Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Armenakis, Achilles: A Journey of Discovery – Seeing Change Through New Eyes

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers

Abstract

The Scottish poet, Robert Burns, once wrote that “The best laid schemes o’ mice and men, gang aft agley” (as cited in Crawford R, MacLachlan C, The best laid schemes: Selected poetry and prose of Robert Burns. Princeton University Press, 2009, p 48). The journey Achilles Armenakis has taken perhaps can be best described as a journey to understand why the best laid change schemes of men have “gang aft agley.” This chapter describes his personal journey along with those of his colleagues to not only understand the problems that arise when organizational leaders try to implement change initiatives but also to offer a framework by which organizational symptoms impacting organizational performance may be recognized, causes of those symptoms discovered, and solutions to “fix the causes” may be proposed. Understanding the process of diagnosis and evaluation, while identifying diagnostic bias, initially drove much of his research. However, during his voyage of research and discovery, Armenakis focused on change readiness or readiness for change in an organization. Along with his colleagues, and those doctoral students he so much influenced as a teacher, he has sought to answer the critical question of how change impacts organizational members, or change recipients, and what motivates them to not only accept but embrace a change initiative. I was one of those students fortunate enough to have the opportunity of studying under him and being along on part of that voyage. A favorite quote of his over the years has been that of Marcel Proust (Proust, Remembrance of things past. Vintage Books, 1981 edition): “The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new lands, but in seeing with new eyes.” Somehow, this has always seemed appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D., & Anderson, L. A. (2001). Beyond change management: Advanced strategies for today’s transformational leaders. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. (1973). Guidelines for evaluating OD efforts with profit-oriented organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. (1988). A review of research on the change typology: Measuring alpha, beta, and gamma change. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. II, pp. 135–162). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., & Bedeian, A. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00004-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Bernerth, J., Pitts, J., & Walker, H. (2007a). Organizational change recipients. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(4), 481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886307303654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., & Feild, H. (1975). The evaluation of organizational change using non-independent criterion measures. Personnel Psychology, 28, 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Feild, H., & Holley, W. (1976). Guidelines for overcoming empirically identified evaluation problems of organizational development change agents. Human Relations, 129, 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., & Harris, S. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformation readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210423080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Harris, S., Cole, M., Fillmer, L., & Self, D. (2007b). A top management team’s reactions to organizational transformation: The diagnostic benefits of five key change sentiments. Journal of Change Management, 7(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701771014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Harris, S., & Feild, H. (1999). Making change permanent: A model for institutionalizing change. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. XII, pp. 97–128). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Harris, S., & Mossholder, K. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Mossholder, K., & Harris, S. (1990). Diagnostic bias in organizational consultation. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 18(6), 563. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(90)90048-E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Pond, S., & Snyder, C. (1981). Organizational diagnosis in a small gray iron foundry. Management International Review, 21, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., & Smith, L. (1978). A practical alternative to comparison group designs in OD evaluations: The abbreviated time series design. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/255731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., & Zmud, R. (1979). Interpreting the measurement of change in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 32, 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb02342.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Reflections of our journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. (2006). Trust and the psychological contract. Employee Relations, 2(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450710741720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, I. E., & Brett, J. F. (2006). 360-degree feedback to leaders. Group and Organization Management, 31(5), 578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J. (2006). Managing change: Steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes. Long Range Planning, 39(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., & Behling, O. C. (1997). Top managers and TQM success: One more look after all these years. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 37. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1997.9707100658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L., & French, J. R. P. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1, 512. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674800100408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., & Buchanan, D. (2005). The way it really happened: Competing narratives in the political process of technological change. Human Relations, 58(7), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705057807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D., & Stace, D. (1990). Under new management: Australian organizations in transition. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dym, B. (1999). Resistance in organizations: How to recognize, understand & respond to it. OD Practitioner, 31(1), 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadiesh, O., & Gilbert, J. L. (2001). Transforming corner-office strategy into frontline action. Harvard Business Review, 79(5), 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (2000). Rebuilding behavioral context: A blueprint for corporate renewal. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (p. 195). Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski, R., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976). Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 133. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637601200201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, B., Armenakis, A., Moates, K., Albritton, M., & Harris, S. (2007). Achieving scientific rigor in organizational diagnosis: An application of the diagnostic funnel. Consulting Psychology Journal, 59(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.59.2.79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. I., & Shirom, A. (1999). Organizational diagnosis and assessment. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R., & Carroll, C. (2012). DICTION 6.0: The text-analysis program. Digitext Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmuth, C., Armenakis, A., Vendette, S., Boje, D. (2015). A mixed methods organizational diagnosis: Integrating manual content analysis with computer-aided text analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Auburn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., Armenakis, A., Feild, H., & Harris, S. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A., & Jick, T. D. (1992). The challenge of organizational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S., & Aiken, C. (2008). The inconvenient truth about change management: Why it isnge unfolds: How managers construe. McKinsey and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S., Meaney, M., & Pung, C. (2010). What successful transformations share. McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (2002). The heart of change: real-life stories of how people change their organizations. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P., & Cohen, D. (2002). The heart of change. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (1993). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labianca, G., Gray, B., & Brass, D. J. (2000). A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11(2), 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meany, M., & Pung, C. (2008 1l change and developmentge, desigating organizational transformations. The McKinsey Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moates, N., Armenakis, A., Gregory, B., Albritton, D., & Feild, H. (2005). Achieving content representativeness in organizational diagnosis: Use of action groups for successful organizational change. Action Research, 3(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305058489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossholder, K., Settoon, R., Harris, S., & Armenakis, A. (1995). Measuring emotion in open-ended responses: An application of textual data analysis. Journal of Management, 21(2), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (2012). Leadership, theory, and practice (6th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C. (1986). Tactics of implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 230–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/256187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A sixty-year review of quantitative studies. Journal of Behavior Science, 47(4), 461–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2009). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). The awakening giant: Continuity and change in ICI. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, L. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E. (2004). Building the bridge as you walk on it: A guide for leading change. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P. J., Roberts, D. R., & Porras, J. I. (1993). An evaluation of a model of planned organizational change: Evidence from a meta-analysis. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (pp. 1–39). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1982). The use of analysis of covariance structures to assess beta and gamma change. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 343. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Self, D., Armenakis, A., & Schraeder, M. (2007). Organizational change content, context, and process: A simultaneous analysis of employee reactions. Journal of Change Management, 7, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701461129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, J., Howard, G., & Maxwell, S. (1980). Evaluating planned organizational change: A method for assessing alpha, beta, and gamma change. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/257811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. J., Armenakis, A. A., & Bernerth, J. B. (2007). Factors influencing organizational change efforts: An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(6), 761. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810710831000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woosley, L. (2006). Rules of disengagement: Gallup poll shows that more than half of workers are. Rules oKnight Ridder Tribune Business News. http://search.proquest.com/docview/465325252?accountid=38769

  • Xu, J., & Helena, C. T. (2011). How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111134661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Armenakis, A., Brown, S., & Mehta, A. (2011). Organizational culture: Assessment and transformation. Journal of Change Management, 11(3), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.568949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., Davy, J., & Carter, C. (1985). Layoffs, self-esteem, and survivor guilt: Motivational, affective, and attitudinal consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90014-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., & Grover, S. Threat of future layoffs, self‐esteem, and survivors’ reactions: Evidence from the laboratory and the field. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140912.

  • Cobb, A., Wooten, K., & Folger, R. (1995). Justice in the making: Toward understanding the theory and practice of justice in organizational change and development. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 8, pp. 243–295). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L., & French, J. R. P. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1, 512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K., Cummings, L., & Pierce, J. (1996). Psychological ownership in organizations: Conditions under which individuals promote and resist change. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organization change and development (Vol. 9, pp. 1–23). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. I., & Shirom, A. (1999). Organizational diagnosis and assessment: Bridging theory and practice. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, E. (2008). The temper of our time. Hopewell Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformational efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, B., & Izumi, H. (1993). Organizational change, design, and work innovation: a meta-analysis of 131 North American field sites – 1961–1991. Research in Organizational Change and Development (pp. 235–313. JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. I. (1995). Types of organizational change: From incremental improvement to discontinuous transformation. In D. A. Nadler, R. B. Shaw, A. E. Walton, & Associates (Eds.), Discontinuous change: Leading organizational transformation (p. 15). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noer, D. M. (1993). Healing the wounds: Overcoming the trauma of layoffs and revitalizing downsized organizations. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, A., & Griffin, M. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. L. (2000). Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 602–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. (n.d.). FERC Order 436: Open access. Blueprint (1985). http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/natuas/analysis_publications/ngmajorleg/ferc436.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sorrell College of Business, Troy University, Troy, AL, USA

    Dennis R. Self

  2. Department of Human Resource Management and Law, Sorrell College of Business at Troy University, Montgomery, AL, USA

    Dennis R. Self

Authors
  1. Dennis R. Self
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Organizational Change Leadership College of Education and Human Development, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

    David B. Szabla

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Self, D.R. (2021). Armenakis, Achilles: A Journey of Discovery – Seeing Change Through New Eyes. In: Szabla, D.B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38324-4_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation