Skip to main content

Towards a Literary Entomology: Arthropods and Humans in William H. Gass

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life After Literature

Part of the book series: Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress ((NAHP,volume 12))

Abstract

This article aims to interpret the work of American author William Gass in a “posthumanist” framework, establishing a thematic interest that is also linked to his poetics. After the introduction, the article traces “the anthropological difference” in Gass’ essays, then examines a specific theme, the interaction between human characters and arthropods in his fiction. A close reading of the early short story “Order of Insects” concludes the article, in which the ties between thematic and formal concerns are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Nazi politics wasn’t even a proper biopolitics, but more literally a zoopolitics, one expressly directed to human animals. Consequently, the correct term for their massacre—anything but the sacred ‘holocaust’—is ‘extermination’: exactly the term used for rats, insects, and lice” (Esposito 2008: 117).

  2. 2.

    Leo Spitzer’s research into “Classical and Christian Ideas of World Harmony” is well known. The German researcher Alexander Becker, on reading modernist theories of music (such as that of Varèse), concludes that in these “gewiss resultiert […] keine Übereinstimmung zwischen musikalischer und seelischer Ordnung im Sinne der ‘alten’ Harmonie der Harmonie” (Becker 2012: 278).

  3. 3.

    For an early nineteenth-century version of the Great Chain of Being, with “insects and angels sometimes exhibiting common traits,” see Parikka 2010: 4.

  4. 4.

    This, of course, presupposes a distinction between external technology and internal (embodied) experience, which can be complicated in a number of ways. One is obviously a Derridean deconstruction of the interiority of speech. Another comes from the archeology of animal philosophy: “An individuality is always constituted as a tension or machination between elements. So even if, as Bergson notes, the technics of animals and insects are immanent to their bodily formations in contrast to the intelligent externalization we find in humans, these technics are in constant tension with an outside, a folding, instead of a self-enclosed system.” (Parikka 2010: 74).

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal. Trans. Kevin Attell. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Alexander. 2012. Die verlorene Harmonie der Harmonie. Musikphilosophische Überlegungen zum Stimmungsbegriff. In Concordia discors. Ästhetiken der Stimmung zwischen Literaturen, Künsten und Wissenschaften, ed. Hans-Georg von Arburg and Sergej Rickenbacher, 261–279. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Metamorphoses. Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, Bruce F., and John D. Edman. 2004. Medical Entomology. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, Roberto. 2008. Bios. Biopolitics and Philosophy. Translated and with an Introduction by Timothy Campbell. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 1966. Omensetter’s Luck. New York; Cleveland, OH: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 1978. The World Within the Word. Essays. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 1979. Fiction and the Figures of Life. Essays. Boston, MA: David R. Godine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 1985. Habitations of the Word. Essays. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 1996. Finding a Form. Essays. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 1998. Cartesian Sonata and Other Novellas. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 1999. Reading Rilke. Reflections on the Problems of Translation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 2003. Tests of Time. Essays. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 2013. Middle C. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, William H. 2015 [1968]. In the Heart of the Heart of the Country. Introduction by Joanna Scott. New York: New York Review Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, H.L. 2002. Understanding William Gass. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Franz. 1995. The Spider and Its Web in American Literature. Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch 36: 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Deconstruction as Second-Order Observing. New Literary History 24: 763–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maierhofer, Roberta. 1999. Die Ungestillte Sehnsucht. Suche nach Ordnung in William H. Gass’ fiktosophischer Theorie der Literatur. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, Larry. 1982. The Metafictional Muse. The Works of Robert Coover, Donald Barthelme, and William H. Gass. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Mark. 2000. Virtuosi. A Defense and a (Sometimes Erotic) Celebration of Great Pianists. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, Jussi. 2010. Insect Media. An Archeology of Animals and Technology. Minneapolis, MI; London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman, Arthur M. 1986. The Fiction of William Gass. The Consolation of Language. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverblatt, Michael. 1998. Interview with William Gass. The Ear’s Mouth Must Move. Essential Interviews of William Gass. https://medium.com/the-william-h-gass-interviews/william-h-gass-interview-with-michael-silverbatt-1998-ab8cdbe33563.

  • Wolfe, Cary. 2010. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MI; London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gábor Tamás Molnár .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Molnár, G.T. (2020). Towards a Literary Entomology: Arthropods and Humans in William H. Gass. In: Kulcsár-Szabó, Z., Lénárt, T., Simon, A., Végső, R. (eds) Life After Literature. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33738-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics