter will evaluate the pharmacological approach to burn pain.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Pain has been defined as a “mutually recognizable somatic experience that reflects a person’s apprehension of threat to their bodily or existential integrity.” [1]. Under normal circumstances, pain helps the body to respond to a source of danger or tissue damage and facilitates protection for tissue repair. Acute pain arises from a range of noxious stimuli, including physical (heat, cold, electrical), mechanical, and chemical [2].
Burn pain has been investigated meticulously in the clinical and research field as the model to understand the intricate pathophysiology processes of pain. Burn pain combines features of nociceptive, neuropathic, and inflammatory mechanism together with peripheral and central components [2, 3].
The management of postburn pain is exceedingly complex, for once it depends on the patient factors such as physical, biological, and social status, but also the burn characteristics and mechanisms of injury. Furthermore, burn pain varies in the same individual throughout the different phases of recovery. Table 1 describes the effects of burns physiology on pain management.
Burn pain can be separated into four components—background pain, procedural pain, breakthrough pain, and neuropathic pain [4]—each of them requiring specific interventions.
Untreated or inadequately treated pain can lead to anxiety, fear, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder. It can cause peripheral and central sensitization [5], resulting in chronic pain [6]. Lastly, pain can also impair the healing process due to multiple factors, including metabolic, humoral, endocrine, and immunological derangements.
Management of burn pain requires a multimodal management strategy. Despite the current “opioid crisis” and concerns about opioid tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, opioid abuse, misuse and diversion, intravenous opioids are the cornerstone of burn pain management [7, 8].This chapter will evaluate the pharmacological approach to burn pain. Non-pharmacological interventions, although important, are beyond the scope of this review.
2 Pain Pathways
After stimulation of local nociceptors, the impulse travels via Ad and C fibers to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Peripheral sensory nerves and descending influences from cortical areas can modulate the magnitude of the pain impulse. Pain is a conscious experience, an interpretation of the nociceptive input influenced by memories, emotional, pathological, genetic, and cognitive factors. Resultant pain is therefore not always related linearly to the nociceptive drive or input, neither is it solely for vital protective functions [9].
Pain is a highly subjective experience affected not only by the burn wound itself but also by context, cognition, pharmacologic, mood, and other predisposing factors [10].
Figure 1 shows a representation of the substances involved in the transmission of noxious stimuli and the possible targets for pharmacological interventions [11].
3 Components of Burn Pain
Burn pain has four distinct components—background, procedural, breakthrough, and neuropathic pain. When pain persists for more than 6 months, it becomes chronic pain. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions should be individualized to target each pain pattern [12].
Table 2 describes the most common pharmacologic interventions, intial doses, side effects, and target pain pattern.
3.1 Background Pain
It is a constant pain that is present while the patient is at rest. Background pain is the result of either direct injury or inflammation of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, or visceral tissue. This type of pain is typical of low to moderate intensity and long duration. It is best treated with mild-to-moderately potent analgesics administered so that plasma drug concentrations remain relatively constant throughout the day. Pain management strategies typically include regular acetaminophen, regular NSAIDs where appropriate, and the use of long-acting opioids.
3.2 Procedural Pain
In contrast to background pain, procedural pain reaches quite intense levels for a brief period; therefore, analgesic regimens for procedural pain are best comprised of combinations of short-acting opioids, benzodiazepines, magnesium and lidocaine infusions, and subanesthetic doses of ketamine.
Among the short-acting opioids, sufentanil poses particular characteristics that make it the first choice. For once, its potency, solubility, and high affinity for mu receptors. This later characteristic is very important in the context of downregulation of mu and kappa receptors.
Procedural pain is generated by a myriad of interventions such as wound debridement, burn excision, donor skin harvesting, grafting, placement of central lines, dressing changes, and rehabilitation efforts.
3.3 Breakthrough Pain
Breakthrough pain describes unexpected spikes of pain that occur when background analgesic effects are exceeded, either at rest, during procedures, or with stress [10]. It can be a result of inadequate doses of analgesics for background pain, or to changing mechanisms of pain over time [13].
3.4 Neuropathic Pain
Neuropathic pain is caused by the direct injury or inflammation to neural tissue or vasum-nevorums in the peripheral and central nervous system. As neurons regenerate, abnormal excitability at or near the site of nerve injury can occur. It often persists after burn wounds have healed. It may be experienced as numbness and tingling in the burned areas, which may progress to painful paresthesias [14].
Since limited options are available for the management of neuropathic pain, gabapentinoids, and laser therapy should be considered as potential treatment options [15].
4 Pain Management
4.1 Pharmacological
4.1.1 Opioids
Opioids mimic the effects of endogenous opioid peptides by interacting with the mu, delta, and kappa receptors. Each opioid has a different effect on these subtypes of receptors, but mostly activate the mu receptor. The wide spectrum of opioids available for clinical use provides dosing flexibility (i.e., variable routes of administration, variable duration of action, variable potency) [13, 16].
For hospitalized burn patients, opioids are the cornerstone of pharmacologic pain control, in part because they are potent, inexpensive, widely available, and familiar to the majority of health care providers [12].
Side effects of opioids are significant and include respiratory depression, constipation, sedation, pruritus, sleep cycle interference, nausea, hallucinations, and vomiting. Additionally, opioids have been associated with dependence, tolerance, and hyperalgesia.
The opioid agonist-antagonist drugs (e.g., nalbuphine, butorphanol) produce analgesia (agonist property) with lesser side effects (antagonist properties), but also exhibit ceiling effects, limiting its use to mild burn pain.
Opioids are not effective at treating neuropathic burn pain.
Range doses for the most commonly used opioids are detailed in Table 2. Suggested starting doses are:
-
Morphine: PCA 1 mg lockout 10 min.
-
Hydromorphone: PCA 0.1 mg lockout 10 min. PO 2 mg Q2H.
-
Fentanyl: PCA 25 mcg lockout 10 min.
-
Sufentanil: PCA 2 mcg lockout 10 min.
-
Oxycodone: 20 mg PO Q6H.
-
Codeine: 60 mg PO Q6H.
4.1.1.1 Methadone
Methadone is a mu opioid receptor agonist with a weak NMDA receptor antagonist. Methadone is a moderate analgesic that has been used as an alternative analgesic in opioid-tolerant patients and to treat opioid dependence [17].
-
The suggested starting dose is 15 mg PO once a day.
4.1.2 Adjuvants
4.1.2.1 NSAIDs
NSAIDs cause analgesia and anti-inflammatory effects by inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis by the cyclo-oxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2) [18].
NSAIDs are mild analgesics that exhibit a ceiling effect in their dose–response relationship. They are useful as adjuncts to opioids treating minor burns, usually in the outpatient setting. NSAIDs had shown to decrease central hyperalgesia, have a synergistic effect, and are opioid-sparing.
The widespread inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase is responsible for many of the adverse effects of these NSAIDs. Bleeding risk, gastrointestinal complications, and renal toxicity are the most feared side effects; making these agents generally unsuitable for the treatment of the typical, severe burn pain [10].
The suggested starting dose is:
-
Celecoxib: 200 mg PO loading dose, followed by 100 mg PO Q12H (maximum 4 days).
-
Ketorolac: 15 mg IV loading dose, followed by 7.5 mg IV Q6H (maximum 4 days).
4.1.2.2 Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen is an antipyretic and an analgesic with both central and peripheral pain modulation activity. The mechanism of action of acetaminophen is unknown, but it may involve the inhibition of central prostaglandin synthesis and the activation of descending serotonergic pathways [19].
Acetaminophen is usually administered as an adjunct to opioids for major burns as it has a synergistic effect.
-
The suggested starting dose is 1 g PO Q6H.
4.1.2.3 Ketamine
Ketamine is an NMDA (N-methyl- d-aspartate) receptor antagonist used as a dissociative anesthetic and adjunct pain medication [20]. Ketamine acts on the thalamic function and the limbic system as a potent noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist and inhibits central pathways associated with central and peripheral pain sensitization [21].
Ketamine has many potential advantages for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in burn patients such as hemodynamic stability, preserving airway patency as well as hypoxic and hypercapnic responses, and decreasing airway resistance.
The suggested starting dose is:
-
Intravenous infusion: 0.1 mg/kg/H. Preferred route.
-
Oral: 30 mg Q6H. Low bioavailability.
4.1.2.4 Alfa Antagonist
4.1.2.4.1 Clonidine
Clonidine is an α-2 agonist used for its sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties. It is useful as an adjunct as it enhances opioid analgesia, decreases opioid requirement, and prolongs local anesthetic action [22]. It can also be administered in the management of alcohol, opiate, and nicotine withdrawal.
-
The suggested starting dose is 0.1 g PO Q12H.
4.1.2.4.2 Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine has specificity to the 2A subtype of the alpha-2 receptor, causing it to be a more effective sedative and analgesic than clonidine.
Dexmedetomidine has been used to provide sedation–analgesia for burned patients and to decrease opioid requirements [23]. Titration of dexmedetomidine may also allow weaning of benzodiazepine as patients get close to extubation. Dexmedetomidine has been shown to result in less delirium than benzodiazepines in several critical care studies [24]. However, it can cause hypotension at higher doses in the presence of hypovolemia, therefore, should not be given to hemodynamically unstable patients.
-
The suggested starting intravenous infusion is 0.2 mcg/kg/h.
4.1.2.5 Gabapentinoids
4.1.2.5.1 Gabapentin
Gabapentin is a structural analog of GABA. Its mechanism of action is not fully defined, but it involves inhibition of the release of excitatory neurotransmitters and increases the release of inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA by binding to the alpha-2-delta-1 subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channel [25].
Gabapentin has been used to manage chronic neuropathic burn pain because it inhibits the central sensitization of pain and also relives postburn pruritus.
-
The suggested starting dose is 100 mg PO Q8H.
4.1.2.5.2 Pregabalin
Like Gabapentin, Pregabalin binds to the alpha-2-delta-1 subunit of the presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channel in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, with subsequent reduced release of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. It has both analgesic and anxiolytic properties [4, 25].
-
The suggested starting dose is 50–100 mg PO Q12H.
4.1.2.6 Cannabinoids
The Cannabis sativa plant contains over 100 bioactive lipid compounds, known as cannabinoids, which produce analgesia in animal models of acute and chronic pain. However, due to abuse potential and numerous additional side effects, such as dependence, tolerance, hypomotility, deficits in executive function, and memory consolidation, the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes has been restricted until recent times [26].
There are two types of cannabinoid (CB) receptors. The CB1 receptor which is found both in the periphery and central nervous system (CNS), and CB2 receptor which is typically expressed predominantly by cells of the immune system, including glial cells of the CNS [27].
The undesirable effects of cannabinoids are caused by the global activation of CNS CB1 receptors. Current research has focused on presumed site-specific modulation of endogenous ligand activity or effects at the non-psychotropic CB2 receptor.
Cannabinoids have been studied in the management of chronic and neuropathic pain in the nonburn population [15, 28].
Currently, the synthetic cannabinoids agents dronabinol [29] (synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), tetrahydrocannabinol, and cannabidiol (CBD) sprays are not FDA-approved for analgesia but are available in the United States.
4.1.2.6.1 Nabilone (Cesamet)
Nabilone is a synthetic CB1 and CB2 agonist. The mechanism of pain modulation by nabilone is complex and involves the peripheral afferent nerves, the dorsal root ganglia, and spinal dorsal horn as well as specific brain areas [30]. Nabilone is effective at decreasing pain and anxiety as well as improving sleep.
-
The suggested starting dose is 0.5 mg PO Q12H.
4.1.2.7 Nitrous Oxide
Nitrous oxide is an inhalant anesthetic that has modest analgesic properties when delivered at subanesthetic doses [31]. Inhaled nitrous oxide and oxygen mixtures can be a very useful form of analgesia for short procedures, such as dressing changes as it has a rapid onset (within seconds) and short duration of action. Although it is generally well-tolerated, nitrous oxide can cause nausea and vomiting, precluding its use in some patients. Repeated or prolonged administration of nitrous oxide can interfere with vitamin B12 metabolism, causing serious hematological and neurological adverse effects and necessitating monitoring and vitamin B12 supplementation as required.
-
The suggested starting dose is mixures of 50% N2O.
4.1.2.8 Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines act by amplifying GABA in the central nervous system, and by reducing catecholamines in the peripheral nervous system.
Although not considered analgesic, benzodiazepines can be effective in alleviating pain symptoms in combination with other analgesics, most likely due to their sedative and anxiolytic effects. Benzodiazepines, with a short-to-moderate duration of action, such as midazolam and lorazepam, are preferred to longer-acting drugs [32].
Benzodiazepines administered along with ketamine can reduce dysphoria. When administered as an adjunct to opioids, benzodiazepines have been shown to decrease both background pain and pain in those patients with high levels of procedural pain [12].
The suggested starting dose is:
-
Lorazepam: 1 mg PO.
-
Midazolam: 1 mg IV.
4.1.2.9 Lidocaine
Lidocaine acts on the voltage-gated sodium channels by blocking the inflow of sodium, causing inhibition in the propagation of the action potentials in neurons [33].
Lidocaine can be used as a local, topical, or systemic anesthetic. However, topical use has been associated with toxicity due to rapid systemic absorption. The efficacy of Lidocaine as an intravenous infusion for the treatment of central and peripheral sensitization as well as neuropathic pain is still being investigated [34].
-
The suggested starting intravenous infusion is 1 mg/kg/h.
4.1.2.10 Antidepressants
Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression has been reported to occur in up to 30% of patients with severe burn injury, often developing in the setting of inadequate treatment of anxiety and pain [35].
Tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, appear to enhance opiate-induced analgesia, especially in patients with neuropathic pain. In addition, antidepressants can help to manage the depression, anxiety, and insomnia that frequently accompany severe burn injury [15].
Due to the potential risk of toxicity, it is essential to monitor the patient for signs of serotoninergic syndrome and cardiac arrhythmias.
The suggested starting dose is:
-
Amitriptyline: 20 mg PO at night.
-
Duloxetine: 30 mg PO once a day.
4.1.2.11 Magnesium
Magnesium is a weak non-selective NMDA receptor antagonist that is involved in neuromodulation of central and peripheral excitability and sensitization. Also, it enhances and promotes mu receptor upregulation, which is very useful in opioid tolerance and opioid induce hyperalgesic states.
-
The suggested starting intravenous infusion is 20 mcg/kg/h. Maximum 2 g/h for a maximum of 24 h.
4.2 Regional Anesthesia
-
Regional anesthesia has an important role in the intraoperative management of burn patients because it provides anesthesia in the operating room, can offer postoperative pain control, and facilitates rehabilitation. Regional anesthesia should be considered both for burn wound pain and donor site pain [10].
-
There are several forms of regional anesthesia, starting from simple techniques such as tumescent local anesthesia injected into a donor site before harvesting [36], subcutaneous catheter infusions [37], or more complex techniques such as peripheral nerve, or central neuraxial blocks [38].
-
Central neuraxial techniques (spinal, epidural) have been used with good effect. There are no reports suggesting that epidural abscesses are more common in burn patients, but studies have suggested that intravascular catheters are more likely to become infected if placed in or near burned tissue [39].
-
The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block is an excellent target for blocks because it is exclusively a sensory nerve and innervates the lateral thigh, which is frequently chosen for split-thickness skin grafts. A fascia iliaca block can also be performed if there is a need to cover the anterior and medial thigh [37, 38, 40].
4.3 Non-pharmacological
Factors such as depression or anxiety strongly affect the perception of pain in burn patients. Although pharmacological agents targeted to control pain are important, non- pharmacological therapies are essential adjuncts for optimal pain control [15].
It is beyond the scope of this chapter to review the indication and evidence of non-pharmacological interventions. Table 3 lists the most common non-pharmacological interventions.
5 Summary
-
The management of burn pain is exceedingly complex as it is affected by patient factors, burn characteristics, and mechanisms of injury.
-
Burn pain will vary in the same individual throughout the different phases of recovery. Therefore, analgesic regimens should be continuously evaluated and adjusted accordingly.
-
An adequate pain control has severe short- and long-term consequences in the patient journey to recovery.
-
Despite the side effects and potential for dependence and misuse, opioids are the cornerstone of pharmacologic pain control.
-
Management of burn pain requires a multimodal approach strategy, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities.
-
Chronic and neuropathic pain are common sequelae in burn patients. Cannabinoids had shown promissing results in recent studies, but further investigation is required.
References
Cohen M, Quintner J, van Rysewyk S (2018) Reconsidering the International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain. Pain Rep 3(2):e634
Morgan M, Deuis JR, Frøsig-Jørgensen M et al (2017) Burn pain: a systematic and critical review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Pain Med 19(4):708–734
Wang Y, Beekman J, Hew J et al (2018) Burn injury: challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 123(C):3–17
Gray P, Kirby J, Smith MT et al (2011) Pregabalin in severe burn injury pain: a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Pain 152(6):1279–1288
Woolf CJ (2011) Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 152(3 Suppl):S2–S15
Sheridan RL, Stoddard FJ, Kazis LE et al (2014) Long-term posttraumatic stress symptoms vary inversely with early opiate dosing in children recovering from serious burns: effects durable at 4 years. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(3):828–832
Gamst-Jensen H, Vedel PN, Lindberg-Larsen VO, Egerod I (2014) Acute pain management in burn patients: appraisal and thematic analysis of four clinical guidelines. Burns 40(8):1463–1469
de Castro RJA, Leal PC, Sakata RK (2013) Pain management in burn patients. Braz J Anesthesiol 63(1):149–153
Tracey I (2008) Imaging pain. Br J Anaesth 101(1):32–39
Griggs C, Goverman J, Bittner EA, Levi B (2017) Sedation and pain management in burn patients. Clin Plast Surg 44(3):535–540
Retrouvey H, Shahrokhi S (2015) Pain and the thermally injured patient—a review of current therapies. J Burn Care Res 36(2):315–323
Patterson DR, Hoflund H, Espey K, Sharar S (2004) Pain management. Burns 30(8):A10–A15
Summer GJ, Puntillo KA, Miaskowski C, Green PG, Levine JD (2007) Burn injury pain: the continuing challenge. J Pain 8(7):533–548
Schneider JC, Harris NL, Shami El A et al (2006) A descriptive review of neuropathic-like pain after burn injury. J Burn Care Res 27(4):524–528
Kim DE, Pruskowski KA, Ainsworth CR, Linsenbardt HR, Rizzo JA, Cancio LC (2019) A review of adjunctive therapies for burn injury pain during the opioid crisis. J Burn Care Res 27(4 Suppl):659–613
Faucher L, Furukawa K (2006) Practice guidelines for the management of pain. J Burn Care Res 27(5):659–668
Jones GM, Porter K, Coffey R et al (2013) Impact of early methadone initiation in critically injured burn patients: a pilot study. J Burn Care Res 34(3):342–348
Bovill JG (1997) Mechanisms of actions of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 15:9–15
Graham GG, Scott KF (2005) Mechanism of action of paracetamol. Am J Ther 12(1):46–55
McGuinness SK, Wasiak J, Cleland H et al (2011) A systematic review of ketamine as an analgesic agent in adult burn injuries. Pain Med 12(10):1551–1558
Warncke T, Stubhaug A, Jørum E (2000) Preinjury treatment with morphine or ketamine inhibits the development of experimentally induced secondary hyperalgesia in man. Pain 86(3):293–303
Tryba M, Gehling M (2002) Clonidine: a potent analgesic adjuvant. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 15(5):511–517
Walker J, MacCallum M, Fischer C, Kopcha R, Saylors R, McCall J (2006) Sedation using dexmedetomidine in pediatric burn patients. J Burn Care Res 27(2):206–210
Asmussen S, Maybauer DM, Fraser JF, Jennings K, George S, Maybauer MO (2013) A meta-analysis of analgesic and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in burn patients. Burns 39(4):625–631
Wong L, Turner L (2010) Treatment of post-burn neuropathic pain: evaluation of pregablin. Burns 36(6):769–772
Woodhams SG, Sagar DR, Burston JJ, Chapman V (2015) The role of the endocannabinoid system in pain. Handb Exp Pharmacol 227:119–143
Di Marzo V (2018) New approaches and challenges to targeting the endocannabinoid system. Nat Rev Drug Discov 17(9):623–639
Burns TL, Ineck JR (2006) Cannabinoid analgesia as a potential new therapeutic option in the treatment of chronic pain. Ann Pharmacother 40(2):251–260
Narang S, Gibson D, Wasan AD et al (2008) Efficacy of dronabinol as an adjuvant treatment for chronic pain patients on opioid therapy. J Pain 9(3):254–264
Bestard JA, Toth CC (2011) An open-label comparison of nabilone and gabapentin as adjuvant therapy or monotherapy in the management of neuropathic pain in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Pain Pract 11(4):353–368
Tomi K, Mashimo T, Tashiro C et al (1993) Alterations in pain threshold and psychomotor response associated with subanaesthetic concentrations of inhalation anaesthetics in humans. Br J Anaesth 70(6):684–686
Reddy S, Patt RB (1994) The benzodiazepines as adjuvant analgesics. J Pain Symptom Manag 9(8):510–514
Cummins TR (2007) Setting up for the block: the mechanism underlying lidocaine’s use-dependent inhibition of sodium channels. J Physiol Lond 582(Pt 1):11
Wasiak J, Mahar PD, McGuinness SK et al (2014) Intravenous lidocaine for the treatment of background or procedural burn pain. Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group, ed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 37(6):951–921
Ehde DM, Patterson DR, Wiechman SA, Wilson LG (1999) Post-traumatic stress symptoms and distress following acute burn injury. Burns 25(7):587–592
Bussolin L, Busoni P, Giorgi L, Crescioli M, Messeri A (2003) Tumescent local anesthesia for the surgical treatment of burns and postburn sequelae in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology 99(6):1371–1375
Hernandez JLR, Savetamal A, Crombie RE et al (2013) Use of continuous local anesthetic infusion in the management of postoperative split-thickness skin graft donor site pain. J Burn Care Res 34(4):e257–e262
Shank ES, Martyn JA, Donelan MB, Perrone A, Firth PG, Driscoll DN (2016) Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for pediatric burn reconstructive surgery: a prospective study. J Burn Care Res 37(3):e213–e217
Bittner EA, Shank E, Woodson L, Martyn JAJ (2015) Acute and perioperative care of the burn-injured patient. Anesthesiology 122(2):448–464
Cuignet O, Pirson J, Boughrouph J, Duville D (2004) The efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for pain management in burn patients undergoing skin grafting procedures. Anesth Analg 98(4):1077–1078
do Vale AHB, da Rocha Videira RL, Gomez DS et al (2015) Effect of nitrous oxide on fentanyl consumption in burned patients undergoing dressing change. Braz J Anesthesiol 66(1):7–11
Blanchet B, Jullien V, Vinsonneau C, Tod M (2008) Influence of burns on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in the care of burn patients. Clin Pharmacokinet 47(10):635–654
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Restrepo, M.S., Avila I, A.J. (2021). Considerations for Pain Management in the Burn-Injured Patient. In: Jeschke, M.G., Kamolz, LP., Shahrokhi, S. (eds) Burn Care and Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39193-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39193-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39192-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39193-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)