Skip to main content

Political Knowledge, Civic Education and Voting at 16

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lowering the Voting Age to 16

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Young People and Politics ((PSYPP))

Abstract

To justify reducing eligibility to vote to age 16 is to show how it serves as a means to enhanced democratic political engagement. Hence the question posed here is under what, if any, circumstances does reducing the voting age enhance political engagement. Political engagement is shorthand for the second, qualitative dimension of electoral participation. The first dimension is that of turnout, a purely quantitative expression. If our concern is limited to this dimension, then we should address making voting compulsory. But, in doing so, we risk bringing to the polls an additional number of less sophisticated voters. This is also the challenge posed to voting at 16 which the data shows, can also raise turnout. This chapter concentrates on the second, qualitative, dimension of political participation, which we can characterize as political engagement, a combination of political interest and knowledge. And here the relationship is far from clear. The conclusion is thus that the first priority must be to promote natural experiments to test, and potentially establish, this relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergh, J. (2013). Does voting rights affect the political maturity of 16- and 17-year olds? Findings from the 2011 Norwegian voting-age trial? Electoral Studies, 32(1), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, Y., Hansen, K., & Wass, H. (2012). The relationship between age and turnout: A roller-coaster ride. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 588–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., & Niemi, R. (2016). Testing civics: State-level civic education requirements and political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000368.

  • Dassonneville, R., Quintelier, E., Hooghe, M., & Claes, E. (2012). The relation between civic education and political attitudes and behavior: A two-year panel study among Belgian late adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 16(3), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fesnic, F. (2016). Can civic education make a difference for democracy? Hungary and Poland compared. Educational Review, 64(4), 966–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S., Laurence, L., & Curtice, J. (2008). Disengaging voters: Do plurality systems discourage the less knowledgeable from voting? Electoral Studies, 27(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., & Stiers, D. (2017). Do reluctant voters vote less accurately? The effect of compulsory voting on party–voter congruence in Australia and Belgium. Australian Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, N., & Edwards, K. (2014). Does civic education for young people increase political participation? A systematic review. Educational Review, 66(1), 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. (2007). Political knowledge and participation among young Canadians and Americans (IRPP Working Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. (2010). The Internet generation. Hanover, NH: UPNE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neundorf, A., Niemi, R., & Smets, K. (2015). The compensation effect of civic education on political engagement: How civics classes make up for missing parental socialization. London: Royal Holloway, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., & Soule, S. (2015, September 3–6). Civic education, political knowledge, and dimensions of political engagement. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pammett, J., & Leduc, L. (2003). Explaining the turnout decline in Canadian federal elections: A new survey of non-voters. Elections Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenqvist, O. (2016). Rising to the occasion? Youth political knowledge and the voting age (Working Paper). The Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU) (2016/6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W., Carstens, R., Losito, B., & Fraillon, J. (2016). ICCS technical report. Amsterdam: IEA, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., & Lopez, S. (2006). Developing citizenship competencies from kindergarden through grade 12: A background paper for policymakers and educators. Denver: Education Commission of States.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Milner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Milner, H. (2020). Political Knowledge, Civic Education and Voting at 16. In: Eichhorn, J., Bergh, J. (eds) Lowering the Voting Age to 16. Palgrave Studies in Young People and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics