Abstract
This chapter contributes to the much-needed task of theorising the intersections between activist memory, social media platforms, autonomous archives and public history institutions. Tracking invocations of the ‘living archive’ across archival forces connected to the Egyptian Arab Uprising, Occupy and the anti-Trump Women’s March On movement, this chapter provides an emergent theory and methodology of archival assemblages. Drawing attention to issues of activist time and labour within these assemblages, this chapter argues that ‘living archives’ operate as nodal and cluster points within wider digital media and memory ecologies. As sites of uneven political discourse and practice, living archives enable protest memories to become newly available both as creative materials for civic engagement and as unintended materials for state appropriation and repression.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A considerable body of scholarship documents the left’s ‘counter culture of remembrance’ (see Cohen, 2018), including how social movement actors engage with questions of history, legacy and heritage. It is also more or less widely recognised that social movement organisations are frequently committed to creating their own ‘autonomous archives’ (Moore & Pell, 2010), which perform as sites of identity concretion, knowledge transmission, and as an evidence base to challenge dominant narratives of power.
- 2.
As with any digital content, ‘living archives’ that are digital-born or migrated online are susceptible to removal or expiration; websites fall out of subscription, website managers leave projects and institutions refresh their web architecture. The internet is full of broken links and dead pages. This occurred with the #searchunderoccupy website—online at the start of this research project, no longer digitally available when it came to finalising the publication. The lesson here is not to be seduced by the terminology of ‘living archives’; these sites are as vulnerable as all digital content. A digital memory researcher can safeguard against such disappearing research materials by consulting the WayBack Machine of the Internet Archive, and creating screenshots and text files of online content in order to ‘back up’ their research materials and archives.
References
Antoun, N. (2012, September 30). The archive of the revolution: A living archive. Arablit. Retrieved from https://arablit.org/2012/09/30/the-archive-of-the-revolution-a-living-archive
Antrobus, H. (2018). Represent! Voices 100 years on. Paper presented Commemorating Women’s Suffrage Symposium, King’s College London, UK, July 4, 2018.
Armstrong, E., & Crage, S. (2006). Movements and memory: The Stonewall myth. American Sociological Review, 71, 724–751.
Assmann, A. (2011). Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooks, K. (2017, January 23). Women’s March signs are headed to museums and libraries across the globe. Huffington Post. Retrieved from www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/museums-collecting-womens-march-signs_us_58863477e4b096b4a23332c9
Brown, S. D., & Hoskins, A. (2010). Terrorism in the new memory ecology: Mediating and remembering the 2005 London Bombings. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 2(2), 87–107.
Buel, J. (2018). Assembling the living archive: A media-archaeological excavation of occupy Wall Street. Public Culture, 30(2), 283–303.
Cascone, S. (2018, January 22). Signs of the times: Museums are collecting protest posters from the 2018 Women’s March. ArtNet. Retrieved from https://news.artnet.com/art-world/museums-already-enshrining-2018-womens-march-us-history-1204031
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements and the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chan, M. (2014, October 24). The Umbrella Archives: Hong Kong artist collective fights to preserve protest art. Art Radar. Retrieved from http://artradarjournal.com/2014/10/24/the-umbrella-archives-hong-kong-artist-collective-fights-to-preserve-protest-art
Chidgey, R. (2018a). Feminist Afterlives. Assemblage Memory in Activist Times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chidgey, R. (2018b). Feminist protest assemblages and remix culture. In G. Meikle (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism (pp. 196–204). Abingdon: Routledge.
Cohen, P. (2018). Archive That, Comrade. Left Legacies and the Counter Culture of Remembrance. Oakland: PM Press.
Collins, S. (2018). Acting out: Resisting copyright monopolies. In G. Meikle (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism (pp. 346–354). Abingdon: Routledge.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.
Derrida, J. (1995). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Trans. E. Prenowitz. Diacritics, 25(2), 9–63.
Drake, J. M. (2016, June 27). Expanding #ArchivesForBlackLives to traditional archival repositories. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/on-archivy/expanding-archivesforblacklives-to-traditional-archival-repositories-b88641e2daf6
Eichhorn, K. (2013). The Archival Turn in Feminism. Outrage in Order. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Ernst, W. (2013). Digital Memory and the Archive (J. Parikka, Ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Eyerman, R. (2016). Social movements and memory. In A. L. Tota & T. Hagen (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies (pp. 79–83). New York: Routledge.
Findlay, C. (2016). Archival activism. Archives and Manuscripts, 44(3), 155–159.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., & Shepherd, E. (2009). Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science, 9(1–2), 71–86.
Foucault, M. (1984). Preface. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (Eds.), Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia (pp. xi–xiv). London: The Athlone Press.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hajek, A. (2013). Negotiating Memories of Protest in Western Europe. The Case of Italy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, S. (2001). Constituting an archive. Third Text, 15(54), 89–92.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoskins, A. (2013). The end of decay time. Memory Studies, 6(4), 387–389.
Kaun, A. (2016). Archiving protest digitally: The temporal regime of immediation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5395–5408.
Kendall Adams, G. (2017, January 25). UK collections seek artefacts from Women’s March. Museums Association. Retrieved from www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/25012017-uk-collections-seek-womens-march-artefacts
Kitch, C. (2018). A living archive of modern protest’: Memory-making in the Women’s March. Popular Communication—The International Journal of Media and Culture, 16(2), 119–127.
Masr, M. (2018, January 25). 858: Archiving as a tool of resistance. Mada. Retrieved from www.madamasr.com/en/2018/02/11/feature/culture/858-archiving-as-a-tool-of-resistance
Merrill, S., & Lindgren, S. (2018). The rhythms of social movement memories: The mobilization of Silvio Meier’s activist remembrance across platforms. Social Movement Studies. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14742837.2018.1534680
Moore, S., & Pell, S. (2010). Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(4–5), 255–268.
Moss, P., & Maddrell, A. (2017). Emergent and divergent spaces in the Women’s March: The challenges of intersectionality and inclusion. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(5), 613–620.
Newberry Library. (2017). Building a living archive of modern protest. Retrieved from https://newberry.org/building-living-archive-modern-protest
Ng, Y. (2015, September 2). Community-based approaches to archives from the Black Lives Matter movement. Witness. Retrieved from https://blog.witness.org/2015/09/community-based-approaches-to-archives-from-the-black-lives-matter-movement
Price, S., & Sanz Sabido, R. (Eds.). (2015). Contemporary Protest and the Legacy of Dissent. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Radjy, A. (2018, January 25). How to save the memories of the Egyptian Revolution. The Atlantic. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/01/an-internet-archive-rekindles-the-egyptian-revolutions-spirit/551489
Reading, A. (2011). Memory and digital media: Six dynamics of the globital memory field. In M. Neiger, O. Meyers, & E. Zandberg (Eds.), On Media Memory: Collective Memory in a New Media Age (pp. 241–252). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reading, A. (2016). Gender and Memory in the Globital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reading, A., & Katriel, T. (Eds.). (2015). Cultural Memories of Nonviolent Struggles: Powerful Times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rhodes, T. (2013). A living, breathing revolution: How libraries can use ‘living archives’ to support, engage and document social movements. IFLA Journal [International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions], 40(1), 5–11.
Rigney, A. (2018). Remembering hope: Transnational activism beyond the traumatic. Memory Studies, 11(3), 368–380.
Rollason-Cass, S., & Reed, S. (2015). Living movements, living archives: Selecting and archiving web content during times of social unrest. New Review of Information Networking, 20(1–2), 241–247.
Romano, R., & Raiford, L. (Eds.). (2006). The Civil Rights Movement in American Memory. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Ryan, L. (2017, January 22). Museums across the world are collecting Women’s March signs. The Cut. Retrieved from www.thecut.com/2017/01/museums-across-the-world-are-collecting-womens-march-signs.html
Shenker, J. (2011, July 15). The struggle to document Egypt’s revolution. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/15/struggle-to-document-egypt-revolution
Smit, R., Heinrich, A., & Broersma, M. (2017a). Witnessing in the new memory ecology: Memory construction of the Syrian conflict on YouTube. New Media & Society, 19(2), 289–307.
Smit, R., Heinrich, A., & Broersma, M. (2017b). Activating the past in the Ferguson protests: Memory work, digital activism and the politics of platforms. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3119–3139.
Steedman, C. (2001). Dust. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Stevens, M., Flinn, A., & Shepherd, E. (2010). New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: From handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 59–76.
Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2013). Bridging collective memories and public agendas: Toward a theory of mediated prospective memory. Communication Theory, 23, 91–111.
Terranova, T., & Donovan, J. (2013). Occupy social networks: Paradoxes of corporate social media for networked social movements. In G. Lovink & M. Rasch (Eds.), Unlike Us Reader: Social Media Monopolies and their Alternatives (pp. 296–311). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. Abingdon: Routledge.
Watts, G. (2017). Applying radical empathy to Women’s March documentation efforts: A reflection exercise. Archives and Manuscripts, 45(3), 191–201.
Wilson, J. (2018). Introduction. In Women’s March Organizers & C. Nast (Eds.), Together We rise: The Protest Heard Around the World (pp. 13–16). New York: Dey Street Books.
Zamponi, L. (2018). Social Movements, Memory and Media. Narrative in Action in the Italian and Spanish Student Movements. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Acknowledgements
The research for this chapter was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/R004889/1) Afterlives of Protest Research Network.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chidgey, R. (2020). How to Curate a ‘Living Archive’: The Restlessness of Activist Time and Labour. In: Merrill, S., Keightley, E., Daphi, P. (eds) Social Movements, Cultural Memory and Digital Media. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32827-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32827-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32826-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32827-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)