Abstract
Children’s literature is inextricably bound up with notions of power. Where the self-determining, agential child has been a favorite of late twentieth and early twenty-first-century authors, such self-determination and subjective agency rarely topple the adult institutions under whose aegis children’s lives are minutely controlled and supervised. What happens when the world adults leave their children is beset by environmental calamity, and the child’s potential to undertake future action is limited by the possibility that there may not be a viable future for them to inherit? This chapter argues that children’s books need to explore new subject positions and look to new environmental subjectivities cognizant of the problems today’s children have inherited and deeply aware of the challenges that lie ahead.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauvais, Clémentine. The Mighty Child: Time and Power in Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press, 2015.
—, “The Problem of ‘Power’: Metacritical Implications of Aetonormativity for Children’s Literature Research.” Children’s Literature in Education 44 (2013): 74–86.
Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.
Clark, Timothy. “Derangements of Scale.” Telemorphosis: Theory in the Era of Climate Change Vol. 1. Ed. T. Cohen. Michigan: Open Humanities, 2012. N. pag.
Clarke, Michael Tavel, Faye Halpern, & Timothy Clark. “Climate Change, Scale, and Literary Criticism: A Conversation.” ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature 46.3 (2015): 1–22.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf.
Estok, Simon C. “Theorising in a Space of Ambivalent Openness: Ecocriticism and Ecophobia.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 16.2 (2009): 203-225.
Gaard, Greta. “Children’s Environmental Literature: From Ecocriticism to Ecopedagogy.” Neohelicon 36 (2009): 321-334.
Grzegorczyk, Blanka. Discourses of Postcolonialism in Contemporary British Children’s Literature. London/New York: Routledge, 2015.
Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016.
Hoyt, John A. “Politics for a humane, sustainable future.” Earth Ethics: Evolving Values for an Earth Community, Center for Respect of Life and Environment (CRLE, Washington, DC), Fall 1996, n.p., www.crle.org/pub_eeindex_fall96.asp.
Huggan, Graham and Helen Tiffin, eds. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge, 2015.
Jackson, Anna, Karen Coats, and Roderick McGillis, eds. The Gothic in Children’s Literature: Haunting the Borders. London & New York: Routledge, 2008.
Levy, Neil. “Foucault’s Unnatural Ecology.” Discourses of the Environment. Ed. Eric Darier. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. 202–16.
McGillis, Roderick. “The Night Side of Nature: Gothic Spaces, Fearful Times.” The Gothic in Children’s Literature: Haunting the Borders. Eds. A. Jackson, Karen Coats, and Roderick McGillis. London/New York: Routledge, 2008. 227-241.
Nikolajeva, Maria. Power, Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers. London/New York: Routledge, 2010.
Olsson, Ulf. Silence and Subject in Modern Literature: Spoken Violence. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Paris Agreement. 2015. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_english_.pdf.
Pilar Blanco, María del, and Esther Peeren, eds. The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory. London/New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.
Reynolds, Kimberley. Radical Children’s Literature: Future Visions and Aesthetic Transformations in Juvenile Fiction. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2007.
Rudd, David. “Theorising and theories: how does children’s literature exist?” Understanding Children’s Literature. Ed. Peter Hunt. 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge, 2005. 15-29.
Seager, Joni. Earth Follies: Coming to Feminist Terms with the Global Environmental Crisis. New York: Routledge, 1993.
Sobel, David. Beyond Ecophobia. Great Barrington, MA: Orion Society, 1996.
Stockholm Declaration. 1972. http://www.unep.org/Documents.multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=97&ArticleID=1503.
Trites, Roberta Seelinger. Disturbing the Universe: Power and Repression in Adolescent Literature. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curry, A. (2020). The Power and Potential: An Ecocritical Reading of Twenty-First-Century Childhood. In: op de Beeck, N. (eds) Literary Cultures and Twenty-First-Century Childhoods. Literary Cultures and Childhoods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32146-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32146-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32145-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32146-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)