Skip to main content

Does Religion Matter? In Search of a Secular Rationale of the EU Neighbourhood Policy: Cases of Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revisiting Secularism in Theory and Practice
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, controversial issue of the role of Christianity in the formation of European identity has made an important comeback to European public agenda. It is recognised as a basis of law in the European Union’s (EU) constitutional order through the notion such as pluralism, balance and inheritance. It makes the EU’s search for a dialogue with a majority of Muslim countries in the Middle-East and North Africa (MENA) rather interesting policy preference. This article examines how the notion of European secularism has been reflected upon European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) regarding the freedom of religion and belief. Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan are chosen as three country cases to observe EU’s position on religious freedom—the major concept of its secular rationale. Analysis of the official documents in regard to EU and revealing requirements and technical/financial support of the ENP for freedom of religion or belief can result in evaluating possible outcomes of whether religion really matters for the EU under the ENP dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) is an intergovernmental institution bringing together the 28 European Union Member States and 15 countries from the Southern and Eastern shores of the Mediterranean to promote dialogue and cooperation. It is chaired by a co-presidency shared between the two shores. Since 2012, UfM is assumed by the European Union on the Northern side, ensuring a close link with the ENP, and by Jordan on the Southern side, allowing its full appropriation by the Southern countries. The co-presidency applies to all levels: summits, ministerial meetings and official-level meetings. More details are available on www.ufmsecretariat.org.

  2. 2.

    Jordan year reports of Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International highly critical on Jordanian Press and Publications Law and actions of the Audiovisual Commission in terms of freedom of expression. Details are available on https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/jordan and https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east-and-north-africa/jordan/report-jordan/.

  3. 3.

    The last amendment of Lebanon Constitution was made by Charter of Lebanese National Reconciliation in 1989. According to the agreement which brought 15 years of civil war to an end, Muslims and Christians are represented on a 50:50 basis in the Parliament, in the Council of Ministers as well as in all high-ranking civilian and military posts: Alawi, Druze, Shia and Sunni within the Muslim community, and Armenian Catholic, Armenian Orthodox, Greek Catholic, Greek Orthodox, Maronites and Protestants within the Christian community.

References

  • Action Document for the “Advancing Women’s Rights in Egypt”. Information for Potential Grant Applicants Work Programme for Grants, ENI/2016/039 542 financed under European Neighbourhood Instrument, Egypt, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Action Fiche for Egypt, Promotion and protection of human rights and civil society in Egypt, DAC-code 15162/15150, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Action Fiche for Jordan, Support to Justice Reform and Good Governance in Jordan, DAC- code 15130, Legal and Judicial Development, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Action fiche for Lebanon, Reinforcing Human rights and Democracy in Lebanon (AFKAR III), DAC- code 15162/15150, ENPI/ Human Rights and Democracy, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Action fiche for Lebanon, Reinforcing Human rights and Democracy in Lebanon (AFKAR III), ENPI/2009/20489, ENPI/ Human Rights and Democracy, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Action Plan for EU-Lebanon Partnership and Cooperation 2013–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2008). Religious America, secular Europe?. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, I. (2004, May 25). Christianity bedevils talks on EU treaty. The Guardian. Accessed August 23, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (2004). Religion, European secular identities, and European Integration. Transit. https://www.eurozine.com/religion-european-secular-identities-and-european-integration/. Accessed August 22, 2018.

  • Casanova, J. (2006). Religion and European secular identities and European integration. In T. A. Byrnes & P. J. Katzenstein (Eds.), Religion in an expanding Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoE. (2013). EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion and belief. Operational Guidelines: basic Principles of Action’, Foreign Affairs Council Meeting Luxemburg. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/137585.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2018.

  • Connolly, C. (2017). Strengthen EU Guidelines on Freedom of Religion or Belief. EPP Group of European Parliament. http://www.eppgroup.eu/news/Strengthen-EU-Guidelines-on-Freedom-of-Religion-or-Belief. Accessed August 22, 2018.

  • Davie, G. (1994). Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, G. (2000). Religion in Modern Europe: A memory mutates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, G. (2006). Is Europe an Exceptional Case. The Hedgehog Review, 23–34. http://www.dnva.no/binfil/download.php?tid=39409. Accessed August 22, 2018.

  • EC “Preamble” in Treaty Establishing A Constitution for Europe (2005). https://europa.eu/europeanunion/sites/europaeu/files/docs/body/treaty_establishing_a_constitution_for_europe_en.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2018.

  • EEAS. (2016). Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European union’s foreign and security policy. https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2018.

  • ENP overview. Web document. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhoodenlargement/neighbourhood/overview_en. Accessed August 25, 2018.

  • ENPI: 2007–2013 Overview of Activities and Results. (2014). Web document. Directorate General Development and Cooperation- EuropeAid. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/overview_of_enpi_results_2007-2013_en_0.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2018.

  • EU Commission SEC. (2011). 647, Joint Staff Working Paper Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2010 Progress Country Report: Egypt. Egypt, Brussels, May 25, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SEC. (2004). 564, Commission Staff Working Paper European Neighbourhood Policy Country Report Jordan. Brussels, May 12, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SEC. (2005). 287/3, Commission Staff Working Paper Annex to: “European Neighbourhood Policy” Country Report Egypt. Brussels, March 2, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SEC. (2005). 289/3, Commission Staff Working Paper Annex to: “European Neighbourhood Policy” Country Report Lebanon, SEC(2005) 289/3, Brussels, March 2, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SEC. (2009). 523/2, Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2008, Progress Report Egypt, Brussels, April 23, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SEC. (2010). 517, Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Taking stock of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2009 Progress Report Egypt, Brussels, May 12, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SWD (2013). 93 final, Joint Staff Working Document Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Lebanon Progress in 2012 and Recommendations for Action Accompanying the Document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, March 20, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SWD (2014). 92 final, Joint Staff Working Document Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Lebanon Progress in 2013 and Recommendations for Action Accompanying the Document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, March 27, 2014..

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SWD. (2012). 117 final, Joint Staff Working Document Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Lebanon Progress in 2011 and Recommendations for Action Accompanying the Document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, May 15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission SWD. (2014). 71 final, Joint Staff Working Document Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Egypt Progress in 2013 and Recommendations for Action Accompanying the Document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, March 27, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU- Jordan ENP Action Plan, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Trust Fund for Africa Web document. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/regions/africa/eu-emergency-trust-fund-africa_en Accessed August 25, 2018.

  • EU/Lebanon ENP Action Plan, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission SEC. (2010). 525, Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Taking Stock of the ENP Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2009, Progress Report Jordan, Brussels, May 12, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission SEC. (2011). 648, Joint Staff Working Paper Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2010 Country Report: Jordan, Brussels, May 25, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission SWD. (2013). 89 final, Joint Staff Working Document Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Egypt Progress in 2012 and Recommendations for Action Accompanying the Document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, March 20, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission SWD. (2014). 74 final, Joint Staff Working Document Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Jordan Progress in 2013 and Recommendations for Action Accompanying the Document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Neighbourhood at the Crossroads: Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2013, Brussels, March 27, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission SWD. (2015). 65 final, Joint Staff Working Document Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Egypt Progress in 2014 and Recommendations for Action Accompanying the Document Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, March 25, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foret, F. (2017). How the European external action service deals with religion through religious freedom. Giorgio Bassotti et al. (Eds.), EU Diplomacy Paper 7/2017, College of Europe Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • From 6 to 28 members. Web document. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/policy/from-6-to-28-members_en. Accessed August 24, 2018.

  • Gutkowski, S. (2016). We are the very model of a moderate Muslim state? The Amman Messages and Jordan’s Foreign Policy, International Relations, 30(2), 206–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyvönen, A. E. (2014). From event to process: The EU and the ‘Arab Spring’. In D. Della Porta & A. Mattoni (Eds.), Spreading Protest: Social Movements in times of Crisis (pp. 91–116). Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavalski, E., & Cho, Y. C. (2018). Worlding the study of normative power: Assessing European and Chinese definitions of the “Normal”. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 15(57), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, H. (2014). Normative Power Europe and the importance of discursive context: The European Union and the politics of religion. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(4), 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, R. (2009). Europe in question’ discussion paper series the recognition of religion within the constitutional and political order of the European Union. LSE Europe in Discussion Paper Series, LEQS Paper No: 10/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrow, S. A. (2016). Religion in the treaty of Lisbon: Aspects and evaluation. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 31(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oven, J. J. (2001). Religion and the demise of liberal rationalism: The foundational crisis of the separation of church and state. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (2015). Managing religion and the Judicialization of Religious Freedom. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (2010). Europeanization beyond the EU: The dynamics of Europeanization in the Southern Mediterranean Partner States. L’Europe en Formation, 2(356), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.3917/eufor.356.0125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S. (2018). EU religious engagement in the Southern Mediterranean: Much ado about nothing? Mediterranean Politics, 23(1), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2017.1358905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucca, L. (2013). Freedom of religion in a secular world. King’s College London Law School Research Paper No. 2013–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pelin Sönmez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirik, H., Sönmez, P. (2020). Does Religion Matter? In Search of a Secular Rationale of the EU Neighbourhood Policy: Cases of Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan. In: Ünsar, S., Ünal Eriş, Ö. (eds) Revisiting Secularism in Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37456-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics