Skip to main content

Abstract

Decision making is a process of choosing and identifying the best alternative among available options to achieve the desired purpose in many areas of human activity. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) has been a fast growing decision making tool for many years. It has taken its role in different application areas due to being useful and attractive for solving complex real-world problems. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the mostly used powerful MCDM techniques for formulating complex decisions. The aim of this paper is to conduct AHP for ranking of five United Kingdom universities. Four important criteria, and namely, teaching, research, citations and international outlook are used to rank the universities. The comparison matrix is used to compare criteria as well as alternatives with respect to each criterion. Consistency index and consistency ratio are calculated by using eigenvalues to check the consistency of comparison matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liberatore, M.J., Nydick, R.L.: Group decision making in higher education using the analytic hierarchy process. Res. High. Educ. 38(5), 593–614 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saaludin, N., Harun, S., Wahab, S.Z.A., Yahya, Y.: Academic staff promotion in higher education by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In: The 4th International Conference on Quantitative Sciences and Its Applications (ICOQSIA) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sahito, M., Chandio, M.S.: An analytical hierarchy process model for the evaluation of university teaching quality. Sindh Univ. Res. J. Sci. Ser. 49(004), 857–860 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mu, E., Pereyra-Rojas, M.: Practical Decision Making. SOR. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33861-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology-world-university-rankings-2019

  6. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/best-universities/best-universities-uk

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashad R. Aliyev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aliyev, R.R., Temizkan, H. (2020). Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for Ranking of Universities. In: Aliev, R., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W., Jamshidi, M., Babanli, M., Sadikoglu, F. (eds) 10th International Conference on Theory and Application of Soft Computing, Computing with Words and Perceptions - ICSCCW-2019. ICSCCW 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1095. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35249-3_101

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics